{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "bithumb", "name": "Bithumb Open API", "vendor": "Bithumb Co., Ltd.", "vendorUrl": "https://apidocs.bithumb.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "Bithumb, a Korean exchange, runs a REST and WebSocket Open API for KRW market data, orders, balances, deposits and withdrawals, and an official AI Trade Kit with a local MCP server, a CLI and agent skills.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bithumb", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bithumb.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bithumb.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bithumb.json", "dns": "bithumb.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/bithumb-official/bithumb-ai-trade-kit", "transports": [ "stdio" ], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bithumb-official/bithumb-mcp" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bithumb-official/bithumb-cli" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "Access and secret keys issued under My Page \u003e API Management on bithumb.com after identity verification. The person picks permissions (asset inquiry, order inquiry, place orders, withdrawals and others) and registers the IP addresses allowed to call. Each request carries a JWT signed with the secret as a Bearer token. Keys are valid for one year from issue and can't be extended; up to 10 per account including expired ones; the secret is shown once. The MCP server and CLI read BITHUMB_ACCESS_KEY and BITHUMB_SECRET_KEY, and market tools need no key (https://apidocs.bithumb.com/docs/빠른-시작-가이드.md, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "Trading fees per fill. The fee page at bithumb.com/react/info/fee/trade timed out on every attempt, so no rate is recorded; press reports from 2024 describe a 0.04 per cent rate with a monthly coupon and 0.25 per cent without, which is a lead and not a source. Public market data needs no key and no account (https://www.bithumb.com/react/info/fee/trade, checked 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "Pay per use", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the API docs, the AI Trade Kit repository or llms.txt (checked 2026-11-03). Fees are taken from each fill.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 41, "popularity": { "githubStars": 6, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://apidocs.bithumb.com/reference/api-레퍼런스", "llmsTxt": "https://apidocs.bithumb.com/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "exchange.market-data", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "market.crypto" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "api-key", "closed-source", "usage-priced", "mcp", "cli", "agent-skills", "read-only-mode", "llms-txt", "mit", "no-status-page" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-13", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 50.6, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 999, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 17, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 67, "maintenance": 69, "payments": 15, "reliability": 34, "schema": 64, "security": 60, "transparency": 47 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Bithumb runs an official local MCP server with 41 tools, module selection and a read-only flag, beside a CLI with per-profile read-only gating and six agent skills, over an API with scoped one-year keys and a mandatory IP list. There is no sandbox, no status page, no documented 429 behaviour, and the fees and terms couldn't be read.", "bestFor": "KRW-market trading for agents acting for a verified Korean account, with a vendor-built MCP server, CLI and skills.", "strengths": [ "An official MCP server from Bithumb with 41 tools in seven selectable modules and a `--read-only` flag that blocks orders, deposits and withdrawals", "Keys scoped to chosen permissions, limited to registered IPs and expiring after one year, with a key-list endpoint that shows expiry", "The CLI's per-profile read-only flag, local audit log and second factor on KRW deposits and withdrawals, and skills that refuse to bypass read-only", "Rate limits published per category with numbers, and notices with effective dates for changes such as the 200-market ticker cap", "Errors return a stable error.name under an HTTP status, with retry guidance for order_not_ready and server_error" ], "weaknesses": [ "No sandbox or testnet; every order uses real funds", "A rate-limit breach is signalled only as a temporary restriction, with no status code, header or Retry-After documented", "No status page, incident history or SLA", "The MCP server is local only, not in the official MCP registry, and its source is not published (the kit repository holds skills and setup files)", "The fee schedule, terms of service and Open API terms on bithumb.com timed out or answered a title only, so none is recorded first-hand" ], "agentNotes": [ "Ask for a key with asset and order inquiry plus order placement only, never withdrawals, with your IP registered; keys expire after one year and a wrong IP answers 401 NotAllowIP", "Start the server with `--modules market,account,trade --read-only` for analysis and drop `--read-only` only when the person asks to trade; deposit and withdraw modules stay off", "Prefer the `bithumb` CLI for writes, as the skills do, and check `bithumb config show --json` for a read-only profile before any order", "Keep the ticker's markets parameter at 200 or fewer, batch orders at 30 and cancels at 30 per request, and stay under 140 private calls a second per category", "Retry 422 order_not_ready and 500 server_error after a pause; there is no sandbox, so start with the smallest order the market allows" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 50.6 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 67, "maintenance": 69, "payments": 15, "reliability": 34, "schema": 64, "security": 