# Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs Teamwork.com

> Teamwork.com scores 65.9 (B) to Atlassian Rovo's 57.9 (C) for issues and tasks. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-teamwork
- Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-teamwork.md (~2,850 tokens)
- Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-teamwork.min.md (~730 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts)
- JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-teamwork.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json)
- Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt)
- API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json
- Updated: 2026-10-08

Teamwork.com scores 65.9 (B) on agent readiness against Atlassian Rovo MCP Server's 57.9 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Atlassian Rovo MCP Server leads on security & auth. Both do issues and tasks.

- Atlassian Rovo MCP Server: grade C, 57.9/100, rank #592 of 950. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/atlassian-rovo-mcp.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/atlassian-rovo-mcp.json
- Teamwork.com: grade B, 65.9/100, rank #309 of 950. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/teamwork.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/teamwork.json
- Best issue tracking, docs and chat tools for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/productivity/index.md
- All 40 work comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/productivity/index.md
- Best project and task management tools for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/project-management/index.md
- All 135 projects comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/project-management/index.md

## Which one, for what

### Atlassian Rovo MCP Server (C)

Good for: Teams already on Atlassian Cloud who want an agent to read and write Jira, Confluence and Bitbucket under the user's permissions with admin audit.

Ahead on:
- Security & auth, 85 against 58

Watch for: No numeric rate limits or 429 guidance published for the MCP server

### Teamwork.com (B)

Good for: Agencies and services firms already on Teamwork.com that want an assistant to create and update tasks, log time, read workload and budgets, and answer Desk tickets.

Ahead on:
- Reliability, 73 against 50
- Schema & documentation, 72 against 58
- Agent ergonomics, 68 against 63
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 88 against 80

Also in its favour:
- Runs on your own machine
- Free to start without a card
- No incidents deducted, where Atlassian Rovo MCP Server loses 3 points for them

Watch for: OAuth scopes are per product only (`projects`, `desk`, `spaces`, `chat`), and the token from the app login flow is described as permanent


## Score by category

| Category | Weight | Atlassian Rovo MCP Server | Teamwork.com | Edge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 50 | 73 | Teamwork.com +23 |
| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 58 | 72 | Teamwork.com +14 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 63 | 68 | Teamwork.com +5 |
| Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 85 | 58 | Atlassian Rovo MCP Server +27 |
| Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 20 | 30 | Teamwork.com +10 |
| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 80 | 88 | Teamwork.com +8 |
| Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 78 | 80 | Teamwork.com +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| **Total** | | **57.9 · C** | **65.9 · B** | |

## Facts side by side

| Fact | Atlassian Rovo MCP Server | Teamwork.com |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Atlassian | Teamwork Crew Limited |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://mcp.atlassian.com/v2/mcp` | `https://mcp.ai.teamwork.com` |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy), stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Your plan | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | proprietary | Proprietary service under Teamwork.com's terms of service. The MCP server on GitHub is MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | 225 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| MCP registry | `com.atlassian/atlassian-mcp-server` | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2024-08-19 |
| Customer content may train models | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 1.1k stars | 26 stars |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | none |

## Verdicts

**Atlassian Rovo MCP Server.** v2 gateway exposes primary tools plus discover and three execute meta-tools, and the rest load on demand. No numeric rate limits or 429 guidance published for the MCP server.

**Teamwork.com.** The official MCP server is MIT licensed, released almost daily, and has typed tools with annotations, profile endpoints and no delete tools on the shipped servers. OAuth scopes stop at product level, access tokens are permanent, and no SLA, API changelog or prompt-injection guidance was found in the reviewed documentation.

