{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "bithumb", "name": "Bithumb Open API", "vendor": "Bithumb Co., Ltd.", "vendorUrl": "https://apidocs.bithumb.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "Bithumb, a Korean exchange, runs a REST and WebSocket Open API for KRW market data, orders, balances, deposits and withdrawals, and an official AI Trade Kit with a local MCP server, a CLI and agent skills.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bithumb", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bithumb.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bithumb.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bithumb.json", "dns": "bithumb.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/bithumb-official/bithumb-ai-trade-kit", "transports": [ "stdio" ], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bithumb-official/bithumb-mcp" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bithumb-official/bithumb-cli" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "Access and secret keys issued under My Page \u003e API Management on bithumb.com after identity verification. The person picks permissions (asset inquiry, order inquiry, place orders, withdrawals and others) and registers the IP addresses allowed to call. Each request carries a JWT signed with the secret as a Bearer token. Keys are valid for one year from issue and can't be extended; up to 10 per account including expired ones; the secret is shown once. The MCP server and CLI read BITHUMB_ACCESS_KEY and BITHUMB_SECRET_KEY, and market tools need no key (https://apidocs.bithumb.com/docs/빠른-시작-가이드.md, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "Trading fees per fill. The fee page at bithumb.com/react/info/fee/trade timed out on every attempt, so no rate is recorded; press reports from 2024 describe a 0.04 per cent rate with a monthly coupon and 0.25 per cent without, which is a lead and not a source. Public market data needs no key and no account (https://www.bithumb.com/react/info/fee/trade, checked 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "Pay per use", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the API docs, the AI Trade Kit repository or llms.txt (checked 2026-11-03). Fees are taken from each fill.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 41, "popularity": { "githubStars": 6, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://apidocs.bithumb.com/reference/api-레퍼런스", "llmsTxt": "https://apidocs.bithumb.com/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "exchange.market-data", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "market.crypto" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "api-key", "closed-source", "usage-priced", "mcp", "cli", "agent-skills", "read-only-mode", "llms-txt", "mit", "no-status-page" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-13", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 50.6, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 934, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 17, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 67, "maintenance": 69, "payments": 15, "reliability": 34, "schema": 64, "security": 60, "transparency": 47 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Bithumb runs an official local MCP server with 41 tools, module selection and a read-only flag, beside a CLI with per-profile read-only gating and six agent skills, over an API with scoped one-year keys and a mandatory IP list. There is no sandbox, no status page, no documented 429 behaviour, and the fees and terms couldn't be read.", "bestFor": "KRW-market trading for agents acting for a verified Korean account, with a vendor-built MCP server, CLI and skills.", "strengths": [ "An official MCP server from Bithumb with 41 tools in seven selectable modules and a `--read-only` flag that blocks orders, deposits and withdrawals", "Keys scoped to chosen permissions, limited to registered IPs and expiring after one year, with a key-list endpoint that shows expiry", "The CLI's per-profile read-only flag, local audit log and second factor on KRW deposits and withdrawals, and skills that refuse to bypass read-only", "Rate limits published per category with numbers, and notices with effective dates for changes such as the 200-market ticker cap", "Errors return a stable error.name under an HTTP status, with retry guidance for order_not_ready and server_error" ], "weaknesses": [ "No sandbox or testnet; every order uses real funds", "A rate-limit breach is signalled only as a temporary restriction, with no status code, header or Retry-After documented", "No status page, incident history or SLA", "The MCP server is local only, not in the official MCP registry, and its source is not published (the kit repository holds skills and setup files)", "The fee schedule, terms of service and Open API terms on bithumb.com timed out or answered a title only, so none is recorded first-hand" ], "agentNotes": [ "Ask for a key with asset and order inquiry plus order placement only, never withdrawals, with your IP registered; keys expire after one year and a wrong IP answers 401 NotAllowIP", "Start the server with `--modules market,account,trade --read-only` for analysis and drop `--read-only` only when the person asks to trade; deposit and withdraw modules stay off", "Prefer the `bithumb` CLI for writes, as the skills do, and check `bithumb config show --json` for a read-only profile before any order", "Keep the ticker's markets parameter at 200 or fewer, batch orders at 30 and cancels at 30 per request, and stay under 140 private calls a second per category", "Retry 422 order_not_ready and 500 server_error after a pause; there is no sandbox, so start with the smallest order the market allows" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 50.6 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 67, "maintenance": 69, "payments": 15, "reliability": 34, "schema": 64, "security": 60, "transparency": 24 }, "provenanceScore": 69, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "npm install -g @bithumb-official/bithumb-cli", "http": "curl 'https://api.bithumb.com/v1/market/all?isDetails=false'", "config": { "mcpServers": { "bithumb": { "args": [ "-y", "@bithumb-official/bithumb-mcp", "--modules", "market,account,trade", "--read-only" ], "command": "npx", "env": { "BITHUMB_ACCESS_KEY": "${BITHUMB_ACCESS_KEY}", "BITHUMB_SECRET_KEY": "${BITHUMB_SECRET_KEY}" } } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.market-data", "tool": "https://letme.dev/bithumb" }, "area": "payments", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Bithumb Co., Ltd.", "domain": "bithumb.com", "domainRegistered": "2015-06-16", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.bithumb.com/react/terms/info-terms", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://apidocs.bithumb.com/changelog", "securityTxt": "unknown", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "Bithumb Co., Ltd. is named in the AI Trade Kit's disclaimer (compliance review 007441, 29 May 2026 to 28 May 2027). The terms of service at bithumb.com/react/terms/info-terms answered a page title only on two attempts, and the Open API terms, company page and fee pages timed out or did the same; no privacy policy URL was found in the sitemap's first part, so it is left empty.", "www.bithumb.com/robots.txt has no active rules (comments only) and two sitemaps; apidocs.bithumb.com/robots.txt allows everything but edit, login and api-next paths and points to llms.txt.", "https://www.bithumb.com/.well-known/security.txt timed out twice; recorded as unknown.", "RDAP gives bithumb.com a registration date of 16 June 2015.", "No status page found; the API has wallet-status and notices endpoints." ], "score": 69 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bithumb.json", "live": { "slug": "bithumb", "versions": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bithumb-official/bithumb-cli", "version": "0.8.5", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:56.600783413Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bithumb-official/bithumb-mcp", "version": "0.8.5", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:55.754674786Z" } ], "githubStars": 6, "npmWeekly": 87, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://bithumb.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:26.914675257Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:57.989976217Z" } }, "answer": "MEXC API scores 56.3 (C) on agent readiness against Bithumb Open API's 50.6 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories.", "b": { "slug": "mexc", "name": "MEXC API", "vendor": "MEXC (Comoros) Ltd", "vendorUrl": "https://www.mexc.com/mexc-api", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "MEXC's spot and futures API gives programmatic access to market data, orders, balances, transfers and withdrawals over REST and WebSocket, with an official command-line tool that also runs as a local MCP server for AI agents.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mexc", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mexc.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mexc.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/mexc.json", "dns": "mexc.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/mexcdevelop", "transports": [ "stdio" ], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@mexc-ai/cli" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "API keys made at mexc.com/user/openapi after a browser sign-up; the futures API also needs identity verification. The key goes in the X-MEXC-APIKEY header and signed endpoints carry an HMAC SHA256 signature with a timestamp and a recvWindow of up to 60 seconds. Permissions are granular (SPOT_ACCOUNT_READ, SPOT_DEAL_WRITE, SPOT_WITHDRAW_WRITE, SPOT_TRANSFER_WRITE and the futures equivalents), a key can be limited to chosen trading pairs and linked to up to 10 IP addresses, and a key with no linked IP is valid for 90 days and can be renewed for 90 more from 5 days before expiry. Up to 30 keys per account (https://www.mexc.com/api-docs/spot-v3/introduction, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "Trading fees per fill. MEXC's own fee guide of 20 October 2026 gives spot 0 per cent maker and 0.05 per cent taker (0.04 per cent with MX deduction), futures from 0 per cent maker and 0.02 per cent taker on BTCUSDT to 0.01 and 0.04 per cent on standard contracts, and a separate API futures schedule of 0.06 per cent maker and 0.08 per cent taker since 1 June 2026. Zero-fee campaigns and MX discounts don't apply to API trading. The fee page itself is drawn by script. Market data needs no key (https://www.mexc.com/learn/article/17827791510370, checked 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "0.05% fee", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the API docs, the CLI docs, llms.txt or the terms (checked 2026-11-03). Fees are taken from each fill.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 299, "popularity": { "githubStars": 315, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://www.mexc.com/api-docs/spot-v3/introduction", "llmsTxt": "https://www.mexc.com/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "exchange.market-data", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.derivatives", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "market.crypto" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "api-key", "closed-source", "usage-priced", "mcp", "cli", "agent-skills", "read-only-mode", "llms-txt", "python", "java", "go", "no-status-page" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-23", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 56.3, "grade": "C", "agentReady": false, "rank": 744, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 13, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 64, "maintenance": 75, "payments": 31, "reliability": 43, "schema": 64, "security": 65, "transparency": 58 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "MEXC publishes granular key