{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "azure-openai", "name": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models", "vendor": "Microsoft", "vendorUrl": "https://azure.microsoft.com", "kind": "model", "category": "inference", "summary": "Microsoft Azure's hosted API for OpenAI's GPT models and other Foundry Models sold by Azure, such as DeepSeek, Llama, Mistral and Grok, called through an OpenAI-compatible v1 endpoint on each customer's Azure resource.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/azure-openai", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/azure-openai.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/azure-openai.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/azure-openai.json", "dns": "azure-openai.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs", "license": "Proprietary service under the Microsoft Product Terms. The v1 OpenAPI spec is MIT, and the OpenAI SDKs the docs use are Apache-2.0", "transports": [ "http" ], "remoteUrl": "https://\u003cresource\u003e.openai.azure.com/openai/v1", "packages": [ { "registry": "pypi", "name": "openai" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "openai" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@azure/openai" } ], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "`api-key` header with one of the resource's two regenerable keys, or a Microsoft Entra ID bearer token (scope https://ai.azure.com/.default) with the Cognitive Services OpenAI User role. Key authentication can be disabled per resource (`disableLocalAuth`). Each model must be deployed in the resource before it can be called, by deployment name.", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "Pay per token on an Azure subscription. Global Standard GPT-6 and GPT-6.1 prices match OpenAI's list (GPT-6.1 Sol $2/$10, GPT-6.1 Terra $1/$5 per million tokens), Data Zone costs 10% more, long-context requests cost 2x input and 1.5x output, cached input 0.1x, cache writes 1.25x, Flex half price and priority processing 2x (GPT-6 Sol). Batch is 50% off Global Standard. Provisioned throughput is billed per PTU hour. Prices from the Azure Retail Prices API, because the pricing page fills its table with JavaScript (checked 2026-11-06).", "priceSummary": "from $0.10 / 1M in", "where": "hosted", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the Foundry docs, the v1 OpenAPI spec or the pricing page. Access needs an Azure subscription with a payment method (checked 2026-11-06).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": 454039, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-06" }, "docsUrl": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/foundry/openai/", "rateLimitsUrl": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/foundry/openai/quotas-limits", "openapi": "https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/main/specification/ai/data-plane/OpenAI.v1/azure-v1-v1-generated.json", "capabilities": [ "inference.llm", "inference.open-weights" ], "tags": [ "official", "hosted", "model", "card-required", "openapi", "openai-compatible", "closed-source", "enterprise", "eu", "python", "typescript", "status-page", "bug-bounty" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-26", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 80, "grade": "A", "agentReady": true, "rank": 14, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1518, "categoryRank": 4, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 98, "maintenance": 86, "payments": 20, "reliability": 80, "schema": 87, "security": 95, "transparency": 83 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-06" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "An OpenAI-compatible v1 API with a public OpenAPI spec, Entra ID roles in place of shared keys and FedRAMP High scope, with GPT-6 and GPT-6.1 at OpenAI's list prices on Global Standard. Access needs an Azure subscription with a card and a deployment per model, and a 29 September 2026 incident caused about six hours of failures in Sweden Central.", "bestFor": "Teams on Azure that need OpenAI models with Entra ID, private networking, EU or US data zones or FedRAMP scope, and one resource that also serves DeepSeek, Llama, Mistral and Grok models.", "strengths": [ "Public OpenAPI 3.2 spec for the v1 API, 71 paths covering Responses, Chat Completions, batches, files and vector stores", "Microsoft Entra ID tokens with Azure roles, and key authentication can be switched off per resource", "GA models carry a retirement date 18 months after launch, set at release and readable through the Models API", "Data Zone deployments keep processing inside the EU or US, and Azure OpenAI is in FedRAMP High scope", "GPT-6 Astra, Sol and Luna at $10/$50, $2/$10 and $0.10/$0.50 per million tokens on Global Standard" ], "weaknesses": [ "Intermittent failures and 5xx errors in Sweden Central for about six hours on 29 September 2026", "An Azure subscription with a card, a resource and a model deployment come before the first call", "No llms.txt, and no Azure OpenAI what's new page was found; the Foundry one still covered August on 6 November", "No retention period stated for prompts kept for human abuse review, and Responses data is kept 30 days by default", "The retirement schedule lists two `gpt-realtime-mini` versions twice with different retirement dates, and no GPT-6 retirement dates yet" ], "agentNotes": [ "Point the OpenAI SDK at https://\u003cresource\u003e.openai.azure.com/openai/v1/ and pass the deployment name as `model`, not the model id", "Prefer Entra ID with the Cognitive Services OpenAI User role over the resource key, which opens the whole data plane", "On 429 wait for `retry-after-ms`, then back off with jitter. The OpenAI SDK retries twice by default", "Set `store: false` on Responses calls you don't need kept. Stored responses persist 30 days by default", "Keep remote MCP approvals on for servers you don't control. They're required by default" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "A", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 80 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 98, "maintenance": 86, "payments": 20, "reliability": 80, "schema": 87, "security": 95, "transparency": 77 }, "provenanceScore": 88, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-06", "maintenance": "2026-11-06", "payments": "2026-11-06", "reliability": "2026-11-06", "schema": "2026-11-06", "security": "2026-11-06", "transparency": "2026-11-06" }, "last": "2026-11-06", "oldest": "2026-11-06", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "pip install openai azure-identity # or: npm i openai @azure/identity", "http": "curl \"https://$AZURE_OPENAI_RESOURCE.openai.azure.com/openai/v1/responses\" \\\n -H \"api-key: $AZURE_OPENAI_API_KEY\" -H \"content-type: application/json\" \\\n -d '{\"model\":\"\u003cyour-deployment-name\u003e\",\"input\":\"hello\"}'" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/inference.llm", "tool": "https://letme.dev/azure-openai" }, "sameCompany": [ "azure-foundry-fine-tuning", "azure-ai-content-safety", "azure-speech-to-text", "azure-text-to-speech", "microsoft-agent-framework", "microsoft-execution-containers", "microsoft-entra-agent-id", "azure-key-vault", "bing-grounding", "azure-document-intelligence", "azure-devops-mcp", "microsoft-learn-mcp", "tokeneconomizer", "playwright-mcp", "azure-mcp", "azure-maps", "azure-translator", "microsoft-graph-calendar", "azure-blob-storage", "onedrive-sharepoint", "microsoft-teams", "dynamics-365-sales", "copilot-studio-mcp", "power-automate", "foundry-local", "microsoft-decision-1", "microsoft-advertising-api", "microsoft-excel-graph", "outlook-mail-graph", "microsoft-graph-people", "fara1-5-27b", "fara1-5-4b", "fara1-5-9b", "mage-vl-cowork" ], "area": "models", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "GPT-6.1 Sol input, Global Standard", "unit": "1m-tokens", "usd": 2, "note": "short context, Retail Prices API meter effective 2026-10-01" }, { "item": "GPT-6.1 Sol output, Global Standard", "unit": "1m-tokens", "usd": 10, "note": "short context" }, { "item": "GPT-6.1 Terra input, Global Standard", "unit": "1m-tokens", "usd": 1, "note": "short context" }, { "item": "GPT-6.1 Terra output, Global Standard", "unit": "1m-tokens", "usd": 5, "note": "short context" }, { "item": "GPT-6 Astra input, Global Standard", "unit": "1m-tokens", "usd": 10, "note": "short context" }, { "item": "GPT-6 Astra output, Global Standard", "unit": "1m-tokens", "usd": 50, "note": "short context" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Microsoft Corporation", "domain": "microsoft.com", "domainRegistered": "1991-05-02", "domainNote": "Endpoints are on openai.azure.com and cognitiveservices.azure.com. microsoft.com publishes a security.txt, but it passed its Expires date on 2026-09-23 and was still expired on 2026-11-06.", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.microsoft.com/licensing/terms/product/ForOnlineServices/all", "privacy": "https://privacy.microsoft.com/en-us/privacystatement", "statusPage": "https://azure.status.microsoft/en-us/status", "changelog": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/foundry/whats-new-foundry", "securityTxt": "expired", "checked": "2026-11-06", "score": 88 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/azure-openai.json", "live": { "slug": "azure-openai", "probe": { "target": "https://\u003cresource\u003e.openai.azure.com/openai/v1", "method": "get", "lastAt": "2026-11-08T12:32:58.920379175Z", "lastOk": false, "lastStatus": 0, "lastMs": 0, "lastNote": "DNS lookup failed", "authRequired": false, "uptime24h": 0, "uptime30d": 0, "p50ms24h": 0, "p95ms24h": 0, "samples24h": 242, "samples30d": 383, "days": [ { "date": "2026-11-06", "probes": 13, "ok": 0 }, { "date": "2026-11-07", "probes": 243, "ok": 0 }, { "date": "2026-11-08", "probes": 127, "ok": 0 } ], "outages": [ { "start": "2026-11-06T22:45:05.888142257Z", "end": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "note": "DNS lookup failed" } ], "since": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z" }, "versions": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@azure/openai", "version": "2.0.0", "seenAt": "2026-11-10T03:23:06.724432553Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "openai", "version": "7.54.0", "seenAt": "2026-11-10T03:23:06.68407452Z" }, { "registry": "pypi", "name": "openai", "version": "3.48.0", "released": "2026-11-09", "seenAt": "2026-11-10T03:23:06.558991593Z" } ], "githubStars": 3113, "npmWeekly": 57338964, "pypiWeekly": 90984450, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://microsoft.