{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "bitget", "name": "Bitget", "vendor": "BTG Technology Holdings Limited", "vendorUrl": "https://www.bitget.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "Bitget is a centralised crypto exchange for spot, margin, futures, earn and tokenised stocks, reached through its Unified Trading Account v3 REST and WebSocket API and an Agent Hub toolkit with a stdio MCP server, CLI and agent skills.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitget.json", "dns": "bitget.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/Bitget-AI/agent-mcp", "transports": [ "stdio" ], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "bitget-mcp-server" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "API key, system-generated secret and user-set passphrase minted under API Key Management after a browser sign-up and identity verification, up to 50 keys per UID, each with read or read-and-write permission, signed per request with HMAC-SHA256 or RSA over timestamp, method, path and body in the ACCESS-KEY, ACCESS-SIGN, ACCESS-TIMESTAMP and ACCESS-PASSPHRASE headers. Binding an IP is recommended, not required. Sub-account keys carry trade or management permission, read-only or read-write, once the main account enables key management for them. Demo keys are minted in demo mode and sent with the paptrading header set to 1 (https://www.bitget.com/legacy-docs/uta/guide, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "The API and the Agent Hub packages cost nothing; trades carry Bitget's fees. Base rates are 0.1 per cent maker and taker on spot and 0.02 per cent maker and 0.06 per cent taker on futures before VIP tiers or the BGB discount, which applies to spot only at a rate the article says to read on the live schedule. The fee page draws its table by script (https://www.bitget.com/support/articles/12560603892734, 20 August 2026, checked 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "0.1% fee", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the UTA docs, the Agent Hub READMEs, the SDK's openapi.yaml or the fee article (checked 2026-11-03).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 14, "popularity": { "githubStars": 234, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://www.bitget.com/api-doc/uta/intro", "registryName": "io.github.Bitget-AI/bitget-agent-mcp", "capabilities": [ "exchange.market-data", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.derivatives", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "exchange.staking", "market.crypto" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "closed-source", "api-key", "usage-priced", "sandbox", "no-status-page", "mcp", "mcp-registry", "official", "read-only-mode", "agent-skills", "cli", "python", "typescript", "go", "java", "php" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-30", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 53.9, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 890, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 15, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 83, "maintenance": 78, "payments": 40, "reliability": 40, "schema": 74, "security": 62, "transparency": 65 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": -8, "negativeNotes": [ "Security incident of 24 September 2026. An attacker who had obtained high-level internal credentials through a vulnerability in a third-party security product injected forged withdrawal commands into Bitget's wallet back end and moved about 388 million dollars in 13 assets on 11 chains from hot and warm wallets. Withdrawals, fiat and C2C were paused from 24 September and restored in phases from 28 September to 2 October 2026; trading, deposits and the API kept running. Bitget says user balances were unaffected, the Protection Fund covered the loss and was topped above 300 million dollars, private keys and cold wallets were untouched, and Mandiant and SlowMist reports of 30 September agree with its account. A fixed, documented incident with a public root cause, so below the top of the range. Sources https://www.bitget.com/academy/12560603896113 (updated 20 October 2026) and https://www.bitget.com/support/articles/12560603896110 (26 September 2026), read 2026-11-03." ], "verdict": "Bitget's official MCP server keeps the default surface to 14 intent tools with discovery, read-only and paper-trading switches, dry runs and a confirmation gate on withdrawals, over an API with demo trading. A 388 million dollar wallet breach in September 2026 paused withdrawals for eight days, and there is no status page, SLA or readable fee table.", "bestFor": "An agent trading spot, futures and earn products in a person's Bitget account outside the prohibited list, with the smallest default MCP surface of the exchanges graded and a paper-trading switch.", "strengths": [ "Official stdio MCP server with 14 intent tools by default, progressive discovery, `--read-only`, `--paper-trading`, `dryRun: true` on writes and `confirm: true` required for withdrawals and cancel-all", "Demo trading on the production host with demo keys and a paptrading header, and a TypeScript agent SDK whose openapi.yaml types all 109 UTA v3 operations", "Terms name BTG Technology Holdings Limited with Hong Kong law, and the privacy notice gives retention periods of 7 and up to 10 years", "Changelog with 58 dated entries since 5 August 2026, including preview notices with demo and live dates for WebSocket changes", "Base fees public in a help article, 0.1 per cent spot and 0.02 per cent maker and 0.06 per cent taker on futures" ], "weaknesses": [ "Hot and warm wallets lost about 388 million dollars on 24 September 2026 to forged withdrawal commands, and withdrawals were paused until 2 October", "No status page, incident history or SLA; the terms disclaim uninterrupted access", "Two official MCP servers coexist, the V2-based bitget-mcp-server on Bitget's own Agent Hub page and the v3 bitget-agent-mcp on GitHub and npm, with different tool counts", "The current api-doc site renders every page as the UTA overview for a reader without script; the legacy docs were used instead", "Keys have read or read-and-write only, with no separate withdrawal permission in the docs read, and IP binding is recommended rather than required" ], "agentNotes": [ "Run `npx -y @bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp --read-only` for research