# Baserow vs Teable (slim)

> Baserow scores 63.6 (B) on agent readiness against Teable's 61 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Teable leads on reliability and security & auth. Both do sheets records. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baserow-vs-teable.md (~2,400 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baserow-vs-teable.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baserow-vs-teable
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-08

Baserow scores 63.6 (B) on agent readiness against Teable's 61 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Teable leads on reliability and security & auth. Both do sheets records.

- Baserow: B 63.6, rank #306 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/baserow.min.md
- Teable: C 61, rank #379 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/teable.min.md
- Baserow, good for Teams that want Airtable-style typed tables they can also self-host, with row-level reads and writes by an agent through table-scoped tokens or a small MCP tool set. Ahead on Agent ergonomics, 72 against 65; Payments & pricing, 40 against 30. Also No incidents deducted, where Teable loses 3 points for them.
- Teable, good for Teams that want Airtable-style typed tables on PostgreSQL that they can also self-host, with an agent reading and writing records through tokens limited by scope and project, or through the vendor's CLI and skill. Ahead on Reliability, 72 against 65; Security & auth, 62 against 54.

| Category | Baserow | Teable |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 65 | 72 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 77 | 75 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 72 | 65 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 54 | 62 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 40 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 72 | 76 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 65 | 64 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Baserow | Teable |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Baserow B.V. | Teable AI, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.baserow.io` | `https://app.teable.ai/api` |
| Transports | HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Licence | MIT for the core, including the REST API and the MCP server. Code under premium/ and enterprise/ is source-available under Baserow's own licences and needs a paid subscription in production. Docs are CC BY-SA 4.0 | AGPL-3.0 with additional brand terms for the backend and web app, MIT for the packages directory. Enterprise functions and the `@teable/cli` package (ISC on npm) are built in a private repository |
| Tools exposed | 7 | none |
| Last release | 2026-09-29 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | 2026-05-25 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2026-10-01 |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | 6.1k stars | 22k stars, 179 npm/wk |