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "valid", "expires": "2027-10-27T16:00:00.000Z", "checkedAt": "2026-11-10T16:08:22.681117444Z" }, "domain": { "domain": "microsoft.com", "registered": "1991-05-02", "source": "https://rdap.verisign.com/com/v1/domain/microsoft.com", "checkedAt": "2026-11-08T15:09:06.124899136Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/foundry/openai/concepts/model-retirement-schedule", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-10T16:24:12.01876211Z", "changedAt": "2026-11-10T16:24:12.01876211Z", "fingerprint": "6c77af177ec4" } ], "github": { "repo": "azure/azure-rest-api-specs", "checkedAt": "2026-11-09T09:42:04.295813444Z", "stars": 3113, "archived": false, "issuesEnabled": true, "pushedAt": "2026-11-09T09:34:04Z", "openIssues": 1756, "openPRs": 314, "issuesOpened90d": 278, "issuesClosed90d": 909, "prsMerged90d": 1607, "ci": { "branch": "main", "runs": 50, "success": 50, "failure": 0, "other": 0, "latest": "success", "latestAt": "2026-11-09T09:17:21Z" }, "replies": { "sampled": 25, "unanswered": 25 } }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-10T16:24:12.01876211Z" }, "streak": { "days": 0, "from": "2026-11-11", "down": true, "last": { "kind": "outage", "date": "2026-11-06", "what": "DNS lookup failed" }, "next": { "kind": "shutdown", "date": "2026-11-19", "what": "`o1`, `o1-pro`, `o3`, `o3-pro`, `o3-mini`, `o3-deep-research` and `o4-mini` retire, replaced by `gpt-5.6-sol` or `gpt-5.6-terra`", "source": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/foundry/openai/concepts/model-retirement-schedule" }, "best": 0 } }, "answer": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models scores 80 (A) on agent readiness against Gemini 4 Carbon's 62.6 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.", "b": { "slug": "gemini-4-carbon", "name": "Gemini 4 Carbon", "vendor": "Google", "vendorUrl": "https://ai.google.dev", "kind": "model", "category": "inference", "summary": "Gemini 4 Carbon is Google's strongest Gemini model, for long agentic coding, cybersecurity and research work, on the paid tier of the Gemini API with a 1,048,576-token limit shared between input and output.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/gemini-4-carbon", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/gemini-4-carbon.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/gemini-4-carbon.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/gemini-4-carbon.json", "dns": "gemini-4-carbon.grade.anchorterminal.com", "license": "Closed model, used through the Gemini API and Google's apps under Google's terms", "transports": [], "remoteUrl": "https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta", "packages": [], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "An `x-goog-api-key` from AI Studio on a project with billing, since Carbon is on the paid tier only, per the Gemini API listing and Google's developer post. Google AI Ultra subscribers can also use it in AI Studio and Antigravity. The `gemini-4-carbon-cyber-permissive` variant needs a project approved through Google's Fairwind Program.", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "Google's announcement gives an introductory $2 per million input tokens and $10 output, cached input 95% off, then $4 and $20, with no end date for the introduction. Paid tier only, no free tier. Every processed token is billed, thinking included (checked 2026-11-10).", "priceSummary": "Pay per use", "where": "hosted", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No machine payment. Paid use needs billing on a Cloud project, per the Gemini API listing (checked 2026-11-10).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-10" }, "docsUrl": "https://docs.cloud.google.com/gemini-enterprise-agent-platform/models/guides/gemini-4-carbon", "llmsTxt": "https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "inference.llm" ], "tags": [ "official", "hosted", "model", "multimodal", "reasoning", "long-context", "tool-calling", "usage-priced", "card-required", "closed-source", "llms-txt", "new" ], "lastRelease": "2026-11-10", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 62.6, "grade": "B", "agentReady": false, "rank": 555, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1518, "categoryRank": 22, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 93, "maintenance": 83, "payments": 20, "reliability": 40, "schema": 85, "security": 55, "transparency": 72 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-10" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Google's strongest model on the same Gemini API as Argon, with a 1M-token budget, function calling and structured output, at an introductory $2 and $10 per million tokens. Paid tier only, sampling parameters are ignored or refused, its launch stage isn't stated, and the price rises to $4 and $20 at a date Google hasn't given.", "bestFor": "Agents on the hardest long tasks (multi-step debugging, large codebases, open-ended research, security work) that can pay frontier prices and already use the Gemini API.", "strengths": [ "Introductory price of $2 input and $10 output per million tokens, with cached input 95% off", "1,048,576 tokens shared between input and output, with long decodes for big outputs", "Function calling, structured output, Google Search grounding and background execution", "Thinking levels LOW, MEDIUM (default) and HIGH, and implicit caching on by default", "The same API, keys and SDKs as Gemini 4 Argon, so switching is a model ID" ], "weaknesses": [ "Paid tier only, with no free tier to try it on", "temperature, top_p and top_k are ignored, and thinking_budget, MINIMAL, penalties and extra candidates return a 400", "No explicit context caching, and prefilled model turns aren't accepted", "The price goes to $4 and $20 after an introduction with no end date given", "Benchmark figures are Google's own, and the launch stage isn't stated" ], "agentNotes": [ "Call generateContent at https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta with model gemini-4-carbon and an x-goog-api-key on a billed project", "Set thinking_level (LOW, MEDIUM or HIGH) instead of thinking_budget, and don't send temperature, top_p or top_k", "Count output against the same 1,048,576-token limit as the input, and set max_output_tokens for long answers", "Put static prompt content first so implicit caching applies; explicit caches aren't supported", "Use gemini-4-argon for most coding and knowledge work, and Carbon for the hardest long tasks, as Google suggests" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "B", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 62.6 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 93, "maintenance": 83, "payments": 20, "reliability": 40, "schema": 85, "security": 55, "transparency": 55 }, "provenanceScore": 89, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-10", "maintenance": "2026-11-10", "payments": "2026-11-10", "reliability": "2026-11-10", "schema": "2026-11-10", "security": "2026-11-10", "transparency": "2026-11-10" }, "last": "2026-11-10", "oldest": "2026-11-10", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "http": "curl \"https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta/models/gemini-4-carbon:generateContent\" \\\n -H \"x-goog-api-key: $GEMINI_API_KEY\" -H \"content-type: application/json\" \\\n -d '{\"contents\":[{\"parts\":[{\"text\":\"hello\"}]}]}'" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/inference.llm", "tool": "https://letme.dev/gemini-4-carbon" }, "sameCompany": [ "vertex-ai", "gemini-embedding", "vertex-ai-tuning", "cloud-run-gpus", "google-model-armor", "google-imagen", "google-veo", "google-lyria", "google-speech-to-text", "google-cloud-tts", "gemini-live", "google-adk", "google-memory-bank", "google-secret-manager", "google-cloud-document-ai", "google-weather-api", "chrome-devtools-mcp", "google-maps-platform", "google-cloud-translation", "google-calendar-api", "firebase-cloud-messaging", "google-cloud-storage", "google-drive-api", "gemini-enterprise", "gemini-cli", "google-search-console", "google-ads-api", "google-forms", "google-sheets-api", "gmail-api", "google-people-api" ], "sameModel": [ "gemini-api" ], "area": "models", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Gemini 4 Carbon input", "unit": "1m-tokens", "usd": 2, "note": "Introductory; $4 after, date not given" }, { "item": "Gemini 4 Carbon cached input", "unit": "1m-tokens", "usd": 