{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "bitget", "name": "Bitget", "vendor": "BTG Technology Holdings Limited", "vendorUrl": "https://www.bitget.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "Bitget is a centralised crypto exchange for spot, margin, futures, earn and tokenised stocks, reached through its Unified Trading Account v3 REST and WebSocket API and an Agent Hub toolkit with a stdio MCP server, CLI and agent skills.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitget.json", "dns": "bitget.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/Bitget-AI/agent-mcp", "transports": [ "stdio" ], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "bitget-mcp-server" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "API key, system-generated secret and user-set passphrase minted under API Key Management after a browser sign-up and identity verification, up to 50 keys per UID, each with read or read-and-write permission, signed per request with HMAC-SHA256 or RSA over timestamp, method, path and body in the ACCESS-KEY, ACCESS-SIGN, ACCESS-TIMESTAMP and ACCESS-PASSPHRASE headers. Binding an IP is recommended, not required. Sub-account keys carry trade or management permission, read-only or read-write, once the main account enables key management for them. Demo keys are minted in demo mode and sent with the paptrading header set to 1 (https://www.bitget.com/legacy-docs/uta/guide, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "The API and the Agent Hub packages cost nothing; trades carry Bitget's fees. Base rates are 0.1 per cent maker and taker on spot and 0.02 per cent maker and 0.06 per cent taker on futures before VIP tiers or the BGB discount, which applies to spot only at a rate the article says to read on the live schedule. The fee page draws its table by script (https://www.bitget.com/support/articles/12560603892734, 20 August 2026, checked 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "0.1% fee", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the UTA docs, the Agent Hub READMEs, the SDK's openapi.yaml or the fee article (checked 2026-11-03).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 14, "popularity": { "githubStars": 234, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://www.bitget.com/api-doc/uta/intro", "registryName": "io.github.Bitget-AI/bitget-agent-mcp", "capabilities": [ "exchange.market-data", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.derivatives", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "exchange.staking", "market.crypto" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "closed-source", "api-key", "usage-priced", "sandbox", "no-status-page", "mcp", "mcp-registry", "official", "read-only-mode", "agent-skills", "cli", "python", "typescript", "go", "java", "php" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-30", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 53.9, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 890, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 15, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 83, "maintenance": 78, "payments": 40, "reliability": 40, "schema": 74, "security": 62, "transparency": 65 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": -8, "negativeNotes": [ "Security incident of 24 September 2026. An attacker who had obtained high-level internal credentials through a vulnerability in a third-party security product injected forged withdrawal commands into Bitget's wallet back end and moved about 388 million dollars in 13 assets on 11 chains from hot and warm wallets. Withdrawals, fiat and C2C were paused from 24 September and restored in phases from 28 September to 2 October 2026; trading, deposits and the API kept running. Bitget says user balances were unaffected, the Protection Fund covered the loss and was topped above 300 million dollars, private keys and cold wallets were untouched, and Mandiant and SlowMist reports of 30 September agree with its account. A fixed, documented incident with a public root cause, so below the top of the range. Sources https://www.bitget.com/academy/12560603896113 (updated 20 October 2026) and https://www.bitget.com/support/articles/12560603896110 (26 September 2026), read 2026-11-03." ], "verdict": "Bitget's official MCP server keeps the default surface to 14 intent tools with discovery, read-only and paper-trading switches, dry runs and a confirmation gate on withdrawals, over an API with demo trading. A 388 million dollar wallet breach in September 2026 paused withdrawals for eight days, and there is no status page, SLA or readable fee table.", "bestFor": "An agent trading spot, futures and earn products in a person's Bitget account outside the prohibited list, with the smallest default MCP surface of the exchanges graded and a paper-trading switch.", "strengths": [ "Official stdio MCP server with 14 intent tools by default, progressive discovery, `--read-only`, `--paper-trading`, `dryRun: true` on writes and `confirm: true` required for withdrawals and cancel-all", "Demo trading on the production host with demo keys and a paptrading header, and a TypeScript agent SDK whose openapi.yaml types all 109 UTA v3 operations", "Terms name BTG Technology Holdings Limited with Hong Kong law, and the privacy notice gives retention periods of 7 and up to 10 years", "Changelog with 58 dated entries since 5 August 2026, including preview notices with demo and live dates for WebSocket changes", "Base fees public in a help article, 0.1 per cent spot and 0.02 per cent maker and 0.06 per cent taker on futures" ], "weaknesses": [ "Hot and warm wallets lost about 388 million dollars on 24 September 2026 to forged withdrawal commands, and withdrawals were paused until 2 October", "No status page, incident history or SLA; the terms disclaim uninterrupted access", "Two official MCP servers coexist, the V2-based bitget-mcp-server on Bitget's own Agent Hub page and the v3 bitget-agent-mcp on GitHub and npm, with different tool counts", "The current api-doc site renders every page as the UTA overview for a reader without script; the legacy docs were used instead", "Keys have read or read-and-write only, with no separate withdrawal permission in the docs read, and IP binding is recommended rather than required" ], "agentNotes": [ "Run `npx -y @bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp --read-only` for research and `--paper-trading` with a demo