{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "arcgis", "name": "ArcGIS Location Platform", "vendor": "Esri", "vendorUrl": "https://location.arcgis.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "maps", "summary": "Esri's pay-as-you-go location services for developers. REST APIs cover geocoding, reverse and batch geocoding, place search, routing, basemap tiles, static maps, elevation and demographic enrichment, with an Esri-hosted MCP server in beta.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/arcgis", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/arcgis.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/arcgis.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/arcgis.json", "dns": "arcgis.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/Esri/arcgis-rest-js", "license": "Proprietary service under the ArcGIS Location Platform Agreement. The ArcGIS REST JS client library is Apache-2.0", "transports": [ "http", "streamable-http" ], "remoteUrl": "https://geocode-api.arcgis.com", "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@esri/arcgis-rest-geocoding" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@esri/arcgis-rest-request" }, { "registry": "pypi", "name": "arcgis" } ], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "Self-serve. A free ArcGIS Location Platform account created in a browser issues API key credentials with selected privileges, an expiry date of up to one year, optional referrer limits and two tokens for rotation. OAuth 2.0 user authentication and app authentication (client ID and secret, short-lived tokens) are also supported. Requests take the token as a `token` parameter or in an `X-Esri-Authorization` or `Authorization` header. Accounts are for one person and may not be shared.", "pricing": "freemium", "pricingNotes": "Usage-based in US dollars with a monthly free tier and no contract. Free each month are 20,000 unstored geocodes, 20,000 routes, 500 place searches, 2 million basemap tiles, 1,000 static maps and 50,000 elevation points. A payment method (card, purchase order or voucher) is needed only to turn on pay-as-you-go, which services without a free tier, among them stored geocodes, require. The sign-up form is drawn by script and we couldn't read whether it asks for a card.", "priceSummary": "$0.50 / 1k req", "where": "hosted", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 on the pricing page, the billing help or the REST and MCP documentation (checked 2026-10-08).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 9, "popularity": { "githubStars": 392, "npmWeekly": 65286, "pypiWeekly": 32974, "asOf": "2026-10-08" }, "docsUrl": "https://developers.arcgis.com/rest/location-based-services/", "capabilities": [ "geo.geocode", "geo.reverse", "geo.places", "geo.routing", "geo.tiles" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "maps", "geocoding", "routing", "places", "api-key", "oauth", "mcp", "beta-mcp", "free-tier", "usage-priced", "sla", "status-page", "typescript", "python" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-27", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 66.1, "grade": "B", "agentReady": false, "rank": 380, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1486, "categoryRank": 7, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 78, "maintenance": 83, "payments": 40, "reliability": 70, "schema": 61, "security": 64, "transparency": 69 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-02" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Per-unit prices are public for every service, with a monthly free tier of 20,000 geocodes and 20,000 routes, keys limited to chosen privileges and a 99.9 per cent SLA. No rate limits or OpenAPI description were found, results may not be stored unless the dearer stored geocode is bought, and the agreement bars benchmarking without written permission.", "bestFor": "Organisations already on Esri software, and work that needs demographic enrichment, service areas or fleet routing beside geocoding.", "strengths": [ "Every service has a public unit price and most have a monthly free tier, such as 20,000 geocodes, 20,000 routes and 2 million basemap tiles (https://location.arcgis.com/pricing/).", "API key credentials carry selected privileges, an expiry date of up to one year, optional referrer limits and two tokens for rotation. OAuth 2.0 user and app authentication are also supported.", "A published SLA commits to 99.9 per cent monthly uptime for ten services, with credits of 10 or 20 per cent of the monthly bill for the affected service (document G632a, 23 December 2025).", "The agreement promises 90 days' notice for deprecations of SDKs, APIs and location services (ArcGIS Location Platform Agreement, revised 21 November 2025, section 4.1).", "An Esri-hosted MCP server at `https://location-services-mcp.arcgis.com/beta/mcp` has nine tools, filters them by the token's privileges and adds no charge on top of service rates." ], "weaknesses": [ "The agreement bars benchmarking availability, performance or functionality, and publishing benchmark results, without prior written permission from Esri and its licensors (sections 3.1.b.6 and 3.1.c.6.F).", "No request rate limits, 429 behaviour or retry guidance