0.1, "note": "95% off input" }, { "item": "Gemini 4 Carbon output", "unit": "1m-tokens", "usd": 10, "note": "Introductory; $20 after" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Google LLC", "domain": "google.com", "domainRegistered": "1997-09-15", "domainNote": "The endpoint is on googleapis.com, Google's API domain. google.com was registered in 1997.", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/terms", "privacy": "https://policies.google.com/privacy", "statusPage": "https://aistudio.google.com/status", "changelog": "https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/changelog", "securityTxt": "valid", "checked": "2026-11-10", "score": 89 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/gemini-4-carbon.json", "live": { "slug": "gemini-4-carbon", "probe": { "target": "https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta", "method": "get", "lastAt": "2026-11-11T00:11:14.576285682Z", "lastOk": true, "lastStatus": 404, "lastMs": 41, "authRequired": false, "uptime24h": 100, "uptime30d": 100, "p50ms24h": 41, "p95ms24h": 130, "samples24h": 67, "samples30d": 67, "days": [ { "date": "2026-11-10", "probes": 65, "ok": 65 }, { "date": "2026-11-11", "probes": 2, "ok": 2 } ], "since": "2026-11-10T17:42:25.910455739Z" }, "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://aistudio.google.com/status", "indicator": "unknown", "summary": "no machine-readable status found", "checkedAt": "2026-11-10T23:00:42.593790699Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-11T00:11:14.576285682Z" }, "streak": { "days": 1, "from": "2026-11-10", "sinceWatching": true, "best": 1 } }, "edges": [ { "by": 40, "category": "reliability", "leads": "azure-openai", "name": "Reliability", "reasons": { "a": "Azure status page with post-incident reviews, listing Azure OpenAI Service, Foundry Models and Foundry Agent Service as components (20). One incident in the 90 days to 6 November 2026 names Azure OpenAI, and no review after it does, intermittent request failures, higher latency and HTTP 5xx errors in Sweden Central from 10:03 to 15:58 UTC on 29 September 2026 (tracking 7QL5-Z50), counted as one major outage as in the Foundry fine-tuning dossier. The 23 July West US review and the 30 September gateway incident don't name it (10). Quota tiers from Free to Tier 6 with TPM and RPM per model and deployment type, 1,000 RPM and 1,000,000 TPM for each GPT-6 model on Global Standard at Tier 1 (15). 429 responses carry `retry-after-ms`, every response carries `x-ratelimit-*` headers, and the quota guide gives exponential backoff with jitter and SDK retry settings (15). The models page says models sold by Azure are covered by Azure service-level agreements and links the Online Services SLA. The consolidated SLA document wouldn't download on 6 October and wasn't retried on 6 November, so the clause rests on Microsoft's docs, read the same way as the 5 October Azure Speech check (10). The v1 API is GA and the GPT-6 models carry no preview label (10).", "b": "Model reading for gemini-4-carbon on the Gemini API. Platform facts are the Gemini API listing's (gemini-api, re-read 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Status page at aistudio.google.com/status with no readable components or history (10 of 20) and no readable incident record (5 of 30). Rate-limit tiers and spend limits published, per-model limits in AI Studio (5 of 15). Backoff guidance for 429 and 503 and SDK retries (15). No SLA (0). Carbon's launch stage isn't stated in Google's developer post, the Antigravity post or the Cloud developer guide read on 10 November, and the model ID carries no preview label, so half (5 of 10, a judgement call; Argon's GA earned the platform 10). 10 + 5 + 5 + 15 + 0 + 5 = 40." }, "scores": { "a": 80, "b": 40 } }, { "by": 40, "category": "security", "leads": "azure-openai", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "reasons": { "a": "Model reading. Microsoft Entra ID tokens with Azure roles (the Cognitive Services OpenAI User role for calls), managed identities, and key authentication that can be disabled per resource, or two regenerable resource keys in the `api-key` header. No documented route puts the key in a URL query string (30). Prompts, completions, embeddings and training data aren't used to train foundation models without the customer's permission or instruction, per the data privacy page updated 4 August 2026 (20). Flagged prompts and completions may be stored in the customer's geography for human abuse review, with no retention period stated, and approved customers can turn that storage off through modified abuse monitoring. Responses API data is kept 30 days by default unless `store` is false (12 of 15). Azure Monitor resource logs and the subscription activity log, as read in the Foundry fine-tuning dossier (15). MSRC coordinated disclosure policy and Microsoft's bounty programme, both named in microsoft.com's security.txt, and Azure OpenAI is listed in FedRAMP High and DoD IL2 scope in Azure public regions. The security.txt passed its Expires date on 2026-09-23 and was still expired on 6 November, which the Bedrock and S3 dossiers mark down by 2, applied here too (18 of 20, down from 20 on 6 October for consistency).", "b": "Model reading for gemini-4-carbon on the Gemini API. Platform facts are the Gemini API listing's (gemini-api, re-read 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Keys bound to a service account and restricted to the Gemini API, with no scopes and a token accepted in the URL (15 of 30, the platform's deduction). Carbon is on the paid tier only, and Google's terms say paid-tier content isn't used to improve products; AI Studio use under a Google AI Ultra subscription falls under terms we didn't read, so 15 of 20 (a judgement call; the platform's 10 is for its free tier). Abuse retention with no number, and new paid projects store requests by default since 26 October (5 of 15). Request logs for billed projects (15). security.txt and a reward programme, no certification naming the API (5 of 20). 15 + 15 + 5 + 15 + 5 = 55." }, "scores": { "a": 95, "b": 55 } }, { "by": 11, "category": "transparency", "leads": "azure-openai", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "reasons": { "a": "Closed service under the Microsoft Product Terms, with the v1 spec under MIT and the OpenAI SDKs under Apache-2.0 (15). The data privacy page agrees with the product terms on no training and states where data is processed and stored by deployment type, but gives no retention period for the human-review store and sits beside a 30-day default for Responses data (24 of 30). A published lifecycle policy and a retirement schedule with dates and replacements, but on 6 November the schedule listed `gpt-realtime-mini` 2025-10-06 and 2025-12-15 twice each with different retirement dates, and no GPT-6 model yet (18 of 20, down from 20). Data locations stated for Standard, Data Zone and Global deployments, and a public sub-processor list per the 5 October Azure Speech check, not re-read (20).", "b": "Model reading for gemini-4-carbon on the Gemini API. Platform facts are the Gemini API listing's (gemini-api, re-read 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Closed service with clear terms, SDKs Apache-2.0 (15). Paid-tier data isn't used, abuse retention has no number, and request storage is on by default for new paid projects (20 of 30). Deprecations table (15 of 20). Data may be cached anywhere Google has facilities; no subprocessor list checked (5 of 20). Every benchmark figure is Google's own. 15 + 20 + 15 + 5 = 55." }, "scores": { "a": 83, "b": 72 } }, { "by": 5, "category": "ergonomics", "leads": "azure-openai", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "reasons": { "a": "Model reading of the checklist (tool use, structured output, caching, context, batch, SDKs, errors). Tool use with parallel calls and a forced call by naming the function in `tool_choice`, 18 of 20 because `gpt-6.1-sol` calls tools only through the Responses API (18). Strict structured outputs (15). Prompt caching from 1,024 tokens, cached input at 0.1x on GPT-6 ($1 per million on Astra) and cache writes at 1.25x from GPT-5.6 on, with explicit breakpoints (15). 1,050,000-token context on GPT-6 and GPT-6.1, input capped at 922,000 (15). Batch at 50% off Global Standard with a 24-hour target (10). The docs use OpenAI's own SDKs for Python, JavaScript, C#, Go and Java against the v1 endpoint (10). 429 and quota errors documented with retry headers (15). Calls name a deployment rather than a model, so each model must be deployed in the resource first, which the model checklist doesn't score.", "b": "Model reading for gemini-4-carbon on the Gemini API. Platform facts are the Gemini API listing's (gemini-api, re-read 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Function calling, with forced calls by FunctionCallingConfig on the API (20). Structured output (13 of 15). Implicit caching with durable caching on by default, cached input 95% off, explicit caches not supported, per the Cloud guide read on 10 November (15). 1,048,576 tokens shared between input and output (15). Batch at half price on the platform (10). Python and JavaScript SDKs (10). Error codes with backoff guidance (10 of 15). 