{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "bitget", "name": "Bitget", "vendor": "BTG Technology Holdings Limited", "vendorUrl": "https://www.bitget.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "Bitget is a centralised crypto exchange for spot, margin, futures, earn and tokenised stocks, reached through its Unified Trading Account v3 REST and WebSocket API and an Agent Hub toolkit with a stdio MCP server, CLI and agent skills.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitget.json", "dns": "bitget.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/Bitget-AI/agent-mcp", "transports": [ "stdio" ], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "bitget-mcp-server" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "API key, system-generated secret and user-set passphrase minted under API Key Management after a browser sign-up and identity verification, up to 50 keys per UID, each with read or read-and-write permission, signed per request with HMAC-SHA256 or RSA over timestamp, method, path and body in the ACCESS-KEY, ACCESS-SIGN, ACCESS-TIMESTAMP and ACCESS-PASSPHRASE headers. Binding an IP is recommended, not required. Sub-account keys carry trade or management permission, read-only or read-write, once the main account enables key management for them. Demo keys are minted in demo mode and sent with the paptrading header set to 1 (https://www.bitget.com/legacy-docs/uta/guide, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "The API and the Agent Hub packages cost nothing; trades carry Bitget's fees. Base rates are 0.1 per cent maker and taker on spot and 0.02 per cent maker and 0.06 per cent taker on futures before VIP tiers or the BGB discount, which applies to spot only at a rate the article says to read on the live schedule. The fee page draws its table by script (https://www.bitget.com/support/articles/12560603892734, 20 August 2026, checked 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "0.1% fee", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the UTA docs, the Agent Hub READMEs, the SDK's openapi.yaml or the fee article (checked 2026-11-03).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 14, "popularity": { "githubStars": 234, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://www.bitget.com/api-doc/uta/intro", "registryName": "io.github.Bitget-AI/bitget-agent-mcp", "capabilities": [ "exchange.market-data", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.derivatives", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "exchange.staking", "market.crypto" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "closed-source", "api-key", "usage-priced", "sandbox", "no-status-page", "mcp", "mcp-registry", "official", "read-only-mode", "agent-skills", "cli", "python", "typescript", "go", "java", "php" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-30", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 53.9, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 824, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 15, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 83, "maintenance": 78, "payments": 40, "reliability": 40, "schema": 74, "security": 62, "transparency": 65 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": -8, "negativeNotes": [ "Security incident of 24 September 2026. An attacker who had obtained high-level internal credentials through a vulnerability in a third-party security product injected forged withdrawal commands into Bitget's wallet back end and moved about 388 million dollars in 13 assets on 11 chains from hot and warm wallets. Withdrawals, fiat and C2C were paused from 24 September and restored in phases from 28 September to 2 October 2026; trading, deposits and the API kept running. Bitget says user balances were unaffected, the Protection Fund covered the loss and was topped above 300 million dollars, private keys and cold wallets were untouched, and Mandiant and SlowMist reports of 30 September agree with its account. A fixed, documented incident with a public root cause, so below the top of the range. Sources https://www.bitget.com/academy/12560603896113 (updated 20 October 2026) and https://www.bitget.com/support/articles/12560603896110 (26 September 2026), read 2026-11-03." ], "verdict": "Bitget's official MCP server keeps the default surface to 14 intent tools with discovery, read-only and paper-trading switches, dry runs and a confirmation gate on withdrawals, over an API with demo trading. A 388 million dollar wallet breach in September 2026 paused withdrawals for eight days, and there is no status page, SLA or readable fee table.", "bestFor": "An agent trading spot, futures and earn products in a person's Bitget account outside the prohibited list, with the smallest default MCP surface of the exchanges graded and a paper-trading switch.", "strengths": [ "Official stdio MCP server with 14 intent tools by default, progressive discovery, `--read-only`, `--paper-trading`, `dryRun: true` on writes and `confirm: true` required for withdrawals and cancel-all", "Demo trading on the production host with demo keys and a paptrading header, and a TypeScript agent SDK whose openapi.yaml types all 109 UTA v3 operations", "Terms name BTG Technology Holdings Limited with Hong Kong law, and the privacy notice gives retention periods of 7 and up to 10 years", "Changelog with 58 dated entries since 5 August 2026, including preview notices with demo and live dates for WebSocket changes", "Base fees public in a help article, 0.1 per cent spot and 0.02 per cent maker and 0.06 per cent taker on futures" ], "weaknesses": [ "Hot and warm wallets lost about 388 million dollars on 24 September 2026 to forged withdrawal commands, and withdrawals were paused until 2 October", "No status page, incident history or SLA; the terms disclaim uninterrupted access", "Two official MCP servers coexist, the V2-based bitget-mcp-server on Bitget's own Agent Hub page and the v3 bitget-agent-mcp on GitHub and npm, with different tool counts", "The