and `--paper-trading` with a demo key before any live order; the two flags cannot be combined", "Call discover({}) first, then the intent verbs; add `dryRun: true` to any write to preview it, and pass `confirm: true` only after the person has agreed to a withdraw or cancelAll", "Send a unique clientOid of at most 64 characters on every order and reuse it on retry; orderId wins when both are sent", "Stay under 10 requests a second per endpoint on a new account and 6,000 a minute per IP; the SDK retries on 429, so do not add a second retry loop", "Bind the key to an IP and keep write permission off a research key; the docs read show no separate withdrawal scope" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 53.9 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 83, "maintenance": 78, "payments": 40, "reliability": 40, "schema": 74, "security": 62, "transparency": 53 }, "provenanceScore": 76, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "npx -y @bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp", "http": "curl https://api.bitget.com/api/v3/market/tickers?category=SPOT\u0026symbol=BTCUSDT", "claudeCode": "claude mcp add bitget -- npx -y @bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp --read-only", "config": { "mcpServers": { "bitget": { "args": [ "-y", "@bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp", "--read-only" ], "command": "npx", "env": { "BITGET_API_KEY": "YOUR_API_KEY", "BITGET_PASSPHRASE": "YOUR_PASSPHRASE", "BITGET_SECRET_KEY": "YOUR_SECRET_KEY" } } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.market-data", "tool": "https://letme.dev/bitget" }, "area": "payments", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Spot trade, base maker or taker", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.1, "note": "before VIP tiers and the BGB discount" }, { "item": "Futures trade, base taker", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.06, "note": "maker 0.02 per cent" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "BTG Technology Holdings Limited", "domain": "bitget.com", "domainRegistered": "2003-02-03", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.bitget.com/support/articles/360014944032-terms-of-use", "privacy": "https://www.bitget.com/support/articles/360015150651", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://www.bitget.com/legacy-docs/uta/changelog", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "Terms of Use last updated 20 October 2026 name BTG Technology Holdings Limited under Hong Kong law with HKIAC arbitration; the privacy notice (5 December 2025) names the same company as controller under the Seychelles Data Protection Act 2023 with BTGT Europe Limited, UAB as EEA representative. /user-agreement and /privacy-policy answer 404; the documents live in the support centre.", "www.bitget.com/robots.txt disallows internal, search, calendar, wiki and register paths; the api-doc, legacy-docs, support, academy, blog and activity-hub paths are allowed.", "RDAP gives bitget.com a registration date of 3 February 2003 (MarkMonitor), earlier than the exchange, so the domain was bought.", "https://www.bitget.com/.well-known/security.txt answers 404; the Agent Hub README gives security@bitget.com for reports. No status page found; status.bitget.com does not resolve and the docs link none.", "The current api-doc site answers every path with the UTA overview for a reader without script; the legacy docs at /legacy-docs/uta/ were read for the guide, rate limits and changelog." ], "score": 76 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget.json", "live": { "slug": "bitget", "versions": [ { "registry": "mcp-registry", "name": "io.github.Bitget-AI/bitget-agent-mcp", "version": "3.0.2", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T17:11:44.552009456Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp", "version": "3.3.1", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:49.846993208Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "bitget-mcp-server", "version": "1.1.0", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:50.714916236Z" } ], "githubStars": 1, "npmWeekly": 255, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://bitget.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:53:53.864777414Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:53.43909091Z" } }, "answer": "Upbit Open API and Bitget score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 54.7 (C) and 53.9 (D). Bitget leads on schema \u0026 documentation, agent ergonomics, payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust.", "b": { "slug": "upbit", "name": "Upbit Open API", "vendor": "Dunamu Inc.", "vendorUrl": "https://docs.upbit.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "Upbit, the Korean exchange run by Dunamu, has a REST and WebSocket Open API for KRW, BTC and USDT market data, orders, balances, deposits and withdrawals, with official SDKs, a CLI and agent skills but no MCP server.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/upbit", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/upbit.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/upbit.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/upbit.json", "dns": "upbit.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/upbit-official", "transports": [], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@upbit-official/upbit-cli" }, { "registry": "pypi", "name": "upbit-sdk" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "Access and secret keys issued on the PC web site under My Page \u003e Open API Management after identity verification and two-factor authentication. At issuance the person picks the functions the key may use and must register at least one public IPv4 address, since the allow-list is mandatory. Each request carries a JWT signed with HMAC SHA512 over the access key, a fresh nonce and a SHA512 hash of the query, as a Bearer token. A key with withdrawal permission gets a withdrawal safe-lock by default that is lifted only in the mobile app. Up to 10 keys on the main pocket and 5 per sub-pocket; expired keys answer expired_access_key (https://docs.upbit.com/kr/docs/api-key.md, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "Trading fees per fill. The fee schedule is on upbit.com, whose robots.txt disallows every path for our crawler, so no rate is recorded. Public quotation endpoints need no key and no account (https://upbit.com/robots.txt, checked 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "Pay per use", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the developer docs, llms.txt, the SDK licence or the CLI docs (checked 2026-11-03). Fees are taken from each fill.