20 + 13 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 10 + 10 = 93." }, "scores": { "a": 98, "b": 93 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "Model API", "b": "Model API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "Microsoft", "b": "Google", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "https://\u003cresource\u003e.openai.azure.com/openai/v1", "b": "https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "HTTP", "b": "", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "OAuth or key", "b": "API key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Pay per use", "b": "Pay per use", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "Proprietary service under the Microsoft Product Terms. The v1 OpenAPI spec is MIT, and the OpenAI SDKs the docs use are Apache-2.0", "b": "Closed model, used through the Gemini API and Google's apps under Google's terms", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "no", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-10-26", "b": "2026-11-10", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "no date given", "b": "2026-04-28", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "2026-09-01", "b": "2026-10-01", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "454k npm/wk", "b": "none", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models scores 80 (A) on agent readiness against Gemini 4 Carbon's 62.6 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models or Gemini 4 Carbon?" }, { "answer": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Gemini 4 Carbon needs an API key.", "question": "Do Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models and Gemini 4 Carbon need an API key?" }, { "answer": "Yes. Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models has a hosted endpoint at https://\u003cresource\u003e.openai.azure.com/openai/v1 and Gemini 4 Carbon at https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta.", "question": "Can an agent call Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models and Gemini 4 Carbon without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 80 against 40", "Agent ergonomics, 98 against 93", "Security \u0026 auth, 95 against 55", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 83 against 72" ], "also": [ "Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better" ], "goodFor": "Teams on Azure that need OpenAI models with Entra ID, private networking, EU or US data zones or FedRAMP scope, and one resource that also serves DeepSeek, Llama, Mistral and Grok models.", "slug": "azure-openai", "watchFor": "Intermittent failures and 5xx errors in Sweden Central for about six hours on 29 September 2026" }, { "aheadOn": null, "also": null, "goodFor": "Agents on the hardest long tasks (multi-step debugging, large codebases, open-ended research, security work) that can pay frontier prices and already use the Gemini API.", "slug": "gemini-4-carbon", "watchFor": "Paid tier only, with no free tier to try it on" } ], "history": null, "job": { "capability": "inference.llm", "name": "LLM inference" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-vs-azure-openai.json", "title": "Amazon Bedrock vs Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-vs-azure-openai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-vs-gemini-4-carbon.json", "title": "Amazon Bedrock vs Gemini 4 Carbon", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-vs-gemini-4-carbon" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-azure-openai.json", "title": "Claude API vs Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-azure-openai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-gemini-4-carbon.json", "title": "Claude API vs Gemini 4 Carbon", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-gemini-4-carbon" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-azure-openai.json", "title": "Antseed vs Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-azure-openai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-gemini-4-carbon.json", "title": "Antseed vs Gemini 4 Carbon", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-gemini-4-carbon" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-blockrun-ai.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs BlockRun.AI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-blockrun-ai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-cerebras-inference.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Cerebras Inference", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-cerebras-inference" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-claude-fable-5-2.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Claude Fable 5.2", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-claude-fable-5-2" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-claude-mythos-5-2.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Claude Mythos 5.2", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-claude-mythos-5-2" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-cloudflare-ai-gateway.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Cloudflare AI Gateway", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-cloudflare-ai-gateway" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-cloudflare-workers-ai.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Cloudflare Workers AI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-cloudflare-workers-ai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-cohere-chat.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Cohere Chat API (Command models)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-cohere-chat" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-deepinfra.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs DeepInfra", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-deepinfra" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-deepseek-api.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs DeepSeek API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-deepseek-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-eden-ai.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Eden AI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-eden-ai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-elorian-glimpse.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Glimpse", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-elorian-glimpse" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-fireworks-inference.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Fireworks AI Inference", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-fireworks-inference" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-gemini-api.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Gemini Developer API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-gemini-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-groq.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs GroqCloud", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-groq" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-hugging-face-inference-providers.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Hugging Face Inference Providers", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-hugging-face-inference-providers" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-inkling-2-small.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Inkling 2 Small", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-inkling-2-small" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-jais-3.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Jais 3", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-jais-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-meta-model-api.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Meta Model API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-meta-model-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-minimax-api.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs MiniMax API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-minimax-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-mistral-api.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Mistral AI API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-mistral-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-muse-ember.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Muse Ember", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-muse-ember" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-muse-spark-open.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Muse Spark Open", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-muse-spark-open" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-nemotron-3-5-super-vl.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-nemotron-3-5-super-vl" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-novita-ai.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Novita AI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-novita-ai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-openai-api.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs OpenAI API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-openai-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-openrouter.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs OpenRouter", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-openrouter" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-prism-inference.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Prism Inference", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-prism-inference" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-ramp-router.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Router.com (Ramp Router)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-ramp-router" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-routerplus.