were found in the geocoding, places or routing reference pages we read.", "No OpenAPI description or llms.txt was found. `/llms.txt` returns 404 on developers.arcgis.com and location.arcgis.com.", "Storing a geocode needs `forStorage=true` at $4 per 1,000 with no free tier, against $0.50 per 1,000 for results that may not be kept.", "The MCP server is a beta under an Early Access programme, and the SLA excludes beta, evaluation and free services. Technical support is sold separately." ], "agentNotes": [ "Send the token in an `X-Esri-Authorization: Bearer` or `Authorization` header. The docs' examples put it in a `token` parameter, which Esri's own best-practice page calls less secure.", "Set `forStorage=true` on `findAddressCandidates` or `reverseGeocode` only when results will be kept. It needs pay-as-you-go and the Geocode (stored) privilege, and costs eight times the unstored rate.", "Cap geocoding output with `maxLocations` (default and maximum 50) and `outFields`, because billing counts results returned and the default returns every field.", "Page place searches with `pageSize` (maximum 20) and `offset`. A nearby or extent search costs $8 per 1,000 requests after 500 free a month.", "Check the JSON body for an `error` object with `code`, `message` and `details`. Code 499 means the token is missing and 403 means it lacks the privilege." ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 4, "avgRating": 3.5, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "B", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 66.1 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 78, "maintenance": 83, "payments": 40, "reliability": 70, "schema": 61, "security": 64, "transparency": 54 }, "provenanceScore": 83, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-02", "maintenance": "2026-11-02", "payments": "2026-11-02", "reliability": "2026-11-02", "schema": "2026-11-02", "security": "2026-11-02", "transparency": "2026-11-02" }, "last": "2026-11-02", "lastMoved": "2026-11-02", "oldest": "2026-11-02", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "npm install @esri/arcgis-rest-request @esri/arcgis-rest-geocoding", "http": "curl https://geocode-api.arcgis.com/arcgis/rest/services/World/GeocodeServer/findAddressCandidates \\\n -d \"f=pjson\" \\\n -d \"address=1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, DC\" \\\n -d \"token=\u003cACCESS_TOKEN\u003e\"", "config": { "servers": { "mcpArcGISLocationServices": { "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer ${input:esriApiKey}" }, "type": "http", "url": "https://location-services-mcp.arcgis.com/beta/mcp" } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/geo.geocode", "tool": "https://letme.dev/arcgis" }, "area": "everyday", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Geocodes, not stored (after 20,000 free a month)", "unit": "1k-requests", "usd": 0.5 }, { "item": "Geocodes, stored (`forStorage=true`, no free tier)", "unit": "1k-requests", "usd": 4 }, { "item": "Places nearby and extent search (after 500 free a month)", "unit": "1k-requests", "usd": 8 }, { "item": "Routes (after 20,000 free a month)", "unit": "1k-requests", "usd": 0.5 }, { "item": "Routes, stop-optimised (no free tier)", "unit": "1k-requests", "usd": 50 }, { "item": "Service areas (after 5,000 free a month)", "unit": "1k-requests", "usd": 50 }, { "item": "Basemap tiles (after 2 million free a month)", "unit": "1k-requests", "usd": 0.15 }, { "item": "Static maps (after 1,000 free a month)", "unit": "1k-requests", "usd": 0.9 }, { "item": "Elevation, per 1,000 points (after 50,000 free a month)", "unit": "1k-requests", "usd": 1 } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.", "domain": "arcgis.com", "domainRegistered": "1999-06-09", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.esri.com/content/dam/esrisites/en-us/media/legal/platform/platform-legal.pdf", "privacy": "https://www.esri.com/en-us/privacy/privacy-statements/privacy-statement", "statusPage": "https://status.location.arcgis.com", "changelog": "https://location.arcgis.com/help/release-notes/2026-09/", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-11-02", "notes": [ "The ArcGIS Location Platform Agreement (E204 Platform Legal, revised 21 November 2025) is between the customer and Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., a California corporation at 380 New York Street, Redlands, California 92373-8100.", "The privacy statement (revised 31 July 2026) is the one the product's pages link. Esri also publishes a Products \u0026 Services Privacy Statement Supplement (9 September 2025) and a Data Processing Addendum (12 March 2024). Neither names ArcGIS Location Platform. The agreement's section 11.5 points to the addendum.", "The services answer on arcgis.com subdomains, among them geocode-api.arcgis.com, places-api.arcgis.com and location-services-mcp.arcgis.com.", "`/.well-known/security.txt` returns 404 on www.esri.com, developers.arcgis.com, location.arcgis.com and www.arcgis.com (developers and location re-read on 2 November 2026). The trust centre takes reports through a form, with a PGP key and a safe harbour statement.", "RDAP gives 1999-06-09 for arcgis.com and 1990-04-18 for esri.com, both registered through