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 0, "popularity": { "githubStars": 91, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://docs.upbit.com/kr/reference/api-overview", "llmsTxt": "https://docs.upbit.com/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "exchange.market-data", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "market.crypto" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "api-key", "closed-source", "usage-priced", "cli", "agent-skills", "llms-txt", "python", "typescript", "go", "no-status-page" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-20", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 54.7, "grade": "C", "agentReady": false, "rank": 860, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 14, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 83, "payments": 15, "reliability": 42, "schema": 66, "security": 59, "transparency": 54 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Upbit's Open API has a mandatory IP allow-list, scoped keys with a default withdrawal lock, per-group rate limits with 429 and 418 signalling, an order-test endpoint, official SDKs, a CLI and agent skills with a CONFIRM gate. There is no MCP server, sandbox or status page, and the fees and terms sit on a host our crawler may not read.", "bestFor": "KRW-market trading for agents acting for a verified Korean account, with first-party SDKs, a CLI and skills but no MCP.", "strengths": [ "Keys need a registered public IP, carry only the chosen functions and get a withdrawal safe-lock by default that only the mobile app lifts", "Rate limits published per group with numbers, a Remaining-Req header on every response, 429 then 418 with a stated block length", "POST /v1/orders/test checks an order and the pair's state at no cost, and the skills run it before a live order", "Official Python, TypeScript and Go SDKs at v1.1.0 (20 October 2026), a CLI with JSON output and agent skills that require a typed CONFIRM before any write", "Notices carry effective dates, such as the path-format change of 16 November 2026" ], "weaknesses": [ "No MCP server; the agent route is the CLI through skills, which need a terminal", "No sandbox or testnet beyond the order-test endpoint, and no status page or SLA", "Keys can only be issued on the PC web site after Korean identity verification and 2FA, and the exchange serves the Korean market", "The fee schedule, user terms and Open API terms are on upbit.com, which disallows every crawler path, so none is recorded first-hand", "The SDK licence page says the SDK material is not open source while the GitHub repositories carry Apache-2.0" ], "agentNotes": [ "Ask the person for a key with only the functions the task needs and your server's public IPv4 address registered; a private or unregistered IP is refused", "Sign every request with a fresh JWT (HS512, new nonce, SHA512 query hash) and branch on error.name, not error.message", "Run POST /v1/orders/test before a live order; it costs nothing and shares the 8-a-second order-test group", "Read Remaining-Req and keep orders under 12 a second per pocket; on 429 wait for the next second and on 418 wait out the stated block", "Leave the withdrawal safe-lock on unless the person lifts it in the app, and send paths with single slashes and no trailing slash before 16 November 2026" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "C", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 54.7 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 83, "payments": 15, "reliability": 42, "schema": 66, "security": 59, "transparency": 42 }, "provenanceScore": 66, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "npm install -g @upbit-official/upbit-cli", "http": "curl 'https://api.upbit.com/v1/ticker?markets=KRW-BTC'" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.market-data", "tool": "https://letme.dev/upbit" }, "area": "payments", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Dunamu Inc.", "domain": "upbit.com", "domainRegistered": "2004-01-10", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "", "privacy": "https://docs.upbit.com/kr/page/privacy_policy_v1_5.md", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://docs.upbit.com/kr/changelog", "securityTxt": "unknown", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "Dunamu Inc. is named as the licensor in the Upbit Developer SDK License v1.0 and as the company in the developer centre's privacy policy V1.5 (from 18 May 2026).", "upbit.com/robots.txt disallows every path for User-agent * (a second group adds /terms_and_policy and others), allowing only Googlebot, MSNBot, Yeti and Daumoa; sg.upbit.com and www.dunamu.com do the same. The user terms, the Open API terms, the fee schedule and security.txt on those hosts were therefore not fetched; the terms URL is left empty.", "docs.upbit.com/robots.txt allows everything but edit, login and api-next paths and points to llms.txt, with Content-Signal ai-train=yes, search=yes, ai-input=yes.", "RDAP gives upbit.com a registration date of 10 January 2004.", "No status page found; the API has a service-status (wallet status) endpoint and an announcements WebSocket stream." ], "score": 66 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/upbit.json", "live": { "slug": "upbit", "securityTxt": { "url": "https://upbit.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:53:27.560288922Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T15:53:27.560288922Z" } }, "edges": [ { "by": 25, "category": "payments", "leads": "bitget", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "reasons": { "a": "No machine payment protocol (0). Base spot and futures rates are stated in a help article without login, the tier table draws by script (20). Market data needs no key, demo trading costs nothing and no card is asked for at sign-up (20). A person registers, verifies identity and mints the key in a browser (0). 40.", "b": "No machine payment protocol (0). The fee schedule is on upbit.com, which disallows every crawler path, so no price is recorded (0 of 20, unchecked). Public quotation endpoints need no key, card or account; trading needs a verified Korean account. Judgement call (15 of 20). A person must sign up, pass identity checks and issue keys on the PC web site (0). 