permissions, per-pair key limits, weighted rate limits with Retry-After and a dated changelog, and its official CLI runs a read-only-capable MCP server with confirmation before any fund movement. There is no sandbox or status page, API futures orders pay a higher fee schedule, and the user agreement excludes the US, UK, EU members and others.", "bestFor": "Spot and futures for agents in served countries that want a vendor-built MCP server with read-only and confirmation modes.", "strengths": [ "Granular key permissions (account read, trade, withdraw, transfer), per-pair restriction, up to 10 linked IPs and a 90-day expiry for unbound keys", "An official MCP mode in the `@mexc-ai/cli` tool with `--read-only`, a read-only market subset of 22 tools and a confirmation step before orders and transfers", "Rate limits published as weight buckets per IP and UID, with Retry-After on 429 and 418", "A dated changelog of 72 spot and 26 futures entries, the newest 23 October 2026", "Fees published on MEXC's own pages, with the API futures schedule stated separately" ], "weaknesses": [ "No sandbox or testnet; only an order-validation endpoint", "No status page, incident history or SLA", "The MCP server is local only, not in the official MCP registry, and the CLI is UNLICENSED with no public source", "API futures orders pay 0.06 per cent maker and 0.08 per cent taker, and zero-fee campaigns exclude API trading", "The user agreement bars users in the United States, the United Kingdom, Mainland China, Singapore, Hong Kong, Canada, France and other jurisdictions" ], "agentNotes": [ "Use a key limited to SPOT_ACCOUNT_READ and SPOT_DEAL_WRITE, the pairs you trade and your IP addresses; keys without a linked IP expire after 90 days", "Start the MCP server as `mexc mcp spot --read-only` unless the task trades, and never pass `--yes`; orders and transfers wait for the person's confirmation", "Call POST /api/v3/order/test before a live order, since there is no sandbox", "On 429 or 418 wait for Retry-After; order placement and cancellation share 12 requests a second per UID, and repeated breaches ban the IP for up to 3 days", "Treat a 5xx on an order as unknown, not failed, and query the order before retrying; set newClientOrderId so the order can be found" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "C", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 56.3 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 64, "maintenance": 75, "payments": 31, "reliability": 43, "schema": 64, "security": 65, "transparency": 38 }, "provenanceScore": 78, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "npm install -g @mexc-ai/cli", "http": "curl 'https://api.mexc.com/api/v3/ticker/price?symbol=BTCUSDT'", "config": { "mcpServers": { "mexc-spot": { "args": [ "mcp", "spot", "--read-only" ], "command": "mexc" } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.market-data", "tool": "https://letme.dev/mexc" }, "area": "payments", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Spot taker fee", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.05, "note": "maker 0 per cent; 0.04 per cent with MX deduction, not for API trading" }, { "item": "API futures taker fee", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.08, "note": "maker 0.06 per cent, since 1 June 2026, outside the Innovation Zone" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "MEXC (Comoros) Ltd", "domain": "mexc.com", "domainRegistered": "2000-02-27", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.mexc.com/terms", "privacy": "https://www.mexc.com/privacypolicy", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://www.mexc.com/api-docs/spot-v3/change-log", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "MEXC (Comoros) Ltd is named in the user agreement, last updated 13 October 2026, with a registered address in Mutsamudu, Anjouan. The privacy policy, last updated 1 June 2026, names no entity.", "RDAP gives mexc.com a registration date of 27 February 2000; the exchange says it began in 2018, so the domain predates it.", "www.mexc.com/robots.txt allows the root and disallows /user/, /orders/ and some locale paths; it lists llms.txt as a sitemap. mexcdevelop.github.io has no robots.txt.", "https://www.mexc.com/.well-known/security.txt answered 404. status.mexc.com does not resolve; no status page was found.", "The fee page at mexc.com/fee is drawn by script; the fee figures come from MEXC's own fee guide and a 2024 announcement." ], "score": 78 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mexc.json", "live": { "slug": "mexc", "versions": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@mexc-ai/cli", "version": "0.0.22", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:34:39.588400079Z" } ], "npmWeekly": 76, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://mexc.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:36.213483882Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T20:34:39.588400079Z" } }, "edges": [ { "by": 16, "category": "payments", "leads": "mexc", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "reasons": { "a": "No machine payment protocol (0). The fee page timed out on every attempt, so no price is recorded (0 of 20, unchecked). Public market data needs no key, card or account; trading needs a verified Korean account. Judgement call (15 of 20). A person must sign up, pass identity checks and issue keys in the browser (0). 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 15.", "b": "No machine payment protocol (0). Fees published without login on MEXC's own fee guide (20 October 2026) and a 2024 announcement, with a separate API futures schedule; the fee page itself is drawn by script (16 of 20). Public market data needs no key or card; trading needs a verified and funded account. Judgement call (15 of 20). A person must sign up in a browser, and futures need identity verification (0). 