# Bithumb Open API vs Hyperliquid (slim)

> Bithumb Open and Hyperliquid score within a point of each other for exchange market data, 50.6 and 50 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid.md (~4,450 tokens) · this version ~2,080 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-03
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Bithumb Open API and Hyperliquid score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 50.6 (D) and 50 (D). Hyperliquid leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do exchange market data.

- Bithumb Open API: D 50.6, rank #999 of 1349 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bithumb.min.md
- Hyperliquid: D 50, rank #1018 of 1349 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.min.md
- Bithumb Open API, good for KRW-market trading for agents acting for a verified Korean account, with a vendor-built MCP server, CLI and skills. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 64 against 42; Maintenance & community, 69 against 39; Transparency & trust, 47 against 26. Also Runs on your own machine.
- Hyperliquid, good for An agent trading perpetuals or spot on chain from its own wallet with no account, or acting for a master account through an approved API wallet. Ahead on Reliability, 40 against 34; Payments & pricing, 55 against 15.

| Category | Bithumb Open API | Hyperliquid |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 34 | 40 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 64 | 42 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 67 | 70 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 60 | 64 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 15 | 55 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 69 | 39 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 47 | 26 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Bithumb Open API | Hyperliquid |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Bithumb Co., Ltd. | Hyperliquid Labs |
| Transports | stdio |  |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Licence | none | The exchange runs on the Hyperliquid chain (HyperCore), whose node is distributed as a binary under an Apache-2.0 repository; the Python and Rust SDKs are MIT. The API servers and front end are closed |
| Tools exposed | 41 | 0 |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-13 | 2026-06-04 |
| Popularity | 6 stars | 1.9k stars, 167k PyPI/wk |

Why the edge:
- Payments & pricing, Hyperliquid +40: Bithumb Open API 15 (No machine payment protocol (0). The fee page timed out on every attempt, so no price is recorded (0 of 20, unchecked). Public market data needs no key, card or account; trading needs a verified Korean account. Judgement call (15 of 20). A person must sign up, pass identity checks and issue keys in the browser (0). 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 15.); Hyperliquid 55 (No machine payment protocol (0). Fees published per tier without login (20). No card anywhere; public info endpoints are free and the testnet faucet gives 1,000 mock USDC, though only to an address that has deposited on mainnet (15 of 20). No signup; an agent with a funded EVM wallet deposits USDC on a bridged chain and trades, subject to the unread terms (20). Total 55.)
- Maintenance & community, Bithumb Open API +30: Bithumb Open API 69 (Read as a closed service. Rate limits updated 27 October 2026 and the ticker cap effective 13 October 2026 (30). Batch orders 20 August, Private v1 retired 30 September, the ticker cap 13 October and the limits page 27 October 2026 (20). A phone support line, dated notices and a GitHub repository with no open issues and one commit; replies not observed (9 of 15). The MCP server is not in the official MCP registry and there is no SDK; the CLI and MCP packages are current (5 of 15). The MCP package depends only on @modelcontextprotocol/sdk ^1.26 on Node 18, with no public source or CI (5 of 10). 30 + 20 + 9 + 5 + 5 = 69.); Hyperliquid 39 (Read as a closed hosted service with open SDKs. The API has no dated changelog, so the last dated change is the Python SDK's 0.24.0 on 4 June 2026, 152 days before this check; the node repository was pushed on 10 August 2026 and the docs describe newer actions (HIP-4 outcome markets, borrow and lend) without dates. Judgement call (10 of 30). No three dated releases in 90 days (0). Support through Discord and the docs' FAQ, 112 open issues on the SDK whose replies couldn't be read (8 of 25). Official Python and Rust SDKs, the Rust one last pushed 21 October 2025; no MCP registry entry (15). CI on Python 3.9 and 3.13 with Poetry, Dependabot badge, a lock file (6 of 10). Total 39.)
- Schema & documentation, Bithumb Open API +22: Bithumb Open API 64 (No OpenAPI found; the reference is a readme.io site with Markdown twins, and the MCP tool schemas weren't read since the server's source isn't published (5 of 25). llms.txt on apidocs.bithumb.com (10). Reference pages state purpose and the skills say when to use each module and when not to (15 of 20). Typed parameters with enums for side, order type and time in force (10 of 15). Examples in several languages and an error-code page with names, statuses and meanings (12 of 15). Versions per endpoint (v1, v2, v2.1.5) and notices with effective dates (12 of 15). 5 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 12 + 12 = 64.); Hyperliquid 42 (No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract; request and response shapes are tables and JSON examples in the docs (0 of 25). llms.txt and a Markdown twin of every page by appending .md (10). Each info type and exchange action has a short description of what it does, and the signing page lists common mistakes, but little says when to use one call over another (12 of 20). Fields are one-letter keys (`a`, `b`, `p`, `s`, `r`, `t`, `c`) with numbers as strings, enums such as `tif` Alo, Ioc or Gtc, and required fields marked in tables (9 of 15). An example for every call and a list of order and cancel error strings, with no HTTP error table (11 of 15). No API version, no changelog and no dated release notes; deprecated actions such as `userDexAbstraction` are marked in place (0 of 15). Total 42.)
- Transparency & trust, Bithumb Open API +21: Bithumb Open API 47 (The editorial half. A closed service whose terms couldn't be read (timeouts and a title-only page); the kit is MIT with a disclaimer naming Bithumb Co., Ltd. (10 of 30). No privacy policy read (0 of 30, unchecked). Dated retirement of WebSocket Private v1 and effective dates on breaking notices (14 of 20). No subprocessor or data-location statement read (0 of 20). 10 + 0 + 14 + 0 = 24.); Hyperliquid 26 (The editorial half. The SDKs are MIT and the node repository Apache-2.0 with a Dockerfile around a binary; the API servers and front end are closed and the terms were unreadable (12 of 30). No privacy policy read and nothing in the docs on data handling (0 of 30). Deprecated actions are marked in the docs without dates or a policy (8 of 20). No subprocessors or data locations (0 of 20). Total 20.)
- Reliability, Hyperliquid +6: Bithumb Open API 34 (Read with the hosted lines. No status page found on apidocs.bithumb.com or in llms.txt; wallet-status and notices endpoints stand in (0). No readable incident history, though two notices record a public WebSocket interruption and a brief service break (5). Rate limits documented per category with numbers, updated 27 October 2026 (15). A breach is described only as a temporary restriction, with no status code, header or Retry-After, and no client order id or idempotency key is documented; 422 order_not_ready and 500 server_error say to retry later (4 of 15). No SLA found (0). The API is generally available; the MCP server and CLI are at 0.8.5 (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 4 + 0 + 10 = 34.); Hyperliquid 40 (Read with the hosted lines on the REST API at api.hyperliquid.xyz, the surface an agent calls; the chain behind it is noted under details. No status page found in the docs, on hyperliquid.xyz or at status.hyperliquid.xyz, which did not resolve (0). No readable history (5). Rate limits documented with numbers per IP, per address and per WebSocket connection (15). When limited, an address gets one request every 10 seconds; no 429 shape or Retry-After is documented, but `cloid`, per-signer nonces, `expiresAfter` and `noop` make retries safe (10 of 15). No SLA (0). Mainnet is generally available (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 10 + 0 + 10 = 40.)