MarkMonitor Inc.", "The status page is Esri's own. Its event history is drawn by script, so we read the platform's RSS feed (all.rss, titled ArcGIS Location Platform Services Status), whose newest entry on 2 November 2026 is still dated 16 June 2026. The page's \"all services RSS feed\" link points at location_platform.rss, which answered 404 that day.", "The platform release notes moved on to a September 2026 page (Static Maps polygon and overlay endpoints, the MCP service, pay-as-you-go moved to the payment methods page, a fix for an API key validation bug in geocoding and routing)." ], "score": 83 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/arcgis.json", "live": { "slug": "arcgis", "probe": { "target": "https://geocode-api.arcgis.com", "method": "get", "lastAt": "2026-11-07T18:20:10.912928956Z", "lastOk": true, "lastStatus": 200, "lastMs": 217, "authRequired": false, "uptime24h": 100, "uptime30d": 100, "p50ms24h": 154, "p95ms24h": 283, "samples24h": 239, "samples30d": 7420, "days": [ { "date": "2026-10-08", "probes": 50, "ok": 50 }, { "date": "2026-10-09", "probes": 250, "ok": 250 }, { "date": "2026-10-10", "probes": 247, "ok": 247 }, { "date": "2026-10-11", "probes": 247, "ok": 247 }, { "date": "2026-10-12", "probes": 247, "ok": 247 }, { "date": "2026-10-13", "probes": 248, "ok": 248 }, { "date": "2026-10-14", "probes": 249, "ok": 249 }, { "date": "2026-10-15", "probes": 253, "ok": 253 }, { "date": "2026-10-16", "probes": 252, "ok": 252 }, { "date": "2026-10-17", "probes": 253, "ok": 253 }, { "date": "2026-10-18", "probes": 256, "ok": 256 }, { "date": "2026-10-19", "probes": 255, "ok": 255 }, { "date": "2026-10-20", "probes": 252, "ok": 252 }, { "date": "2026-10-21", "probes": 253, "ok": 253 }, { "date": "2026-10-22", "probes": 253, "ok": 253 }, { "date": "2026-10-23", "probes": 248, "ok": 248 }, { "date": "2026-10-24", "probes": 251, "ok": 251 }, { "date": "2026-10-25", "probes": 250, "ok": 250 }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "probes": 252, "ok": 252 }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "probes": 249, "ok": 249 }, { "date": "2026-10-28", "probes": 251, "ok": 251 }, { "date": "2026-10-29", "probes": 249, "ok": 249 }, { "date": "2026-10-30", "probes": 248, "ok": 248 }, { "date": "2026-10-31", "probes": 251, "ok": 251 }, { "date": "2026-11-01", "probes": 249, "ok": 249 }, { "date": "2026-11-02", "probes": 250, "ok": 250 }, { "date": "2026-11-03", "probes": 248, "ok": 248 }, { "date": "2026-11-04", "probes": 246, "ok": 246 }, { "date": "2026-11-05", "probes": 185, "ok": 185 }, { "date": "2026-11-06", "probes": 241, "ok": 241 }, { "date": "2026-11-07", "probes": 187, "ok": 187 } ] }, "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.location.arcgis.com", "indicator": "unknown", "summary": "no machine-readable status found", "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T04:47:06.736228455Z" }, "versions": [ { "registry": "github", "name": "Esri/arcgis-rest-js", "version": "@esri/arcgis-rest-request@4.11.1", "released": "2026-08-12", "seenAt": "2026-11-06T23:07:01.462203334Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@esri/arcgis-rest-geocoding", "version": "4.11.0", "seenAt": "2026-11-06T23:06:59.054252559Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@esri/arcgis-rest-request", "version": "4.11.0", "seenAt": "2026-11-06T23:06:59.265334951Z" }, { "registry": "pypi", "name": "arcgis", "version": "2.4.4", "released": "2026-10-20", "seenAt": "2026-11-06T23:07:01.275527424Z" } ], "githubStars": 394, "npmWeekly": 8426, "pypiWeekly": 37506, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://arcgis.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T16:01:16.036225554Z" }, "domain": { "domain": "arcgis.com", "registered": "1999-06-09", "source": "https://rdap.verisign.com/com/v1/domain/arcgis.com", "checkedAt": "2026-11-01T14:12:57.919937705Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://location.arcgis.com/help/release-notes/2026-07/", "kind": "changelog", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-11-02T07:20:10.512584723Z", "changedAt": "2026-10-17T23:05:30.185999821Z", "fingerprint": "9af8b8dce85d" }, { "url": "https://location.arcgis.com/help/release-notes/2026-09/", "kind": "changelog", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:13:25.735875546Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "bcf8d7b9a99a" }, { "url": "https://support.esri.com/en-us/knowledge-base/landscape-variables-in-arcgis-geoenrichment-000043632", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:21:26.942689851Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "135039d0a7c5" }, { "url": "https://www.esri.com/en-us/privacy/privacy-statements/privacy-statement", "kind": "privacy", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:28:19.883777876Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "a1bf1873839c" } ], "github": { "repo": "esri/arcgis-rest-js", "checkedAt": "2026-11-02T08:46:46.266240285Z", "stars": 393, "archived": false, "issuesEnabled": true, "pushedAt": "2026-10-30T17:50:59Z", "openIssues": 59, "openPRs": 5, "issuesOpened90d": 2, "issuesClosed90d": 1, "prsMerged90d": 7, "ci": { "branch": "main", "runs": 50, "success": 45, "failure": 3, "other": 2, "latest": "success", "latestAt": "2026-08-07T21:03:48Z" }, "replies": { "sampled": 25, "unanswered": 12, "medianDays": 33.4 } }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-07T18:20:10.912928956Z" } }, "answer": "ArcGIS Location Platform scores 66.1 (B) on agent readiness against MapTiler Cloud's 62.1 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. MapTiler Cloud leads on schema \u0026 documentation and transparency \u0026 trust.", "b": { "slug": "maptiler", "name": "MapTiler Cloud", "vendor": "MapTiler AG", "vendorUrl": "https://www.maptiler.