0 + 16 + 15 + 0 = 31." }, "scores": { "a": 15, "b": 31 } }, { "by": 11, "category": "transparency", "leads": "mexc", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "reasons": { "a": "The editorial half. A closed service whose terms couldn't be read (timeouts and a title-only page); the kit is MIT with a disclaimer naming Bithumb Co., Ltd. (10 of 30). No privacy policy read (0 of 30, unchecked). Dated retirement of WebSocket Private v1 and effective dates on breaking notices (14 of 20). No subprocessor or data-location statement read (0 of 20). 10 + 0 + 14 + 0 = 24.", "b": "The editorial half. A closed service with a dated user agreement naming MEXC (Comoros) Ltd; the CLI is UNLICENSED on npm (15 of 30). The privacy policy names no entity, states no retention periods and relies on standard contractual clauses for transfers (10 of 30). The changelog flags endpoints as \"will be discontinued soon\" without dates and the futures log records removals (8 of 20). Third parties are named by category only, with no subprocessor list or data locations (5 of 20). 15 + 10 + 8 + 5 = 38." }, "scores": { "a": 47, "b": 58 } }, { "by": 9, "category": "reliability", "leads": "mexc", "name": "Reliability", "reasons": { "a": "Read with the hosted lines. No status page found on apidocs.bithumb.com or in llms.txt; wallet-status and notices endpoints stand in (0). No readable incident history, though two notices record a public WebSocket interruption and a brief service break (5). Rate limits documented per category with numbers, updated 27 October 2026 (15). A breach is described only as a temporary restriction, with no status code, header or Retry-After, and no client order id or idempotency key is documented; 422 order_not_ready and 500 server_error say to retry later (4 of 15). No SLA found (0). The API is generally available; the MCP server and CLI are at 0.8.5 (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 4 + 0 + 10 = 34.", "b": "Read with the hosted lines. No status page found; status.mexc.com does not resolve and llms.txt points to a maintenance-updates feed (0). No readable incident history (5). Rate limits documented with numbers, 300 weight per 10 seconds per IP, 500 per UID, 12 order requests a second per UID, 100 WebSocket messages a second (15). 429 and 418 carry Retry-After with ban lengths stated, a 5xx is to be treated as unknown rather than failed, an order-test endpoint exists, and newClientOrderId is optional with no idempotency promise (13 of 15). No SLA found (0). Spot and futures are generally available, futures order placement having reopened on 31 March 2026 after being closed since July 2022 (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 13 + 0 + 10 = 43." }, "scores": { "a": 34, "b": 43 } }, { "by": 6, "category": "maintenance", "leads": "mexc", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "reasons": { "a": "Read as a closed service. Rate limits updated 27 October 2026 and the ticker cap effective 13 October 2026 (30). Batch orders 20 August, Private v1 retired 30 September, the ticker cap 13 October and the limits page 27 October 2026 (20). A phone support line, dated notices and a GitHub repository with no open issues and one commit; replies not observed (9 of 15). The MCP server is not in the official MCP registry and there is no SDK; the CLI and MCP packages are current (5 of 15). The MCP package depends only on @modelcontextprotocol/sdk ^1.26 on Node 18, with no public source or CI (5 of 10). 30 + 20 + 9 + 5 + 5 = 69.", "b": "Read as a closed service. Last dated change 23 October 2026 in both the spot and futures logs (30). Spot entries on 14 August, 24 August, 11 September and 23 October 2026, futures on 1 September, 11 September, 19 October and 23 October (20). An API support Telegram group, a ticket form and dated changelogs; GitHub issues not read (10 of 15). The official SDK repository was last pushed in February 2024 while the CLI is current (10 of 15). The CLI ships platform binaries with no dependencies and no public repository or CI; the SDK is stale (5 of 10). 30 + 20 + 10 + 10 + 5 = 75." }, "scores": { "a": 69, "b": 75 } }, { "by": 5, "category": "security", "leads": "mexc", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "reasons": { "a": "Keys scoped to chosen permissions, mandatory registered IPs, one-year expiry, a JWT per request and a key-list endpoint with expiry (26 of 30). Read-only keys, `--read-only` on the MCP server, per-profile read_only on the CLI, a second factor on KRW deposits and withdrawals, and skills that refuse to switch profiles to bypass read-only; nothing server-side confirms an order (16 of 20). The API returns exchange data and the disclaimer warns about prompt injection through third-party plugins (11 of 15). A local audit log for CLI and MCP calls and a key-list endpoint; no server-side per-call log (7 of 15). security.txt timed out and no disclosure policy, bug bounty or certification was found (0 of 20, security.txt unchecked). 26 + 16 + 11 + 7 + 0 = 60.", "b": "Granular permissions (account read, trade, withdraw, transfer), per-pair restriction, up to 10 linked IPs, 90-day expiry without an IP, renewal and revocation in the account, 30 keys per account (26 of 30). A read-only MCP mode that hides write tools, a confirmation step before orders and transfers in the CLI and MCP, and --yes that agents are told not to add; nothing server-side confirms an API order (17 of 20). The API returns exchange data, and the CLI security page warns that agents may be led by web pages or files into unwanted actions (12 of 15). CLI confirmations are logged and reported to MEXC with no operator access described; an apiKeyInfo endpoint shows key settings (6 of 15). No security.txt, disclosure policy or bug bounty found; a proof-of-reserves page exists (4 of 20). 