60, "transparency": 24 }, "provenanceScore": 69, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "npm install -g @bithumb-official/bithumb-cli", "http": "curl 'https://api.bithumb.com/v1/market/all?isDetails=false'", "config": { "mcpServers": { "bithumb": { "args": [ "-y", "@bithumb-official/bithumb-mcp", "--modules", "market,account,trade", "--read-only" ], "command": "npx", "env": { "BITHUMB_ACCESS_KEY": "${BITHUMB_ACCESS_KEY}", "BITHUMB_SECRET_KEY": "${BITHUMB_SECRET_KEY}" } } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.market-data", "tool": "https://letme.dev/bithumb" }, "area": "payments", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Bithumb Co., Ltd.", "domain": "bithumb.com", "domainRegistered": "2015-06-16", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.bithumb.com/react/terms/info-terms", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://apidocs.bithumb.com/changelog", "securityTxt": "unknown", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "Bithumb Co., Ltd. is named in the AI Trade Kit's disclaimer (compliance review 007441, 29 May 2026 to 28 May 2027). The terms of service at bithumb.com/react/terms/info-terms answered a page title only on two attempts, and the Open API terms, company page and fee pages timed out or did the same; no privacy policy URL was found in the sitemap's first part, so it is left empty.", "www.bithumb.com/robots.txt has no active rules (comments only) and two sitemaps; apidocs.bithumb.com/robots.txt allows everything but edit, login and api-next paths and points to llms.txt.", "https://www.bithumb.com/.well-known/security.txt timed out twice; recorded as unknown.", "RDAP gives bithumb.com a registration date of 16 June 2015.", "No status page found; the API has wallet-status and notices endpoints." ], "score": 69 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bithumb.json", "live": { "slug": "bithumb", "versions": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bithumb-official/bithumb-cli", "version": "0.8.5", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:56.600783413Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bithumb-official/bithumb-mcp", "version": "0.8.5", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:55.754674786Z" } ], "githubStars": 6, "npmWeekly": 87, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://bithumb.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:26.914675257Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:57.989976217Z" } }, "answer": "Bithumb Open API and Hyperliquid score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 50.6 (D) and 50 (D). Hyperliquid leads on reliability and payments \u0026 pricing.", "b": { "slug": "hyperliquid", "name": "Hyperliquid", "vendor": "Hyperliquid Labs", "vendorUrl": "https://hyperliquid.xyz", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "Hyperliquid is a perpetuals and spot exchange whose order book runs on its own chain. Agents trade through the REST info and exchange endpoints and WebSocket at api.hyperliquid.xyz, signing with a wallet key or an approved API wallet.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hyperliquid.json", "dns": "hyperliquid.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/hyperliquid-dex/hyperliquid-python-sdk", "license": "The exchange runs on the Hyperliquid chain (HyperCore), whose node is distributed as a binary under an Apache-2.0 repository; the Python and Rust SDKs are MIT. The API servers and front end are closed", "transports": [], "packages": [ { "registry": "pypi", "name": "hyperliquid-python-sdk" } ], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "No API keys. Every exchange action is a signed message from an EVM wallet; info requests need no signature. A master account approves API wallets (agent wallets) with `approveAgent`, optionally named and with an expiry, which can only sign on its behalf and cannot query data. L1 actions (orders, cancels, margin settings) and user-signed actions (USDC and spot sends, withdrawals, approvals) use two different EIP-712 schemes, and the docs recommend an SDK for signing. Nonces are per signer, must sit within two days behind and one day ahead of block time, and sub-accounts signed by one API wallet share its nonce set (https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/for-developers/api/nonces-and-api-wallets.md, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "The API has no charge. Base-tier fees are 0.045% taker and 0.015% maker on perpetuals and 0.070% taker and 0.040% maker on spot, assessed on rolling 14-day volume, falling to 0.024% taker and 0% maker above $7 billion, with maker rebates to -0.003% for large maker share and staking discounts of 5% to 40%. Withdrawals to the bridge cost $1; an activation gas fee applies to a first order. `reserveRequestWeight` buys extra rate limit at 0.0005 USDC a request (https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/trading/fees.md, checked 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "0.04% fee", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the API docs (checked 2026-11-03). Accounts are funded by depositing USDC on Arbitrum or other bridged chains; several third-party MCP servers in the registry sell Hyperliquid data by x402, none of them Hyperliquid's.