{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "binance", "name": "Binance API", "vendor": "Binance", "vendorUrl": "https://developers.binance.com/", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "Binance's API covers spot, margin and futures trading, market data and account endpoints over REST, WebSocket and FIX, with a free spot testnet and a remote MCP server, documented on 30 October 2026, that trades inside a dedicated Agentic sub-account.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/binance", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/binance.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/binance.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/binance.json", "dns": "binance.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/binance/binance-spot-api-docs", "license": "Proprietary hosted service under Binance's Terms of Use, which load by script and weren't read. The API docs, connectors, CLI and Skills Hub are open on GitHub under MIT", "transports": [ "streamable-http" ], "remoteUrl": "https://agent.binance.com/mcp/agentic", "packages": [], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "API key with an HMAC secret, or a self-generated RSA or Ed25519 key pair whose public key is registered, sent as X-MBX-APIKEY with a signed query and timestamp (recvWindow 5000 ms by default). Permissions are reading, spot and margin trading, futures and withdrawals; an HMAC key without an IP restriction can only read since 30 January 2023, and withdrawals need an IP restriction. Only Verified Plus accounts can create keys. The MCP server uses OAuth in a desktop browser with four scopes (market data, account, trade, transfer) on a dedicated Agentic sub-account and no withdrawal scope (https://www.binance.com/en/support/faq/detail/360002502072, https://developers.binance.com/en/docs/agent-native/mcp-server/agentic, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "The API costs nothing to call. Spot trades carry a standard fee of 0.1 per cent for regular users per the fee FAQ; the maker and taker table on the fee page loads by script and wasn't read, nor were futures fees. Public market data and the spot testnet need no account; the testnet needs a GitHub login.", "priceSummary": "0.1% fee", "where": "hosted", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 on the exchange API or the MCP server in the docs read (checked 2026-11-03). A separate Binance x402 product is named in press coverage of Agent OS, which wasn't read first-hand.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": 4903, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://developers.binance.com/docs/binance-spot-api-docs/README", "llmsTxt": "https://developers.binance.com/en/docs/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.market-data", "exchange.derivatives", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "exchange.staking", "market.crypto" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "official", "closed-source", "api-key", "oauth", "mcp", "remote-mcp", "llms-txt", "sandbox", "python", "typescript", "java", "go", "cli", "usage-priced", "no-card" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-30", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 63.2, "grade": "B", "agentReady": false, "rank": 473, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 6, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 76, "maintenance": 81, "payments": 35, "reliability": 45, "schema": 86, "security": 72, "transparency": 43 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Binance publishes numeric rate limits, a free testnet with FIX, connectors in eight languages and, since late October 2026, a remote MCP server that trades only in a dedicated sub-account with no withdrawal scope. There is no status page, the terms and privacy notice could not be read, and the MCP tool list is not published.", "bestFor": "An agent trading a funded Binance account outside the prohibited countries, with the deepest set of markets in this group and a free testnet.", "strengths": [ "Rate limits published as per-endpoint weights with 6,000 a minute, 50 orders per 10 seconds and Retry-After on 429 and 418", "Spot testnet with REST, WebSocket and FIX endpoints, virtual balances and production limits, free with a GitHub login", "Official remote MCP server with OAuth scopes, an isolated Agentic sub-account, no withdrawal scope and confirmation before writes", "Keys with reading, trading, futures and withdrawal permissions; unrestricted-IP HMAC keys can only read and withdrawals need an IP restriction", "Dated changelog since 2018 with retirement dates announced months ahead, llms.txt and llms-full.txt" ], "weaknesses": [ "No status page or incident history found on binance.com or in the API docs", "The Terms of Use and privacy notice load by script and weren't read, so what they say about bots and API use is unknown", "The MCP server's tool list and schemas are not published; the docs describe four scopes", "The maker and taker fee table loads by script; only the 0.1 per cent standard rate in a FAQ was read", "binance-api-swagger was last pushed in October 2024, so the machine-readable spec lags the docs" ], "agentNotes": [ "Read the X-MBX-USED-WEIGHT and X-MBX-ORDER-COUNT headers and stop on 429 for the Retry-After seconds; a 418 ban runs 2 minutes to 3 days", "Treat a 5xx on an order as unknown, not failed, and query the order by origClientOrderId before retrying", "Use an Ed25519 key with an IP restriction and only the reading and trading permissions; never enable withdrawals for an agent key", "Develop on testnet.binance.vision with BINANCE_API_ENV=testnet; it resets about monthly without notice", "For the MCP route, the person must fund the Agentic sub-account from the web UI first; the agent cannot move funds in from the main account" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "B", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 63.2 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 76, "maintenance": 81, "payments": 35, "reliability": 45, "schema": 86, "security": 72, "transparency": 31 }, "provenanceScore": 54, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "http": "curl https://api.binance.com/api/v3/ticker/price?symbol=BTCUSDT", "claudeCode": "claude mcp add binance-mcp-server --transport http https://agent.binance.com/mcp/agentic", "config": { "mcpServers": { "binance-mcp-server": { "url": "https://agent.binance.com/mcp/agentic" } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.spot-trading", "tool": "https://letme.dev/binance" }, "area": "payments", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Spot trade, regular user", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.1, "note": "standard fee