## Before you call either

### Atlassian Rovo MCP Server

1. Connect to `https://mcp.atlassian.com/v2/mcp`, not `/v1/sse`, which stopped being supported after 30 June 2026
2. Call `discover` before execute, since flat tool names have changed under v2
3. Pass `maxResults: 10` on JQL and CQL searches, as Atlassian's own skills require
4. Expect a permission error rather than a tool for deletes until an admin enables delete_jira
5. For headless runs send a service-account key as `Authorization: Bearer`, and note that JSM tools need this route

### Teamwork.com

1. Use a profile endpoint such as https://mcp.ai.teamwork.com/project-manager. The base URL loads every tool across Projects, Desk, Spaces and Chat.
2. Ask a site administrator to enable MCP under Settings, AI before connecting.
3. Build REST URLs from `installation.apiEndPoint` in the token response. Sites live at {site}.teamwork.com (US) or {site}.eu.teamwork.com (EU).
4. Stay under 150 requests a minute on Free, Basics and Accelerate. The limit is shared by the whole site. On 429, wait until `X-Rate-Limit-Reset`.
5. Pass `verbose=false` to `list_*` tools to get ids and names only, and use `twprojects-create_tasks` for many tasks in one call.

## Questions

### Which is better for AI agents, Atlassian Rovo MCP Server or Teamwork.com?

Teamwork.com scores 65.9 (B) on agent readiness against Atlassian Rovo MCP Server's 57.9 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Atlassian Rovo MCP Server leads on security & auth.

### Do Atlassian Rovo MCP Server and Teamwork.com need an API key?

Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.

### Can an agent call Atlassian Rovo MCP Server and Teamwork.com without installing anything?

Yes. Atlassian Rovo MCP Server has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.atlassian.com/v2/mcp and Teamwork.com at https://mcp.ai.teamwork.com.


## For agents

- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-teamwork.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-teamwork.min.md
- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "atlassian-rovo-mcp", "b": "teamwork"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare atlassian-rovo-mcp teamwork`
- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/atlassian-rovo-mcp.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/teamwork.json

## Other comparisons with Atlassian Rovo MCP Server or Teamwork.com

- [Asana vs Atlassian Rovo MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/asana-vs-atlassian-rovo-mcp.md)
- [Asana vs Teamwork.com](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/asana-vs-teamwork.md)
- [Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs Basecamp](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-basecamp.md)
- [Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs ClickUp](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-clickup.md)
- [Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs monday.com](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-monday.md)
- [Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs OpenProject](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-openproject.md)
- [Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs Plane](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-plane.md)
- [Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs Redmine](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-redmine.md)
- [Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs Roma](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-roma.md)
- [Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs Shortcut](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-shortcut.md)
- [Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs Taiga](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-taiga.md)
- [Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs Todoist](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-todoist.md)
- [Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs Trello](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-trello.md)
- [Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs Wrike](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-wrike.md)
- [Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs YouTrack](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-youtrack.md)
- [Basecamp vs Teamwork.com](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/basecamp-vs-teamwork.md)
- [ClickUp vs Teamwork.com](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clickup-vs-teamwork.md)
- [Linear MCP vs Teamwork.com](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/linear-mcp-vs-teamwork.md)
- [monday.com vs Teamwork.com](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/monday-vs-teamwork.md)
- [OpenProject vs Teamwork.com](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-teamwork.md)
- [Plane vs Teamwork.com](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/plane-vs-teamwork.md)
- [Redmine vs Teamwork.com](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/redmine-vs-teamwork.md)
- [Roma vs Teamwork.com](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/roma-vs-teamwork.md)
- [Shortcut vs Teamwork.com](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/shortcut-vs-teamwork.md)
- [Taiga vs Teamwork.com](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/taiga-vs-teamwork.md)
- [Teamwork.com vs Todoist](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/teamwork-vs-todoist.md)
- [Teamwork.com vs Trello](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/teamwork-vs-trello.md)
- [Teamwork.com vs Wrike](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/teamwork-vs-wrike.md)
- [Teamwork.com vs YouTrack](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/teamwork-vs-youtrack.md)
- [Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs Notion MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-notion-mcp.md)
- [Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs Outline](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-outline.md)
- [Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs Linear MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-linear-mcp.md)