26 + 17 + 12 + 6 + 4 = 65." }, "scores": { "a": 60, "b": 65 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "HTTP API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "Bithumb Co., Ltd.", "b": "MEXC (Comoros) Ltd", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "stdio", "b": "stdio", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "API key", "b": "API key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Pay per use", "b": "Pay per use", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "41", "b": "299", "name": "Tools exposed" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-10-13", "b": "2026-10-23", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "2026-10-13", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "no document linked", "b": "2026-06-01", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "yes", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "yes", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "yes", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "6 stars", "b": "315 stars", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "MEXC API scores 56.3 (C) on agent readiness against Bithumb Open API's 50.6 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Bithumb Open API or MEXC API?" }, { "answer": "Both need an API key.", "question": "Do Bithumb Open API and MEXC API need an API key?" }, { "answer": "Bithumb Open API runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. MEXC API runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.", "question": "Can an agent call Bithumb Open API and MEXC API without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": null, "also": null, "goodFor": "KRW-market trading for agents acting for a verified Korean account, with a vendor-built MCP server, CLI and skills.", "slug": "bithumb", "watchFor": "No sandbox or testnet; every order uses real funds" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 43 against 34", "Security \u0026 auth, 65 against 60", "Payments \u0026 pricing, 31 against 15", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 75 against 69", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 58 against 47" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "Spot and futures for agents in served countries that want a vendor-built MCP server with read-only and confirmation modes.", "slug": "mexc", "watchFor": "No sandbox or testnet; only an order-validation endpoint" } ], "history": null, "job": { "capability": "exchange.market-data", "name": "Exchange market data" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bithumb.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs Bithumb Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bithumb" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb.json", "title": "Bitget vs Bithumb Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Bitget vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bitstamp.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Bitstamp API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bitstamp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bybit.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Bybit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bybit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-coinbase-mcp.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-coinbase-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-crypto-com-exchange.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Crypto.com Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-crypto-com-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-deribit.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Deribit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-deribit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-dydx.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs dYdX", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-dydx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-gate-io.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Gate", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-gate-io" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-gemini-exchange.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Gemini Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-gemini-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-htx.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-kraken.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Kraken API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-kraken" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-kucoin.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs KuCoin", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-kucoin" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-okx.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Bybit vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Crypto.com Exchange API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Gate vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Gemini Exchange API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-mexc.json", "title": "HTX trading API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kucoin-vs-mexc.json", "title": "KuCoin vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kucoin-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-okx.json", "title": "MEXC API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "MEXC API vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-upbit.json", "title": "MEXC API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bithumb.json", "title": "Binance API vs Bithumb Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bithumb" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Binance API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kraken-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Kraken API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kraken-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Deribit vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-mexc.json", "title": "dYdX vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "bithumb": 34, "by": 9, "edge": "mexc", "key": "reliability", "mexc": 43, "name": "Reliability", "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "bithumb": 64, "by": 0, "edge": "", "key": "schema", "mexc": 64, "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "weight": 13 }, { "bithumb": 67, "by": 3, "edge": "bithumb", "key": "ergonomics", "mexc": 64, "name": "Agent ergonomics", "weight": 13 }, { "bithumb": 60, "by": 5, "edge": "mexc", "key": "security", "mexc": 65, "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "weight": 14 }, { "bithumb": 15, "by": 16, "edge": "mexc", "key": "payments", "mexc": 31, "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "bithumb": 69, "by": 6, "edge": "mexc", "key": "maintenance", "mexc": 75, "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "weight": 7 }, { "bithumb": 47, "by": 11, "edge": "mexc", "key": "transparency", "mexc": 58, "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "MEXC API scores 56.3 (C) on agent readiness against Bithumb Open API's 50.6 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do exchange market data.