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 15." }, "scores": { "a": 40, "b": 15 } }, { "by": 13, "category": "ergonomics", "leads": "bitget", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "reasons": { "a": "Read for the API with the MCP server as the agent route. 14 compact tools by default, module filters, a full surface on request and progressive discovery (25). Cursor pagination on CFD order history since 15 October 2026 and limit parameters on lists (15 of 20). Uniform ok or error result shape from the SDK with typed error classes and compact JSON in the text channel (13 of 20). clientOid on orders, `dryRun: true` on every write, `confirm: true` gating cancelAll and withdraw, annotations derived from risk level including readOnlyHint, destructiveHint and idempotentHint (18 of 20). Few required fields, official SDKs in five languages plus the TypeScript agent SDK and a CLI (12 of 15). 83.", "b": "Graded on the REST API with the CLI. Candle counts, list limits and the CLI's --max-items and --transform size responses (16 of 25). Paging and filters on orders and history (15 of 20). error.name codes to branch on, which the November 2026 notice tells clients to use, and 418 with its block length (15 of 20). An order-test endpoint and a CONFIRM gate in the skills; an order identifier for idempotent placement was not checked (11 of 20). Few required parameters, SDKs in three languages and a CLI, but keys need the PC web site and a registered IP (13 of 15). 16 + 15 + 15 + 11 + 13 = 70." }, "scores": { "a": 83, "b": 70 } }, { "by": 11, "category": "transparency", "leads": "bitget", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "reasons": { "a": "The editorial half. A closed hosted service with clear terms naming BTG Technology Holdings Limited; the toolkit is MIT (15 of 30). The privacy notice names the controller and EEA representative, gives 7-year and up to 10-year retention for compliance and litigation, and names recipients by category only (18 of 30). Deprecations and parameter changes carry effective dates (delta mode deprecated 27 August, symbol and category required from 30 September, snapshot changes with demo and live dates) but no written policy (15 of 20). Recipients by category, transfers under Seychelles law with no locations or provider names (5 of 20). 53.", "b": "The editorial half. A closed service whose user and Open API terms could not be fetched under upbit.com's robots.txt, and whose SDK licence page calls the SDK material not open source while the repositories carry Apache-2.0 (8 of 30). The developer centre's privacy policy names Dunamu Inc., gives retention periods and names Zendesk in Japan; the main privacy policy was not read (14 of 30). Notices with effective dates, including the path-format change and the deprecated Remaining-Req min field (12 of 20). Zendesk and Google Analytics named with a location for the developer centre only (8 of 20). 8 + 14 + 12 + 8 = 42." }, "scores": { "a": 65, "b": 54 } }, { "by": 8, "category": "schema", "leads": "bitget", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "reasons": { "a": "The agent SDK ships openapi.yaml with 109 typed UTA v3 operations from which the tools are generated, a machine-readable contract from the vendor's own organisation though not on the docs site (20 of 25). llms.txt in the SDK and MCP repositories; the docs site has none (6 of 10). Intent tools with a discover tool that explains each verb, action and its risk level, and the server's initialize instructions state surface, modules and read-only posture (15 of 20). Typed inputs with enums and required fields from the OpenAPI source (12 of 15). Examples in the quick start and READMEs, a REST error code page in the legacy docs that we did not read in full (9 of 15). Changelog by day with preview notices and effective dates (12 of 15). 74.", "b": "No OpenAPI found; the reference is a readme.io site with a Markdown twin of every page (5 of 25). llms.txt on docs.upbit.com and a kr/llms.txt index (10). Each reference page states what the endpoint does, its group and its errors, with warnings such as market_offline after maintenance (14 of 20). Typed parameters with enums for order type, side and time in force and required flags (11 of 15). Recipes in Python, Java and Node.js and an error format of error.name and error.message with HTTP statuses (13 of 15). Feature versions in page histories (v1.6.1) and dated notices with effective dates, no single API version (13 of 15). 5 + 10 + 14 + 11 + 13 + 13 = 66." }, "scores": { "a": 74, "b": 66 } }, { "by": 5, "category": "maintenance", "leads": "upbit", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "reasons": { "a": "Read as a hosted service with an open-source toolkit. The UTA changelog's latest launched entry is 30 October 2026 and a preview entry 3 November; the MCP package shipped 3.3.1 on 20 September and agent-skill was pushed 30 October (30). 58 dated changelog entries since 5 August 2026 and six MCP versions since June (20). Issue trackers on the Bitget-AI repositories (11 open on agent_hub) and a support centre; replies were not checked (10 of 25). In the official MCP registry under io.github.Bitget-AI, a GitHub namespace, with official SDKs in five languages (10 of 15). CI workflow with coverage, npm provenance attestations, two runtime dependencies, no install scripts (8 of 10). 78.", "b": "Read as a closed service. SDK v1.1.0 on 20 October 2026 (30). The CLI 1.0.0 on 1 September, the rate-limit update of 7 October, the SDK on 20 October and the path-format notice for 16 November 2026 (20). open-api@upbit.com answers in turn on weekdays per the support notice, notices carry dates, and the six upbit-official repositories show no open issues (12 of 15). Current official SDKs in Python, TypeScript and Go (15). Apache-2.0 repositories pushed in October 2026; CI not checked (6 of 10). 