current api-doc site renders every page as the UTA overview for a reader without script; the legacy docs were used instead", "Keys have read or read-and-write only, with no separate withdrawal permission in the docs read, and IP binding is recommended rather than required" ], "agentNotes": [ "Run `npx -y @bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp --read-only` for research and `--paper-trading` with a demo key before any live order; the two flags cannot be combined", "Call discover({}) first, then the intent verbs; add `dryRun: true` to any write to preview it, and pass `confirm: true` only after the person has agreed to a withdraw or cancelAll", "Send a unique clientOid of at most 64 characters on every order and reuse it on retry; orderId wins when both are sent", "Stay under 10 requests a second per endpoint on a new account and 6,000 a minute per IP; the SDK retries on 429, so do not add a second retry loop", "Bind the key to an IP and keep write permission off a research key; the docs read show no separate withdrawal scope" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 53.9 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 83, "maintenance": 78, "payments": 40, "reliability": 40, "schema": 74, "security": 62, "transparency": 53 }, "provenanceScore": 76, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "npx -y @bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp", "http": "curl https://api.bitget.com/api/v3/market/tickers?category=SPOT\u0026symbol=BTCUSDT", "claudeCode": "claude mcp add bitget -- npx -y @bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp --read-only", "config": { "mcpServers": { "bitget": { "args": [ "-y", "@bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp", "--read-only" ], "command": "npx", "env": { "BITGET_API_KEY": "YOUR_API_KEY", "BITGET_PASSPHRASE": "YOUR_PASSPHRASE", "BITGET_SECRET_KEY": "YOUR_SECRET_KEY" } } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.market-data", "tool": "https://letme.dev/bitget" }, "area": "payments", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Spot trade, base maker or taker", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.1, "note": "before VIP tiers and the BGB discount" }, { "item": "Futures trade, base taker", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.06, "note": "maker 0.02 per cent" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "BTG Technology Holdings Limited", "domain": "bitget.com", "domainRegistered": "2003-02-03", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.bitget.com/support/articles/360014944032-terms-of-use", "privacy": "https://www.bitget.com/support/articles/360015150651", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://www.bitget.com/legacy-docs/uta/changelog", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "Terms of Use last updated 20 October 2026 name BTG Technology Holdings Limited under Hong Kong law with HKIAC arbitration; the privacy notice (5 December 2025) names the same company as controller under the Seychelles Data Protection Act 2023 with BTGT Europe Limited, UAB as EEA representative. /user-agreement and /privacy-policy answer 404; the documents live in the support centre.", "www.bitget.com/robots.txt disallows internal, search, calendar, wiki and register paths; the api-doc, legacy-docs, support, academy, blog and activity-hub paths are allowed.", "RDAP gives bitget.com a registration date of 3 February 2003 (MarkMonitor), earlier than the exchange, so the domain was bought.", "https://www.bitget.com/.well-known/security.txt answers 404; the Agent Hub README gives security@bitget.com for reports. No status page found; status.bitget.com does not resolve and the docs link none.", "The current api-doc site answers every path with the UTA overview for a reader without script; the legacy docs at /legacy-docs/uta/ were read for the guide, rate limits and changelog." ], "score": 76 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget.json", "live": { "slug": "bitget", "versions": [ { "registry": "mcp-registry", "name": "io.github.Bitget-AI/bitget-agent-mcp", "version": "3.0.2", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T17:11:44.552009456Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp", "version": "3.3.1", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:49.846993208Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "bitget-mcp-server", "version": "1.1.0", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:50.714916236Z" } ], "githubStars": 1, "npmWeekly": 255, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://bitget.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:53:53.864777414Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:53.43909091Z" } }, "answer": "MEXC API scores 56.3 (C) on agent readiness against Bitget's 53.9 (D), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Bitget leads on schema \u0026 documentation, agent ergonomics, payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust.", "b": { "slug": "mexc", "name": "MEXC API", "vendor": "MEXC (Comoros) Ltd", "vendorUrl": "https://www.mexc.com/mexc-api", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "MEXC's spot and futures API gives programmatic access to market data, orders, balances, transfers and withdrawals over REST and WebSocket, with an official command-line tool that also runs as a local MCP server for AI agents.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mexc", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mexc.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mexc.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/mexc.json", "dns": "mexc.