key before any live order; the two flags cannot be combined", "Call discover({}) first, then the intent verbs; add `dryRun: true` to any write to preview it, and pass `confirm: true` only after the person has agreed to a withdraw or cancelAll", "Send a unique clientOid of at most 64 characters on every order and reuse it on retry; orderId wins when both are sent", "Stay under 10 requests a second per endpoint on a new account and 6,000 a minute per IP; the SDK retries on 429, so do not add a second retry loop", "Bind the key to an IP and keep write permission off a research key; the docs read show no separate withdrawal scope" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 53.9 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 83, "maintenance": 78, "payments": 40, "reliability": 40, "schema": 74, "security": 62, "transparency": 53 }, "provenanceScore": 76, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "npx -y @bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp", "http": "curl https://api.bitget.com/api/v3/market/tickers?category=SPOT\u0026symbol=BTCUSDT", "claudeCode": "claude mcp add bitget -- npx -y @bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp --read-only", "config": { "mcpServers": { "bitget": { "args": [ "-y", "@bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp", "--read-only" ], "command": "npx", "env": { "BITGET_API_KEY": "YOUR_API_KEY", "BITGET_PASSPHRASE": "YOUR_PASSPHRASE", "BITGET_SECRET_KEY": "YOUR_SECRET_KEY" } } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.market-data", "tool": "https://letme.dev/bitget" }, "area": "payments", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Spot trade, base maker or taker", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.1, "note": "before VIP tiers and the BGB discount" }, { "item": "Futures trade, base taker", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.06, "note": "maker 0.02 per cent" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "BTG Technology Holdings Limited", "domain": "bitget.com", "domainRegistered": "2003-02-03", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.bitget.com/support/articles/360014944032-terms-of-use", "privacy": "https://www.bitget.com/support/articles/360015150651", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://www.bitget.com/legacy-docs/uta/changelog", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "Terms of Use last updated 20 October 2026 name BTG Technology Holdings Limited under Hong Kong law with HKIAC arbitration; the privacy notice (5 December 2025) names the same company as controller under the Seychelles Data Protection Act 2023 with BTGT Europe Limited, UAB as EEA representative. /user-agreement and /privacy-policy answer 404; the documents live in the support centre.", "www.bitget.com/robots.txt disallows internal, search, calendar, wiki and register paths; the api-doc, legacy-docs, support, academy, blog and activity-hub paths are allowed.", "RDAP gives bitget.com a registration date of 3 February 2003 (MarkMonitor), earlier than the exchange, so the domain was bought.", "https://www.bitget.com/.well-known/security.txt answers 404; the Agent Hub README gives security@bitget.com for reports. No status page found; status.bitget.com does not resolve and the docs link none.", "The current api-doc site answers every path with the UTA overview for a reader without script; the legacy docs at /legacy-docs/uta/ were read for the guide, rate limits and changelog." ], "score": 76 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget.json", "live": { "slug": "bitget", "versions": [ { "registry": "mcp-registry", "name": "io.github.Bitget-AI/bitget-agent-mcp", "version": "3.0.2", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T17:11:44.552009456Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp", "version": "3.3.1", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:49.846993208Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "bitget-mcp-server", "version": "1.1.0", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:50.714916236Z" } ], "githubStars": 1, "npmWeekly": 255, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://bitget.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:53:53.864777414Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:53.43909091Z" } }, "answer": "Bitget scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Hyperliquid's 50 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Hyperliquid leads on payments \u0026 pricing.", "b": { "slug": "hyperliquid", "name": "Hyperliquid", "vendor": "Hyperliquid Labs", "vendorUrl": "https://hyperliquid.xyz", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "Hyperliquid is a perpetuals and spot exchange whose order book runs on its own chain. Agents trade through the REST info and exchange endpoints and WebSocket at api.hyperliquid.xyz, signing with a wallet key or an approved API wallet.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hyperliquid.json", "dns": "hyperliquid.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/hyperliquid-dex/hyperliquid-python-sdk", "license": "The exchange runs on the Hyperliquid chain (HyperCore), whose node is distributed as a binary under an Apache-2.0 repository; the Python and Rust SDKs are MIT. The API servers and front end are closed", "transports": [], "packages": [ { "registry": "pypi", "name": "hyperliquid-python-sdk" } ], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "No API keys. Every exchange action is a signed message from an EVM wallet; info requests need no signature. A master account approves API wallets (agent wallets) with `approveAgent`, optionally named and with an expiry, which can only sign on its behalf and cannot query data. L1 actions (orders, cancels, margin settings) and user-signed actions (USDC and spot sends, withdrawals, approvals) use two different EIP-712 schemes, and the docs recommend an SDK for signing. Nonces are per signer, must sit within two days behind and one day ahead of block time, and sub-accounts signed by one API wallet share its nonce set (https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/for-developers/api/nonces-and-api-wallets.md, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "The API has no charge. Base-tier fees are 0.045% taker and 0.015% maker on perpetuals and 0.070% taker and 0.040% maker on spot, assessed on rolling 14-day volume, falling to 0.024% taker and 0% maker above $7 billion, with maker rebates to -0.003% for large maker share and staking discounts of 5% to 40%. Withdrawals to the bridge cost $1; an activation gas fee applies to a first order. `reserveRequestWeight` buys extra rate limit at 0.0005 USDC a request (https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/trading/fees.md, checked 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "0.04% fee", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the API docs (checked 2026-11-03). Accounts are funded by depositing USDC on Arbitrum or other bridged chains; several third-party MCP servers in the registry sell Hyperliquid data by x402, none of them Hyperliquid's.