per the fee FAQ; maker and taker table not read" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "", "domain": "binance.com", "domainRegistered": "2017-04-01", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.binance.com/en/terms", "privacy": "https://www.binance.com/en-GB/about-legal/privacy-portal", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://developers.binance.com/docs/binance-spot-api-docs/CHANGELOG", "securityTxt": "unknown", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "The Terms of Use and the privacy pages answered our reader with navigation and footer only, so no contracting entity, governing law or data-handling statement was read. The about page names three ADGM entities as regulated subsidiaries, not as the contracting party.", "RDAP gives binance.com a registration date of 1 April 2017.", "https://www.binance.com/.well-known/security.txt has a Contact line (security@binance.com) and no Expires or Policy line, so its validity is unknown under RFC 9116.", "No status page was found. www.binance.com/robots.txt allows the pages read and disallows */api/, */bapi/ and */my/; developers.binance.com and agent.binance.com have no robots.txt (404); api.binance.com and testnet.binance.vision disallow all crawlers, so no API call was made to either.", "The spot API changelog is dated, newest 30 October 2026." ], "score": 54 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/binance.json", "live": { "slug": "binance", "probe": { "target": "https://agent.binance.com/mcp/agentic", "method": "get", "lastAt": "2026-11-04T21:27:41.116383471Z", "lastOk": true, "lastStatus": 404, "lastMs": 476, "authRequired": false, "uptime24h": 100, "uptime30d": 100, "p50ms24h": 476, "p95ms24h": 586, "samples24h": 62, "samples30d": 62, "days": [ { "date": "2026-11-04", "probes": 62, "ok": 62 } ] }, "githubStars": 4902, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://binance.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "valid", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:53:46.658619838Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T21:27:41.116383471Z" } }, "answer": "Binance API scores 63.2 (B) on agent readiness against Bitstamp API's 50.4 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Bitstamp API leads on reliability and transparency \u0026 trust.", "b": { "slug": "bitstamp", "name": "Bitstamp API", "vendor": "Bitstamp Ltd.", "vendorUrl": "https://www.bitstamp.net", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "Bitstamp's HTTP API v2 for spot and derivatives trading, balances, deposits and withdrawals, with WebSocket and FIX feeds and a sandbox at sandbox.bitstamp.net. Bitstamp is a Robinhood company since June 2025.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitstamp", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitstamp.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitstamp.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitstamp.json", "dns": "bitstamp.grade.anchorterminal.com", "license": "Proprietary hosted API under Bitstamp's terms of use, which our reader couldn't load", "transports": [], "packages": [], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "API key and secret made in the Bitstamp account after a browser signup, sent as `X-Auth: BITSTAMP {key}` with an HMAC-SHA256 `X-Auth-Signature` over the verb, host, path, query, nonce, timestamp and body, a 36-character single-use nonce and a timestamp within 150 seconds. Keys carry per-endpoint permissions (error API0003 names a missing permission) and an IP allow-list (API0002), and `X-Auth-Subaccount-Id` targets a sub-account. `POST /api/v2/revoke_all_api_keys/` is a kill switch for every key. Responses carry an `X-Server-Auth-Signature` to verify (https://www.bitstamp.net/api/, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "The API itself costs nothing. Trading fees are maker and taker by 30-day volume per the API's fees endpoints, but the fee schedule page at bitstamp.net/fee-schedule/ draws its table by script and loaded empty for our reader, so the rates are unchecked. Commercial use of exchange data needs a Data License Agreement through partners@bitstamp.net. The sandbox at sandbox.bitstamp.net needs no money (https://www.bitstamp.net/api/, checked 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "Pay per use", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the API documentation (checked 2026-11-03). Fees are taken from the account; onboarding is a browser signup.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://www.bitstamp.net/api/", "capabilities": [ "exchange.market-data", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.derivatives", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "exchange.staking", "market.crypto" ], "tags": [ "official", "hosted", "api-key", "sandbox", "status-page", "usage-priced", "eu", "uk" ], "lastRelease": "2026-08-28", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 50.4, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 942, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 18, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 58, "maintenance": 28, "payments": 20, "reliability": 63, "schema": 51, "security": 60, "transparency": 53 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "low", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Bitstamp documents its v2 API on one static page with numeric rate limits, per-endpoint key permissions, an IP allow-list, a kill switch and a sandbox. There is no official MCP server, duplicate client order ids are allowed, and the fee schedule, terms, privacy policy and country list render by script and could not be read.", "bestFor": "An agent that needs a long-running regulated spot venue in the EU, UK and US with a sandbox and per-endpoint key permissions, and can do its own signing.", "strengths": [ "Rate limits with numbers (400 requests a second, 10,000 per 10 minutes) and named error codes for client and market limits", "Keys carry per-endpoint permissions and an IP allow-list, and one call revokes every key on the account", "A sandbox at sandbox.bitstamp.net with the same v2 paths, plus order-data endpoints to recover gaps after a dropped WebSocket", "A dated API changelog from 2023 to 28 August 2026 and a Statuspage feed with per-market incidents", "Signed responses (`X-Server-Auth-Signature`) let a client verify what the server returned" ], "weaknesses": [ "No official MCP server, SDK, llms.txt or OpenAPI file; the registry's Bitstamp servers are third parties proxying public market data", "Duplicate client order ids are allowed since November 2023, so a retried order can execute twice", "The fee schedule, terms of use, privacy policy, about page and FAQ load empty without a browser, so