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 0, "popularity": { "githubStars": 1873, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": 167497, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/for-developers/api", "llmsTxt": "https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "exchange.derivatives", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.market-data", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "exchange.staking", "market.crypto", "wallet.onchain" ], "tags": [ "official", "hosted", "closed-source", "llms-txt", "python", "rust", "sandbox", "usage-priced", "no-key", "no-status-page", "bug-bounty", "rest" ], "lastRelease": "2026-06-04", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 50, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 1018, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 19, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 39, "payments": 55, "reliability": 40, "schema": 42, "security": 64, "transparency": 26 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Hyperliquid's API needs no signup or key, an approved API wallet can trade but not withdraw, fees and rate limits are published with numbers, and a testnet mirrors mainnet. There is no official MCP server, OpenAPI file, status page, changelog or readable terms, and signing uses two schemes the docs say to leave to an SDK.", "bestFor": "An agent trading perpetuals or spot on chain from its own wallet with no account, or acting for a master account through an approved API wallet.", "strengths": [ "API wallets approved by the master account can only sign trading actions; withdrawals and external transfers need the user's own key", "Numeric rate limits per IP and per address, with weights per request type and a paid `reserveRequestWeight` top-up", "Fees published per tier from 0.045% taker and 0.015% maker on perpetuals, with maker rebates and staking discounts", "A testnet at api.hyperliquid-testnet.xyz with the same API and a faucet of 1,000 mock USDC for addresses that have deposited on mainnet", "Client order IDs (`cloid`), `expiresAfter`, `noop` and a `scheduleCancel` dead man's switch for safe retries" ], "weaknesses": [ "No official MCP server; the 23 registry entries are all third parties, several selling data by x402", "No OpenAPI file, no changelog, no API versioning and no status page found", "The terms of use and privacy policy at app.hyperliquid.xyz draw by script and hyperliquid.xyz/terms answered 403, so the restricted jurisdictions are unchecked", "Order errors are message strings without codes, and the docs give no 429 or Retry-After guidance beyond one request every 10 seconds when limited", "The official Python SDK is marked Alpha, last released 4 June 2026, with 112 open issues" ], "agentNotes": [ "Generate a fresh API wallet, approve it with `approveAgent` with a name and expiry, sign with it, and query with the master address, never the agent address", "Use the Python SDK's `sign_l1_action` and `sign_user_signed_action`; mixing the two, field order in msgpack or an uppercase address gives \"User or API Wallet ... does not exist\"", "Set a `cloid` on every order and read the per-order `statuses` array; one batch-level error rejects the whole batch", "Budget address limits by volume (one action per 1 USDC traded after 10,000); batch orders to lower IP weight, and use WebSocket for data", "Arm `scheduleCancel` before unattended trading so open orders are cancelled if the agent stops" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 50 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 39, "payments": 55, "reliability": 40, "schema": 42, "security": 64, "transparency": 20 }, "provenanceScore": 32, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "pip install hyperliquid-python-sdk", "http": "curl -X POST https://api.hyperliquid.xyz/info -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{\"type\":\"l2Book\",\"coin\":\"BTC\"}'" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.derivatives", "tool": "https://letme.dev/hyperliquid" }, "area": "payments", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Perpetuals taker fee, tier 0", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.045, "note": "0.045% of notional; maker 0.015%" }, { "item": "Spot taker fee, tier 0", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.07, "note": "0.070% of notional; maker 0.040%" }, { "item": "Bridge withdrawal", "unit": "tx", "usd": 1, "note": "$1 per withdrawal to the bridge contract" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "", "domain": "hyperliquid.xyz", "domainRegistered": "2022-10-15", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/terms", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "", "securityTxt": "unknown", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "No legal entity found on a readable page. The docs name Hyperliquid Labs (self-funded) and the Hyper Foundation (bug bounty); app.hyperliquid.xyz/terms and hyperfoundation.org draw by script and hyperliquid.xyz/terms answered 403.", "RDAP gives hyperliquid.xyz a registration date of 15 October 2022, registrar Squarespace Domains.", "No status page found; status.hyperliquid.xyz did not resolve and the docs link none. No changelog; the docs have no dated release notes.", "https://hyperliquid.xyz/.well-known/security.txt answered 403, so security.txt is unknown. The docs' bug bounty page gives bugbounty@hyperfoundation.org.", "hyperliquid.gitbook.io/robots.txt allows everything with Content-Signal ai-input=yes; hyperliquid.xyz/robots.txt allows everything." ], "score": 32 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.json", "live": { "slug": "hyperliquid", "securityTxt": { "url": "https://hyperliquid.xyz/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "unknown", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:05.956872316Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:05.956872316Z" } }, "edges": [ { "by": 40, "category": "payments", "leads": "hyperliquid", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "reasons": { "a": "No machine payment protocol (0). The fee page timed out on every attempt, so no price is recorded (0 of 20, unchecked). Public market data needs no key, card or account; trading needs a verified Korean account. Judgement call (15 of 20). A person must sign up, pass identity checks and issue keys in the browser (0). 