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 0, "popularity": { "githubStars": 1873, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": 167497, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/for-developers/api", "llmsTxt": "https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "exchange.derivatives", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.market-data", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "exchange.staking", "market.crypto", "wallet.onchain" ], "tags": [ "official", "hosted", "closed-source", "llms-txt", "python", "rust", "sandbox", "usage-priced", "no-key", "no-status-page", "bug-bounty", "rest" ], "lastRelease": "2026-06-04", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 50, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 1018, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 19, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 39, "payments": 55, "reliability": 40, "schema": 42, "security": 64, "transparency": 26 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Hyperliquid's API needs no signup or key, an approved API wallet can trade but not withdraw, fees and rate limits are published with numbers, and a testnet mirrors mainnet. There is no official MCP server, OpenAPI file, status page, changelog or readable terms, and signing uses two schemes the docs say to leave to an SDK.", "bestFor": "An agent trading perpetuals or spot on chain from its own wallet with no account, or acting for a master account through an approved API wallet.", "strengths": [ "API wallets approved by the master account can only sign trading actions; withdrawals and external transfers need the user's own key", "Numeric rate limits per IP and per address, with weights per request type and a paid `reserveRequestWeight` top-up", "Fees published per tier from 0.045% taker and 0.015% maker on perpetuals, with maker rebates and staking discounts", "A testnet at api.hyperliquid-testnet.xyz with the same API and a faucet of 1,000 mock USDC for addresses that have deposited on mainnet", "Client order IDs (`cloid`), `expiresAfter`, `noop` and a `scheduleCancel` dead man's switch for safe retries" ], "weaknesses": [ "No official MCP server; the 23 registry entries are all third parties, several selling data by x402", "No OpenAPI file, no changelog, no API versioning and no status page found", "The terms of use and privacy policy at app.hyperliquid.xyz draw by script and hyperliquid.xyz/terms answered 403, so the restricted jurisdictions are unchecked", "Order errors are message strings without codes, and the docs give no 429 or Retry-After guidance beyond one request every 10 seconds when limited", "The official Python SDK is marked Alpha, last released 4 June 2026, with 112 open issues" ], "agentNotes": [ "Generate a fresh API wallet, approve it with `approveAgent` with a name and expiry, sign with it, and query with the master address, never the agent address", "Use the Python SDK's `sign_l1_action` and `sign_user_signed_action`; mixing the two, field order in msgpack or an uppercase address gives \"User or API Wallet ... does not exist\"", "Set a `cloid` on every order and read the per-order `statuses` array; one batch-level error rejects the whole batch", "Budget address limits by volume (one action per 1 USDC traded after 10,000); batch orders to lower IP weight, and use WebSocket for data", "Arm `scheduleCancel` before unattended trading so open orders are cancelled if the agent stops" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 50 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 39, "payments": 55, "reliability": 40, "schema": 42, "security": 64, "transparency": 20 }, "provenanceScore": 32, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "pip install hyperliquid-python-sdk", "http": "curl -X POST https://api.hyperliquid.xyz/info -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{\"type\":\"l2Book\",\"coin\":\"BTC\"}'" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.derivatives", "tool": "https://letme.dev/hyperliquid" }, "area": "payments", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Perpetuals taker fee, tier 0", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.045, "note": "0.045% of notional; maker 0.015%" }, { "item": "Spot taker fee, tier 0", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.07, "note": "0.070% of notional; maker 0.040%" }, { "item": "Bridge withdrawal", "unit": "tx", "usd": 1, "note": "$1 per withdrawal to the bridge contract" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "", "domain": "hyperliquid.xyz", "domainRegistered": "2022-10-15", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/terms", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "", "securityTxt": "unknown", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "No legal entity found on a readable page. The docs name Hyperliquid Labs (self-funded) and the Hyper Foundation (bug bounty); app.hyperliquid.xyz/terms and hyperfoundation.org draw by script and hyperliquid.xyz/terms answered 403.", "RDAP gives hyperliquid.xyz a registration date of 15 October 2022, registrar Squarespace Domains.", "No status page found; status.hyperliquid.xyz did not resolve and the docs link none. No changelog; the docs have no dated release notes.", "https://hyperliquid.xyz/.well-known/security.txt answered 403, so security.txt is unknown. The docs' bug bounty page gives bugbounty@hyperfoundation.org.", "hyperliquid.gitbook.io/robots.txt allows everything with Content-Signal ai-input=yes; hyperliquid.xyz/robots.txt allows everything." ], "score": 32 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.json", "live": { "slug": "hyperliquid", "securityTxt": { "url": "https://hyperliquid.xyz/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "unknown", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:05.956872316Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:05.956872316Z" } }, "edges": [ { "by": 39, "category": "maintenance", "leads": "bitget", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "reasons": { "a": "Read as a hosted service with an open-source toolkit. The UTA changelog's latest launched entry is 30 October 2026 and a preview entry 3 November; the MCP package shipped 3.3.1 on 20 September and agent-skill was pushed 30 October (30). 