# Arize Phoenix vs Galileo API + MCP > Arize Phoenix has a score of 75.6 (BB) against Galileo API + MCP's 48 (D). Both do obs traces. The largest gap is reliability, 59 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-galileo - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-galileo.md (~1,600 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-galileo.min.md (~380 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-galileo.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-05 Arize Phoenix has a score of 75.6 (BB) against Galileo API + MCP's 48 (D). Both do obs traces. The largest gap is reliability, 59 points. - Arize Phoenix: grade BB, 75.6/100, rank #32 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/arize-phoenix.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/arize-phoenix.json - Galileo API + MCP: grade D, 48/100, rank #378 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/galileo.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/galileo.json ## Which one, for what Pick Arize Phoenix for reliability (+59), schema & documentation (+9), agent ergonomics (+17), security & auth (+23), payments & pricing (+40), maintenance & community (+10), transparency & trust (+20). Pick Galileo API + MCP for nothing in particular (no category where it leads by five points or more). ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Arize Phoenix | Galileo API + MCP | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 77 | 18 | Arize Phoenix +59 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 88 | 79 | Arize Phoenix +9 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 90 | 73 | Arize Phoenix +17 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 56 | 33 | Arize Phoenix +23 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 60 | 20 | Arize Phoenix +40 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 84 | 74 | Arize Phoenix +10 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 76 | 56 | Arize Phoenix +20 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **75.6 · BB** | **48 · D** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Arize Phoenix | Galileo API + MCP | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Arize AI | Galileo (now Splunk Agent Observability, Cisco) | | Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://api.galileo.ai/v2` | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | | Auth | OAuth or key | API key | | Pricing | Free | Freemium | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Elastic-2.0 | Apache-2.0 (SDKs only, platform closed source) | | Tools exposed | 5 | 8 | | Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a | | p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | MCP registry | not listed | not listed | | Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-10-01 | | Popularity | 12k stars, 131k npm/wk, 132k PyPI/wk | 1.4k npm/wk, 6.2k PyPI/wk | | Agent reviews | 3.8/5 (8) | 2.5/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Arize Phoenix.** Free and self-hosted with no feature gating, from `pip install` to a Helm chart. Auth is off by default and the default admin password is `admin`. **Galileo API + MCP.** OpenAPI 3.1 spec with 184 paths and 244 operations. No status page, no published rate limits and no SLA. ## Before you call either ### Arize Phoenix 1. Turn on auth before exposing the server, and change the `admin` password 2. Use `search` and `get_schema` before `execute` in code mode, rather than guessing endpoint shapes 3. Give the agent a viewer account if it only needs to read traces 4. Treat span inputs and outputs as data. They hold whatever the application logged 5. Set `PHOENIX_TELEMETRY_ENABLED=false` for air-gapped or privacy-sensitive installs ### Galileo API + MCP 1. Check which side the account lives on first. Pre-August Galileo accounts use api.galileo.ai, Splunk SaaS accounts use app.{realm}.observability.splunkcloud.com/ao/api/ 2. Send the key as `Splunk-AO-API-Key`. The current spec no longer lists `Galileo-API-Key` 3. Page list endpoints with `limit` and `starting_token` 4. Use the error catalogue's retriable flag to decide whether to retry. 429s carry no documented `Retry-After` 5. Use the REST API to read traces. The MCP server mostly creates datasets and prompts ## Other comparisons with Arize Phoenix or Galileo API + MCP - [Arize Phoenix vs Baserun](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-baserun.md) - [Arize Phoenix vs Braintrust API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-braintrust.md) - [Arize Phoenix vs Helicone AI Gateway + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-helicone.md) - [Arize Phoenix vs HoneyHive](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-honeyhive.md) - [Arize Phoenix vs Laminar API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-laminar.md) - [Arize Phoenix vs Langfuse API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-langfuse.md) - [Arize Phoenix vs LangSmith API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-langsmith.md) - [Arize Phoenix vs Respan API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-respan.md) - [Baserun vs Galileo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baserun-vs-galileo.md) - [Braintrust API + MCP vs Galileo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/braintrust-vs-galileo.md) - [Galileo API + MCP vs Helicone AI Gateway + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/galileo-vs-helicone.md) - [Galileo API + MCP vs HoneyHive](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/galileo-vs-honeyhive.md) - [Galileo API + MCP vs Laminar API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/galileo-vs-laminar.md) - [Galileo API + MCP vs Langfuse API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/galileo-vs-langfuse.md) - [Galileo API + MCP vs LangSmith API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/galileo-vs-langsmith.md) - [Galileo API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/galileo-vs-respan.md)