fees, retention and the bot clauses are unchecked", "A 3-hour withdrawal failure across 14 networks on 21 August 2026 and a 39-minute halt of all markets on 5 August 2026", "security.txt expired on 12 July 2026, and no SLA was found" ], "agentNotes": [ "Mint a key with only the endpoint permissions the task needs and an IP allow-list; keep `revoke_all_api_keys` in reach as a kill switch", "Treat `client_order_id` as a label, not a guard. On a timeout (500.016) fetch the order by client id before resending, because duplicates are accepted", "Use a fresh 36-character nonce and a timestamp within 150 seconds of server time on every request, or expect API0004 and API0017", "Stay under 400 requests a second and 10,000 per 10 minutes; 400.002 and 400.067 mean back off, and open-orders answers are cached for 10 seconds", "Start on sandbox.bitstamp.net with the same paths, and read the fee schedule in a browser before quoting costs, since it is unreadable to a plain fetch" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "low", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 50.4 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 58, "maintenance": 28, "payments": 20, "reliability": 63, "schema": 51, "security": 60, "transparency": 16 }, "provenanceScore": 90, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "http": "curl https://www.bitstamp.net/api/v2/ticker/btcusd/" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.market-data", "tool": "https://letme.dev/bitstamp" }, "area": "payments", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Bitstamp Ltd.", "domain": "bitstamp.net", "domainRegistered": "2011-07-04", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.bitstamp.net/terms-of-use/", "privacy": "https://www.bitstamp.net/privacy-policy/", "statusPage": "https://status.bitstamp.net", "changelog": "https://www.bitstamp.net/api/", "securityTxt": "expired", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "Bitstamp Ltd. is named in Robinhood's newsroom post of 2 June 2025 on closing the acquisition; the terms of use and privacy policy pages loaded empty for our reader, so the entities they name are unconfirmed.", "RDAP gives bitstamp.net a registration date of 4 July 2011.", "https://www.bitstamp.net/.well-known/security.txt names HackerOne's Robinhood programme as Contact and Policy and expired on 12 July 2026.", "www.bitstamp.net/robots.txt allows /api/ itself and disallows /api/*, /account/, /trade/ and others; only /api/ was read under it. status.bitstamp.net disallows /api/ and /embed/, so the history feed was read. support.bitstamp.net did not resolve.", "The API changelog is a section of the API documentation page; there is no separate changelog URL." ], "score": 90 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitstamp.json", "live": { "slug": "bitstamp", "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.bitstamp.net", "indicator": "minor", "summary": "Partially Degraded Service", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T21:25:16.463949619Z" }, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://bitstamp.net/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "expired", "expires": "2026-07-12T11:59:00.000Z", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:53:31.314157297Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T21:25:16.463949619Z" } }, "edges": [ { "by": 53, "category": "maintenance", "leads": "binance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "reasons": { "a": "Read as a closed service. The spot changelog's newest entry is 30 October 2026, the MCP docs are dated 30 October and binance-cli v2.2.0 shipped on 20 October (30). Changelog entries on 2 September, 18 September, 27 October and 30 October (20). A public changelog, connectors pushed in October and a Skills Hub merging pull requests weekly; issue replies not read (10 of 15). Official connectors in nine languages current as of October 2026; the MCP server is not in the official registry (15). Connector CI not read; the CLI publishes release installers (6 of 10). 30 + 20 + 10 + 15 + 6 = 81.", "b": "Read as a closed service. The last dated API change is 28 August 2026, 67 days before the check (20). Only one dated entry in the last 90 days, after 1 July and 12 June (0). No public repository or issue tracker, support pages did not load and support.bitstamp.net did not resolve; a changelog exists (8 of 25). No official SDKs and no MCP registry presence of Bitstamp's own (0). No package to assess (0). 20 + 0 + 8 + 0 + 0 = 28." }, "scores": { "a": 81, "b": 28 } }, { "by": 35, "category": "schema", "leads": "binance", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "reasons": { "a": "The docs are Markdown in a public repository with a Postman collection and a Swagger spec, but the spec was last pushed in October 2024 (20 of 25). llms.txt and llms-full.txt on developers.binance.com (10). Each endpoint states its weight, parameters and notes on behaviour, with less on when not to use one (15 of 20). Enums for order types, time in force and symbol filters, required columns in the parameter tables (12 of 15). Request and response examples throughout and an error code list with messages (14 of 15). A dated changelog since 2018 with retirements announced months ahead, such as the 2 September 2026 field removal notified on 2 December 2025 (15). 20 + 10 + 15 + 12 + 14 + 15 = 86.", "b": "No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract was found on the API page or elsewhere (0). No llms.txt or Markdown docs (0). The single documentation page describes each endpoint's purpose and parameters, with notes such as the 10-second cache on open orders and the Travel Rule fields, but not when to use one endpoint over another (14 of 20). Parameters are typed with enumerations (margin mode CROSS or ISOLATED, margin multiplier 1 to 25, order types) and required fields marked (11 of 15). Signing examples in Python, Java and C++, and error families with numbered codes and explanations (13 of 15). Version v2 in the path and header, a dated changelog from 7 April 2023 to 28 August 2026, and a 410.001 code for deprecated endpoints, with no stated notice period (13 of 15). 0 + 0 + 14 + 11 + 13 + 13 = 51." }, "scores": { "a": 86, "b": 51 } }, { "by": 18, "category": "reliability", "leads": "bitstamp", "name": "Reliability", "reasons": { "a": "Read with the hosted lines on the spot REST API. No status page was found on binance.com or in the API docs (0), so no incident record (5). Rate limits are published as per-endpoint weights with numbers from exchangeInfo, 6,000 request weight a minute, 50 orders per 10 seconds, 160,000 a day and 61,000 raw requests per 5 minutes, and FIX limits per session (15). 