{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "bitget", "name": "Bitget", "vendor": "BTG Technology Holdings Limited", "vendorUrl": "https://www.bitget.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "Bitget is a centralised crypto exchange for spot, margin, futures, earn and tokenised stocks, reached through its Unified Trading Account v3 REST and WebSocket API and an Agent Hub toolkit with a stdio MCP server, CLI and agent skills.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitget.json", "dns": "bitget.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/Bitget-AI/agent-mcp", "transports": [ "stdio" ], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "bitget-mcp-server" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "API key, system-generated secret and user-set passphrase minted under API Key Management after a browser sign-up and identity verification, up to 50 keys per UID, each with read or read-and-write permission, signed per request with HMAC-SHA256 or RSA over timestamp, method, path and body in the ACCESS-KEY, ACCESS-SIGN, ACCESS-TIMESTAMP and ACCESS-PASSPHRASE headers. Binding an IP is recommended, not required. Sub-account keys carry trade or management permission, read-only or read-write, once the main account enables key management for them. Demo keys are minted in demo mode and sent with the paptrading header set to 1 (https://www.bitget.com/legacy-docs/uta/guide, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "The API and the Agent Hub packages cost nothing; trades carry Bitget's fees. Base rates are 0.1 per cent maker and taker on spot and 0.02 per cent maker and 0.06 per cent taker on futures before VIP tiers or the BGB discount, which applies to spot only at a rate the article says to read on the live schedule. The fee page draws its table by script (https://www.bitget.com/support/articles/12560603892734, 20 August 2026, checked 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "0.1% fee", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the UTA docs, the Agent Hub READMEs, the SDK's openapi.yaml or the fee article (checked 2026-11-03).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 14, "popularity": { "githubStars": 234, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://www.bitget.com/api-doc/uta/intro", "registryName": "io.github.Bitget-AI/bitget-agent-mcp", "capabilities": [ "exchange.market-data", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.derivatives", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "exchange.staking", "market.crypto" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "closed-source", "api-key", "usage-priced", "sandbox", "no-status-page", "mcp", "mcp-registry", "official", "read-only-mode", "agent-skills", "cli", "python", "typescript", "go", "java", "php" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-30", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 53.9, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 890, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 15, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 83, "maintenance": 78, "payments": 40, "reliability": 40, "schema": 74, "security": 62, "transparency": 65 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": -8, "negativeNotes": [ "Security incident of 24 September 2026. An attacker who had obtained high-level internal credentials through a vulnerability in a third-party security product injected forged withdrawal commands into Bitget's wallet back end and moved about 388 million dollars in 13 assets on 11 chains from hot and warm wallets. Withdrawals, fiat and C2C were paused from 24 September and restored in phases from 28 September to 2 October 2026; trading, deposits and the API kept running. Bitget says user balances were unaffected, the Protection Fund covered the loss and was topped above 300 million dollars, private keys and cold wallets were untouched, and Mandiant and SlowMist reports of 30 September agree with its account. A fixed, documented incident with a public root cause, so below the top of the range. Sources https://www.bitget.com/academy/12560603896113 (updated 20 October 2026) and https://www.bitget.com/support/articles/12560603896110 (26 September 2026), read 2026-11-03." ], "verdict": "Bitget's official MCP server keeps the default surface to 14 intent tools with discovery, read-only and paper-trading switches, dry runs and a confirmation gate on withdrawals, over an API with demo trading. A 388 million dollar wallet breach in September 2026 paused withdrawals for eight days, and there is no status page, SLA or readable fee table.", "bestFor": "An agent trading spot, futures and earn products in a person's Bitget account outside the prohibited list, with the smallest default MCP surface of the exchanges graded and a paper-trading switch.", "strengths": [ "Official stdio MCP server with 14 intent tools by default, progressive discovery, `--read-only`, `--paper-trading`, `dryRun: true` on writes and `confirm: true` required for withdrawals and cancel-all", "Demo trading on the production host with demo keys and a paptrading header, and a TypeScript agent SDK whose openapi.yaml types all 109 UTA v3 operations", "Terms name BTG Technology Holdings Limited with Hong Kong law, and the privacy notice gives retention periods of 7 and up to 10 years", "Changelog with 58 dated entries since 5 August 2026, including preview notices with demo and live dates for WebSocket changes", "Base fees public in a help article, 0.1 per cent spot and 0.02 per cent maker and 0.06 per cent taker on futures" ], "weaknesses": [ "Hot and warm wallets lost about 388 million dollars on 24 September 2026 to forged withdrawal commands, and withdrawals were paused until 2 October", "No status page, incident history or SLA; the terms disclaim uninterrupted access", "Two official MCP servers coexist, the V2-based bitget-mcp-server on Bitget's own Agent Hub page and the v3 bitget-agent-mcp on GitHub and npm, with different tool counts", "The current api-doc site renders every page as the UTA overview for a reader without script; the legacy docs were used instead", "Keys have read or read-and-write only, with no separate withdrawal permission in the docs read, and IP binding is recommended rather than required" ], "agentNotes": [ "Run `npx -y @bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp --read-only` for research and `--paper-trading` with a demo key before any live order; the two flags cannot be combined", "Call discover({}) first, then the intent verbs; add `dryRun: true` to any write to preview it, and pass `confirm: true` only after the person has agreed to a withdraw or cancelAll", "Send a unique clientOid of at most 64 characters on every order and reuse it on retry; orderId wins when both are sent", "Stay under 10 requests