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "bithumb": "Bithumb runs an official local MCP server with 41 tools, module selection and a read-only flag, beside a CLI with per-profile read-only gating and six agent skills, over an API with scoped one-year keys and a mandatory IP list. There is no sandbox, no status page, no documented 429 behaviour, and the fees and terms couldn't be read.", "mexc": "MEXC publishes granular key permissions, per-pair key limits, weighted rate limits with Retry-After and a dated changelog, and its official CLI runs a read-only-capable MCP server with confirmation before any fund movement. There is no sandbox or status page, API futures orders pay a higher fee schedule, and the user agreement excludes the US, UK, EU members and others." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-mexc", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-mexc.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-mexc.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-mexc.min.md" }, "markdown": "MEXC API scores 56.3 (C) on agent readiness against Bithumb Open API's 50.6 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do exchange market data.\n\n- Bithumb Open API: grade D, 50.6/100, rank #934 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bithumb.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bithumb.json\n- MEXC API: grade C, 56.3/100, rank #744 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mexc.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/mexc.json\n- Best crypto exchange APIs and MCP servers for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n- All 210 exchanges comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Bithumb Open API (D)\n\nGood for: KRW-market trading for agents acting for a verified Korean account, with a vendor-built MCP server, CLI and skills.\n\nWatch for: No sandbox or testnet; every order uses real funds\n\n### MEXC API (C)\n\nGood for: Spot and futures for agents in served countries that want a vendor-built MCP server with read-only and confirmation modes.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 43 against 34\n- Security \u0026 auth, 65 against 60\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 31 against 15\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 75 against 69\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 58 against 47\n\nWatch for: No sandbox or testnet; only an order-validation endpoint\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Payments \u0026 pricing: MEXC API +16\n\n- Bithumb Open API (15): No machine payment protocol (0). The fee page timed out on every attempt, so no price is recorded (0 of 20, unchecked). Public market data needs no key, card or account; trading needs a verified Korean account. Judgement call (15 of 20). A person must sign up, pass identity checks and issue keys in the browser (0). 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 15.\n- MEXC API (31): No machine payment protocol (0). Fees published without login on MEXC's own fee guide (20 October 2026) and a 2024 announcement, with a separate API futures schedule; the fee page itself is drawn by script (16 of 20). Public market data needs no key or card; trading needs a verified and funded account. Judgement call (15 of 20). A person must sign up in a browser, and futures need identity verification (0). 0 + 16 + 15 + 0 = 31.\n\n### Transparency \u0026 trust: MEXC API +11\n\n- Bithumb Open API (47): The editorial half. A closed service whose terms couldn't be read (timeouts and a title-only page); the kit is MIT with a disclaimer naming Bithumb Co., Ltd. (10 of 30). No privacy policy read (0 of 30, unchecked). Dated retirement of WebSocket Private v1 and effective dates on breaking notices (14 of 20). No subprocessor or data-location statement read (0 of 20). 10 + 0 + 14 + 0 = 24.\n- MEXC API (58): The editorial half. A closed service with a dated user agreement naming MEXC (Comoros) Ltd; the CLI is UNLICENSED on npm (15 of 30). The privacy policy names no entity, states no retention periods and relies on standard contractual clauses for transfers (10 of 30). The changelog flags endpoints as \"will be discontinued soon\" without dates and the futures log records removals (8 of 20). Third parties are named by category only, with no subprocessor list or data locations (5 of 20). 15 + 10 + 8 + 5 = 38.\n\n### Reliability: MEXC API +9\n\n- Bithumb Open API (34): Read with the hosted lines. No status page found on apidocs.bithumb.com or in llms.txt; wallet-status and notices endpoints stand in (0). No readable incident history, though two notices record a public WebSocket interruption and a brief service break (5). Rate limits documented per category with numbers, updated 27 October 2026 (15). A breach is described only as a temporary restriction, with no status code, header or Retry-After, and no client order id or idempotency key is documented; 422 order_not_ready and 500 server_error say to retry later (4 of 15). No SLA found (0). The API is generally available; the MCP server and CLI are at 0.8.5 (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 4 + 0 + 10 = 34.