429 and 418 carry Retry-After, a 5xx is documented as unknown status to be queried, and orders take a client order id (15). No SLA (0). Generally available (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 15 + 0 + 10 = 45.", "b": "Read with the hosted lines on the HTTP API v2 at www.bitstamp.net/api/v2/. status.bitstamp.net is a Statuspage site with component history (20). Its feed for 5 August to 3 November 2026 has 17 entries, among them withdrawals failing on 14 networks for about 3 hours on 21 August, database maintenance with login failures and intermittent trading interruptions for about 1 hour 44 minutes on 23 September, a 39-minute halt of all markets on 5 August, and delistings and single-asset suspensions. One major (10). Rate limits with numbers, 400 a second and 10,000 per 10 minutes (15). Limit errors are named (400.002, 400.067, 400.068) but there is no Retry-After or backoff guidance, duplicate client order ids are allowed, and the only retry guidance is to check the order after a 500.016 timeout (8 of 15). No SLA found (0). Generally available (10). 20 + 10 + 15 + 8 + 0 + 10 = 63." }, "scores": { "a": 45, "b": 63 } }, { "by": 18, "category": "ergonomics", "leads": "binance", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "reasons": { "a": "limit on depth, trades and klines, a symbols filter on exchangeInfo and tickers, and SBE encoding, though fields cannot be selected (16 of 25). fromId, startTime, endTime and limit on history endpoints (16 of 20). Error codes with messages an agent can branch on, such as the rate limit and timestamp errors (17 of 20). newClientOrderId on orders, a cancel-replace endpoint and the 5xx unknown-status rule, but no idempotency key on other writes (12 of 20). Connectors in nine languages, a CLI with testnet and demo profiles, and a timestamped HMAC or Ed25519 signature on every private call (15). 16 + 16 + 17 + 12 + 15 = 76.", "b": "Graded on the REST API. Order book grouping and transaction time windows size responses, but there is no field selection and no MCP surface (15 of 25). Offset, limit, since and sort on transaction history, `until_id` windows on order-data replay (14 of 20). `response_code` and `response_explanation` name the failure, such as 400.009 insufficient balance, 403.004 trading blocked and 500.025 insufficient liquidity (16 of 20). No idempotency, since `client_order_id` duplicates are allowed since November 2023 and the docs say only to check the order id after a timeout; the kill switch limits damage (8 of 20). Few required parameters, but no official SDK in any language (5 of 15). 15 + 14 + 16 + 8 + 5 = 58." }, "scores": { "a": 76, "b": 58 } }, { "by": 15, "category": "payments", "leads": "binance", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "reasons": { "a": "No machine payment protocol (0). A 0.1 per cent standard spot fee is stated in the fee FAQ; the maker and taker table and futures fees load by script and weren't read (15 of 20). Public market data needs no key and the testnet is free with a GitHub login (20). A person signs up, passes Verified Plus verification, deposits and mints a key (0). 0 + 15 + 20 + 0 = 35.", "b": "No machine payment protocol (0). The fee schedule page loaded empty, the API's fee endpoints need a key, and no rate could be read, so fees are scored as not published (0, unchecked). The API is free, public endpoints need no key and the sandbox needs no money (20). A person must sign up in a browser with identity checks and mint the key (0). 0 + 0 + 20 + 0 = 20." }, "scores": { "a": 35, "b": 20 } }, { "by": 12, "category": "security", "leads": "binance", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "reasons": { "a": "API keys with HMAC, RSA or Ed25519 signatures, permissions for reading, trading, futures and withdrawals, an IP restriction, revocation in API Management, and OAuth with four scopes on the MCP server; no key expiry found (28 of 30). Read-only keys, sub-accounts, withdrawals only with an IP restriction, and the MCP server's isolated Agentic sub-account with no withdrawal scope and confirmation before writes (18 of 20). The API returns no untrusted content (10). Keys are listed in API Management and used weight is returned per call, but no per-call log for the operator was found (6 of 15). security.txt with a contact and no expiry, a Bugcrowd programme named in the proof-of-solvency repository, no certification read (10 of 20). 28 + 18 + 10 + 6 + 10 = 72.", "b": "Revocable HMAC-SHA256 keys with per-endpoint permissions, an IP allow-list, single-use nonces, a timestamp window, sub-account scoping and a one-call kill switch for every key; no key expiry found (24 of 30). Permissions are chosen per endpoint and withdrawals can need Travel Rule address verification, but whether a withdrawal address allow-list exists sits in the unread account settings and no confirmation step is documented for API withdrawals (14 of 20). The API returns exchange data, not third-party text (10). No per-key audit log found; the account's transaction history is the record (4 of 15). security.txt names HackerOne's Robinhood programme but expired on 12 July 2026; no certification page was readable (8 of 20). 24 + 14 + 10 + 4 + 8 = 60." }, "scores": { "a": 72, "b": 60 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "HTTP API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "Binance", "b": "Bitstamp Ltd.", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "https://agent.binance.com/mcp/agentic", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "Streamable HTTP", "b": "", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "OAuth or key", "b": "API key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Pay per use", "b": "Pay per use", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "Proprietary hosted service under Binance's Terms of Use, which load by script and weren't read. The API docs, connectors, CLI and Skills Hub are open on GitHub under MIT", "b": "Proprietary hosted API under Bitstamp's terms of use, which our reader couldn't load", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "no", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-10-30", "b": "2026-08-28", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "4.9k stars", "b": "none", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Binance API scores 63.2 (B) on agent readiness against Bitstamp API's 50.4 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Bitstamp API leads on reliability and transparency \u0026 trust.