a second per endpoint on a new account and 6,000 a minute per IP; the SDK retries on 429, so do not add a second retry loop", "Bind the key to an IP and keep write permission off a research key; the docs read show no separate withdrawal scope" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 53.9 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 83, "maintenance": 78, "payments": 40, "reliability": 40, "schema": 74, "security": 62, "transparency": 53 }, "provenanceScore": 76, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "npx -y @bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp", "http": "curl https://api.bitget.com/api/v3/market/tickers?category=SPOT\u0026symbol=BTCUSDT", "claudeCode": "claude mcp add bitget -- npx -y @bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp --read-only", "config": { "mcpServers": { "bitget": { "args": [ "-y", "@bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp", "--read-only" ], "command": "npx", "env": { "BITGET_API_KEY": "YOUR_API_KEY", "BITGET_PASSPHRASE": "YOUR_PASSPHRASE", "BITGET_SECRET_KEY": "YOUR_SECRET_KEY" } } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.market-data", "tool": "https://letme.dev/bitget" }, "area": "payments", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Spot trade, base maker or taker", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.1, "note": "before VIP tiers and the BGB discount" }, { "item": "Futures trade, base taker", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.06, "note": "maker 0.02 per cent" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "BTG Technology Holdings Limited", "domain": "bitget.com", "domainRegistered": "2003-02-03", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.bitget.com/support/articles/360014944032-terms-of-use", "privacy": "https://www.bitget.com/support/articles/360015150651", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://www.bitget.com/legacy-docs/uta/changelog", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "Terms of Use last updated 20 October 2026 name BTG Technology Holdings Limited under Hong Kong law with HKIAC arbitration; the privacy notice (5 December 2025) names the same company as controller under the Seychelles Data Protection Act 2023 with BTGT Europe Limited, UAB as EEA representative. /user-agreement and /privacy-policy answer 404; the documents live in the support centre.", "www.bitget.com/robots.txt disallows internal, search, calendar, wiki and register paths; the api-doc, legacy-docs, support, academy, blog and activity-hub paths are allowed.", "RDAP gives bitget.com a registration date of 3 February 2003 (MarkMonitor), earlier than the exchange, so the domain was bought.", "https://www.bitget.com/.well-known/security.txt answers 404; the Agent Hub README gives security@bitget.com for reports. No status page found; status.bitget.com does not resolve and the docs link none.", "The current api-doc site answers every path with the UTA overview for a reader without script; the legacy docs at /legacy-docs/uta/ were read for the guide, rate limits and changelog." ], "score": 76 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget.json", "live": { "slug": "bitget", "versions": [ { "registry": "mcp-registry", "name": "io.github.Bitget-AI/bitget-agent-mcp", "version": "3.0.2", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T17:11:44.552009456Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp", "version": "3.3.1", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:49.846993208Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "bitget-mcp-server", "version": "1.1.0", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:50.714916236Z" } ], "githubStars": 1, "npmWeekly": 255, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://bitget.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:53:53.864777414Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:53.43909091Z" } }, "answer": "Bitget scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Bithumb Open API's 50.6 (D), and leads in every scored category.", "b": { "slug": "bithumb", "name": "Bithumb Open API", "vendor": "Bithumb Co., Ltd.", "vendorUrl": "https://apidocs.bithumb.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "Bithumb, a Korean exchange, runs a REST and WebSocket Open API for KRW market data, orders, balances, deposits and withdrawals, and an official AI Trade Kit with a local MCP server, a CLI and agent skills.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bithumb", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bithumb.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bithumb.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bithumb.json", "dns": "bithumb.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/bithumb-official/bithumb-ai-trade-kit", "transports": [ "stdio" ], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bithumb-official/bithumb-mcp" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bithumb-official/bithumb-cli" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "Access and secret keys issued under My Page \u003e API Management on bithumb.com after identity verification. The person picks permissions (asset inquiry, order inquiry, place orders, withdrawals and others) and registers the IP addresses allowed to call. Each request carries a JWT signed with the secret as a Bearer token. Keys are valid for one year from issue and can't be extended; up to 10 per account including expired ones; the secret is shown once. The MCP server and CLI read BITHUMB_ACCESS_KEY and BITHUMB_SECRET_KEY, and market tools need no key (https://apidocs.bithumb.com/docs/빠른-시작-가이드.md, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "Trading fees per fill. The fee page at bithumb.com/react/info/fee/trade timed out on every attempt, so no rate is recorded; press reports from 2024 describe a 0.04 per cent rate with a monthly coupon and 0.25 per cent without, which is a lead and not a source. Public market data needs no key and no account (https://www.bithumb.com/react/info/fee/trade, checked 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "Pay per use", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the API docs, the AI Trade Kit repository or llms.txt (checked 2026-11-03). Fees are taken from each fill.