# Baseten vs Crusoe Cloud (slim)

> Baseten scores 66.5 (B) to Crusoe Cloud's 63.4 (B) for gpu compute. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baseten-vs-crusoe-cloud.md (~2,750 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baseten-vs-crusoe-cloud.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baseten-vs-crusoe-cloud
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Baseten scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against Crusoe Cloud's 63.4 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Crusoe Cloud leads on transparency & trust. Both do gpu compute.

- Baseten: B 66.5, rank #285 of 950 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/baseten.min.md
- Crusoe Cloud: B 63.4, rank #396 of 950 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/crusoe-cloud.min.md
- Baseten, good for Teams that want one model behind a production endpoint with real autoscaling knobs, environments and scoped keys. Ahead on Reliability, 80 against 66; Schema & documentation, 84 against 79; Agent ergonomics, 55 against 45; Security & auth, 82 against 74; Payments & pricing, 40 against 30; Maintenance & community, 90 against 76. Also Open source.
- Crusoe Cloud, good for Teams that want whole GPU machines or clusters with managed Kubernetes or Slurm in the US, Iceland or Norway, under an SLA, and are content to manage lifecycles themselves. Ahead on Transparency & trust, 77 against 65. Also Runs on your own machine; No incidents deducted, where Baseten loses 5 points for them.

| Category | Baseten | Crusoe Cloud |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 80 | 66 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 84 | 79 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 55 | 45 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 82 | 74 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 40 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 90 | 76 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 65 | 77 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Baseten | Crusoe Cloud |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Baseten | Crusoe |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.baseten.co` | `https://api.cloud.crusoe.ai/v1` |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, stdio |
| Licence | MIT | Proprietary service under the Crusoe Cloud Platform Terms of Service. The Go client and the MCP server package are MIT. The CLI ships as binaries, and no licence file was found in the Terraform provider repository |
| Tools exposed | none | 41 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-28 | 2026-10-08 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 1.2k stars, 74k PyPI/wk | 7 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | none |