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 15.", "b": "No machine payment protocol (0). Fees published per tier without login (20). No card anywhere; public info endpoints are free and the testnet faucet gives 1,000 mock USDC, though only to an address that has deposited on mainnet (15 of 20). No signup; an agent with a funded EVM wallet deposits USDC on a bridged chain and trades, subject to the unread terms (20). Total 55." }, "scores": { "a": 15, "b": 55 } }, { "by": 30, "category": "maintenance", "leads": "bithumb", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "reasons": { "a": "Read as a closed service. Rate limits updated 27 October 2026 and the ticker cap effective 13 October 2026 (30). Batch orders 20 August, Private v1 retired 30 September, the ticker cap 13 October and the limits page 27 October 2026 (20). A phone support line, dated notices and a GitHub repository with no open issues and one commit; replies not observed (9 of 15). The MCP server is not in the official MCP registry and there is no SDK; the CLI and MCP packages are current (5 of 15). The MCP package depends only on @modelcontextprotocol/sdk ^1.26 on Node 18, with no public source or CI (5 of 10). 30 + 20 + 9 + 5 + 5 = 69.", "b": "Read as a closed hosted service with open SDKs. The API has no dated changelog, so the last dated change is the Python SDK's 0.24.0 on 4 June 2026, 152 days before this check; the node repository was pushed on 10 August 2026 and the docs describe newer actions (HIP-4 outcome markets, borrow and lend) without dates. Judgement call (10 of 30). No three dated releases in 90 days (0). Support through Discord and the docs' FAQ, 112 open issues on the SDK whose replies couldn't be read (8 of 25). Official Python and Rust SDKs, the Rust one last pushed 21 October 2025; no MCP registry entry (15). CI on Python 3.9 and 3.13 with Poetry, Dependabot badge, a lock file (6 of 10). Total 39." }, "scores": { "a": 69, "b": 39 } }, { "by": 22, "category": "schema", "leads": "bithumb", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "reasons": { "a": "No OpenAPI found; the reference is a readme.io site with Markdown twins, and the MCP tool schemas weren't read since the server's source isn't published (5 of 25). llms.txt on apidocs.bithumb.com (10). Reference pages state purpose and the skills say when to use each module and when not to (15 of 20). Typed parameters with enums for side, order type and time in force (10 of 15). Examples in several languages and an error-code page with names, statuses and meanings (12 of 15). Versions per endpoint (v1, v2, v2.1.5) and notices with effective dates (12 of 15). 5 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 12 + 12 = 64.", "b": "No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract; request and response shapes are tables and JSON examples in the docs (0 of 25). llms.txt and a Markdown twin of every page by appending .md (10). Each info type and exchange action has a short description of what it does, and the signing page lists common mistakes, but little says when to use one call over another (12 of 20). Fields are one-letter keys (`a`, `b`, `p`, `s`, `r`, `t`, `c`) with numbers as strings, enums such as `tif` Alo, Ioc or Gtc, and required fields marked in tables (9 of 15). An example for every call and a list of order and cancel error strings, with no HTTP error table (11 of 15). No API version, no changelog and no dated release notes; deprecated actions such as `userDexAbstraction` are marked in place (0 of 15). Total 42." }, "scores": { "a": 64, "b": 42 } }, { "by": 21, "category": "transparency", "leads": "bithumb", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "reasons": { "a": "The editorial half. A closed service whose terms couldn't be read (timeouts and a title-only page); the kit is MIT with a disclaimer naming Bithumb Co., Ltd. (10 of 30). No privacy policy read (0 of 30, unchecked). Dated retirement of WebSocket Private v1 and effective dates on breaking notices (14 of 20). No subprocessor or data-location statement read (0 of 20). 10 + 0 + 14 + 0 = 24.", "b": "The editorial half. The SDKs are MIT and the node repository Apache-2.0 with a Dockerfile around a binary; the API servers and front end are closed and the terms were unreadable (12 of 30). No privacy policy read and nothing in the docs on data handling (0 of 30). Deprecated actions are marked in the docs without dates or a policy (8 of 20). No subprocessors or data locations (0 of 20). Total 20." }, "scores": { "a": 47, "b": 26 } }, { "by": 6, "category": "reliability", "leads": "hyperliquid", "name": "Reliability", "reasons": { "a": "Read with the hosted lines. No status page found on apidocs.bithumb.com or in llms.txt; wallet-status and notices endpoints stand in (0). No readable incident history, though two notices record a public WebSocket interruption and a brief service break (5). Rate limits documented per category with numbers, updated 27 October 2026 (15). A breach is described only as a temporary restriction, with no status code, header or Retry-After, and no client order id or idempotency key is documented; 422 order_not_ready and 500 server_error say to retry later (4 of 15). No SLA found (0). The API is generally available; the MCP server and CLI are at 0.8.5 (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 4 + 0 + 10 = 34.", "b": "Read with the hosted lines on the REST API at api.hyperliquid.xyz, the surface an agent calls; the chain behind it is noted under details. No status page found in the docs, on hyperliquid.xyz or at status.hyperliquid.xyz, which did not resolve (0). No readable history (5). Rate limits documented with numbers per IP, per address and per WebSocket connection (15). When limited, an address gets one request every 10 seconds; no 429 shape or Retry-After is documented, but `cloid`, per-signer nonces, `expiresAfter` and `noop` make retries safe (10 of 15). No SLA (0). Mainnet is generally available (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 10 + 0 + 10 = 40." }, "scores": { "a": 34, "b": 40 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "HTTP API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "Bithumb