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/mexcdevelop", "transports": [ "stdio" ], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@mexc-ai/cli" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "API keys made at mexc.com/user/openapi after a browser sign-up; the futures API also needs identity verification. The key goes in the X-MEXC-APIKEY header and signed endpoints carry an HMAC SHA256 signature with a timestamp and a recvWindow of up to 60 seconds. Permissions are granular (SPOT_ACCOUNT_READ, SPOT_DEAL_WRITE, SPOT_WITHDRAW_WRITE, SPOT_TRANSFER_WRITE and the futures equivalents), a key can be limited to chosen trading pairs and linked to up to 10 IP addresses, and a key with no linked IP is valid for 90 days and can be renewed for 90 more from 5 days before expiry. Up to 30 keys per account (https://www.mexc.com/api-docs/spot-v3/introduction, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "Trading fees per fill. MEXC's own fee guide of 20 October 2026 gives spot 0 per cent maker and 0.05 per cent taker (0.04 per cent with MX deduction), futures from 0 per cent maker and 0.02 per cent taker on BTCUSDT to 0.01 and 0.04 per cent on standard contracts, and a separate API futures schedule of 0.06 per cent maker and 0.08 per cent taker since 1 June 2026. Zero-fee campaigns and MX discounts don't apply to API trading. The fee page itself is drawn by script. Market data needs no key (https://www.mexc.com/learn/article/17827791510370, checked 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "0.05% fee", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the API docs, the CLI docs, llms.txt or the terms (checked 2026-11-03). Fees are taken from each fill.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 299, "popularity": { "githubStars": 315, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://www.mexc.com/api-docs/spot-v3/introduction", "llmsTxt": "https://www.mexc.com/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "exchange.market-data", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.derivatives", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "market.crypto" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "api-key", "closed-source", "usage-priced", "mcp", "cli", "agent-skills", "read-only-mode", "llms-txt", "python", "java", "go", "no-status-page" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-23", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 56.3, "grade": "C", "agentReady": false, "rank": 744, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 13, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 64, "maintenance": 75, "payments": 31, "reliability": 43, "schema": 64, "security": 65, "transparency": 58 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "MEXC publishes granular key permissions, per-pair key limits, weighted rate limits with Retry-After and a dated changelog, and its official CLI runs a read-only-capable MCP server with confirmation before any fund movement. There is no sandbox or status page, API futures orders pay a higher fee schedule, and the user agreement excludes the US, UK, EU members and others.", "bestFor": "Spot and futures for agents in served countries that want a vendor-built MCP server with read-only and confirmation modes.", "strengths": [ "Granular key permissions (account read, trade, withdraw, transfer), per-pair restriction, up to 10 linked IPs and a 90-day expiry for unbound keys", "An official MCP mode in the `@mexc-ai/cli` tool with `--read-only`, a read-only market subset of 22 tools and a confirmation step before orders and transfers", "Rate limits published as weight buckets per IP and UID, with Retry-After on 429 and 418", "A dated changelog of 72 spot and 26 futures entries, the newest 23 October 2026", "Fees published on MEXC's own pages, with the API futures schedule stated separately" ], "weaknesses": [ "No sandbox or testnet; only an order-validation endpoint", "No status page, incident history or SLA", "The MCP server is local only, not in the official MCP registry, and the CLI is UNLICENSED with no public source", "API futures orders pay 0.06 per cent maker and 0.08 per cent taker, and zero-fee campaigns exclude API trading", "The user agreement bars users in the United States, the United Kingdom, Mainland China, Singapore, Hong Kong, Canada, France and other jurisdictions" ], "agentNotes": [ "Use a key limited to SPOT_ACCOUNT_READ and SPOT_DEAL_WRITE, the pairs you trade and your IP addresses; keys without a linked IP expire after 90 days", "Start the MCP server as `mexc mcp spot --read-only` unless the task trades, and never pass `--yes`; orders and transfers wait for the person's confirmation", "Call POST /api/v3/order/test before a live order, since there is no sandbox", "On 429 or 418 wait for Retry-After; order placement and cancellation share 12 requests a second per UID, and repeated breaches ban the IP for up to 3 days", "Treat a 5xx on an order as unknown, not failed, and query the order before retrying; set newClientOrderId so the order can be found" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "C", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 56.3 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 64, "maintenance": 75, "payments": 31, "reliability": 43, "schema": 64, "security": 65, "transparency": 38 }, "provenanceScore": 78, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "npm install -g @mexc-ai/cli", "http": "curl 'https://api.mexc.com/api/v3/ticker/price?symbol=BTCUSDT'", "config": { "mcpServers": { "mexc-spot": { "args": [ "mcp", "spot", "--read-only" ], "command": "mexc" } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.market-data", "tool": "https://letme.dev/mexc" }, "area": "payments", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Spot taker fee", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.05, "note": "maker 0 per cent; 0.04 per cent with MX deduction, not for API trading" }, { "item": "API futures taker fee", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.08, "note": "maker 0.06 per cent, since 1 June 2026, outside the Innovation Zone" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "MEXC (Comoros) Ltd", "domain": "mexc.com", "domainRegistered": "2000-02-27", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.mexc.com/terms", "privacy": "https://www.mexc.com/privacypolicy", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://www.mexc.com/api-docs/spot-v3/change-log", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "MEXC (Comoros) Ltd is named in the user agreement, last updated 13 October 2026, with a registered address in Mutsamudu, Anjouan. The privacy policy, last updated 1 June 2026, names no entity.", "RDAP gives mexc.com a registration date of 27 February 2000; the exchange says it began in 2018, so the domain predates it.", "www.mexc.com/robots.txt allows the root and disallows /user/, /orders/ and some locale paths; it lists llms.txt as a sitemap. mexcdevelop.github.io has no robots.txt.", "https://www.mexc.com/.well-known/security.txt answered 404. status.mexc.com does not resolve; no status page was found.", "The fee page at mexc.com/fee is drawn by script; the fee figures come from MEXC's own fee guide and a 2024 announcement." ], "score": 78 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mexc.json", "live": { "slug": "mexc", "versions": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@mexc-ai/cli", "version": "0.0.22", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:34:39.588400079Z" } ], "npmWeekly": 76, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://mexc.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:36.213483882Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T20:34:39.588400079Z" } }, "edges": [ { "by": 19, "category": "ergonomics", "leads": "bitget", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "reasons": { "a": "Read for the API with the MCP server as the agent route. 14 compact tools by default, module filters, a full surface on request and progressive discovery (25). Cursor pagination on CFD order history since 15 October 2026 and limit parameters on lists (15 of 20). Uniform ok or error result shape from the SDK with typed error classes and compact JSON in the text channel (13 of 20). clientOid on orders, `dryRun: true` on every write, `confirm: true` gating cancelAll and withdraw, annotations derived from risk level including readOnlyHint, destructiveHint and idempotentHint (18 of 20). Few required fields, official SDKs in five languages plus the TypeScript agent SDK and a CLI (12 of 15). 83.", "b": "Graded on the REST API with the CLI's MCP mode. Responses take limit parameters and the MCP read-only market subset is 22 tools, but a full spot MCP category lists 123 tools (15 of 25). startTime, endTime and limit on history, symbol filters on open orders (14 of 20). Numeric codes with messages, a 30035 order-limit code added 23 October 2026, 5xx guidance (14 of 20). newClientOrderId is optional with no idempotency guarantee; the CLI adds --dry-run and a confirmation step (10 of 20). Few required parameters; SDKs in five languages whose repository was last pushed in February 2024 (11 of 15). 15 + 14 + 14 + 10 + 11 = 64." }, "scores": { "a": 83, "b": 64 } }, { "by": 10, "category": "schema", "leads": "bitget", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "reasons": { "a": "The agent SDK ships openapi.yaml with 109 typed UTA v3 operations from which the tools are generated, a machine-readable contract from the vendor's own organisation though not on the docs site (20 of 25). llms.txt in the SDK and MCP repositories; the docs site has none (6 of 10). Intent tools with a discover tool that explains each verb, action and its risk level, and the server's initialize instructions state surface, modules and read-only posture (15 of 20). Typed inputs with enums and required fields from the OpenAPI source (12 of 15). Examples in the quick start and READMEs, a REST error code page in the legacy docs that we did not read in full (9 of 15). Changelog by day with preview notices and effective dates (12 of 15). 74.", "b": "No OpenAPI found; a Postman collection and the CLI's 25 capability reference files are the nearest machine-readable contract (5 of 25). llms.txt on mexc.com, written for assistants and pointing at the API docs and legal pages (7 of 10). Per-endpoint pages with purpose, parameters and permissions, without when-not-to-use guidance (13 of 20). Typed parameters with enums for order types, statuses and intervals (11 of 15). Examples on each endpoint and a separate error-code page with numeric codes and messages (13 of 15). Versioned API (v3) with a dated changelog of 72 entries to 23 October 2026 (15). 5 + 7 + 13 + 11 + 13 + 15 = 64." }, "scores": { "a": 74, "b": 64 } }, { "by": 9, "category": "payments", "leads": "bitget", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "reasons": { "a": "No machine payment protocol (0). Base spot and futures rates are stated in a help article without login, the tier table draws by script (20). Market data needs no key, demo trading costs nothing and no card is asked for at sign-up (20). A person registers, verifies identity and mints the key in a browser (0). 40.", "b": "No machine payment protocol (0). Fees published without login on MEXC's own fee guide (20 October 2026) and a 2024 announcement, with a separate API futures schedule; the fee page itself is drawn by script (16 of 20). Public market data needs no key or card; trading needs a verified and funded account. Judgement call (15 of 20). A person must sign up in a browser, and futures need identity verification (0). 0 + 16 + 15 + 0 = 31." }, "scores": { "a": 40, "b": 31 } }, { "by": 7, "category": "transparency", "leads": "bitget", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "reasons": { "a": "The editorial half. A closed hosted service with clear terms naming BTG Technology Holdings Limited; the toolkit is MIT (15 of 30). The privacy notice names the controller and EEA representative, gives 7-year and up to 10-year retention for compliance and litigation, and names recipients by category only (18 of 30). Deprecations and parameter changes carry effective dates (delta mode deprecated 27 August, symbol and category required from 30 September, snapshot changes with demo and live dates) but no written policy (15 of 20). Recipients by category, transfers under Seychelles law with no locations or provider names (5 of 20). 