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 41, "popularity": { "githubStars": 6, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://apidocs.bithumb.com/reference/api-레퍼런스", "llmsTxt": "https://apidocs.bithumb.com/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "exchange.market-data", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "market.crypto" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "api-key", "closed-source", "usage-priced", "mcp", "cli", "agent-skills", "read-only-mode", "llms-txt", "mit", "no-status-page" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-13", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 50.6, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 999, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 17, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 67, "maintenance": 69, "payments": 15, "reliability": 34, "schema": 64, "security": 60, "transparency": 47 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Bithumb runs an official local MCP server with 41 tools, module selection and a read-only flag, beside a CLI with per-profile read-only gating and six agent skills, over an API with scoped one-year keys and a mandatory IP list. There is no sandbox, no status page, no documented 429 behaviour, and the fees and terms couldn't be read.", "bestFor": "KRW-market trading for agents acting for a verified Korean account, with a vendor-built MCP server, CLI and skills.", "strengths": [ "An official MCP server from Bithumb with 41 tools in seven selectable modules and a `--read-only` flag that blocks orders, deposits and withdrawals", "Keys scoped to chosen permissions, limited to registered IPs and expiring after one year, with a key-list endpoint that shows expiry", "The CLI's per-profile read-only flag, local audit log and second factor on KRW deposits and withdrawals, and skills that refuse to bypass read-only", "Rate limits published per category with numbers, and notices with effective dates for changes such as the 200-market ticker cap", "Errors return a stable error.name under an HTTP status, with retry guidance for order_not_ready and server_error" ], "weaknesses": [ "No sandbox or testnet; every order uses real funds", "A rate-limit breach is signalled only as a temporary restriction, with no status code, header or Retry-After documented", "No status page, incident history or SLA", "The MCP server is local only, not in the official MCP registry, and its source is not published (the kit repository holds skills and setup files)", "The fee schedule, terms of service and Open API terms on bithumb.com timed out or answered a title only, so none is recorded first-hand" ], "agentNotes": [ "Ask for a key with asset and order inquiry plus order placement only, never withdrawals, with your IP registered; keys expire after one year and a wrong IP answers 401 NotAllowIP", "Start the server with `--modules market,account,trade --read-only` for analysis and drop `--read-only` only when the person asks to trade; deposit and withdraw modules stay off", "Prefer the `bithumb` CLI for writes, as the skills do, and check `bithumb config show --json` for a read-only profile before any order", "Keep the ticker's markets parameter at 200 or fewer, batch orders at 30 and cancels at 30 per request, and stay under 140 private calls a second per category", "Retry 422 order_not_ready and 500 server_error after a pause; there is no sandbox, so start with the smallest order the market allows" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 50.6 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 67, "maintenance": 69, "payments": 15, "reliability": 34, "schema": 64, "security": 60, "transparency": 24 }, "provenanceScore": 69, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "npm install -g @bithumb-official/bithumb-cli", "http": "curl 'https://api.bithumb.com/v1/market/all?isDetails=false'", "config": { "mcpServers": { "bithumb": { "args": [ "-y", "@bithumb-official/bithumb-mcp", "--modules", "market,account,trade", "--read-only" ], "command": "npx", "env": { "BITHUMB_ACCESS_KEY": "${BITHUMB_ACCESS_KEY}", "BITHUMB_SECRET_KEY": "${BITHUMB_SECRET_KEY}" } } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.market-data", "tool": "https://letme.dev/bithumb" }, "area": "payments", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Bithumb Co., Ltd.", "domain": "bithumb.com", "domainRegistered": "2015-06-16", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.bithumb.com/react/terms/info-terms", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://apidocs.bithumb.com/changelog", "securityTxt": "unknown", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "Bithumb Co., Ltd. is named in the AI Trade Kit's disclaimer (compliance review 007441, 29 May 2026 to 28 May 2027). The terms of service at bithumb.com/react/terms/info-terms answered a page title only on two attempts, and the Open API terms, company page and fee pages timed out or did the same; no privacy policy URL was found in the sitemap's first part, so it is left empty.", "www.bithumb.com/robots.txt has no active rules (comments only) and two sitemaps; apidocs.bithumb.com/robots.txt allows everything but edit, login and api-next paths and points to llms.txt.", "https://www.bithumb.com/.well-known/security.txt timed out twice; recorded as unknown.", "RDAP gives bithumb.com a registration date of 16 June 2015.", "No status page found; the API has wallet-status and notices endpoints." ], "score": 69 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bithumb.json", "live": { "slug": "bithumb", "versions": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bithumb-official/bithumb-cli", "version": "0.8.5", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:56.600783413Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@bithumb-official/bithumb-mcp", "version": "0.8.5", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:55.754674786Z" } ], "githubStars": 6, "npmWeekly": 87, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://bithumb.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:26.914675257Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T20:02:57.989976217Z" } }, "edges": [ { "by": 25, "category": "payments", "leads": "bitget", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "reasons": { "a": "No machine payment protocol (0). Base spot and futures rates are stated in a help article without login, the tier table draws by script (20). Market data needs no key, demo trading costs nothing and no card is asked for at sign-up (20). A person registers, verifies identity and mints the key in a browser (0). 40.", "b": "No machine payment protocol (0). The fee page timed out on every attempt, so no price is recorded (0 of 20, unchecked). Public market data needs no key, card or account; trading needs a verified Korean account. Judgement call (15 of 20). A person must sign up, pass identity checks and issue keys in the browser (0). 