30 + 20 + 12 + 15 + 6 = 83." }, "scores": { "a": 78, "b": 83 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "HTTP API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "BTG Technology Holdings Limited", "b": "Dunamu Inc.", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "stdio", "b": "", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "API key", "b": "API key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Pay per use", "b": "Pay per use", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "14", "b": "0", "name": "Tools exposed" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "no", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "io.github.Bitget-AI/bitget-agent-mcp", "b": "not listed", "name": "MCP registry" }, { "a": "2026-10-30", "b": "2026-10-20", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "2026-10-20", "b": "no document linked", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "2025-12-05", "b": "no date given", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not read yet", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "not read yet", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not read yet", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "not read yet", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "not read yet", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "234 stars", "b": "91 stars", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Upbit Open API and Bitget score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 54.7 (C) and 53.9 (D). Bitget leads on schema \u0026 documentation, agent ergonomics, payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Bitget or Upbit Open API?" }, { "answer": "Both need an API key.", "question": "Do Bitget and Upbit Open API need an API key?" }, { "answer": "Bitget runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. No hosted endpoint is listed for Upbit Open API.", "question": "Can an agent call Bitget and Upbit Open API without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Schema \u0026 documentation, 74 against 66", "Agent ergonomics, 83 against 70", "Payments \u0026 pricing, 40 against 15", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 65 against 54" ], "also": [ "Runs on your own machine" ], "goodFor": "An agent trading spot, futures and earn products in a person's Bitget account outside the prohibited list, with the smallest default MCP surface of the exchanges graded and a paper-trading switch.", "slug": "bitget", "watchFor": "Hot and warm wallets lost about 388 million dollars on 24 September 2026 to forged withdrawal commands, and withdrawals were paused until 2 October" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Maintenance \u0026 community, 83 against 78" ], "also": [ "No incidents deducted, where Bitget loses 8 points for them" ], "goodFor": "KRW-market trading for agents acting for a verified Korean account, with first-party SDKs, a CLI and skills but no MCP.", "slug": "upbit", "watchFor": "No MCP server; the agent route is the CLI through skills, which need a terminal" } ], "history": null, "job": { "capability": "exchange.market-data", "name": "Exchange market data" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitget.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs Bitget", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitget" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb.json", "title": "Bitget vs Bithumb Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp.json", "title": "Bitget vs Bitstamp API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bybit.json", "title": "Bitget vs Bybit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bybit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.json", "title": "Bitget vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-mcp.json", "title": "Bitget vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-crypto-com-exchange.json", "title": "Bitget vs Crypto.com Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-crypto-com-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-deribit.json", "title": "Bitget vs Deribit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-deribit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-dydx.json", "title": "Bitget vs dYdX", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-dydx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gate-io.json", "title": "Bitget vs Gate", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gate-io" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gemini-exchange.json", "title": "Bitget vs Gemini Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gemini-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-htx.json", "title": "Bitget vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bitget vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kraken.json", "title": "Bitget vs Kraken API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kraken" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kucoin.json", "title": "Bitget vs KuCoin", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kucoin" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Bitget vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-okx.json", "title": "Bitget vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "Bitget vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Bybit vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Crypto.com Exchange API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Deribit vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-upbit.json", "title": "dYdX vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Gate vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Gemini Exchange API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-upbit.json", "title": "HTX trading API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kucoin-vs-upbit.json", "title": "KuCoin vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kucoin-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-upbit.json", "title": "MEXC API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitget.json", "title": "Binance API vs Bitget", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitget" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Binance API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kraken-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Kraken API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kraken-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/okx-vs-upbit.json", "title": "OKX API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/okx-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/uniswap-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Uniswap Trading