Co., Ltd.", "b": "Hyperliquid Labs", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "stdio", "b": "", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "API key", "b": "OAuth or key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Pay per use", "b": "Pay per use", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "none", "b": "The exchange runs on the Hyperliquid chain (HyperCore), whose node is distributed as a binary under an Apache-2.0 repository; the Python and Rust SDKs are MIT. The API servers and front end are closed", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "41", "b": "0", "name": "Tools exposed" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-10-13", "b": "2026-06-04", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "no document linked", "b": "no document linked", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "6 stars", "b": "1.9k stars, 167k PyPI/wk", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Bithumb Open API and Hyperliquid score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 50.6 (D) and 50 (D). Hyperliquid leads on reliability and payments \u0026 pricing.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Bithumb Open API or Hyperliquid?" }, { "answer": "Bithumb Open API needs an API key. Hyperliquid takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.", "question": "Do Bithumb Open API and Hyperliquid need an API key?" }, { "answer": "Bithumb Open API runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. No hosted endpoint is listed for Hyperliquid.", "question": "Can an agent call Bithumb Open API and Hyperliquid without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Schema \u0026 documentation, 64 against 42", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 69 against 39", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 47 against 26" ], "also": [ "Runs on your own machine" ], "goodFor": "KRW-market trading for agents acting for a verified Korean account, with a vendor-built MCP server, CLI and skills.", "slug": "bithumb", "watchFor": "No sandbox or testnet; every order uses real funds" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 40 against 34", "Payments \u0026 pricing, 55 against 15" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "An agent trading perpetuals or spot on chain from its own wallet with no account, or acting for a master account through an approved API wallet.", "slug": "hyperliquid", "watchFor": "No official MCP server; the 23 registry entries are all third parties, several selling data by x402" } ], "history": null, "job": { "capability": "exchange.market-data", "name": "Exchange market data" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bithumb.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs Bithumb Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bithumb" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb.json", "title": "Bitget vs Bithumb Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bitget vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bitstamp.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Bitstamp API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bitstamp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bybit.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Bybit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bybit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-coinbase-mcp.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-coinbase-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-crypto-com-exchange.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Crypto.com Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-crypto-com-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-deribit.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Deribit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-deribit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-dydx.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs dYdX", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-dydx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-gate-io.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Gate", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-gate-io" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-gemini-exchange.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Gemini Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-gemini-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-htx.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-kraken.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Kraken API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-kraken" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-kucoin.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs KuCoin", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-kucoin" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-okx.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bybit vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Crypto.com Exchange API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Gate vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Gemini Exchange API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "HTX trading API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bithumb.json", "title": "Binance API vs Bithumb Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bithumb" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Binance API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Deribit vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "dYdX vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kraken.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs Kraken API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kraken" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kucoin.