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 15." }, "scores": { "a": 40, "b": 15 } }, { "by": 18, "category": "transparency", "leads": "bitget", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "reasons": { "a": "The editorial half. A closed hosted service with clear terms naming BTG Technology Holdings Limited; the toolkit is MIT (15 of 30). The privacy notice names the controller and EEA representative, gives 7-year and up to 10-year retention for compliance and litigation, and names recipients by category only (18 of 30). Deprecations and parameter changes carry effective dates (delta mode deprecated 27 August, symbol and category required from 30 September, snapshot changes with demo and live dates) but no written policy (15 of 20). Recipients by category, transfers under Seychelles law with no locations or provider names (5 of 20). 53.", "b": "The editorial half. A closed service whose terms couldn't be read (timeouts and a title-only page); the kit is MIT with a disclaimer naming Bithumb Co., Ltd. (10 of 30). No privacy policy read (0 of 30, unchecked). Dated retirement of WebSocket Private v1 and effective dates on breaking notices (14 of 20). No subprocessor or data-location statement read (0 of 20). 10 + 0 + 14 + 0 = 24." }, "scores": { "a": 65, "b": 47 } }, { "by": 16, "category": "ergonomics", "leads": "bitget", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "reasons": { "a": "Read for the API with the MCP server as the agent route. 14 compact tools by default, module filters, a full surface on request and progressive discovery (25). Cursor pagination on CFD order history since 15 October 2026 and limit parameters on lists (15 of 20). Uniform ok or error result shape from the SDK with typed error classes and compact JSON in the text channel (13 of 20). clientOid on orders, `dryRun: true` on every write, `confirm: true` gating cancelAll and withdraw, annotations derived from risk level including readOnlyHint, destructiveHint and idempotentHint (18 of 20). Few required fields, official SDKs in five languages plus the TypeScript agent SDK and a CLI (12 of 15). 83.", "b": "Graded on the REST API with the MCP server. 41 tools in all, selectable by module, so 15 for 11 to 30 or more and 8 added back for the module switch (23 of 25). Candle counts, order paging and a 200-market cap on the ticker (13 of 20). Stable error.name values with retry guidance for order_not_ready and server_error (14 of 20). No client order id or idempotency key documented; the CLI's per-profile read-only flag, the MCP --read-only flag and the skills' read-only gate help, and readOnlyHint annotations weren't checked (9 of 20). Few required parameters, but no official SDK beyond the CLI and a CCXT guide (8 of 15). 23 + 13 + 14 + 9 + 8 = 67." }, "scores": { "a": 83, "b": 67 } }, { "by": 10, "category": "schema", "leads": "bitget", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "reasons": { "a": "The agent SDK ships openapi.yaml with 109 typed UTA v3 operations from which the tools are generated, a machine-readable contract from the vendor's own organisation though not on the docs site (20 of 25). llms.txt in the SDK and MCP repositories; the docs site has none (6 of 10). Intent tools with a discover tool that explains each verb, action and its risk level, and the server's initialize instructions state surface, modules and read-only posture (15 of 20). Typed inputs with enums and required fields from the OpenAPI source (12 of 15). Examples in the quick start and READMEs, a REST error code page in the legacy docs that we did not read in full (9 of 15). Changelog by day with preview notices and effective dates (12 of 15). 74.", "b": "No OpenAPI found; the reference is a readme.io site with Markdown twins, and the MCP tool schemas weren't read since the server's source isn't published (5 of 25). llms.txt on apidocs.bithumb.com (10). Reference pages state purpose and the skills say when to use each module and when not to (15 of 20). Typed parameters with enums for side, order type and time in force (10 of 15). Examples in several languages and an error-code page with names, statuses and meanings (12 of 15). Versions per endpoint (v1, v2, v2.1.5) and notices with effective dates (12 of 15). 5 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 12 + 12 = 64." }, "scores": { "a": 74, "b": 64 } }, { "by": 9, "category": "maintenance", "leads": "bitget", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "reasons": { "a": "Read as a hosted service with an open-source toolkit. The UTA changelog's latest launched entry is 30 October 2026 and a preview entry 3 November; the MCP package shipped 3.3.1 on 20 September and agent-skill was pushed 30 October (30). 58 dated changelog entries since 5 August 2026 and six MCP versions since June (20). Issue trackers on the Bitget-AI repositories (11 open on agent_hub) and a support centre; replies were not checked (10 of 25). In the official MCP registry under io.github.Bitget-AI, a GitHub namespace, with official SDKs in five languages (10 of 15). CI workflow with coverage, npm provenance attestations, two runtime dependencies, no install scripts (8 of 10). 78.", "b": "Read as a closed service. Rate limits updated 27 October 2026 and the ticker cap effective 13 October 2026 (30). Batch orders 20 August, Private v1 retired 30 September, the ticker cap 13 October and the limits page 27 October 2026 (20). A phone support line, dated notices and a GitHub repository with no open issues and one commit; replies not observed (9 of 15). The MCP server is not in the official MCP registry and there is no SDK; the CLI and MCP packages are current (5 of 15). The MCP package depends only on @modelcontextprotocol/sdk ^1.26 on Node 18, with no public source or CI (5 of 10). 30 + 20 + 9 + 5 + 5 = 69." }, "scores": { "a": 78, "b": 69 } }, { "by": 6, "category": "reliability", "leads": "bitget", "name": "Reliability", "reasons": { "a": "Graded with the hosted lines on the UTA v3 API at api.bitget.com. No status page found (status.bitget.com does not resolve, the docs link none), so 0 for the page and 5 for no readable history; the September 2026 breach is in the deduction, not here. Rate limits are published as 6,000 per IP per minute and per-endpoint UID limits by VIP level (15). An x-mbx-used-remain-limit header is documented and the agent SDK backs off on 429, orders take a clientOid of up to 64 characters, but the breach error code and a Retry-After rule were not read (10 of 15). No SLA (0). UTA v3 is the production API (10). 