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Binance API or Bitstamp API?" }, { "answer": "Binance API takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Bitstamp API needs an API key.", "question": "Do Binance API and Bitstamp API need an API key?" }, { "answer": "Binance API has a hosted endpoint at https://agent.binance.com/mcp/agentic. No hosted endpoint is listed for Bitstamp API.", "question": "Can an agent call Binance API and Bitstamp API without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Schema \u0026 documentation, 86 against 51", "Agent ergonomics, 76 against 58", "Security \u0026 auth, 72 against 60", "Payments \u0026 pricing, 35 against 20", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 81 against 28" ], "also": [ "A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install", "Free to start without a card" ], "goodFor": "An agent trading a funded Binance account outside the prohibited countries, with the deepest set of markets in this group and a free testnet.", "slug": "binance", "watchFor": "No status page or incident history found on binance.com or in the API docs" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 63 against 45", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 53 against 43" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "An agent that needs a long-running regulated spot venue in the EU, UK and US with a sandbox and per-endpoint key permissions, and can do its own signing.", "slug": "bitstamp", "watchFor": "No official MCP server, SDK, llms.txt or OpenAPI file; the registry's Bitstamp servers are third parties proxying public market data" } ], "history": null, "job": { "capability": "exchange.spot-trading", "name": "Exchange spot trading" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitstamp.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs Bitstamp API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitstamp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp.json", "title": "Bitget vs Bitstamp API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bitstamp.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Bitstamp API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bitstamp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-bybit.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Bybit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-bybit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-coinbase-mcp.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-coinbase-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-crypto-com-exchange.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Crypto.com Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-crypto-com-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-deribit.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Deribit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-deribit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-dydx.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs dYdX", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-dydx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-gate-io.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Gate", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-gate-io" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-gemini-exchange.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Gemini Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-gemini-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-htx.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-kraken.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Kraken API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-kraken" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-kucoin.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs KuCoin", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-kucoin" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-okx.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitfinex.json", "title": "Binance API vs Bitfinex API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitfinex" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitget.json", "title": "Binance API vs Bitget", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitget" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bithumb.json", "title": "Binance API vs Bithumb Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bithumb" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bybit.json", "title": "Binance API vs Bybit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bybit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.json", "title": "Binance API vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-coinbase-mcp.json", "title": "Binance API vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-coinbase-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-crypto-com-exchange.json", "title": "Binance API vs Crypto.com Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-crypto-com-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-deribit.json", "title": "Binance API vs Deribit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-deribit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-gate-io.json", "title": "Binance API vs Gate", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-gate-io" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-gemini-exchange.json", "title": "Binance API vs Gemini Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-gemini-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-htx.json", "title": "Binance API vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Binance API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-kraken.json", "title": "Binance API vs Kraken API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-kraken" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-kucoin.json", "title": "Binance API vs KuCoin", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-kucoin" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Binance API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-okx.json", "title": "Binance API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "Binance API vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Binance API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-dydx.json", "title": "Binance API vs dYdX", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-dydx" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "binance": 45, "bitstamp": 63, "by": 18, "edge": "bitstamp", "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "binance": 86, "bitstamp": 51, "by": 35, "edge": "binance", "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "weight": 13 }, { "binance": 76, "bitstamp": 58, "by": 18, "edge": "binance", "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "weight": 13 }, { "binance": 72, "bitstamp": 60, "by": 12, "edge": "binance", "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "weight": 14 }, { "binance": 35, "bitstamp": 20, "by": 15, "edge": "binance", "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "binance": 81, "bitstamp": 28, "by": 53, "edge": "binance", "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "weight": 7 }, { "binance": 43, "bitstamp": 53, "by": 10, "edge": "bitstamp", "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "Binance API scores 63.2 (B) on agent readiness against Bitstamp API's 50.4 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Bitstamp API leads on reliability and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do exchange spot trading.