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs KuCoin", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kucoin" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "bithumb": 34, "by": 6, "edge": "hyperliquid", "hyperliquid": 40, "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "bithumb": 64, "by": 22, "edge": "bithumb", "hyperliquid": 42, "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "weight": 13 }, { "bithumb": 67, "by": 3, "edge": "hyperliquid", "hyperliquid": 70, "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "weight": 13 }, { "bithumb": 60, "by": 4, "edge": "hyperliquid", "hyperliquid": 64, "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "weight": 14 }, { "bithumb": 15, "by": 40, "edge": "hyperliquid", "hyperliquid": 55, "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "bithumb": 69, "by": 30, "edge": "bithumb", "hyperliquid": 39, "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "weight": 7 }, { "bithumb": 47, "by": 21, "edge": "bithumb", "hyperliquid": 26, "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "Bithumb Open API and Hyperliquid score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 50.6 (D) and 50 (D). Hyperliquid leads on reliability and payments \u0026 pricing. Both do exchange market data.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "bithumb": "Bithumb runs an official local MCP server with 41 tools, module selection and a read-only flag, beside a CLI with per-profile read-only gating and six agent skills, over an API with scoped one-year keys and a mandatory IP list. There is no sandbox, no status page, no documented 429 behaviour, and the fees and terms couldn't be read.", "hyperliquid": "Hyperliquid's API needs no signup or key, an approved API wallet can trade but not withdraw, fees and rate limits are published with numbers, and a testnet mirrors mainnet. There is no official MCP server, OpenAPI file, status page, changelog or readable terms, and signing uses two schemes the docs say to leave to an SDK." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid.min.md" }, "markdown": "Bithumb Open API and Hyperliquid score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 50.6 (D) and 50 (D). Hyperliquid leads on reliability and payments \u0026 pricing. Both do exchange market data.\n\n- Bithumb Open API: grade D, 50.6/100, rank #999 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bithumb.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bithumb.json\n- Hyperliquid: grade D, 50/100, rank #1018 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hyperliquid.json\n- Best crypto exchange APIs and MCP servers for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n- All 210 exchanges comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Bithumb Open API (D)\n\nGood for: KRW-market trading for agents acting for a verified Korean account, with a vendor-built MCP server, CLI and skills.\n\nAhead on:\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 64 against 42\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 69 against 39\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 47 against 26\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- Runs on your own machine\n\nWatch for: No sandbox or testnet; every order uses real funds\n\n### Hyperliquid (D)\n\nGood for: An agent trading perpetuals or spot on chain from its own wallet with no account, or acting for a master account through an approved API wallet.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 40 against 34\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 55 against 15\n\nWatch for: No official MCP server; the 23 registry entries are all third parties, several selling data by x402\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Payments \u0026 pricing: Hyperliquid +40\n\n- Bithumb Open API (15): No machine payment protocol (0). The fee page timed out on every attempt, so no price is recorded (0 of 20, unchecked). Public market data needs no key, card or account; trading needs a verified Korean account. Judgement call (15 of 20). A person must sign up, pass identity checks and issue keys in the browser (0). 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 15.\n- Hyperliquid (55): No machine payment protocol (0). Fees published per tier without login (20). No card anywhere; public info endpoints are free and the testnet faucet gives 1,000 mock USDC, though only to an address that has deposited on mainnet (15 of 20). No signup; an agent with a funded EVM wallet deposits USDC on a bridged chain and trades, subject to the unread terms (20). Total 55.\n\n### Maintenance \u0026 community: Bithumb Open API +30\n\n- Bithumb Open API (69): Read as a closed service. Rate limits updated 27 October 2026 and the ticker cap effective 13 October 2026 (30). Batch orders 20 August, Private v1 retired 30 September, the ticker cap 13 October and the limits page 27 October 2026 (20). A phone support line, dated notices and a GitHub repository with no open issues and one commit; replies not observed (9 of 15). The MCP server is not in the official MCP registry and there is no SDK; the CLI and MCP packages are current (5 of 15). The MCP package depends only on @modelcontextprotocol/sdk ^1.26 on Node 18, with no public source or CI (5 of 10). 30 + 20 + 9 + 5 + 5 = 69.\n- Hyperliquid (39): Read as a closed hosted service with open SDKs. The API has no dated changelog, so the last dated change is the Python SDK's 0.24.0 on 4 June 2026, 152 days before this check; the node repository was pushed on 10 August 2026 and the docs describe newer actions (HIP-4 outcome markets, borrow and lend) without dates. Judgement call (10 of 30). No three dated releases in 90 days (0). Support through Discord and the docs' FAQ, 112 open issues on the SDK whose replies couldn't be read (8 of 25). Official Python and Rust SDKs, the Rust one last pushed 21 October 2025; no MCP registry entry (15). CI on Python 3.9 and 3.13 with Poetry, Dependabot badge, a lock file (6 of 10). Total 39.