40.", "b": "Read with the hosted lines. No status page found on apidocs.bithumb.com or in llms.txt; wallet-status and notices endpoints stand in (0). No readable incident history, though two notices record a public WebSocket interruption and a brief service break (5). Rate limits documented per category with numbers, updated 27 October 2026 (15). A breach is described only as a temporary restriction, with no status code, header or Retry-After, and no client order id or idempotency key is documented; 422 order_not_ready and 500 server_error say to retry later (4 of 15). No SLA found (0). The API is generally available; the MCP server and CLI are at 0.8.5 (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 4 + 0 + 10 = 34." }, "scores": { "a": 40, "b": 34 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "HTTP API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "BTG Technology Holdings Limited", "b": "Bithumb Co., Ltd.", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "stdio", "b": "stdio", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "API key", "b": "API key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Pay per use", "b": "Pay per use", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "14", "b": "41", "name": "Tools exposed" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "no", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "io.github.Bitget-AI/bitget-agent-mcp", "b": "not listed", "name": "MCP registry" }, { "a": "2026-10-30", "b": "2026-10-13", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "2026-10-20", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "2025-12-05", "b": "no document linked", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "234 stars", "b": "6 stars", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Bitget scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Bithumb Open API's 50.6 (D), and leads in every scored category.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Bitget or Bithumb Open API?" }, { "answer": "Both need an API key.", "question": "Do Bitget and Bithumb Open API need an API key?" }, { "answer": "Bitget runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. Bithumb Open API runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.", "question": "Can an agent call Bitget and Bithumb Open API without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 40 against 34", "Schema \u0026 documentation, 74 against 64", "Agent ergonomics, 83 against 67", "Payments \u0026 pricing, 40 against 15", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 78 against 69", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 65 against 47" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "An agent trading spot, futures and earn products in a person's Bitget account outside the prohibited list, with the smallest default MCP surface of the exchanges graded and a paper-trading switch.", "slug": "bitget", "watchFor": "Hot and warm wallets lost about 388 million dollars on 24 September 2026 to forged withdrawal commands, and withdrawals were paused until 2 October" }, { "aheadOn": null, "also": [ "No incidents deducted, where Bitget loses 8 points for them" ], "goodFor": "KRW-market trading for agents acting for a verified Korean account, with a vendor-built MCP server, CLI and skills.", "slug": "bithumb", "watchFor": "No sandbox or testnet; every order uses real funds" } ], "history": null, "job": { "capability": "exchange.market-data", "name": "Exchange market data" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitget.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs Bitget", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitget" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bithumb.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs Bithumb Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bithumb" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp.json", "title": "Bitget vs Bitstamp API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bybit.json", "title": "Bitget vs Bybit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bybit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.json", "title": "Bitget vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-mcp.json", "title": "Bitget vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-crypto-com-exchange.json", "title": "Bitget vs Crypto.com Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-crypto-com-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-deribit.json", "title": "Bitget vs Deribit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-deribit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-dydx.json", "title": "Bitget vs dYdX", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-dydx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gate-io.json", "title": "Bitget vs Gate", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gate-io" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gemini-exchange.json", "title": "Bitget vs Gemini Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gemini-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-htx.json", "title": "Bitget vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bitget vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kraken.json", "title": "Bitget vs Kraken API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kraken" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kucoin.json", "title": "Bitget vs KuCoin", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kucoin" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Bitget vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-okx.json", "title": "Bitget vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "Bitget vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Bitget vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bitstamp.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Bitstamp API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bitstamp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bybit.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Bybit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bybit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-coinbase-mcp.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-coinbase-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-crypto-com-exchange.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Crypto.com Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-crypto-com-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-deribit.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Deribit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-deribit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-dydx.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs dYdX", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-dydx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-gate-io.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Gate", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-gate-io" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-gemini-exchange.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Gemini Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-gemini-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-htx.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-kraken.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Kraken API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-kraken" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-kucoin.