53.", "b": "The editorial half. A closed service with a dated user agreement naming MEXC (Comoros) Ltd; the CLI is UNLICENSED on npm (15 of 30). The privacy policy names no entity, states no retention periods and relies on standard contractual clauses for transfers (10 of 30). The changelog flags endpoints as \"will be discontinued soon\" without dates and the futures log records removals (8 of 20). Third parties are named by category only, with no subprocessor list or data locations (5 of 20). 15 + 10 + 8 + 5 = 38." }, "scores": { "a": 65, "b": 58 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "HTTP API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "BTG Technology Holdings Limited", "b": "MEXC (Comoros) Ltd", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "stdio", "b": "stdio", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "API key", "b": "API key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Pay per use", "b": "Pay per use", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "14", "b": "299", "name": "Tools exposed" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "no", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "io.github.Bitget-AI/bitget-agent-mcp", "b": "not listed", "name": "MCP registry" }, { "a": "2026-10-30", "b": "2026-10-23", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "2026-10-20", "b": "2026-10-13", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "2025-12-05", "b": "2026-06-01", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "234 stars", "b": "315 stars", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "MEXC API scores 56.3 (C) on agent readiness against Bitget's 53.9 (D), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Bitget leads on schema \u0026 documentation, agent ergonomics, payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Bitget or MEXC API?" }, { "answer": "Both need an API key.", "question": "Do Bitget and MEXC API need an API key?" }, { "answer": "Bitget runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. MEXC API runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.", "question": "Can an agent call Bitget and MEXC API without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Schema \u0026 documentation, 74 against 64", "Agent ergonomics, 83 against 64", "Payments \u0026 pricing, 40 against 31", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 65 against 58" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "An agent trading spot, futures and earn products in a person's Bitget account outside the prohibited list, with the smallest default MCP surface of the exchanges graded and a paper-trading switch.", "slug": "bitget", "watchFor": "Hot and warm wallets lost about 388 million dollars on 24 September 2026 to forged withdrawal commands, and withdrawals were paused until 2 October" }, { "aheadOn": null, "also": [ "No incidents deducted, where Bitget loses 8 points for them" ], "goodFor": "Spot and futures for agents in served countries that want a vendor-built MCP server with read-only and confirmation modes.", "slug": "mexc", "watchFor": "No sandbox or testnet; only an order-validation endpoint" } ], "history": null, "job": { "capability": "exchange.market-data", "name": "Exchange market data" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitget.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs Bitget", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitget" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb.json", "title": "Bitget vs Bithumb Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp.json", "title": "Bitget vs Bitstamp API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bybit.json", "title": "Bitget vs Bybit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bybit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.json", "title": "Bitget vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-mcp.json", "title": "Bitget vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-crypto-com-exchange.json", "title": "Bitget vs Crypto.com Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-crypto-com-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-deribit.json", "title": "Bitget vs Deribit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-deribit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-dydx.json", "title": "Bitget vs dYdX", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-dydx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gate-io.json", "title": "Bitget vs Gate", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gate-io" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gemini-exchange.json", "title": "Bitget vs Gemini Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gemini-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-htx.json", "title": "Bitget vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bitget vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kraken.json", "title": "Bitget vs Kraken API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kraken" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kucoin.json", "title": "Bitget vs KuCoin", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kucoin" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-okx.json", "title": "Bitget vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "Bitget vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Bitget vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Bybit vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Crypto.com Exchange API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Gate vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Gemini Exchange API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-mexc.json", "title": "HTX trading API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kucoin-vs-mexc.json", "title": "KuCoin vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kucoin-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-okx.json", "title": "MEXC API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "MEXC API vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-upbit.json", "title": "MEXC API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitget.json", "title": "Binance API vs Bitget", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitget" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Binance API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kraken-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Kraken API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kraken-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Deribit vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-mexc.json", "title": "dYdX vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "bitget": 40, "by": 3, "edge": "mexc", "key": "reliability", "mexc": 43, "name": "Reliability", "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "bitget": 74, "by": 10, "edge": "bitget", "key": "schema", "mexc": 64, "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "weight": 13 }, { "bitget": 83, "by": 19, "edge": "bitget", "key": "ergonomics", "mexc": 64, "name": "Agent ergonomics", "weight": 13 }, { "bitget": 62, "by": 3, "edge": "mexc", "key": "security", "mexc": 65, "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "weight": 14 }, { "bitget": 40, "by": 9, "edge": "bitget", "key": "payments", "mexc": 31, "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "bitget": 78, "by": 3, "edge": "bitget", "key": "maintenance", "mexc": 75, "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "weight": 7 }, { "bitget": 65, "by": 7, "edge": "bitget", "key": "transparency", "mexc": 58, "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "MEXC API scores 56.3 (C) on agent readiness against Bitget's 53.9 (D), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Bitget leads on schema \u0026 documentation, agent ergonomics, payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do exchange market data.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "bitget": "Bitget's official MCP server keeps the default surface to 14 intent tools with discovery, read-only and paper-trading switches, dry runs and a confirmation gate on withdrawals, over an API with demo trading. A 388 million dollar wallet breach in September 2026 paused withdrawals for eight days, and there is no status page, SLA or readable fee table.", "mexc": "MEXC publishes granular key permissions, per-pair key limits, weighted rate limits with Retry-After and a dated changelog, and its official CLI runs a read-only-capable MCP server with confirmation before any fund movement. There is no sandbox or status page, API futures orders pay a higher fee schedule, and the user agreement excludes the US, UK, EU members and others." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-mexc", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-mexc.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-mexc.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-mexc.min.md" }, "markdown": "MEXC API scores 56.3 (C) on agent readiness against Bitget's 53.9 (D), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Bitget leads on schema \u0026 documentation, agent ergonomics, payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do exchange market data.\n\n- Bitget: grade D, 53.9/100, rank #824 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitget.json\n- MEXC API: grade C, 56.3/100, rank #744 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mexc.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/mexc.json\n- Best crypto exchange APIs and MCP servers for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n- All 210 exchanges comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Bitget (D)\n\nGood for: An agent trading spot, futures and earn products in a person's Bitget account outside the prohibited list, with the smallest default MCP surface of the exchanges graded and a paper-trading switch.\n\nAhead on:\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 74 against 64\n- Agent ergonomics, 83 against 64\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 40 against 31\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 65 against 58\n\nWatch for: Hot and warm wallets lost about 388 million dollars on 24 September 2026 to forged withdrawal commands, and withdrawals were paused until 2 October\n\n### MEXC API (C)\n\nGood for: Spot and futures for agents in served countries that want a vendor-built MCP server with read-only and confirmation modes.\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- No incidents deducted, where Bitget loses 8 points for them\n\nWatch for: No sandbox or testnet; only an order-validation endpoint\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Agent ergonomics: Bitget +19\n\n- Bitget (83): Read for the API with the MCP server as the agent route. 14 compact tools by default, module filters, a full surface on request and progressive discovery (25). Cursor pagination on CFD order history since 15 October 2026 and limit parameters on lists (15 of 20). Uniform ok or error result shape from the SDK with typed error classes and compact JSON in the text channel (13 of 20). clientOid on orders, `dryRun: true` on every write, `confirm: true` gating cancelAll and withdraw, annotations derived from risk level including readOnlyHint, destructiveHint and idempotentHint (18 of 20). Few required fields, official SDKs in five languages plus the TypeScript agent SDK and a CLI (12 of 15). 83.\n- MEXC API (64): Graded on the REST API with the CLI's MCP mode. Responses take limit parameters and the MCP read-only market subset is 22 tools, but a full spot MCP category lists 123 tools (15 of 25). startTime, endTime and limit on history, symbol filters on open orders (14 of 20). Numeric codes with messages, a 30035 order-limit code added 23 October 2026, 5xx guidance (14 of 20). newClientOrderId is optional with no idempotency guarantee; the CLI adds --dry-run and a confirmation step (10 of 20). Few required parameters; SDKs in five languages whose repository was last pushed in February 2024 (11 of 15). 