# Baserun vs Galileo API + MCP (slim)

> Galileo API + MCP has a score of 48 (D) against Baserun's 7.3 (F). Both do obs traces. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 74 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baserun-vs-galileo.md (~1,550 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baserun-vs-galileo.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baserun-vs-galileo
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

Galileo API + MCP has a score of 48 (D) against Baserun's 7.3 (F). Both do obs traces. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 74 points.

- Baserun: F 7.3, rank retired, not ranked · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/baserun.min.md
- Galileo API + MCP: D 48, rank #378 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/galileo.min.md
- Pick Baserun for nothing in particular. Pick Galileo API + MCP for reliability (+18), schema & documentation (+64), agent ergonomics (+68), security & auth (+28), payments & pricing (+20), maintenance & community (+74), transparency & trust (+20).

| Category | Baserun | Galileo API + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 0 | 18 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 15 | 79 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 5 | 73 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 5 | 33 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 0 | 20 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 0 | 74 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 36 | 56 |