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs RouterPlus", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-routerplus" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-sambanova.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs SambaCloud", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-sambanova" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-siliconflow.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs SiliconFlow", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-siliconflow" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-simplismart.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Simplismart", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-simplismart" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-stepfun-api.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs StepFun API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-stepfun-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-tencent-tokenhub.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-tencent-tokenhub" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-together-inference.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Together AI Inference", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-together-inference" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-vercel-ai-gateway.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Vercel AI Gateway", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-vercel-ai-gateway" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-vertex-ai.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-vertex-ai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-xai-api.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs xAI API (Grok)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-xai-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-gemini-4-carbon.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Gemini 4 Carbon", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-gemini-4-carbon" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cerebras-inference-vs-gemini-4-carbon.json", "title": "Cerebras Inference vs Gemini 4 Carbon", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cerebras-inference-vs-gemini-4-carbon" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-gemini-4-carbon.json", "title": "Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Carbon", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-gemini-4-carbon" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-mythos-5-2-vs-gemini-4-carbon.json", "title": "Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Carbon", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-mythos-5-2-vs-gemini-4-carbon" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-ai-gateway-vs-gemini-4-carbon.json", "title": "Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Gemini 4 Carbon", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-ai-gateway-vs-gemini-4-carbon" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-workers-ai-vs-gemini-4-carbon.json", "title": "Cloudflare Workers AI vs Gemini 4 Carbon", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-workers-ai-vs-gemini-4-carbon" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-chat-vs-gemini-4-carbon.json", "title": "Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Gemini 4 Carbon", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-chat-vs-gemini-4-carbon" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepinfra-vs-gemini-4-carbon.json", "title": "DeepInfra vs Gemini 4 Carbon", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepinfra-vs-gemini-4-carbon" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-api-vs-gemini-4-carbon.json", "title": "DeepSeek API vs Gemini 4 Carbon", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-api-vs-gemini-4-carbon" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/eden-ai-vs-gemini-4-carbon.json", "title": "Eden AI vs Gemini 4 Carbon", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/eden-ai-vs-gemini-4-carbon" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/elorian-glimpse-vs-gemini-4-carbon.json", "title": "Glimpse vs Gemini 4 Carbon", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/elorian-glimpse-vs-gemini-4-carbon" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fireworks-inference-vs-gemini-4-carbon.json", "title": "Fireworks AI Inference vs Gemini 4 Carbon", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fireworks-inference-vs-gemini-4-carbon" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-gemini-api.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Gemini Developer API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-gemini-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-groq.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs GroqCloud", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-groq" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-hugging-face-inference-providers.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Hugging Face Inference Providers", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-hugging-face-inference-providers" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-inkling-2-small.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Inkling 2 Small", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-inkling-2-small" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-jais-3.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Jais 3", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-jais-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-meta-model-api.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Meta Model API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-meta-model-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-minimax-api.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs MiniMax API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-minimax-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-mistral-api.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Mistral AI API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-mistral-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-muse-ember.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Muse Ember", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-muse-ember" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-muse-spark-open.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Muse Spark Open", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-muse-spark-open" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-nemotron-3-5-super-vl.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-nemotron-3-5-super-vl" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-novita-ai.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Novita AI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-novita-ai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-openai-api.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs OpenAI API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-openai-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-openrouter.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs OpenRouter", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-openrouter" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-prism-inference.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Prism Inference", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-prism-inference" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-ramp-router.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Router.com (Ramp Router)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-ramp-router" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-routerplus.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs RouterPlus", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-routerplus" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-sambanova.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs SambaCloud", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-sambanova" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-siliconflow.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs SiliconFlow", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-siliconflow" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-simplismart.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Simplismart", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-simplismart" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-stepfun-api.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs StepFun API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-stepfun-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-tencent-tokenhub.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-tencent-tokenhub" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-together-inference.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Together AI Inference", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-together-inference" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-vercel-ai-gateway.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Vercel AI Gateway", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-vercel-ai-gateway" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-vertex-ai.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-vertex-ai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-xai-api.