\n- MEXC API (43): Read with the hosted lines. No status page found; status.mexc.com does not resolve and llms.txt points to a maintenance-updates feed (0). No readable incident history (5). Rate limits documented with numbers, 300 weight per 10 seconds per IP, 500 per UID, 12 order requests a second per UID, 100 WebSocket messages a second (15). 429 and 418 carry Retry-After with ban lengths stated, a 5xx is to be treated as unknown rather than failed, an order-test endpoint exists, and newClientOrderId is optional with no idempotency promise (13 of 15). No SLA found (0). Spot and futures are generally available, futures order placement having reopened on 31 March 2026 after being closed since July 2022 (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 13 + 0 + 10 = 43.\n\n### Maintenance \u0026 community: MEXC API +6\n\n- Bithumb Open API (69): Read as a closed service. Rate limits updated 27 October 2026 and the ticker cap effective 13 October 2026 (30). Batch orders 20 August, Private v1 retired 30 September, the ticker cap 13 October and the limits page 27 October 2026 (20). A phone support line, dated notices and a GitHub repository with no open issues and one commit; replies not observed (9 of 15). The MCP server is not in the official MCP registry and there is no SDK; the CLI and MCP packages are current (5 of 15). The MCP package depends only on @modelcontextprotocol/sdk ^1.26 on Node 18, with no public source or CI (5 of 10). 30 + 20 + 9 + 5 + 5 = 69.\n- MEXC API (75): Read as a closed service. Last dated change 23 October 2026 in both the spot and futures logs (30). Spot entries on 14 August, 24 August, 11 September and 23 October 2026, futures on 1 September, 11 September, 19 October and 23 October (20). An API support Telegram group, a ticket form and dated changelogs; GitHub issues not read (10 of 15). The official SDK repository was last pushed in February 2024 while the CLI is current (10 of 15). The CLI ships platform binaries with no dependencies and no public repository or CI; the SDK is stale (5 of 10). 30 + 20 + 10 + 10 + 5 = 75.\n\n### Security \u0026 auth: MEXC API +5\n\n- Bithumb Open API (60): Keys scoped to chosen permissions, mandatory registered IPs, one-year expiry, a JWT per request and a key-list endpoint with expiry (26 of 30). Read-only keys, `--read-only` on the MCP server, per-profile read_only on the CLI, a second factor on KRW deposits and withdrawals, and skills that refuse to switch profiles to bypass read-only; nothing server-side confirms an order (16 of 20). The API returns exchange data and the disclaimer warns about prompt injection through third-party plugins (11 of 15). A local audit log for CLI and MCP calls and a key-list endpoint; no server-side per-call log (7 of 15). security.txt timed out and no disclosure policy, bug bounty or certification was found (0 of 20, security.txt unchecked). 26 + 16 + 11 + 7 + 0 = 60.\n- MEXC API (65): Granular permissions (account read, trade, withdraw, transfer), per-pair restriction, up to 10 linked IPs, 90-day expiry without an IP, renewal and revocation in the account, 30 keys per account (26 of 30). A read-only MCP mode that hides write tools, a confirmation step before orders and transfers in the CLI and MCP, and --yes that agents are told not to add; nothing server-side confirms an API order (17 of 20). The API returns exchange data, and the CLI security page warns that agents may be led by web pages or files into unwanted actions (12 of 15). CLI confirmations are logged and reported to MEXC with no operator access described; an apiKeyInfo endpoint shows key settings (6 of 15). No security.txt, disclosure policy or bug bounty found; a proof-of-reserves page exists (4 of 20). 26 + 17 + 12 + 6 + 4 = 65.\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Bithumb Open API | MEXC API | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 34 | 43 | MEXC API +9 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 64 | 64 | even |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 67 | 64 | Bithumb Open API +3 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 60 | 65 | MEXC API +5 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 15 | 31 | MEXC API +16 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 69 | 75 | MEXC API +6 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 47 | 58 | MEXC API +11 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **50.6 · D** | **56.3 · C** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Bithumb Open API | MEXC API |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | Bithumb Co., Ltd. | MEXC (Comoros) Ltd |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | stdio | stdio |\n| Auth | API key | API key |\n| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Tools exposed | 41 | 299 |\n| Read-only variant documented | yes | yes |\n| llms.txt | yes | yes |\n| Last release | 2026-10-13 | 2026-10-23 |\n| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | 2026-10-13 |\n| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-06-01 |\n| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | yes |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | not found in the text |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | yes |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | yes |\n| Popularity | 6 stars | 315 stars |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Bithumb Open API.** Bithumb runs an official local MCP server with 41 tools, module selection and a read-only flag, beside a CLI with per-profile read-only gating and six agent skills, over an API with scoped one-year keys and a mandatory IP list. There is no sandbox, no status page, no documented 429 behaviour, and the fees and terms couldn't be read.\n\n**MEXC API.** MEXC publishes granular key permissions, per-pair key limits, weighted rate limits with Retry-After and a dated changelog, and its official CLI runs a read-only-capable MCP server with confirmation before any fund movement. There is no sandbox or status page, API futures orders pay a higher fee schedule, and the user agreement excludes the US, UK, EU members and others.