# Arete-27B vs Granite 4.2 30B (slim)

> Granite 4.2 30B scores 61 (C) to Arete-27B's 55.1 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arete-27b-vs-granite-4-2-30b.md (~8,850 tokens) · this version ~630 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arete-27b-vs-granite-4-2-30b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arete-27b-vs-granite-4-2-30b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Granite 4.2 30B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Arete-27B's 55.1 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Arete-27B: C 55.1, rank #123 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/arete-27b.min.md
- Granite 4.2 30B: C 61, rank #65 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/granite-4-2-30b.min.md
- Arete-27B, good for Agents that want Qwen3.8-27B's coding and tool use without its handling of politically sensitive topics, on a 24 GB card or a 128 GB machine
- Granite 4.2 30B, good for Agents that want a documented, signed, Apache 2.0 reasoning model with tool calling on a 24 GB card Ahead on Reach, 90 against 50; Agent interface, 85 against 60; Documentation and upkeep, 87 against 63.

| Category | Arete-27B | Granite 4.2 30B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 50 | 90 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 60 | 85 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 63 | 87 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Arete-27B | Granite 4.2 30B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Nous Research | IBM |
| Last release | 2026-11-06 | 2026-09-04 |

Why the edge:
- Reach, Granite 4.2 30B +40: Arete-27B 50 (Memory 10, the only build from Nous Research is the 54.7 GB BF16 release, which needs about 66 GB and fits the reference machine.); Granite 4.2 30B 90 (Memory 25, IBM's own 4-bit MLX build granite-4.2-30b-q4-mlx is 16.47 GB, and 16.47 GB × 1.2 = 19.8 GB, which fits 24 GB but not 16 GB.)
- Agent interface, Granite 4.2 30B +25: Arete-27B 60 (Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository.); Granite 4.2 30B 85 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, with roles, tools, tool responses, the thinking switch and low effort.)
- Documentation and upkeep, Granite 4.2 30B +24: Arete-27B 63 (Model card 8, no limitations, context length, languages or cut-off.); Granite 4.2 30B 87 (Model card 17, Intended use (best for), limitations (ethical considerations and limitations), architecture, parameters (30B), context length (128K native) and 1…)