58 dated changelog entries since 5 August 2026 and six MCP versions since June (20). Issue trackers on the Bitget-AI repositories (11 open on agent_hub) and a support centre; replies were not checked (10 of 25). In the official MCP registry under io.github.Bitget-AI, a GitHub namespace, with official SDKs in five languages (10 of 15). CI workflow with coverage, npm provenance attestations, two runtime dependencies, no install scripts (8 of 10). 78.", "b": "Read as a closed hosted service with open SDKs. The API has no dated changelog, so the last dated change is the Python SDK's 0.24.0 on 4 June 2026, 152 days before this check; the node repository was pushed on 10 August 2026 and the docs describe newer actions (HIP-4 outcome markets, borrow and lend) without dates. Judgement call (10 of 30). No three dated releases in 90 days (0). Support through Discord and the docs' FAQ, 112 open issues on the SDK whose replies couldn't be read (8 of 25). Official Python and Rust SDKs, the Rust one last pushed 21 October 2025; no MCP registry entry (15). CI on Python 3.9 and 3.13 with Poetry, Dependabot badge, a lock file (6 of 10). Total 39." }, "scores": { "a": 78, "b": 39 } }, { "by": 39, "category": "transparency", "leads": "bitget", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "reasons": { "a": "The editorial half. A closed hosted service with clear terms naming BTG Technology Holdings Limited; the toolkit is MIT (15 of 30). The privacy notice names the controller and EEA representative, gives 7-year and up to 10-year retention for compliance and litigation, and names recipients by category only (18 of 30). Deprecations and parameter changes carry effective dates (delta mode deprecated 27 August, symbol and category required from 30 September, snapshot changes with demo and live dates) but no written policy (15 of 20). Recipients by category, transfers under Seychelles law with no locations or provider names (5 of 20). 53.", "b": "The editorial half. The SDKs are MIT and the node repository Apache-2.0 with a Dockerfile around a binary; the API servers and front end are closed and the terms were unreadable (12 of 30). No privacy policy read and nothing in the docs on data handling (0 of 30). Deprecated actions are marked in the docs without dates or a policy (8 of 20). No subprocessors or data locations (0 of 20). Total 20." }, "scores": { "a": 65, "b": 26 } }, { "by": 32, "category": "schema", "leads": "bitget", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "reasons": { "a": "The agent SDK ships openapi.yaml with 109 typed UTA v3 operations from which the tools are generated, a machine-readable contract from the vendor's own organisation though not on the docs site (20 of 25). llms.txt in the SDK and MCP repositories; the docs site has none (6 of 10). Intent tools with a discover tool that explains each verb, action and its risk level, and the server's initialize instructions state surface, modules and read-only posture (15 of 20). Typed inputs with enums and required fields from the OpenAPI source (12 of 15). Examples in the quick start and READMEs, a REST error code page in the legacy docs that we did not read in full (9 of 15). Changelog by day with preview notices and effective dates (12 of 15). 74.", "b": "No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract; request and response shapes are tables and JSON examples in the docs (0 of 25). llms.txt and a Markdown twin of every page by appending .md (10). Each info type and exchange action has a short description of what it does, and the signing page lists common mistakes, but little says when to use one call over another (12 of 20). Fields are one-letter keys (`a`, `b`, `p`, `s`, `r`, `t`, `c`) with numbers as strings, enums such as `tif` Alo, Ioc or Gtc, and required fields marked in tables (9 of 15). An example for every call and a list of order and cancel error strings, with no HTTP error table (11 of 15). No API version, no changelog and no dated release notes; deprecated actions such as `userDexAbstraction` are marked in place (0 of 15). Total 42." }, "scores": { "a": 74, "b": 42 } }, { "by": 15, "category": "payments", "leads": "hyperliquid", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "reasons": { "a": "No machine payment protocol (0). Base spot and futures rates are stated in a help article without login, the tier table draws by script (20). Market data needs no key, demo trading costs nothing and no card is asked for at sign-up (20). A person registers, verifies identity and mints the key in a browser (0). 40.", "b": "No machine payment protocol (0). Fees published per tier without login (20). No card anywhere; public info endpoints are free and the testnet faucet gives 1,000 mock USDC, though only to an address that has deposited on mainnet (15 of 20). No signup; an agent with a funded EVM wallet deposits USDC on a bridged chain and trades, subject to the unread terms (20). Total 55." }, "scores": { "a": 40, "b": 55 } }, { "by": 13, "category": "ergonomics", "leads": "bitget", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "reasons": { "a": "Read for the API with the MCP server as the agent route. 14 compact tools by default, module filters, a full surface on request and progressive discovery (25). Cursor pagination on CFD order history since 15 October 2026 and limit parameters on lists (15 of 20). Uniform ok or error result shape from the SDK with typed error classes and compact JSON in the text channel (13 of 20). clientOid on orders, `dryRun: true` on every write, `confirm: true` gating cancelAll and withdraw, annotations derived from risk level including readOnlyHint, destructiveHint and idempotentHint (18 of 20). Few required fields, official SDKs in five languages plus the TypeScript agent SDK and a CLI (12 of 15). 