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Bithumb Open API\n\n1. Ask for a key with asset and order inquiry plus order placement only, never withdrawals, with your IP registered; keys expire after one year and a wrong IP answers 401 NotAllowIP\n2. Start the server with `--modules market,account,trade --read-only` for analysis and drop `--read-only` only when the person asks to trade; deposit and withdraw modules stay off\n3. Prefer the `bithumb` CLI for writes, as the skills do, and check `bithumb config show --json` for a read-only profile before any order\n4. Keep the ticker's markets parameter at 200 or fewer, batch orders at 30 and cancels at 30 per request, and stay under 140 private calls a second per category\n5. Retry 422 order_not_ready and 500 server_error after a pause; there is no sandbox, so start with the smallest order the market allows\n\n### MEXC API\n\n1. Use a key limited to SPOT_ACCOUNT_READ and SPOT_DEAL_WRITE, the pairs you trade and your IP addresses; keys without a linked IP expire after 90 days\n2. Start the MCP server as `mexc mcp spot --read-only` unless the task trades, and never pass `--yes`; orders and transfers wait for the person's confirmation\n3. Call POST /api/v3/order/test before a live order, since there is no sandbox\n4. On 429 or 418 wait for Retry-After; order placement and cancellation share 12 requests a second per UID, and repeated breaches ban the IP for up to 3 days\n5. Treat a 5xx on an order as unknown, not failed, and query the order before retrying; set newClientOrderId so the order can be found\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Bithumb Open API or MEXC API?\n\nMEXC API scores 56.3 (C) on agent readiness against Bithumb Open API's 50.6 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories.\n\n### Do Bithumb Open API and MEXC API need an API key?\n\nBoth need an API key.\n\n### Can an agent call Bithumb Open API and MEXC API without installing anything?\n\nBithumb Open API runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. MEXC API runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-mexc.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-mexc.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"bithumb\", \"b\": \"mexc\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare bithumb mexc`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bithumb.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/mexc.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Bithumb Open API or MEXC API\n\n- [Bitfinex API vs Bithumb Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bithumb.md)\n- [Bitfinex API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Bitget vs Bithumb Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb.md)\n- [Bitget vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Bitstamp API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bitstamp.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Bybit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bybit.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-coinbase-mcp.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Crypto.com Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-crypto-com-exchange.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Deribit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-deribit.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs dYdX](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-dydx.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Gate](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-gate-io.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Gemini Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-gemini-exchange.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-htx.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Kraken API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-kraken.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs KuCoin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-kucoin.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-okx.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Bybit vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Crypto.com Exchange API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Gate vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Gemini Exchange API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-mexc.md)\n- [HTX trading API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-mexc.md)\n- [KuCoin vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kucoin-vs-mexc.md)\n- [MEXC API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-okx.md)\n- [MEXC API vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [MEXC API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Binance API vs Bithumb Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bithumb.md)\n- [Binance API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Kraken API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kraken-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Deribit vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-mexc.md)\n- [dYdX vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-04", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.7", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Bithumb Open API vs MEXC API", "url": "" } ], "description": "MEXC scores 56.3 (C) to Bithumb Open's 50.6 (D) for exchange market data. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Bithumb Open API D 50.6", "MEXC API C 56.3", "scores" ], "h1": "Bithumb Open API vs MEXC API", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/bithumb-vs-mexc", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Bithumb Open vs MEXC for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-04", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-mexc" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 4300, "slim": 2130 }, "version": 1 }