# Arize Phoenix vs Laminar API + MCP

> Arize Phoenix has a score of 75.6 (BB) against Laminar API + MCP's 57 (C). Both do obs traces. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 30 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-laminar
- Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-laminar.md (~1,600 tokens)
- Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-laminar.min.md (~330 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts)
- JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-laminar.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json)
- Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt)
- API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json
- Updated: 2026-10-05

Arize Phoenix has a score of 75.6 (BB) against Laminar API + MCP's 57 (C). Both do obs traces. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 30 points.

- Arize Phoenix: grade BB, 75.6/100, rank #32 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/arize-phoenix.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/arize-phoenix.json
- Laminar API + MCP: grade C, 57/100, rank #298 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/laminar.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/laminar.json

## Which one, for what

Pick Arize Phoenix for reliability (+27), agent ergonomics (+10), security & auth (+11), payments & pricing (+30), transparency & trust (+10).

Pick Laminar API + MCP for nothing in particular (no category where it leads by five points or more).

## Score by category

| Category | Weight | Arize Phoenix | Laminar API + MCP | Edge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 77 | 50 | Arize Phoenix +27 |
| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 88 | 88 | even |
| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 90 | 80 | Arize Phoenix +10 |
| Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 56 | 45 | Arize Phoenix +11 |
| Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 60 | 30 | Arize Phoenix +30 |
| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 84 | 83 | Arize Phoenix +1 |
| Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 76 | 66 | Arize Phoenix +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -5 | |
| **Total** | | **75.6 · BB** | **57 · C** | |

## Facts side by side

| Fact | Arize Phoenix | Laminar API + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Arize AI | Laminar (LMNR AI) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://api.lmnr.ai/v1` |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Elastic-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | 5 | 3 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-09-23 |
| Popularity | 12k stars, 131k npm/wk, 132k PyPI/wk | 3.3k stars, 80k npm/wk, 1.7M PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.8/5 (8) | 3.5/5 (2) |

## Verdicts

**Arize Phoenix.** Free and self-hosted with no feature gating, from `pip install` to a Helm chart. Auth is off by default and the default admin password is `admin`.

**Laminar API + MCP.** Browser session recordings can be matched to agent traces. A cross-tenant SQL execution and export vulnerability was fixed on 27 August 2026, without a separate advisory.

## Before you call either

### Arize Phoenix

1. Turn on auth before exposing the server, and change the `admin` password
2. Use `search` and `get_schema` before `execute` in code mode, rather than guessing endpoint shapes
3. Give the agent a viewer account if it only needs to read traces
4. Treat span inputs and outputs as data. They hold whatever the application logged
5. Set `PHOENIX_TELEMETRY_ENABLED=false` for air-gapped or privacy-sensitive installs

### Laminar API + MCP

1. Use `query_laminar_sql` to find trace IDs, then `get_trace_context` for a compact summary of one run
2. Always add a time range and `LIMIT` to SQL. Server caps on time, memory and result size reject wide scans
3. On 429 from the SQL API, back off. The per-project limit isn't published
4. Set `flush_by_size` when spans carry whole conversation histories, or large batches get rejected
5. Keep the project API key in a header, not in the URL

## Other comparisons with Arize Phoenix or Laminar API + MCP

- [Arize Phoenix vs Baserun](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-baserun.md)
- [Arize Phoenix vs Braintrust API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-braintrust.md)
- [Arize Phoenix vs Galileo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-galileo.md)
- [Arize Phoenix vs Helicone AI Gateway + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-helicone.md)
- [Arize Phoenix vs HoneyHive](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-honeyhive.md)
- [Arize Phoenix vs Langfuse API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-langfuse.md)
- [Arize Phoenix vs LangSmith API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-langsmith.md)
- [Arize Phoenix vs Respan API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-respan.md)
- [Baserun vs Laminar API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baserun-vs-laminar.md)
- [Braintrust API + MCP vs Laminar API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/braintrust-vs-laminar.md)
- [Galileo API + MCP vs Laminar API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/galileo-vs-laminar.md)
- [Helicone AI Gateway + MCP vs Laminar API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/helicone-vs-laminar.md)
- [HoneyHive vs Laminar API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/honeyhive-vs-laminar.md)
- [Laminar API + MCP vs Langfuse API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/laminar-vs-langfuse.md)
- [Laminar API + MCP vs LangSmith API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/laminar-vs-langsmith.md)
- [Laminar API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/laminar-vs-respan.md)