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "binance": "Binance publishes numeric rate limits, a free testnet with FIX, connectors in eight languages and, since late October 2026, a remote MCP server that trades only in a dedicated sub-account with no withdrawal scope. There is no status page, the terms and privacy notice could not be read, and the MCP tool list is not published.", "bitstamp": "Bitstamp documents its v2 API on one static page with numeric rate limits, per-endpoint key permissions, an IP allow-list, a kill switch and a sandbox. There is no official MCP server, duplicate client order ids are allowed, and the fee schedule, terms, privacy policy and country list render by script and could not be read." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitstamp", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitstamp.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitstamp.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitstamp.min.md" }, "markdown": "Binance API scores 63.2 (B) on agent readiness against Bitstamp API's 50.4 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Bitstamp API leads on reliability and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do exchange spot trading.\n\n- Binance API: grade B, 63.2/100, rank #473 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/binance.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/binance.json\n- Bitstamp API: grade D, 50.4/100, rank #942 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitstamp.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitstamp.json\n- Best crypto exchange APIs and MCP servers for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n- All 210 exchanges comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Binance API (B)\n\nGood for: An agent trading a funded Binance account outside the prohibited countries, with the deepest set of markets in this group and a free testnet.\n\nAhead on:\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 86 against 51\n- Agent ergonomics, 76 against 58\n- Security \u0026 auth, 72 against 60\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 35 against 20\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 81 against 28\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install\n- Free to start without a card\n\nWatch for: No status page or incident history found on binance.com or in the API docs\n\n### Bitstamp API (D)\n\nGood for: An agent that needs a long-running regulated spot venue in the EU, UK and US with a sandbox and per-endpoint key permissions, and can do its own signing.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 63 against 45\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 53 against 43\n\nWatch for: No official MCP server, SDK, llms.txt or OpenAPI file; the registry's Bitstamp servers are third parties proxying public market data\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Maintenance \u0026 community: Binance API +53\n\n- Binance API (81): Read as a closed service. The spot changelog's newest entry is 30 October 2026, the MCP docs are dated 30 October and binance-cli v2.2.0 shipped on 20 October (30). Changelog entries on 2 September, 18 September, 27 October and 30 October (20). A public changelog, connectors pushed in October and a Skills Hub merging pull requests weekly; issue replies not read (10 of 15). Official connectors in nine languages current as of October 2026; the MCP server is not in the official registry (15). Connector CI not read; the CLI publishes release installers (6 of 10). 30 + 20 + 10 + 15 + 6 = 81.\n- Bitstamp API (28): Read as a closed service. The last dated API change is 28 August 2026, 67 days before the check (20). Only one dated entry in the last 90 days, after 1 July and 12 June (0). No public repository or issue tracker, support pages did not load and support.bitstamp.net did not resolve; a changelog exists (8 of 25). No official SDKs and no MCP registry presence of Bitstamp's own (0). No package to assess (0). 20 + 0 + 8 + 0 + 0 = 28.\n\n### Schema \u0026 documentation: Binance API +35\n\n- Binance API (86): The docs are Markdown in a public repository with a Postman collection and a Swagger spec, but the spec was last pushed in October 2024 (20 of 25). llms.txt and llms-full.txt on developers.binance.com (10). Each endpoint states its weight, parameters and notes on behaviour, with less on when not to use one (15 of 20). Enums for order types, time in force and symbol filters, required columns in the parameter tables (12 of 15). Request and response examples throughout and an error code list with messages (14 of 15). A dated changelog since 2018 with retirements announced months ahead, such as the 2 September 2026 field removal notified on 2 December 2025 (15). 20 + 10 + 15 + 12 + 14 + 15 = 86.\n- Bitstamp API (51): No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract was found on the API page or elsewhere (0). No llms.txt or Markdown docs (0). The single documentation page describes each endpoint's purpose and parameters, with notes such as the 10-second cache on open orders and the Travel Rule fields, but not when to use one endpoint over another (14 of 20). Parameters are typed with enumerations (margin mode CROSS or ISOLATED, margin multiplier 1 to 25, order types) and required fields marked (11 of 15). Signing examples in Python, Java and C++, and error families with numbered codes and explanations (13 of 15). Version v2 in the path and header, a dated changelog from 7 April 2023 to 28 August 2026, and a 410.001 code for deprecated endpoints, with no stated notice period (13 of 15). 0 + 0 + 14 + 11 + 13 + 13 = 51.\n\n### Reliability: Bitstamp API +18\n\n- Binance API (45): Read with the hosted lines on the spot REST API. No status page was found on binance.com or in the API docs (0), so no incident record (5). Rate limits are published as per-endpoint weights with numbers from exchangeInfo, 6,000 request weight a minute, 50 orders per 10 seconds, 160,000 a day and 61,000 raw requests per 5 minutes, and FIX limits per session (15). 429 and 418 carry Retry-After, a 5xx is documented as unknown status to be queried, and orders take a client order id (15). No SLA (0). Generally available (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 15 + 0 + 10 = 45.