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs KuCoin", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-kucoin" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-okx.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitget.json", "title": "Binance API vs Bitget", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitget" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bithumb.json", "title": "Binance API vs Bithumb Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bithumb" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "bitget": 40, "bithumb": 34, "by": 6, "edge": "bitget", "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "bitget": 74, "bithumb": 64, "by": 10, "edge": "bitget", "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "weight": 13 }, { "bitget": 83, "bithumb": 67, "by": 16, "edge": "bitget", "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "weight": 13 }, { "bitget": 62, "bithumb": 60, "by": 2, "edge": "bitget", "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "weight": 14 }, { "bitget": 40, "bithumb": 15, "by": 25, "edge": "bitget", "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "bitget": 78, "bithumb": 69, "by": 9, "edge": "bitget", "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "weight": 7 }, { "bitget": 65, "bithumb": 47, "by": 18, "edge": "bitget", "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "Bitget scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Bithumb Open API's 50.6 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do exchange market data.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "bitget": "Bitget's official MCP server keeps the default surface to 14 intent tools with discovery, read-only and paper-trading switches, dry runs and a confirmation gate on withdrawals, over an API with demo trading. A 388 million dollar wallet breach in September 2026 paused withdrawals for eight days, and there is no status page, SLA or readable fee table.", "bithumb": "Bithumb runs an official local MCP server with 41 tools, module selection and a read-only flag, beside a CLI with per-profile read-only gating and six agent skills, over an API with scoped one-year keys and a mandatory IP list. There is no sandbox, no status page, no documented 429 behaviour, and the fees and terms couldn't be read." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb.min.md" }, "markdown": "Bitget scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Bithumb Open API's 50.6 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do exchange market data.\n\n- Bitget: grade D, 53.9/100, rank #890 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitget.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitget.json\n- Bithumb Open API: grade D, 50.6/100, rank #999 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bithumb.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bithumb.json\n- Best crypto exchange APIs and MCP servers for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n- All 210 exchanges comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Bitget (D)\n\nGood for: An agent trading spot, futures and earn products in a person's Bitget account outside the prohibited list, with the smallest default MCP surface of the exchanges graded and a paper-trading switch.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 40 against 34\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 74 against 64\n- Agent ergonomics, 83 against 67\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 40 against 15\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 78 against 69\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 65 against 47\n\nWatch for: Hot and warm wallets lost about 388 million dollars on 24 September 2026 to forged withdrawal commands, and withdrawals were paused until 2 October\n\n### Bithumb Open API (D)\n\nGood for: KRW-market trading for agents acting for a verified Korean account, with a vendor-built MCP server, CLI and skills.\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- No incidents deducted, where Bitget loses 8 points for them\n\nWatch for: No sandbox or testnet; every order uses real funds\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Payments \u0026 pricing: Bitget +25\n\n- Bitget (40): No machine payment protocol (0). Base spot and futures rates are stated in a help article without login, the tier table draws by script (20). Market data needs no key, demo trading costs nothing and no card is asked for at sign-up (20). A person registers, verifies identity and mints the key in a browser (0). 40.\n- Bithumb Open API (15): No machine payment protocol (0). The fee page timed out on every attempt, so no price is recorded (0 of 20, unchecked). Public market data needs no key, card or account; trading needs a verified Korean account. Judgement call (15 of 20). A person must sign up, pass identity checks and issue keys in the browser (0). 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 15.\n\n### Transparency \u0026 trust: Bitget +18\n\n- Bitget (65): The editorial half. A closed hosted service with clear terms naming BTG Technology Holdings Limited; the toolkit is MIT (15 of 30). The privacy notice names the controller and EEA representative, gives 7-year and up to 10-year retention for compliance and litigation, and names recipients by category only (18 of 30). Deprecations and parameter changes carry effective dates (delta mode deprecated 27 August, symbol and category required from 30 September, snapshot changes with demo and live dates) but no written policy (15 of 20). Recipients by category, transfers under Seychelles law with no locations or provider names (5 of 20). 53.\n- Bithumb Open API (47): The editorial half. A closed service whose terms couldn't be read (timeouts and a title-only page); the kit is MIT with a disclaimer naming Bithumb Co., Ltd. (10 of 30). No privacy policy read (0 of 30, unchecked). Dated retirement of WebSocket Private v1 and effective dates on breaking notices (14 of 20). No subprocessor or data-location statement read (0 of 20). 10 + 0 + 14 + 0 = 24.\n\n### Agent ergonomics: Bitget +16\n\n- Bitget (83): Read for the API with the MCP server as the agent route. 14 compact tools by default, module filters, a full surface on request and progressive discovery (25). Cursor pagination on CFD order history since 15 October 2026 and limit parameters on lists (15 of 20). Uniform ok or error result shape from the SDK with typed error classes and compact JSON in the text channel (13 of 20). clientOid on orders, `dryRun: true` on every write, `confirm: true` gating cancelAll and withdraw, annotations derived from risk level including readOnlyHint, destructiveHint and idempotentHint (18 of 20). Few required fields, official SDKs in five languages plus the TypeScript agent SDK and a CLI (12 of 15). 