83.", "b": "An API, read for response sizing. Time-range calls return at most 500 blocks of data, fills and historical orders cap at 2,000 items, candles at 5,000, l2Book at 20 levels a side (18 of 25). Cursor-by-timestamp pagination on fills and funding, filtering by coin or dex, no field selection (14 of 20). Order errors are documented strings per order, one batch-level error rejects a batch, and `orderStatus` answers `unknownOid`; no codes and no rate-limit error shape (12 of 20). `cloid`, per-signer nonces within a time window, `expiresAfter`, `noop` to burn a nonce and `scheduleCancel` as a dead man's switch (18 of 20). Few required fields, but signing needs msgpack field order, two EIP-712 schemes and lowercase addresses, and the official SDKs are Python (Alpha) and Rust only (8 of 15). Total 70." }, "scores": { "a": 83, "b": 70 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "HTTP API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "BTG Technology Holdings Limited", "b": "Hyperliquid Labs", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "stdio", "b": "", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "API key", "b": "OAuth or key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Pay per use", "b": "Pay per use", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "none", "b": "The exchange runs on the Hyperliquid chain (HyperCore), whose node is distributed as a binary under an Apache-2.0 repository; the Python and Rust SDKs are MIT. The API servers and front end are closed", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "14", "b": "0", "name": "Tools exposed" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "no", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "io.github.Bitget-AI/bitget-agent-mcp", "b": "not listed", "name": "MCP registry" }, { "a": "2026-10-30", "b": "2026-06-04", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "2026-10-20", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "2025-12-05", "b": "no document linked", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "234 stars", "b": "1.9k stars, 167k PyPI/wk", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Bitget scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Hyperliquid's 50 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Hyperliquid leads on payments \u0026 pricing.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Bitget or Hyperliquid?" }, { "answer": "Bitget needs an API key. Hyperliquid takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.", "question": "Do Bitget and Hyperliquid need an API key?" }, { "answer": "Bitget runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. No hosted endpoint is listed for Hyperliquid.", "question": "Can an agent call Bitget and Hyperliquid without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Schema \u0026 documentation, 74 against 42", "Agent ergonomics, 83 against 70", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 78 against 39", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 65 against 26" ], "also": [ "Runs on your own machine" ], "goodFor": "An agent trading spot, futures and earn products in a person's Bitget account outside the prohibited list, with the smallest default MCP surface of the exchanges graded and a paper-trading switch.", "slug": "bitget", "watchFor": "Hot and warm wallets lost about 388 million dollars on 24 September 2026 to forged withdrawal commands, and withdrawals were paused until 2 October" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Payments \u0026 pricing, 55 against 40" ], "also": [ "No incidents deducted, where Bitget loses 8 points for them" ], "goodFor": "An agent trading perpetuals or spot on chain from its own wallet with no account, or acting for a master account through an approved API wallet.", "slug": "hyperliquid", "watchFor": "No official MCP server; the 23 registry entries are all third parties, several selling data by x402" } ], "history": null, "job": { "capability": "exchange.market-data", "name": "Exchange market data" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitget.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs Bitget", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitget" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb.json", "title": "Bitget vs Bithumb Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp.json", "title": "Bitget vs Bitstamp API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bybit.json", "title": "Bitget vs Bybit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bybit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.json", "title": "Bitget vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-mcp.json", "title": "Bitget vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-crypto-com-exchange.json", "title": "Bitget vs Crypto.com Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-crypto-com-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-deribit.json", "title": "Bitget vs Deribit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-deribit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-dydx.json", "title": "Bitget vs dYdX", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-dydx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gate-io.json", "title": "Bitget vs Gate", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gate-io" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gemini-exchange.json", "title": "Bitget vs Gemini Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gemini-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-htx.json", "title": "Bitget vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kraken.json", "title": "Bitget vs Kraken API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kraken" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kucoin.json", "title": "Bitget vs KuCoin", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kucoin" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Bitget vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-okx.json", "title": "Bitget vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "Bitget vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Bitget vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bybit vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Crypto.com Exchange API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Gate vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Gemini Exchange API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "HTX trading API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitget.json", "title": "Binance API vs Bitget", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitget" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Binance API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Deribit vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "dYdX vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kraken.