15 + 14 + 14 + 10 + 11 = 64.\n\n### Schema \u0026 documentation: Bitget +10\n\n- Bitget (74): The agent SDK ships openapi.yaml with 109 typed UTA v3 operations from which the tools are generated, a machine-readable contract from the vendor's own organisation though not on the docs site (20 of 25). llms.txt in the SDK and MCP repositories; the docs site has none (6 of 10). Intent tools with a discover tool that explains each verb, action and its risk level, and the server's initialize instructions state surface, modules and read-only posture (15 of 20). Typed inputs with enums and required fields from the OpenAPI source (12 of 15). Examples in the quick start and READMEs, a REST error code page in the legacy docs that we did not read in full (9 of 15). Changelog by day with preview notices and effective dates (12 of 15). 74.\n- MEXC API (64): No OpenAPI found; a Postman collection and the CLI's 25 capability reference files are the nearest machine-readable contract (5 of 25). llms.txt on mexc.com, written for assistants and pointing at the API docs and legal pages (7 of 10). Per-endpoint pages with purpose, parameters and permissions, without when-not-to-use guidance (13 of 20). Typed parameters with enums for order types, statuses and intervals (11 of 15). Examples on each endpoint and a separate error-code page with numeric codes and messages (13 of 15). Versioned API (v3) with a dated changelog of 72 entries to 23 October 2026 (15). 5 + 7 + 13 + 11 + 13 + 15 = 64.\n\n### Payments \u0026 pricing: Bitget +9\n\n- Bitget (40): No machine payment protocol (0). Base spot and futures rates are stated in a help article without login, the tier table draws by script (20). Market data needs no key, demo trading costs nothing and no card is asked for at sign-up (20). A person registers, verifies identity and mints the key in a browser (0). 40.\n- MEXC API (31): No machine payment protocol (0). Fees published without login on MEXC's own fee guide (20 October 2026) and a 2024 announcement, with a separate API futures schedule; the fee page itself is drawn by script (16 of 20). Public market data needs no key or card; trading needs a verified and funded account. Judgement call (15 of 20). A person must sign up in a browser, and futures need identity verification (0). 0 + 16 + 15 + 0 = 31.\n\n### Transparency \u0026 trust: Bitget +7\n\n- Bitget (65): The editorial half. A closed hosted service with clear terms naming BTG Technology Holdings Limited; the toolkit is MIT (15 of 30). The privacy notice names the controller and EEA representative, gives 7-year and up to 10-year retention for compliance and litigation, and names recipients by category only (18 of 30). Deprecations and parameter changes carry effective dates (delta mode deprecated 27 August, symbol and category required from 30 September, snapshot changes with demo and live dates) but no written policy (15 of 20). Recipients by category, transfers under Seychelles law with no locations or provider names (5 of 20). 53.\n- MEXC API (58): The editorial half. A closed service with a dated user agreement naming MEXC (Comoros) Ltd; the CLI is UNLICENSED on npm (15 of 30). The privacy policy names no entity, states no retention periods and relies on standard contractual clauses for transfers (10 of 30). The changelog flags endpoints as \"will be discontinued soon\" without dates and the futures log records removals (8 of 20). Third parties are named by category only, with no subprocessor list or data locations (5 of 20). 15 + 10 + 8 + 5 = 38.\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Bitget | MEXC API | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 40 | 43 | MEXC API +3 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 74 | 64 | Bitget +10 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 83 | 64 | Bitget +19 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 62 | 65 | MEXC API +3 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 40 | 31 | Bitget +9 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 78 | 75 | Bitget +3 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 65 | 58 | Bitget +7 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | -8 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **53.9 · D** | **56.3 · C** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Bitget | MEXC API |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | BTG Technology Holdings Limited | MEXC (Comoros) Ltd |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | stdio | stdio |\n| Auth | API key | API key |\n| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Tools exposed | 14 | 299 |\n| Read-only variant documented | yes | yes |\n| llms.txt | no | yes |\n| MCP registry | `io.github.Bitget-AI/bitget-agent-mcp` | not listed |\n| Last release | 2026-10-30 | 2026-10-23 |\n| Terms last updated | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-13 |\n| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-12-05 | 2026-06-01 |\n| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict automated access | yes | yes |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | yes |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | yes |\n| Popularity | 234 stars | 315 stars |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Bitget.** Bitget's official MCP server keeps the default surface to 14 intent tools with discovery, read-only and paper-trading switches, dry runs and a confirmation gate on withdrawals, over an API with demo trading. A 388 million dollar wallet breach in September 2026 paused withdrawals for eight days, and there is no status page, SLA or readable fee table.\n\n**MEXC API.