\n\n### Schema \u0026 documentation: Bithumb Open API +22\n\n- Bithumb Open API (64): No OpenAPI found; the reference is a readme.io site with Markdown twins, and the MCP tool schemas weren't read since the server's source isn't published (5 of 25). llms.txt on apidocs.bithumb.com (10). Reference pages state purpose and the skills say when to use each module and when not to (15 of 20). Typed parameters with enums for side, order type and time in force (10 of 15). Examples in several languages and an error-code page with names, statuses and meanings (12 of 15). Versions per endpoint (v1, v2, v2.1.5) and notices with effective dates (12 of 15). 5 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 12 + 12 = 64.\n- Hyperliquid (42): No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract; request and response shapes are tables and JSON examples in the docs (0 of 25). llms.txt and a Markdown twin of every page by appending .md (10). Each info type and exchange action has a short description of what it does, and the signing page lists common mistakes, but little says when to use one call over another (12 of 20). Fields are one-letter keys (`a`, `b`, `p`, `s`, `r`, `t`, `c`) with numbers as strings, enums such as `tif` Alo, Ioc or Gtc, and required fields marked in tables (9 of 15). An example for every call and a list of order and cancel error strings, with no HTTP error table (11 of 15). No API version, no changelog and no dated release notes; deprecated actions such as `userDexAbstraction` are marked in place (0 of 15). Total 42.\n\n### Transparency \u0026 trust: Bithumb Open API +21\n\n- Bithumb Open API (47): The editorial half. A closed service whose terms couldn't be read (timeouts and a title-only page); the kit is MIT with a disclaimer naming Bithumb Co., Ltd. (10 of 30). No privacy policy read (0 of 30, unchecked). Dated retirement of WebSocket Private v1 and effective dates on breaking notices (14 of 20). No subprocessor or data-location statement read (0 of 20). 10 + 0 + 14 + 0 = 24.\n- Hyperliquid (26): The editorial half. The SDKs are MIT and the node repository Apache-2.0 with a Dockerfile around a binary; the API servers and front end are closed and the terms were unreadable (12 of 30). No privacy policy read and nothing in the docs on data handling (0 of 30). Deprecated actions are marked in the docs without dates or a policy (8 of 20). No subprocessors or data locations (0 of 20). Total 20.\n\n### Reliability: Hyperliquid +6\n\n- Bithumb Open API (34): Read with the hosted lines. No status page found on apidocs.bithumb.com or in llms.txt; wallet-status and notices endpoints stand in (0). No readable incident history, though two notices record a public WebSocket interruption and a brief service break (5). Rate limits documented per category with numbers, updated 27 October 2026 (15). A breach is described only as a temporary restriction, with no status code, header or Retry-After, and no client order id or idempotency key is documented; 422 order_not_ready and 500 server_error say to retry later (4 of 15). No SLA found (0). The API is generally available; the MCP server and CLI are at 0.8.5 (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 4 + 0 + 10 = 34.\n- Hyperliquid (40): Read with the hosted lines on the REST API at api.hyperliquid.xyz, the surface an agent calls; the chain behind it is noted under details. No status page found in the docs, on hyperliquid.xyz or at status.hyperliquid.xyz, which did not resolve (0). No readable history (5). Rate limits documented with numbers per IP, per address and per WebSocket connection (15). When limited, an address gets one request every 10 seconds; no 429 shape or Retry-After is documented, but `cloid`, per-signer nonces, `expiresAfter` and `noop` make retries safe (10 of 15). No SLA (0). Mainnet is generally available (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 10 + 0 + 10 = 40.\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Bithumb Open API | Hyperliquid | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 34 | 40 | Hyperliquid +6 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 64 | 42 | Bithumb Open API +22 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 67 | 70 | Hyperliquid +3 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 60 | 64 | Hyperliquid +4 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 15 | 55 | Hyperliquid +40 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 69 | 39 | Bithumb Open API +30 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 47 | 26 | Bithumb Open API +21 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **50.6 · D** | **50 · D** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Bithumb Open API | Hyperliquid |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | Bithumb Co., Ltd. | Hyperliquid Labs |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | stdio | |\n| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |\n| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | none | The exchange runs on the Hyperliquid chain (HyperCore), whose node is distributed as a binary under an Apache-2.0 repository; the Python and Rust SDKs are MIT. The API servers and front end are closed |\n| Tools exposed | 41 | 0 |\n| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |\n| llms.txt | yes | yes |\n| Last release | 2026-10-13 | 2026-06-04 |\n| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |\n| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Popularity | 6 stars | 1.9k stars, 167k PyPI/wk |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Bithumb Open API.** Bithumb runs an official local MCP server with 41 tools, module selection and a read-only flag, beside a CLI with per-profile read-only gating and six agent skills, over an API with scoped one-year keys and a mandatory IP list. There is no sandbox, no status page, no documented 429 behaviour, and the fees and terms couldn't be read.\n\n**Hyperliquid.