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs Kraken API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kraken" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kucoin.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs KuCoin", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kucoin" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "bitget": 40, "by": 0, "edge": "", "hyperliquid": 40, "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "bitget": 74, "by": 32, "edge": "bitget", "hyperliquid": 42, "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "weight": 13 }, { "bitget": 83, "by": 13, "edge": "bitget", "hyperliquid": 70, "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "weight": 13 }, { "bitget": 62, "by": 2, "edge": "hyperliquid", "hyperliquid": 64, "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "weight": 14 }, { "bitget": 40, "by": 15, "edge": "hyperliquid", "hyperliquid": 55, "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "bitget": 78, "by": 39, "edge": "bitget", "hyperliquid": 39, "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "weight": 7 }, { "bitget": 65, "by": 39, "edge": "bitget", "hyperliquid": 26, "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "Bitget scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Hyperliquid's 50 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Hyperliquid leads on payments \u0026 pricing. Both do exchange market data.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "bitget": "Bitget's official MCP server keeps the default surface to 14 intent tools with discovery, read-only and paper-trading switches, dry runs and a confirmation gate on withdrawals, over an API with demo trading. A 388 million dollar wallet breach in September 2026 paused withdrawals for eight days, and there is no status page, SLA or readable fee table.", "hyperliquid": "Hyperliquid's API needs no signup or key, an approved API wallet can trade but not withdraw, fees and rate limits are published with numbers, and a testnet mirrors mainnet. There is no official MCP server, OpenAPI file, status page, changelog or readable terms, and signing uses two schemes the docs say to leave to an SDK." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid.min.md" }, "markdown": "Bitget scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Hyperliquid's 50 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Hyperliquid leads on payments \u0026 pricing. Both do exchange market data.\n\n- Bitget: grade D, 53.9/100, rank #890 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitget.json\n- Hyperliquid: grade D, 50/100, rank #1018 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hyperliquid.json\n- Best crypto exchange APIs and MCP servers for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n- All 210 exchanges comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Bitget (D)\n\nGood for: An agent trading spot, futures and earn products in a person's Bitget account outside the prohibited list, with the smallest default MCP surface of the exchanges graded and a paper-trading switch.\n\nAhead on:\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 74 against 42\n- Agent ergonomics, 83 against 70\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 78 against 39\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 65 against 26\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- Runs on your own machine\n\nWatch for: Hot and warm wallets lost about 388 million dollars on 24 September 2026 to forged withdrawal commands, and withdrawals were paused until 2 October\n\n### Hyperliquid (D)\n\nGood for: An agent trading perpetuals or spot on chain from its own wallet with no account, or acting for a master account through an approved API wallet.\n\nAhead on:\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 55 against 40\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- No incidents deducted, where Bitget loses 8 points for them\n\nWatch for: No official MCP server; the 23 registry entries are all third parties, several selling data by x402\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Maintenance \u0026 community: Bitget +39\n\n- Bitget (78): Read as a hosted service with an open-source toolkit. The UTA changelog's latest launched entry is 30 October 2026 and a preview entry 3 November; the MCP package shipped 3.3.1 on 20 September and agent-skill was pushed 30 October (30). 58 dated changelog entries since 5 August 2026 and six MCP versions since June (20). Issue trackers on the Bitget-AI repositories (11 open on agent_hub) and a support centre; replies were not checked (10 of 25). In the official MCP registry under io.github.Bitget-AI, a GitHub namespace, with official SDKs in five languages (10 of 15). CI workflow with coverage, npm provenance attestations, two runtime dependencies, no install scripts (8 of 10). 78.\n- Hyperliquid (39): Read as a closed hosted service with open SDKs. The API has no dated changelog, so the last dated change is the Python SDK's 0.24.0 on 4 June 2026, 152 days before this check; the node repository was pushed on 10 August 2026 and the docs describe newer actions (HIP-4 outcome markets, borrow and lend) without dates. Judgement call (10 of 30). No three dated releases in 90 days (0). Support through Discord and the docs' FAQ, 112 open issues on the SDK whose replies couldn't be read (8 of 25). Official Python and Rust SDKs, the Rust one last pushed 21 October 2025; no MCP registry entry (15). CI on Python 3.9 and 3.13 with Poetry, Dependabot badge, a lock file (6 of 10). Total 39.\n\n### Transparency \u0026 trust: Bitget +39\n\n- Bitget (65): The editorial half. A closed hosted service with clear terms naming BTG Technology Holdings Limited; the toolkit is MIT (15 of 30). The privacy notice names the controller and EEA representative, gives 7-year and up to 10-year retention for compliance and litigation, and names recipients by category only (18 of 30). Deprecations and parameter changes carry effective dates (delta mode deprecated 27 August, symbol and category required from 30 September, snapshot changes with demo and live dates) but no written policy (15 of 20). Recipients by category, transfers under Seychelles law with no locations or provider names (5 of 20). 