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs xAI API (Grok)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-xai-api" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "azure-openai": 80, "by": 40, "edge": "azure-openai", "gemini-4-carbon": 40, "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "azure-openai": 87, "by": 2, "edge": "azure-openai", "gemini-4-carbon": 85, "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "weight": 13 }, { "azure-openai": 98, "by": 5, "edge": "azure-openai", "gemini-4-carbon": 93, "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "weight": 13 }, { "azure-openai": 95, "by": 40, "edge": "azure-openai", "gemini-4-carbon": 55, "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "weight": 14 }, { "azure-openai": 20, "by": 0, "edge": "", "gemini-4-carbon": 20, "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "azure-openai": 86, "by": 3, "edge": "azure-openai", "gemini-4-carbon": 83, "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "weight": 7 }, { "azure-openai": 83, "by": 11, "edge": "azure-openai", "gemini-4-carbon": 72, "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models scores 80 (A) on agent readiness against Gemini 4 Carbon's 62.6 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do llm inference.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "azure-openai": "An OpenAI-compatible v1 API with a public OpenAPI spec, Entra ID roles in place of shared keys and FedRAMP High scope, with GPT-6 and GPT-6.1 at OpenAI's list prices on Global Standard. Access needs an Azure subscription with a card and a deployment per model, and a 29 September 2026 incident caused about six hours of failures in Sweden Central.", "gemini-4-carbon": "Google's strongest model on the same Gemini API as Argon, with a 1M-token budget, function calling and structured output, at an introductory $2 and $10 per million tokens. Paid tier only, sampling parameters are ignored or refused, its launch stage isn't stated, and the price rises to $4 and $20 at a date Google hasn't given." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-gemini-4-carbon", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-gemini-4-carbon.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-gemini-4-carbon.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-gemini-4-carbon.min.md" }, "markdown": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models scores 80 (A) on agent readiness against Gemini 4 Carbon's 62.6 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do llm inference.\n\n- Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models: grade A, 80/100, rank #14 of 1518. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/azure-openai.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/azure-openai.json\n- Gemini 4 Carbon: grade B, 62.6/100, rank #555 of 1518. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/gemini-4-carbon.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/gemini-4-carbon.json\n- Best model APIs and inference for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/inference/index.md\n- All 1000 models comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/inference/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models (A)\n\nGood for: Teams on Azure that need OpenAI models with Entra ID, private networking, EU or US data zones or FedRAMP scope, and one resource that also serves DeepSeek, Llama, Mistral and Grok models.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 80 against 40\n- Agent ergonomics, 98 against 93\n- Security \u0026 auth, 95 against 55\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 83 against 72\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better\n\nWatch for: Intermittent failures and 5xx errors in Sweden Central for about six hours on 29 September 2026\n\n### Gemini 4 Carbon (B)\n\nGood for: Agents on the hardest long tasks (multi-step debugging, large codebases, open-ended research, security work) that can pay frontier prices and already use the Gemini API.\n\nWatch for: Paid tier only, with no free tier to try it on\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Reliability: Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models +40\n\n- Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models (80): Azure status page with post-incident reviews, listing Azure OpenAI Service, Foundry Models and Foundry Agent Service as components (20). One incident in the 90 days to 6 November 2026 names Azure OpenAI, and no review after it does, intermittent request failures, higher latency and HTTP 5xx errors in Sweden Central from 10:03 to 15:58 UTC on 29 September 2026 (tracking 7QL5-Z50), counted as one major outage as in the Foundry fine-tuning dossier. The 23 July West US review and the 30 September gateway incident don't name it (10). Quota tiers from Free to Tier 6 with TPM and RPM per model and deployment type, 1,000 RPM and 1,000,000 TPM for each GPT-6 model on Global Standard at Tier 1 (15). 429 responses carry `retry-after-ms`, every response carries `x-ratelimit-*` headers, and the quota guide gives exponential backoff with jitter and SDK retry settings (15). The models page says models sold by Azure are covered by Azure service-level agreements and links the Online Services SLA. The consolidated SLA document wouldn't download on 6 October and wasn't retried on 6 November, so the clause rests on Microsoft's docs, read the same way as the 5 October Azure Speech check (10). The v1 API is GA and the GPT-6 models carry no preview label (10).\n- Gemini 4 Carbon (40): Model reading for gemini-4-carbon on the Gemini API. Platform facts are the Gemini API listing's (gemini-api, re-read 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Status page at aistudio.google.com/status with no readable components or history (10 of 20) and no readable incident record (5 of 30). Rate-limit tiers and spend limits published, per-model limits in AI Studio (5 of 15). Backoff guidance for 429 and 503 and SDK retries (15). No SLA (0). Carbon's launch stage isn't stated in Google's developer post, the Antigravity post or the Cloud developer guide read on 10 November, and the model ID carries no preview label, so half (5 of 10, a judgement call; Argon's GA earned the platform 10). 10 + 5 + 5 + 15 + 0 + 5 = 40.\n\n### Security \u0026 auth: Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models +40\n\n- Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models (95): Model reading. Microsoft Entra ID tokens with Azure roles (the Cognitive Services OpenAI User role for calls), managed identities, and key authentication that can be disabled per resource, or two regenerable resource keys in the `api-key` header. No documented route puts the key in a URL query string (30). Prompts, completions, embeddings and training data aren't used to train foundation models without the customer's permission or instruction, per the data privacy page updated 4 August 2026 (20). Flagged prompts and completions may be stored in the customer's geography for human abuse review, with no retention period stated, and approved customers can turn that storage off through modified abuse monitoring. Responses API data is kept 30 days by default unless `store` is false (12 of 15). Azure Monitor resource logs and the subscription activity log, as read in the Foundry fine-tuning dossier (15). MSRC coordinated disclosure policy and Microsoft's bounty programme, both named in microsoft.com's security.txt, and Azure OpenAI is listed in FedRAMP High and DoD IL2 scope in Azure public regions. The security.txt passed its Expires date on 2026-09-23 and was still expired on 6 November, which the Bedrock and S3 dossiers mark down by 2, applied here too (18 of 20, down from 20 on 6 October for consistency).\n- Gemini 4 Carbon (55): Model reading for gemini-4-carbon on the Gemini API. Platform facts are the Gemini API listing's (gemini-api, re-read 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Keys bound to a service account and restricted to the Gemini API, with no scopes and a token accepted in the URL (15 of 30, the platform's deduction). Carbon is on the paid tier only, and Google's terms say paid-tier content isn't used to improve products; AI Studio use under a Google AI Ultra subscription falls under terms we didn't read, so 15 of 20 (a judgement call; the platform's 10 is for its free tier). Abuse retention with no number, and new paid projects store requests by default since 26 October (5 of 15). Request logs for billed projects (15). security.txt and a reward programme, no certification naming the API (5 of 20). 15 + 15 + 5 + 15 + 5 = 55.\n\n### Transparency \u0026 trust: Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models +11\n\n- Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models (83): Closed service under the Microsoft Product Terms, with the v1 spec under MIT and the OpenAI SDKs under Apache-2.0 (15). The data privacy page agrees with the product terms on no training and states where data is processed and stored by deployment type, but gives no retention period for the human-review store and sits beside a 30-day default for Responses data (24 of 30). A published lifecycle policy and a retirement schedule with dates and replacements, but on 6 November the schedule listed `gpt-realtime-mini` 2025-10-06 and 2025-12-15 twice each with different retirement dates, and no GPT-6 model yet (18 of 20, down from 20). Data locations stated for Standard, Data Zone and Global deployments, and a public sub-processor list per the 5 October Azure Speech check, not re-read (20).