** MEXC publishes granular key permissions, per-pair key limits, weighted rate limits with Retry-After and a dated changelog, and its official CLI runs a read-only-capable MCP server with confirmation before any fund movement. There is no sandbox or status page, API futures orders pay a higher fee schedule, and the user agreement excludes the US, UK, EU members and others.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Bitget\n\n1. Run `npx -y @bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp --read-only` for research and `--paper-trading` with a demo key before any live order; the two flags cannot be combined\n2. Call discover({}) first, then the intent verbs; add `dryRun: true` to any write to preview it, and pass `confirm: true` only after the person has agreed to a withdraw or cancelAll\n3. Send a unique clientOid of at most 64 characters on every order and reuse it on retry; orderId wins when both are sent\n4. Stay under 10 requests a second per endpoint on a new account and 6,000 a minute per IP; the SDK retries on 429, so do not add a second retry loop\n5. Bind the key to an IP and keep write permission off a research key; the docs read show no separate withdrawal scope\n\n### MEXC API\n\n1. Use a key limited to SPOT_ACCOUNT_READ and SPOT_DEAL_WRITE, the pairs you trade and your IP addresses; keys without a linked IP expire after 90 days\n2. Start the MCP server as `mexc mcp spot --read-only` unless the task trades, and never pass `--yes`; orders and transfers wait for the person's confirmation\n3. Call POST /api/v3/order/test before a live order, since there is no sandbox\n4. On 429 or 418 wait for Retry-After; order placement and cancellation share 12 requests a second per UID, and repeated breaches ban the IP for up to 3 days\n5. Treat a 5xx on an order as unknown, not failed, and query the order before retrying; set newClientOrderId so the order can be found\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Bitget or MEXC API?\n\nMEXC API scores 56.3 (C) on agent readiness against Bitget's 53.9 (D), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Bitget leads on schema \u0026 documentation, agent ergonomics, payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust.\n\n### Do Bitget and MEXC API need an API key?\n\nBoth need an API key.\n\n### Can an agent call Bitget and MEXC API without installing anything?\n\nBitget runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. MEXC API runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-mexc.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-mexc.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"bitget\", \"b\": \"mexc\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare bitget mexc`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitget.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/mexc.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Bitget or MEXC API\n\n- [Bitfinex API vs Bitget](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitget.md)\n- [Bitfinex API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Bitget vs Bithumb Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb.md)\n- [Bitget vs Bitstamp API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp.md)\n- [Bitget vs Bybit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bybit.md)\n- [Bitget vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.md)\n- [Bitget vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-mcp.md)\n- [Bitget vs Crypto.com Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-crypto-com-exchange.md)\n- [Bitget vs Deribit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-deribit.md)\n- [Bitget vs dYdX](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-dydx.md)\n- [Bitget vs Gate](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gate-io.md)\n- [Bitget vs Gemini Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gemini-exchange.md)\n- [Bitget vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-htx.md)\n- [Bitget vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bitget vs Kraken API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kraken.md)\n- [Bitget vs KuCoin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kucoin.md)\n- [Bitget vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-okx.md)\n- [Bitget vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [Bitget vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Bybit vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Crypto.com Exchange API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Gate vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Gemini Exchange API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-mexc.md)\n- [HTX trading API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-mexc.md)\n- [KuCoin vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kucoin-vs-mexc.md)\n- [MEXC API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-okx.md)\n- [MEXC API vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [MEXC API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Binance API vs Bitget](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitget.md)\n- [Binance API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Kraken API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kraken-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Deribit vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-mexc.md)\n- [dYdX vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-04", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.7", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Bitget vs MEXC API", "url": "" } ], "description": "MEXC scores 56.3 (C) to Bitget's 53.9 (D) for exchange market data. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Bitget D 53.9", "MEXC API C 56.3", "scores" ], "h1": "Bitget vs MEXC API", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/bitget-vs-mexc", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Bitget vs MEXC for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-04", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-mexc" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 4000, "slim": 1780 }, "version": 1 }