API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/uniswap-vs-upbit" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "bitget": 40, "by": 2, "edge": "upbit", "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "upbit": 42, "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "bitget": 74, "by": 8, "edge": "bitget", "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "upbit": 66, "weight": 13 }, { "bitget": 83, "by": 13, "edge": "bitget", "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "upbit": 70, "weight": 13 }, { "bitget": 62, "by": 3, "edge": "bitget", "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "upbit": 59, "weight": 14 }, { "bitget": 40, "by": 25, "edge": "bitget", "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "upbit": 15, "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "bitget": 78, "by": 5, "edge": "upbit", "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "upbit": 83, "weight": 7 }, { "bitget": 65, "by": 11, "edge": "bitget", "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "upbit": 54, "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "Upbit Open API and Bitget score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 54.7 (C) and 53.9 (D). Bitget leads on schema \u0026 documentation, agent ergonomics, payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do exchange market data.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "bitget": "Bitget's official MCP server keeps the default surface to 14 intent tools with discovery, read-only and paper-trading switches, dry runs and a confirmation gate on withdrawals, over an API with demo trading. A 388 million dollar wallet breach in September 2026 paused withdrawals for eight days, and there is no status page, SLA or readable fee table.", "upbit": "Upbit's Open API has a mandatory IP allow-list, scoped keys with a default withdrawal lock, per-group rate limits with 429 and 418 signalling, an order-test endpoint, official SDKs, a CLI and agent skills with a CONFIRM gate. There is no MCP server, sandbox or status page, and the fees and terms sit on a host our crawler may not read." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-upbit", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-upbit.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-upbit.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-upbit.min.md" }, "markdown": "Upbit Open API and Bitget score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 54.7 (C) and 53.9 (D). Bitget leads on schema \u0026 documentation, agent ergonomics, payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do exchange market data.\n\n- Bitget: grade D, 53.9/100, rank #890 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitget.json\n- Upbit Open API: grade C, 54.7/100, rank #860 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/upbit.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/upbit.json\n- Best crypto exchange APIs and MCP servers for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n- All 210 exchanges comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Bitget (D)\n\nGood for: An agent trading spot, futures and earn products in a person's Bitget account outside the prohibited list, with the smallest default MCP surface of the exchanges graded and a paper-trading switch.\n\nAhead on:\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 74 against 66\n- Agent ergonomics, 83 against 70\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 40 against 15\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 65 against 54\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- Runs on your own machine\n\nWatch for: Hot and warm wallets lost about 388 million dollars on 24 September 2026 to forged withdrawal commands, and withdrawals were paused until 2 October\n\n### Upbit Open API (C)\n\nGood for: KRW-market trading for agents acting for a verified Korean account, with first-party SDKs, a CLI and skills but no MCP.\n\nAhead on:\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 83 against 78\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- No incidents deducted, where Bitget loses 8 points for them\n\nWatch for: No MCP server; the agent route is the CLI through skills, which need a terminal\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Payments \u0026 pricing: Bitget +25\n\n- Bitget (40): No machine payment protocol (0). Base spot and futures rates are stated in a help article without login, the tier table draws by script (20). Market data needs no key, demo trading costs nothing and no card is asked for at sign-up (20). A person registers, verifies identity and mints the key in a browser (0). 40.\n- Upbit Open API (15): No machine payment protocol (0). The fee schedule is on upbit.com, which disallows every crawler path, so no price is recorded (0 of 20, unchecked). Public quotation endpoints need no key, card or account; trading needs a verified Korean account. Judgement call (15 of 20). A person must sign up, pass identity checks and issue keys on the PC web site (0). 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 15.\n\n### Agent ergonomics: Bitget +13\n\n- Bitget (83): Read for the API with the MCP server as the agent route. 14 compact tools by default, module filters, a full surface on request and progressive discovery (25). Cursor pagination on CFD order history since 15 October 2026 and limit parameters on lists (15 of 20). Uniform ok or error result shape from the SDK with typed error classes and compact JSON in the text channel (13 of 20). clientOid on orders, `dryRun: true` on every write, `confirm: true` gating cancelAll and withdraw, annotations derived from risk level including readOnlyHint, destructiveHint and idempotentHint (18 of 20). Few required fields, official SDKs in five languages plus the TypeScript agent SDK and a CLI (12 of 15). 83.\n- Upbit Open API (70): Graded on the REST API with the CLI. Candle counts, list limits and the CLI's --max-items and --transform size responses (16 of 25). Paging and filters on orders and history (15 of 20). error.name codes to branch on, which the November 2026 notice tells clients to use, and 418 with its block length (15 of 20). An order-test endpoint and a CONFIRM gate in the skills; an order identifier for idempotent placement was not checked (11 of 20). Few required parameters, SDKs in three languages and a CLI, but keys need the PC web site and a registered IP (13 of 15). 