\n- Gemini 4 Carbon (72): Model reading for gemini-4-carbon on the Gemini API. Platform facts are the Gemini API listing's (gemini-api, re-read 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Closed service with clear terms, SDKs Apache-2.0 (15). Paid-tier data isn't used, abuse retention has no number, and request storage is on by default for new paid projects (20 of 30). Deprecations table (15 of 20). Data may be cached anywhere Google has facilities; no subprocessor list checked (5 of 20). Every benchmark figure is Google's own. 15 + 20 + 15 + 5 = 55.\n\n### Agent ergonomics: Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models +5\n\n- Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models (98): Model reading of the checklist (tool use, structured output, caching, context, batch, SDKs, errors). Tool use with parallel calls and a forced call by naming the function in `tool_choice`, 18 of 20 because `gpt-6.1-sol` calls tools only through the Responses API (18). Strict structured outputs (15). Prompt caching from 1,024 tokens, cached input at 0.1x on GPT-6 ($1 per million on Astra) and cache writes at 1.25x from GPT-5.6 on, with explicit breakpoints (15). 1,050,000-token context on GPT-6 and GPT-6.1, input capped at 922,000 (15). Batch at 50% off Global Standard with a 24-hour target (10). The docs use OpenAI's own SDKs for Python, JavaScript, C#, Go and Java against the v1 endpoint (10). 429 and quota errors documented with retry headers (15). Calls name a deployment rather than a model, so each model must be deployed in the resource first, which the model checklist doesn't score.\n- Gemini 4 Carbon (93): Model reading for gemini-4-carbon on the Gemini API. Platform facts are the Gemini API listing's (gemini-api, re-read 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Function calling, with forced calls by FunctionCallingConfig on the API (20). Structured output (13 of 15). Implicit caching with durable caching on by default, cached input 95% off, explicit caches not supported, per the Cloud guide read on 10 November (15). 1,048,576 tokens shared between input and output (15). Batch at half price on the platform (10). Python and JavaScript SDKs (10). Error codes with backoff guidance (10 of 15). 20 + 13 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 10 + 10 = 93.\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models | Gemini 4 Carbon | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 80 | 40 | Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models +40 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 87 | 85 | Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models +2 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 98 | 93 | Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models +5 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 95 | 55 | Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models +40 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 20 | 20 | even |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 86 | 83 | Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models +3 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 83 | 72 | Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models +11 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **80 · A** | **62.6 · B** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models | Gemini 4 Carbon |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | Model API | Model API |\n| Vendor | Microsoft | Google |\n| Hosted endpoint | `https://\u003cresource\u003e.openai.azure.com/openai/v1` | `https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta` |\n| Transports | HTTP | |\n| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |\n| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | Proprietary service under the Microsoft Product Terms. The v1 OpenAPI spec is MIT, and the OpenAI SDKs the docs use are Apache-2.0 | Closed model, used through the Gemini API and Google's apps under Google's terms |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | no |\n| llms.txt | no | yes |\n| Last release | 2026-10-26 | 2026-11-10 |\n| Terms last updated | no date given | 2026-04-28 |\n| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-01 | 2026-10-01 |\n| Customer content may train models | yes | yes |\n| Terms restrict automated access | yes | yes |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Popularity | 454k npm/wk | none |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models.** An OpenAI-compatible v1 API with a public OpenAPI spec, Entra ID roles in place of shared keys and FedRAMP High scope, with GPT-6 and GPT-6.1 at OpenAI's list prices on Global Standard. Access needs an Azure subscription with a card and a deployment per model, and a 29 September 2026 incident caused about six hours of failures in Sweden Central.\n\n**Gemini 4 Carbon.** Google's strongest model on the same Gemini API as Argon, with a 1M-token budget, function calling and structured output, at an introductory $2 and $10 per million tokens. Paid tier only, sampling parameters are ignored or refused, its launch stage isn't stated, and the price rises to $4 and $20 at a date Google hasn't given.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models\n\n1. Point the OpenAI SDK at https://\u003cresource\u003e.openai.azure.com/openai/v1/ and pass the deployment name as `model`, not the model id\n2. Prefer Entra ID with the Cognitive Services OpenAI User role over the resource key, which opens the whole data plane\n3. On 429 wait for `retry-after-ms`, then back off with jitter. The OpenAI SDK retries twice by default\n4. Set `store: false` on Responses calls you don't need kept. Stored responses persist 30 days by default\n5. Keep remote MCP approvals on for servers you don't control. They're required by default\n\n### Gemini 4 Carbon\n\n1. Call generateContent at https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta with model gemini-4-carbon and an x-goog-api-key on a billed project\n2. Set thinking_level (LOW, MEDIUM or HIGH) instead of thinking_budget, and don't send temperature, top_p or top_k\n3. Count output against the same 1,048,576-token limit as the input, and set max_output_tokens for long answers\n4. Put static prompt content first so implicit caching applies; explicit caches aren't supported\n5. Use gemini-4-argon for most coding and knowledge work, and Carbon for the hardest long tasks, as Google suggests\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models or Gemini 4 Carbon?\n\nAzure OpenAI in Foundry Models scores 80 (A) on agent readiness against Gemini 4 Carbon's 62.6 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.\n\n### Do Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models and Gemini 4 Carbon need an API key?\n\nAzure OpenAI in Foundry Models takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Gemini 4 Carbon needs an API key.\n\n### Can an agent call Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models and Gemini 4 Carbon without installing anything?\n\nYes. Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models has a hosted endpoint at https://\u003cresource\u003e.openai.azure.com/openai/v1 and Gemini 4 Carbon at https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-gemini-4-carbon.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-gemini-4-carbon.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"azure-openai\", \"b\": \"gemini-4-carbon\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare azure-openai gemini-4-carbon`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/azure-openai.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/gemini-4-carbon.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models or Gemini 4 Carbon\n\n- [Amazon Bedrock vs Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-vs-azure-openai.md)\n- [Amazon Bedrock vs Gemini 4 Carbon](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-vs-gemini-4-carbon.md)\n- [Claude API vs Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-azure-openai.md)\n- [Claude API vs Gemini 4 Carbon](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-gemini-4-carbon.md)\n- [Antseed vs Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-azure-openai.md)\n- [Antseed vs Gemini 4 Carbon](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-gemini-4-carbon.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs BlockRun.AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-blockrun-ai.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Cerebras Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-cerebras-inference.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Claude Fable 5.2](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-claude-fable-5-2.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Claude Mythos 5.2](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-claude-mythos-5-2.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Cloudflare AI Gateway](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-cloudflare-ai-gateway.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Cloudflare Workers AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-cloudflare-workers-ai.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Cohere Chat API (Command models)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-cohere-chat.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs DeepInfra](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-deepinfra.