# Azure Maps vs OpenCage Geocoding API (slim)

> OpenCage Geocoding API scores 69.2 (B) on agent readiness against Azure Maps's 67.9 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Azure Maps leads on schema & documentation and security & auth. Both do geo geocode. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-maps-vs-opencage.md (~2,300 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-maps-vs-opencage.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-maps-vs-opencage
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-08

OpenCage Geocoding API scores 69.2 (B) on agent readiness against Azure Maps's 67.9 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Azure Maps leads on schema & documentation and security & auth. Both do geo geocode.

- Azure Maps: B 67.9, rank #196 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/azure-maps.min.md
- OpenCage Geocoding API: B 69.2, rank #164 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/opencage.min.md
- Azure Maps, good for Teams already on Azure that want geocoding and routing under Entra ID roles and one flat price. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 83 against 77; Security & auth, 66 against 47.
- OpenCage Geocoding API, good for Bulk or repeated geocoding where results go into a database, and for EU data residency. Ahead on Agent ergonomics, 86 against 73; Payments & pricing, 35 against 20; Transparency & trust, 84 against 74. Also Runs on your own machine; Free to start without a card.

| Category | Azure Maps | OpenCage Geocoding API |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 81 | 85 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 83 | 77 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 73 | 86 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 66 | 47 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 20 | 35 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 67 | 66 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 74 | 84 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Azure Maps | OpenCage Geocoding API |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Microsoft Azure | OpenCage |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://atlas.microsoft.com` | `https://api.opencagedata.com/geocode/v1/json` |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Price for geo geocode | $4.50 per 1,000 requests | not published |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Microsoft's Product Terms. The Azure SDK client libraries are MIT | MIT (MCP server) |
| Tools exposed | none | 3 |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | `io.github.OpenCageData/opencage-geocoding-mcp` |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-06-25 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-01 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 9.1k npm/wk, 25k PyPI/wk | 19 stars, 5.5k npm/wk, 138k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (2) |