16 + 15 + 15 + 11 + 13 = 70.\n\n### Transparency \u0026 trust: Bitget +11\n\n- Bitget (65): The editorial half. A closed hosted service with clear terms naming BTG Technology Holdings Limited; the toolkit is MIT (15 of 30). The privacy notice names the controller and EEA representative, gives 7-year and up to 10-year retention for compliance and litigation, and names recipients by category only (18 of 30). Deprecations and parameter changes carry effective dates (delta mode deprecated 27 August, symbol and category required from 30 September, snapshot changes with demo and live dates) but no written policy (15 of 20). Recipients by category, transfers under Seychelles law with no locations or provider names (5 of 20). 53.\n- Upbit Open API (54): The editorial half. A closed service whose user and Open API terms could not be fetched under upbit.com's robots.txt, and whose SDK licence page calls the SDK material not open source while the repositories carry Apache-2.0 (8 of 30). The developer centre's privacy policy names Dunamu Inc., gives retention periods and names Zendesk in Japan; the main privacy policy was not read (14 of 30). Notices with effective dates, including the path-format change and the deprecated Remaining-Req min field (12 of 20). Zendesk and Google Analytics named with a location for the developer centre only (8 of 20). 8 + 14 + 12 + 8 = 42.\n\n### Schema \u0026 documentation: Bitget +8\n\n- Bitget (74): The agent SDK ships openapi.yaml with 109 typed UTA v3 operations from which the tools are generated, a machine-readable contract from the vendor's own organisation though not on the docs site (20 of 25). llms.txt in the SDK and MCP repositories; the docs site has none (6 of 10). Intent tools with a discover tool that explains each verb, action and its risk level, and the server's initialize instructions state surface, modules and read-only posture (15 of 20). Typed inputs with enums and required fields from the OpenAPI source (12 of 15). Examples in the quick start and READMEs, a REST error code page in the legacy docs that we did not read in full (9 of 15). Changelog by day with preview notices and effective dates (12 of 15). 74.\n- Upbit Open API (66): No OpenAPI found; the reference is a readme.io site with a Markdown twin of every page (5 of 25). llms.txt on docs.upbit.com and a kr/llms.txt index (10). Each reference page states what the endpoint does, its group and its errors, with warnings such as market_offline after maintenance (14 of 20). Typed parameters with enums for order type, side and time in force and required flags (11 of 15). Recipes in Python, Java and Node.js and an error format of error.name and error.message with HTTP statuses (13 of 15). Feature versions in page histories (v1.6.1) and dated notices with effective dates, no single API version (13 of 15). 5 + 10 + 14 + 11 + 13 + 13 = 66.\n\n### Maintenance \u0026 community: Upbit Open API +5\n\n- Bitget (78): Read as a hosted service with an open-source toolkit. The UTA changelog's latest launched entry is 30 October 2026 and a preview entry 3 November; the MCP package shipped 3.3.1 on 20 September and agent-skill was pushed 30 October (30). 58 dated changelog entries since 5 August 2026 and six MCP versions since June (20). Issue trackers on the Bitget-AI repositories (11 open on agent_hub) and a support centre; replies were not checked (10 of 25). In the official MCP registry under io.github.Bitget-AI, a GitHub namespace, with official SDKs in five languages (10 of 15). CI workflow with coverage, npm provenance attestations, two runtime dependencies, no install scripts (8 of 10). 78.\n- Upbit Open API (83): Read as a closed service. SDK v1.1.0 on 20 October 2026 (30). The CLI 1.0.0 on 1 September, the rate-limit update of 7 October, the SDK on 20 October and the path-format notice for 16 November 2026 (20). open-api@upbit.com answers in turn on weekdays per the support notice, notices carry dates, and the six upbit-official repositories show no open issues (12 of 15). Current official SDKs in Python, TypeScript and Go (15). Apache-2.0 repositories pushed in October 2026; CI not checked (6 of 10). 30 + 20 + 12 + 15 + 6 = 83.\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Bitget | Upbit Open API | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 40 | 42 | Upbit Open API +2 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 74 | 66 | Bitget +8 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 83 | 70 | Bitget +13 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 62 | 59 | Bitget +3 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 40 | 15 | Bitget +25 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 78 | 83 | Upbit Open API +5 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 65 | 54 | Bitget +11 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | -8 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **53.9 · D** | **54.7 · C** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Bitget | Upbit Open API |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | BTG Technology Holdings Limited | Dunamu Inc. |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | stdio | |\n| Auth | API key | API key |\n| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Tools exposed | 14 | 0 |\n| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |\n| llms.txt | no | yes |\n| MCP registry | `io.github.Bitget-AI/bitget-agent-mcp` | not listed |\n| Last release | 2026-10-30 | 2026-10-20 |\n| Terms last updated | 2026-10-20 | no document linked |\n| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-12-05 | no date given |\n| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not read yet |\n| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not read yet |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not read yet |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not read yet |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not read yet |\n| Popularity | 234 stars | 91 stars |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Bitget.** Bitget's official MCP server keeps the default surface to 14 intent tools with discovery, read-only and paper-trading switches, dry runs and a confirmation gate on withdrawals, over an API with demo trading. A 388 million dollar wallet breach in September 2026 paused withdrawals for eight days, and there is no status page, SLA or readable fee table.