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs DeepSeek API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-deepseek-api.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Eden AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-eden-ai.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Glimpse](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-elorian-glimpse.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Fireworks AI Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-fireworks-inference.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Gemini Developer API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-gemini-api.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs GroqCloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-groq.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Hugging Face Inference Providers](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-hugging-face-inference-providers.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Inkling 2 Small](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-inkling-2-small.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Jais 3](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-jais-3.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Meta Model API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-meta-model-api.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs MiniMax API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-minimax-api.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Mistral AI API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-mistral-api.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Muse Ember](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-muse-ember.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Muse Spark Open](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-muse-spark-open.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-nemotron-3-5-super-vl.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Novita AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-novita-ai.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs OpenAI API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-openai-api.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs OpenRouter](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-openrouter.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-prism-inference.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Router.com (Ramp Router)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-ramp-router.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs RouterPlus](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-routerplus.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs SambaCloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-sambanova.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs SiliconFlow](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-siliconflow.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Simplismart](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-simplismart.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs StepFun API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-stepfun-api.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-tencent-tokenhub.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Together AI Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-together-inference.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Vercel AI Gateway](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-vercel-ai-gateway.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-vertex-ai.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs xAI API (Grok)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-xai-api.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Gemini 4 Carbon](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-gemini-4-carbon.md)\n- [Cerebras Inference vs Gemini 4 Carbon](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cerebras-inference-vs-gemini-4-carbon.md)\n- [Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Carbon](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-gemini-4-carbon.md)\n- [Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Carbon](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-mythos-5-2-vs-gemini-4-carbon.md)\n- [Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Gemini 4 Carbon](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-ai-gateway-vs-gemini-4-carbon.md)\n- [Cloudflare Workers AI vs Gemini 4 Carbon](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-workers-ai-vs-gemini-4-carbon.md)\n- [Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Gemini 4 Carbon](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-chat-vs-gemini-4-carbon.md)\n- [DeepInfra vs Gemini 4 Carbon](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepinfra-vs-gemini-4-carbon.md)\n- [DeepSeek API vs Gemini 4 Carbon](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-api-vs-gemini-4-carbon.md)\n- [Eden AI vs Gemini 4 Carbon](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/eden-ai-vs-gemini-4-carbon.md)\n- [Glimpse vs Gemini 4 Carbon](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/elorian-glimpse-vs-gemini-4-carbon.md)\n- [Fireworks AI Inference vs Gemini 4 Carbon](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fireworks-inference-vs-gemini-4-carbon.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Gemini Developer API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-gemini-api.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs GroqCloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-groq.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Hugging Face Inference Providers](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-hugging-face-inference-providers.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Inkling 2 Small](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-inkling-2-small.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Jais 3](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-jais-3.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Meta Model API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-meta-model-api.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs MiniMax API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-minimax-api.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Mistral AI API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-mistral-api.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Muse Ember](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-muse-ember.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Muse Spark Open](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-muse-spark-open.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-nemotron-3-5-super-vl.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Novita AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-novita-ai.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs OpenAI API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-openai-api.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs OpenRouter](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-openrouter.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-prism-inference.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Router.com (Ramp Router)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-ramp-router.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs RouterPlus](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-routerplus.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs SambaCloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-sambanova.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs SiliconFlow](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-siliconflow.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Simplismart](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-simplismart.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs StepFun API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-stepfun-api.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-tencent-tokenhub.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Together AI Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-together-inference.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Vercel AI Gateway](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-vercel-ai-gateway.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-vertex-ai.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs xAI API (Grok)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-xai-api.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-11", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.7", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Gemini 4 Carbon", "url": "" } ], "description": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models scores 80 (A) to Gemini 4 Carbon's 62.6 (B) for llm inference. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models A 80", "Gemini 4 Carbon B 62.6", "scores" ], "h1": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Gemini 4 Carbon", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/azure-openai-vs-gemini-4-carbon", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Gemini 4 Carbon for AI agents (2026)", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-10", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-gemini-4-carbon" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 6500, "slim": 930 }, "version": 1 }