53.\n- Hyperliquid (26): The editorial half. The SDKs are MIT and the node repository Apache-2.0 with a Dockerfile around a binary; the API servers and front end are closed and the terms were unreadable (12 of 30). No privacy policy read and nothing in the docs on data handling (0 of 30). Deprecated actions are marked in the docs without dates or a policy (8 of 20). No subprocessors or data locations (0 of 20). Total 20.\n\n### Schema \u0026 documentation: Bitget +32\n\n- Bitget (74): The agent SDK ships openapi.yaml with 109 typed UTA v3 operations from which the tools are generated, a machine-readable contract from the vendor's own organisation though not on the docs site (20 of 25). llms.txt in the SDK and MCP repositories; the docs site has none (6 of 10). Intent tools with a discover tool that explains each verb, action and its risk level, and the server's initialize instructions state surface, modules and read-only posture (15 of 20). Typed inputs with enums and required fields from the OpenAPI source (12 of 15). Examples in the quick start and READMEs, a REST error code page in the legacy docs that we did not read in full (9 of 15). Changelog by day with preview notices and effective dates (12 of 15). 74.\n- Hyperliquid (42): No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract; request and response shapes are tables and JSON examples in the docs (0 of 25). llms.txt and a Markdown twin of every page by appending .md (10). Each info type and exchange action has a short description of what it does, and the signing page lists common mistakes, but little says when to use one call over another (12 of 20). Fields are one-letter keys (`a`, `b`, `p`, `s`, `r`, `t`, `c`) with numbers as strings, enums such as `tif` Alo, Ioc or Gtc, and required fields marked in tables (9 of 15). An example for every call and a list of order and cancel error strings, with no HTTP error table (11 of 15). No API version, no changelog and no dated release notes; deprecated actions such as `userDexAbstraction` are marked in place (0 of 15). Total 42.\n\n### Payments \u0026 pricing: Hyperliquid +15\n\n- Bitget (40): No machine payment protocol (0). Base spot and futures rates are stated in a help article without login, the tier table draws by script (20). Market data needs no key, demo trading costs nothing and no card is asked for at sign-up (20). A person registers, verifies identity and mints the key in a browser (0). 40.\n- Hyperliquid (55): No machine payment protocol (0). Fees published per tier without login (20). No card anywhere; public info endpoints are free and the testnet faucet gives 1,000 mock USDC, though only to an address that has deposited on mainnet (15 of 20). No signup; an agent with a funded EVM wallet deposits USDC on a bridged chain and trades, subject to the unread terms (20). Total 55.\n\n### Agent ergonomics: Bitget +13\n\n- Bitget (83): Read for the API with the MCP server as the agent route. 14 compact tools by default, module filters, a full surface on request and progressive discovery (25). Cursor pagination on CFD order history since 15 October 2026 and limit parameters on lists (15 of 20). Uniform ok or error result shape from the SDK with typed error classes and compact JSON in the text channel (13 of 20). clientOid on orders, `dryRun: true` on every write, `confirm: true` gating cancelAll and withdraw, annotations derived from risk level including readOnlyHint, destructiveHint and idempotentHint (18 of 20). Few required fields, official SDKs in five languages plus the TypeScript agent SDK and a CLI (12 of 15). 83.\n- Hyperliquid (70): An API, read for response sizing. Time-range calls return at most 500 blocks of data, fills and historical orders cap at 2,000 items, candles at 5,000, l2Book at 20 levels a side (18 of 25). Cursor-by-timestamp pagination on fills and funding, filtering by coin or dex, no field selection (14 of 20). Order errors are documented strings per order, one batch-level error rejects a batch, and `orderStatus` answers `unknownOid`; no codes and no rate-limit error shape (12 of 20). `cloid`, per-signer nonces within a time window, `expiresAfter`, `noop` to burn a nonce and `scheduleCancel` as a dead man's switch (18 of 20). Few required fields, but signing needs msgpack field order, two EIP-712 schemes and lowercase addresses, and the official SDKs are Python (Alpha) and Rust only (8 of 15). Total 70.\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Bitget | Hyperliquid | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 40 | 40 | even |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 74 | 42 | Bitget +32 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 83 | 70 | Bitget +13 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 62 | 64 | Hyperliquid +2 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 40 | 55 | Hyperliquid +15 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 78 | 39 | Bitget +39 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 65 | 26 | Bitget +39 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | -8 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **53.9 · D** | **50 · D** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Bitget | Hyperliquid |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | BTG Technology Holdings Limited | Hyperliquid Labs |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | stdio | |\n| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |\n| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | none | The exchange runs on the Hyperliquid chain (HyperCore), whose node is distributed as a binary under an Apache-2.0 repository; the Python and Rust SDKs are MIT. The API servers and front end are closed |\n| Tools exposed | 14 | 0 |\n| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |\n| llms.txt | no | yes |\n| MCP registry | `io.github.Bitget-AI/bitget-agent-mcp` | not listed |\n| Last release | 2026-10-30 | 2026-06-04 |\n| Terms last updated | 2026-10-20 | couldn't be read |\n| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-12-05 | no document linked |\n| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read |\n| Terms restrict automated access | yes | couldn't be read |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | couldn't be read |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | couldn't be read |\n| Popularity | 234 stars | 1.9k stars, 167k PyPI/wk |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Bitget.