83.\n- Bithumb Open API (67): Graded on the REST API with the MCP server. 41 tools in all, selectable by module, so 15 for 11 to 30 or more and 8 added back for the module switch (23 of 25). Candle counts, order paging and a 200-market cap on the ticker (13 of 20). Stable error.name values with retry guidance for order_not_ready and server_error (14 of 20). No client order id or idempotency key documented; the CLI's per-profile read-only flag, the MCP --read-only flag and the skills' read-only gate help, and readOnlyHint annotations weren't checked (9 of 20). Few required parameters, but no official SDK beyond the CLI and a CCXT guide (8 of 15). 23 + 13 + 14 + 9 + 8 = 67.\n\n### Schema \u0026 documentation: Bitget +10\n\n- Bitget (74): The agent SDK ships openapi.yaml with 109 typed UTA v3 operations from which the tools are generated, a machine-readable contract from the vendor's own organisation though not on the docs site (20 of 25). llms.txt in the SDK and MCP repositories; the docs site has none (6 of 10). Intent tools with a discover tool that explains each verb, action and its risk level, and the server's initialize instructions state surface, modules and read-only posture (15 of 20). Typed inputs with enums and required fields from the OpenAPI source (12 of 15). Examples in the quick start and READMEs, a REST error code page in the legacy docs that we did not read in full (9 of 15). Changelog by day with preview notices and effective dates (12 of 15). 74.\n- Bithumb Open API (64): No OpenAPI found; the reference is a readme.io site with Markdown twins, and the MCP tool schemas weren't read since the server's source isn't published (5 of 25). llms.txt on apidocs.bithumb.com (10). Reference pages state purpose and the skills say when to use each module and when not to (15 of 20). Typed parameters with enums for side, order type and time in force (10 of 15). Examples in several languages and an error-code page with names, statuses and meanings (12 of 15). Versions per endpoint (v1, v2, v2.1.5) and notices with effective dates (12 of 15). 5 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 12 + 12 = 64.\n\n### Maintenance \u0026 community: Bitget +9\n\n- Bitget (78): Read as a hosted service with an open-source toolkit. The UTA changelog's latest launched entry is 30 October 2026 and a preview entry 3 November; the MCP package shipped 3.3.1 on 20 September and agent-skill was pushed 30 October (30). 58 dated changelog entries since 5 August 2026 and six MCP versions since June (20). Issue trackers on the Bitget-AI repositories (11 open on agent_hub) and a support centre; replies were not checked (10 of 25). In the official MCP registry under io.github.Bitget-AI, a GitHub namespace, with official SDKs in five languages (10 of 15). CI workflow with coverage, npm provenance attestations, two runtime dependencies, no install scripts (8 of 10). 78.\n- Bithumb Open API (69): Read as a closed service. Rate limits updated 27 October 2026 and the ticker cap effective 13 October 2026 (30). Batch orders 20 August, Private v1 retired 30 September, the ticker cap 13 October and the limits page 27 October 2026 (20). A phone support line, dated notices and a GitHub repository with no open issues and one commit; replies not observed (9 of 15). The MCP server is not in the official MCP registry and there is no SDK; the CLI and MCP packages are current (5 of 15). The MCP package depends only on @modelcontextprotocol/sdk ^1.26 on Node 18, with no public source or CI (5 of 10). 30 + 20 + 9 + 5 + 5 = 69.\n\n### Reliability: Bitget +6\n\n- Bitget (40): Graded with the hosted lines on the UTA v3 API at api.bitget.com. No status page found (status.bitget.com does not resolve, the docs link none), so 0 for the page and 5 for no readable history; the September 2026 breach is in the deduction, not here. Rate limits are published as 6,000 per IP per minute and per-endpoint UID limits by VIP level (15). An x-mbx-used-remain-limit header is documented and the agent SDK backs off on 429, orders take a clientOid of up to 64 characters, but the breach error code and a Retry-After rule were not read (10 of 15). No SLA (0). UTA v3 is the production API (10). 40.\n- Bithumb Open API (34): Read with the hosted lines. No status page found on apidocs.bithumb.com or in llms.txt; wallet-status and notices endpoints stand in (0). No readable incident history, though two notices record a public WebSocket interruption and a brief service break (5). Rate limits documented per category with numbers, updated 27 October 2026 (15). A breach is described only as a temporary restriction, with no status code, header or Retry-After, and no client order id or idempotency key is documented; 422 order_not_ready and 500 server_error say to retry later (4 of 15). No SLA found (0). The API is generally available; the MCP server and CLI are at 0.8.5 (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 4 + 0 + 10 = 34.\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Bitget | Bithumb Open API | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 40 | 34 | Bitget +6 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 74 | 64 | Bitget +10 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 83 | 67 | Bitget +16 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 62 | 60 | Bitget +2 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 40 | 15 | Bitget +25 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 78 | 69 | Bitget +9 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 65 | 47 | Bitget +18 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | -8 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **53.9 · D** | **50.6 · D** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Bitget | Bithumb Open API |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | BTG Technology Holdings Limited | Bithumb Co., Ltd. |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | stdio | stdio |\n| Auth | API key | API key |\n| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Tools exposed | 14 | 41 |\n| Read-only variant documented | yes | yes |\n| llms.txt | no | yes |\n| MCP registry | `io.github.Bitget-AI/bitget-agent-mcp` | not listed |\n| Last release | 2026-10-30 | 2026-10-13 |\n| Terms last updated | 2026-10-20 | couldn't be read |\n| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-12-05 | no document linked |\n| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read |\n| Terms restrict automated access | yes | couldn't be read |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | couldn't be read |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | couldn't be read |\n| Popularity | 234 stars | 6 stars |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Bitget.