\n\n**Upbit Open API.** Upbit's Open API has a mandatory IP allow-list, scoped keys with a default withdrawal lock, per-group rate limits with 429 and 418 signalling, an order-test endpoint, official SDKs, a CLI and agent skills with a CONFIRM gate. There is no MCP server, sandbox or status page, and the fees and terms sit on a host our crawler may not read.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Bitget\n\n1. Run `npx -y @bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp --read-only` for research and `--paper-trading` with a demo key before any live order; the two flags cannot be combined\n2. Call discover({}) first, then the intent verbs; add `dryRun: true` to any write to preview it, and pass `confirm: true` only after the person has agreed to a withdraw or cancelAll\n3. Send a unique clientOid of at most 64 characters on every order and reuse it on retry; orderId wins when both are sent\n4. Stay under 10 requests a second per endpoint on a new account and 6,000 a minute per IP; the SDK retries on 429, so do not add a second retry loop\n5. Bind the key to an IP and keep write permission off a research key; the docs read show no separate withdrawal scope\n\n### Upbit Open API\n\n1. Ask the person for a key with only the functions the task needs and your server's public IPv4 address registered; a private or unregistered IP is refused\n2. Sign every request with a fresh JWT (HS512, new nonce, SHA512 query hash) and branch on error.name, not error.message\n3. Run POST /v1/orders/test before a live order; it costs nothing and shares the 8-a-second order-test group\n4. Read Remaining-Req and keep orders under 12 a second per pocket; on 429 wait for the next second and on 418 wait out the stated block\n5. Leave the withdrawal safe-lock on unless the person lifts it in the app, and send paths with single slashes and no trailing slash before 16 November 2026\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Bitget or Upbit Open API?\n\nUpbit Open API and Bitget score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 54.7 (C) and 53.9 (D). Bitget leads on schema \u0026 documentation, agent ergonomics, payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust.\n\n### Do Bitget and Upbit Open API need an API key?\n\nBoth need an API key.\n\n### Can an agent call Bitget and Upbit Open API without installing anything?\n\nBitget runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. No hosted endpoint is listed for Upbit Open API.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-upbit.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-upbit.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"bitget\", \"b\": \"upbit\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare bitget upbit`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitget.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/upbit.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Bitget or Upbit Open API\n\n- [Bitfinex API vs Bitget](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitget.md)\n- [Bitfinex API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Bitget vs Bithumb Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb.md)\n- [Bitget vs Bitstamp API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp.md)\n- [Bitget vs Bybit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bybit.md)\n- [Bitget vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.md)\n- [Bitget vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-mcp.md)\n- [Bitget vs Crypto.com Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-crypto-com-exchange.md)\n- [Bitget vs Deribit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-deribit.md)\n- [Bitget vs dYdX](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-dydx.md)\n- [Bitget vs Gate](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gate-io.md)\n- [Bitget vs Gemini Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gemini-exchange.md)\n- [Bitget vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-htx.md)\n- [Bitget vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bitget vs Kraken API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kraken.md)\n- [Bitget vs KuCoin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kucoin.md)\n- [Bitget vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Bitget vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-okx.md)\n- [Bitget vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Bybit vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Crypto.com Exchange API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Deribit vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-upbit.md)\n- [dYdX vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Gate vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Gemini Exchange API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-upbit.md)\n- [HTX trading API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-upbit.md)\n- [KuCoin vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kucoin-vs-upbit.md)\n- [MEXC API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Binance API vs Bitget](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitget.md)\n- [Binance API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Kraken API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kraken-vs-upbit.md)\n- [OKX API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/okx-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Uniswap Trading API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/uniswap-vs-upbit.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-04", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.7", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Bitget vs Upbit Open API", "url": "" } ], "description": "Upbit Open and Bitget score within a point of each other for exchange market data, 54.7 and 53.9 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Bitget D 53.9", "Upbit Open API C 54.7", "scores" ], "h1": "Bitget vs Upbit Open API", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/bitget-vs-upbit", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Bitget vs Upbit Open for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-03", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-upbit" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 4400, "slim": 2280 }, "version": 1 }