\n- Bitstamp API (63): Read with the hosted lines on the HTTP API v2 at www.bitstamp.net/api/v2/. status.bitstamp.net is a Statuspage site with component history (20). Its feed for 5 August to 3 November 2026 has 17 entries, among them withdrawals failing on 14 networks for about 3 hours on 21 August, database maintenance with login failures and intermittent trading interruptions for about 1 hour 44 minutes on 23 September, a 39-minute halt of all markets on 5 August, and delistings and single-asset suspensions. One major (10). Rate limits with numbers, 400 a second and 10,000 per 10 minutes (15). Limit errors are named (400.002, 400.067, 400.068) but there is no Retry-After or backoff guidance, duplicate client order ids are allowed, and the only retry guidance is to check the order after a 500.016 timeout (8 of 15). No SLA found (0). Generally available (10). 20 + 10 + 15 + 8 + 0 + 10 = 63.\n\n### Agent ergonomics: Binance API +18\n\n- Binance API (76): limit on depth, trades and klines, a symbols filter on exchangeInfo and tickers, and SBE encoding, though fields cannot be selected (16 of 25). fromId, startTime, endTime and limit on history endpoints (16 of 20). Error codes with messages an agent can branch on, such as the rate limit and timestamp errors (17 of 20). newClientOrderId on orders, a cancel-replace endpoint and the 5xx unknown-status rule, but no idempotency key on other writes (12 of 20). Connectors in nine languages, a CLI with testnet and demo profiles, and a timestamped HMAC or Ed25519 signature on every private call (15). 16 + 16 + 17 + 12 + 15 = 76.\n- Bitstamp API (58): Graded on the REST API. Order book grouping and transaction time windows size responses, but there is no field selection and no MCP surface (15 of 25). Offset, limit, since and sort on transaction history, `until_id` windows on order-data replay (14 of 20). `response_code` and `response_explanation` name the failure, such as 400.009 insufficient balance, 403.004 trading blocked and 500.025 insufficient liquidity (16 of 20). No idempotency, since `client_order_id` duplicates are allowed since November 2023 and the docs say only to check the order id after a timeout; the kill switch limits damage (8 of 20). Few required parameters, but no official SDK in any language (5 of 15). 15 + 14 + 16 + 8 + 5 = 58.\n\n### Payments \u0026 pricing: Binance API +15\n\n- Binance API (35): No machine payment protocol (0). A 0.1 per cent standard spot fee is stated in the fee FAQ; the maker and taker table and futures fees load by script and weren't read (15 of 20). Public market data needs no key and the testnet is free with a GitHub login (20). A person signs up, passes Verified Plus verification, deposits and mints a key (0). 0 + 15 + 20 + 0 = 35.\n- Bitstamp API (20): No machine payment protocol (0). The fee schedule page loaded empty, the API's fee endpoints need a key, and no rate could be read, so fees are scored as not published (0, unchecked). The API is free, public endpoints need no key and the sandbox needs no money (20). A person must sign up in a browser with identity checks and mint the key (0). 0 + 0 + 20 + 0 = 20.\n\n### Security \u0026 auth: Binance API +12\n\n- Binance API (72): API keys with HMAC, RSA or Ed25519 signatures, permissions for reading, trading, futures and withdrawals, an IP restriction, revocation in API Management, and OAuth with four scopes on the MCP server; no key expiry found (28 of 30). Read-only keys, sub-accounts, withdrawals only with an IP restriction, and the MCP server's isolated Agentic sub-account with no withdrawal scope and confirmation before writes (18 of 20). The API returns no untrusted content (10). Keys are listed in API Management and used weight is returned per call, but no per-call log for the operator was found (6 of 15). security.txt with a contact and no expiry, a Bugcrowd programme named in the proof-of-solvency repository, no certification read (10 of 20). 28 + 18 + 10 + 6 + 10 = 72.\n- Bitstamp API (60): Revocable HMAC-SHA256 keys with per-endpoint permissions, an IP allow-list, single-use nonces, a timestamp window, sub-account scoping and a one-call kill switch for every key; no key expiry found (24 of 30). Permissions are chosen per endpoint and withdrawals can need Travel Rule address verification, but whether a withdrawal address allow-list exists sits in the unread account settings and no confirmation step is documented for API withdrawals (14 of 20). The API returns exchange data, not third-party text (10). No per-key audit log found; the account's transaction history is the record (4 of 15). security.txt names HackerOne's Robinhood programme but expired on 12 July 2026; no certification page was readable (8 of 20). 24 + 14 + 10 + 4 + 8 = 60.\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Binance API | Bitstamp API | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 45 | 63 | Bitstamp API +18 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 86 | 51 | Binance API +35 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 76 | 58 | Binance API +18 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 72 | 60 | Binance API +12 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 35 | 20 | Binance API +15 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 81 | 28 | Binance API +53 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 43 | 53 | Bitstamp API +10 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **63.2 · B** | **50.4 · D** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Binance API | Bitstamp API |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | Binance | Bitstamp Ltd. |\n| Hosted endpoint | `https://agent.binance.com/mcp/agentic` | no (local only) |\n| Transports | Streamable HTTP | |\n| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |\n| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under Binance's Terms of Use, which load by script and weren't read. The API docs, connectors, CLI and Skills Hub are open on GitHub under MIT | Proprietary hosted API under Bitstamp's terms of use, which our reader couldn't load |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | no |\n| llms.txt | yes | no |\n| Last release | 2026-10-30 | 2026-08-28 |\n| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Popularity | 4.9k stars | none |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Binance API.** Binance publishes numeric rate limits, a free testnet with FIX, connectors in eight languages and, since late October 2026, a remote MCP server that trades only in a dedicated sub-account with no withdrawal scope. There is no status page, the terms and privacy notice could not be read, and the MCP tool list is not published.\n\n**Bitstamp API.