** Bitget's official MCP server keeps the default surface to 14 intent tools with discovery, read-only and paper-trading switches, dry runs and a confirmation gate on withdrawals, over an API with demo trading. A 388 million dollar wallet breach in September 2026 paused withdrawals for eight days, and there is no status page, SLA or readable fee table.\n\n**Hyperliquid.** Hyperliquid's API needs no signup or key, an approved API wallet can trade but not withdraw, fees and rate limits are published with numbers, and a testnet mirrors mainnet. There is no official MCP server, OpenAPI file, status page, changelog or readable terms, and signing uses two schemes the docs say to leave to an SDK.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Bitget\n\n1. Run `npx -y @bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp --read-only` for research and `--paper-trading` with a demo key before any live order; the two flags cannot be combined\n2. Call discover({}) first, then the intent verbs; add `dryRun: true` to any write to preview it, and pass `confirm: true` only after the person has agreed to a withdraw or cancelAll\n3. Send a unique clientOid of at most 64 characters on every order and reuse it on retry; orderId wins when both are sent\n4. Stay under 10 requests a second per endpoint on a new account and 6,000 a minute per IP; the SDK retries on 429, so do not add a second retry loop\n5. Bind the key to an IP and keep write permission off a research key; the docs read show no separate withdrawal scope\n\n### Hyperliquid\n\n1. Generate a fresh API wallet, approve it with `approveAgent` with a name and expiry, sign with it, and query with the master address, never the agent address\n2. Use the Python SDK's `sign_l1_action` and `sign_user_signed_action`; mixing the two, field order in msgpack or an uppercase address gives \"User or API Wallet ... does not exist\"\n3. Set a `cloid` on every order and read the per-order `statuses` array; one batch-level error rejects the whole batch\n4. Budget address limits by volume (one action per 1 USDC traded after 10,000); batch orders to lower IP weight, and use WebSocket for data\n5. Arm `scheduleCancel` before unattended trading so open orders are cancelled if the agent stops\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Bitget or Hyperliquid?\n\nBitget scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Hyperliquid's 50 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Hyperliquid leads on payments \u0026 pricing.\n\n### Do Bitget and Hyperliquid need an API key?\n\nBitget needs an API key. Hyperliquid takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.\n\n### Can an agent call Bitget and Hyperliquid without installing anything?\n\nBitget runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. No hosted endpoint is listed for Hyperliquid.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"bitget\", \"b\": \"hyperliquid\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare bitget hyperliquid`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitget.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hyperliquid.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Bitget or Hyperliquid\n\n- [Bitfinex API vs Bitget](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitget.md)\n- [Bitfinex API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bitget vs Bithumb Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb.md)\n- [Bitget vs Bitstamp API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp.md)\n- [Bitget vs Bybit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bybit.md)\n- [Bitget vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.md)\n- [Bitget vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-mcp.md)\n- [Bitget vs Crypto.com Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-crypto-com-exchange.md)\n- [Bitget vs Deribit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-deribit.md)\n- [Bitget vs dYdX](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-dydx.md)\n- [Bitget vs Gate](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gate-io.md)\n- [Bitget vs Gemini Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gemini-exchange.md)\n- [Bitget vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-htx.md)\n- [Bitget vs Kraken API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kraken.md)\n- [Bitget vs KuCoin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kucoin.md)\n- [Bitget vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Bitget vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-okx.md)\n- [Bitget vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [Bitget vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bybit vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Crypto.com Exchange API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Gate vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Gemini Exchange API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [HTX trading API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Binance API vs Bitget](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitget.md)\n- [Binance API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [Deribit vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [dYdX vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs Kraken API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kraken.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs KuCoin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kucoin.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-04", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.7", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Bitget vs Hyperliquid", "url": "" } ], "description": "Bitget scores 53.9 (D) to Hyperliquid's 50 (D) for exchange market data. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Bitget D 53.9", "Hyperliquid D 50", "scores" ], "h1": "Bitget vs Hyperliquid", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Bitget vs Hyperliquid for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-03", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 4550, "slim": 2380 }, "version": 1 }