** Hyperliquid's API needs no signup or key, an approved API wallet can trade but not withdraw, fees and rate limits are published with numbers, and a testnet mirrors mainnet. There is no official MCP server, OpenAPI file, status page, changelog or readable terms, and signing uses two schemes the docs say to leave to an SDK.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Bithumb Open API\n\n1. Ask for a key with asset and order inquiry plus order placement only, never withdrawals, with your IP registered; keys expire after one year and a wrong IP answers 401 NotAllowIP\n2. Start the server with `--modules market,account,trade --read-only` for analysis and drop `--read-only` only when the person asks to trade; deposit and withdraw modules stay off\n3. Prefer the `bithumb` CLI for writes, as the skills do, and check `bithumb config show --json` for a read-only profile before any order\n4. Keep the ticker's markets parameter at 200 or fewer, batch orders at 30 and cancels at 30 per request, and stay under 140 private calls a second per category\n5. Retry 422 order_not_ready and 500 server_error after a pause; there is no sandbox, so start with the smallest order the market allows\n\n### Hyperliquid\n\n1. Generate a fresh API wallet, approve it with `approveAgent` with a name and expiry, sign with it, and query with the master address, never the agent address\n2. Use the Python SDK's `sign_l1_action` and `sign_user_signed_action`; mixing the two, field order in msgpack or an uppercase address gives \"User or API Wallet ... does not exist\"\n3. Set a `cloid` on every order and read the per-order `statuses` array; one batch-level error rejects the whole batch\n4. Budget address limits by volume (one action per 1 USDC traded after 10,000); batch orders to lower IP weight, and use WebSocket for data\n5. Arm `scheduleCancel` before unattended trading so open orders are cancelled if the agent stops\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Bithumb Open API or Hyperliquid?\n\nBithumb Open API and Hyperliquid score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 50.6 (D) and 50 (D). Hyperliquid leads on reliability and payments \u0026 pricing.\n\n### Do Bithumb Open API and Hyperliquid need an API key?\n\nBithumb Open API needs an API key. Hyperliquid takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.\n\n### Can an agent call Bithumb Open API and Hyperliquid without installing anything?\n\nBithumb Open API runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. No hosted endpoint is listed for Hyperliquid.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"bithumb\", \"b\": \"hyperliquid\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare bithumb hyperliquid`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bithumb.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hyperliquid.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Bithumb Open API or Hyperliquid\n\n- [Bitfinex API vs Bithumb Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bithumb.md)\n- [Bitfinex API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bitget vs Bithumb Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb.md)\n- [Bitget vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Bitstamp API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bitstamp.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Bybit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bybit.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-coinbase-mcp.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Crypto.com Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-crypto-com-exchange.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Deribit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-deribit.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs dYdX](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-dydx.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Gate](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-gate-io.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Gemini Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-gemini-exchange.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-htx.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Kraken API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-kraken.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs KuCoin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-kucoin.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-okx.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bybit vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Crypto.com Exchange API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Gate vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Gemini Exchange API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [HTX trading API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Binance API vs Bithumb Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bithumb.md)\n- [Binance API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [Deribit vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [dYdX vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs Kraken API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kraken.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs KuCoin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kucoin.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-04", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.7", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Bithumb Open API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "" } ], "description": "Bithumb Open and Hyperliquid score within a point of each other for exchange market data, 50.6 and 50 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Bithumb Open API D 50.6", "Hyperliquid D 50", "scores" ], "h1": "Bithumb Open API vs Hyperliquid", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Bithumb Open vs Hyperliquid for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-03", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 4450, "slim": 2080 }, "version": 1 }