** Bitstamp documents its v2 API on one static page with numeric rate limits, per-endpoint key permissions, an IP allow-list, a kill switch and a sandbox. There is no official MCP server, duplicate client order ids are allowed, and the fee schedule, terms, privacy policy and country list render by script and could not be read.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Binance API\n\n1. Read the X-MBX-USED-WEIGHT and X-MBX-ORDER-COUNT headers and stop on 429 for the Retry-After seconds; a 418 ban runs 2 minutes to 3 days\n2. Treat a 5xx on an order as unknown, not failed, and query the order by origClientOrderId before retrying\n3. Use an Ed25519 key with an IP restriction and only the reading and trading permissions; never enable withdrawals for an agent key\n4. Develop on testnet.binance.vision with BINANCE_API_ENV=testnet; it resets about monthly without notice\n5. For the MCP route, the person must fund the Agentic sub-account from the web UI first; the agent cannot move funds in from the main account\n\n### Bitstamp API\n\n1. Mint a key with only the endpoint permissions the task needs and an IP allow-list; keep `revoke_all_api_keys` in reach as a kill switch\n2. Treat `client_order_id` as a label, not a guard. On a timeout (500.016) fetch the order by client id before resending, because duplicates are accepted\n3. Use a fresh 36-character nonce and a timestamp within 150 seconds of server time on every request, or expect API0004 and API0017\n4. Stay under 400 requests a second and 10,000 per 10 minutes; 400.002 and 400.067 mean back off, and open-orders answers are cached for 10 seconds\n5. Start on sandbox.bitstamp.net with the same paths, and read the fee schedule in a browser before quoting costs, since it is unreadable to a plain fetch\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Binance API or Bitstamp API?\n\nBinance API scores 63.2 (B) on agent readiness against Bitstamp API's 50.4 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Bitstamp API leads on reliability and transparency \u0026 trust.\n\n### Do Binance API and Bitstamp API need an API key?\n\nBinance API takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Bitstamp API needs an API key.\n\n### Can an agent call Binance API and Bitstamp API without installing anything?\n\nBinance API has a hosted endpoint at https://agent.binance.com/mcp/agentic. No hosted endpoint is listed for Bitstamp API.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitstamp.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitstamp.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"binance\", \"b\": \"bitstamp\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare binance bitstamp`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/binance.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitstamp.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Binance API or Bitstamp API\n\n- [Bitfinex API vs Bitstamp API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitstamp.md)\n- [Bitget vs Bitstamp API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Bitstamp API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bitstamp.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Bybit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-bybit.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-coinbase-mcp.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Crypto.com Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-crypto-com-exchange.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Deribit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-deribit.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs dYdX](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-dydx.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Gate](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-gate-io.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Gemini Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-gemini-exchange.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-htx.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Kraken API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-kraken.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs KuCoin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-kucoin.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-okx.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Binance API vs Bitfinex API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitfinex.md)\n- [Binance API vs Bitget](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitget.md)\n- [Binance API vs Bithumb Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bithumb.md)\n- [Binance API vs Bybit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bybit.md)\n- [Binance API vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.md)\n- [Binance API vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-coinbase-mcp.md)\n- [Binance API vs Crypto.com Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-crypto-com-exchange.md)\n- [Binance API vs Deribit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-deribit.md)\n- [Binance API vs Gate](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-gate-io.md)\n- [Binance API vs Gemini Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-gemini-exchange.md)\n- [Binance API vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-htx.md)\n- [Binance API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Binance API vs Kraken API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-kraken.md)\n- [Binance API vs KuCoin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-kucoin.md)\n- [Binance API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Binance API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-okx.md)\n- [Binance API vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [Binance API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Binance API vs dYdX](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-dydx.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-04", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.7", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Binance API vs Bitstamp API", "url": "" } ], "description": "Binance scores 63.2 (B) to Bitstamp's 50.4 (D) for exchange spot trading. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Binance API B 63.2", "Bitstamp API D 50.4", "scores" ], "h1": "Binance API vs Bitstamp API", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/binance-vs-bitstamp", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Binance vs Bitstamp for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-04", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitstamp" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 4950, "slim": 2630 }, "version": 1 }