** Bitget's official MCP server keeps the default surface to 14 intent tools with discovery, read-only and paper-trading switches, dry runs and a confirmation gate on withdrawals, over an API with demo trading. A 388 million dollar wallet breach in September 2026 paused withdrawals for eight days, and there is no status page, SLA or readable fee table.\n\n**Bithumb Open API.** Bithumb runs an official local MCP server with 41 tools, module selection and a read-only flag, beside a CLI with per-profile read-only gating and six agent skills, over an API with scoped one-year keys and a mandatory IP list. There is no sandbox, no status page, no documented 429 behaviour, and the fees and terms couldn't be read.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Bitget\n\n1. Run `npx -y @bitget-ai/bitget-agent-mcp --read-only` for research and `--paper-trading` with a demo key before any live order; the two flags cannot be combined\n2. Call discover({}) first, then the intent verbs; add `dryRun: true` to any write to preview it, and pass `confirm: true` only after the person has agreed to a withdraw or cancelAll\n3. Send a unique clientOid of at most 64 characters on every order and reuse it on retry; orderId wins when both are sent\n4. Stay under 10 requests a second per endpoint on a new account and 6,000 a minute per IP; the SDK retries on 429, so do not add a second retry loop\n5. Bind the key to an IP and keep write permission off a research key; the docs read show no separate withdrawal scope\n\n### Bithumb Open API\n\n1. Ask for a key with asset and order inquiry plus order placement only, never withdrawals, with your IP registered; keys expire after one year and a wrong IP answers 401 NotAllowIP\n2. Start the server with `--modules market,account,trade --read-only` for analysis and drop `--read-only` only when the person asks to trade; deposit and withdraw modules stay off\n3. Prefer the `bithumb` CLI for writes, as the skills do, and check `bithumb config show --json` for a read-only profile before any order\n4. Keep the ticker's markets parameter at 200 or fewer, batch orders at 30 and cancels at 30 per request, and stay under 140 private calls a second per category\n5. Retry 422 order_not_ready and 500 server_error after a pause; there is no sandbox, so start with the smallest order the market allows\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Bitget or Bithumb Open API?\n\nBitget scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Bithumb Open API's 50.6 (D), and leads in every scored category.\n\n### Do Bitget and Bithumb Open API need an API key?\n\nBoth need an API key.\n\n### Can an agent call Bitget and Bithumb Open API without installing anything?\n\nBitget runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. Bithumb Open API runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"bitget\", \"b\": \"bithumb\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare bitget bithumb`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitget.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bithumb.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Bitget or Bithumb Open API\n\n- [Bitfinex API vs Bitget](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitget.md)\n- [Bitfinex API vs Bithumb Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bithumb.md)\n- [Bitget vs Bitstamp API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp.md)\n- [Bitget vs Bybit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bybit.md)\n- [Bitget vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.md)\n- [Bitget vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-coinbase-mcp.md)\n- [Bitget vs Crypto.com Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-crypto-com-exchange.md)\n- [Bitget vs Deribit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-deribit.md)\n- [Bitget vs dYdX](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-dydx.md)\n- [Bitget vs Gate](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gate-io.md)\n- [Bitget vs Gemini Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-gemini-exchange.md)\n- [Bitget vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-htx.md)\n- [Bitget vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bitget vs Kraken API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kraken.md)\n- [Bitget vs KuCoin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-kucoin.md)\n- [Bitget vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Bitget vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-okx.md)\n- [Bitget vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [Bitget vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Bitstamp API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bitstamp.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Bybit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bybit.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-coinbase-mcp.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Crypto.com Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-crypto-com-exchange.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Deribit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-deribit.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs dYdX](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-dydx.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Gate](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-gate-io.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Gemini Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-gemini-exchange.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-htx.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Kraken API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-kraken.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs KuCoin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-kucoin.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-okx.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Binance API vs Bitget](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitget.md)\n- [Binance API vs Bithumb Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bithumb.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-04", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.7", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Bitget vs Bithumb Open API", "url": "" } ], "description": "Bitget scores 53.9 (D) to Bithumb Open's 50.6 (D) for exchange market data. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Bitget D 53.9", "Bithumb Open API D 50.6", "scores" ], "h1": "Bitget vs Bithumb Open API", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Bitget vs Bithumb Open for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-03", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bithumb" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 4700, "slim": 2530 }, "version": 1 }