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "maps", "summary": "MapTiler Cloud is a hosted maps platform from MapTiler AG in Switzerland. Its read-only REST APIs serve map styles, vector and raster tiles, static maps, forward and reverse geocoding, IP geolocation, elevation, coordinate transforms and weather data.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/maptiler", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/maptiler.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/maptiler.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/maptiler.json", "dns": "maptiler.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/maptiler/maptiler-client-js", "transports": [ "http" ], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@maptiler/client" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@maptiler/sdk" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "API key from the MapTiler Cloud account after a browser signup, always passed as the `key` query parameter. Keys can be limited to HTTP origins and a User-Agent substring and are managed through the Service API. From a backend, a service token can sign each request with a `signature` parameter instead. The Service API (uploads, tilesets, keys, analytics) needs a service token.", "pricing": "freemium", "pricingNotes": "Free plan with 100,000 API requests, 5,000 sessions and 1,000 search sessions a month, no card, for testing and non-commercial use; service pauses at the limit. Flex is $30 a month with 500,000 requests, then $0.15 per 1,000 requests and $2.50 per 1,000 search sessions. Custom contracts carry a 99.9% SLA.", "priceSummary": "$0.15 / 1k req", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the API reference, OpenAPI spec, llms.txt or pricing page (checked 2026-11-06). Paid plans are billed by FastSpring.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": 114682, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-06" }, "docsUrl": "https://docs.maptiler.com/cloud/api/", "llmsTxt": "https://docs.maptiler.com/llms.txt", "openapi": "https://docs.maptiler.com/_data/cloud/api/openapi.yml", "capabilities": [ "geo.geocode", "geo.reverse", "geo.places", "geo.tiles", "data.weather" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "api-key", "freemium", "free-tier", "no-card", "llms-txt", "openapi", "official", "agent-skills", "typescript", "status-page", "security-txt", "iso27001", "eu", "eu-region", "sla", "closed-source" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-02", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 62.1, "grade": "B", "agentReady": false, "rank": 574, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1486, "categoryRank": 10, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 70, "payments": 40, "reliability": 43, "schema": 79, "security": 64, "transparency": 80 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-06" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "MapTiler Cloud has an OpenAPI 3.1 reference, llms.txt with Markdown pages, an agent skill and ISO 27001 certification, and allows geocoding results to be stored. The key always travels in the query string, there's no routing API, no documented rate limit or 429 handling, and the free plan excludes commercial use.", "bestFor": "Map tiles, static maps and worldwide geocoding with storable results for apps that also show a map, with EU data residency.", "strengths": [ "OpenAPI 3.1.0 spec, llms.txt, llms-full.txt and a Markdown version of every docs page", "Geocoding results may be bulk downloaded and used outside the service with attribution", "Keys can be restricted by origin and User-Agent, and service tokens can sign requests instead", "ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification, security.txt and a vulnerability disclosure policy", "EU-only endpoint at api.maptiler.eu and hosting mainly in Switzerland and the EEA" ], "weaknesses": [ "The API key is always sent as a query parameter", "No routing, directions or matrix API", "No per-second rate limit, 429 behaviour or retry guidance found in the documentation", "The free plan is for testing and non-commercial use only, and pauses at its monthly limit", "Official clients are JavaScript and TypeScript only" ], "agentNotes": [ "Restrict the key to an origin or User-Agent, or sign requests with a service token from a backend, since the key appears in every URL", "Use the batch geocoding path (up to 50 semicolon-separated queries) rather than one call per address", "Use api.maptiler.eu when the user's requests must stay in the EU", "Read docs pages as Markdown by appending .md, starting from https://docs.maptiler.com/llms.txt", "Don't cache map tiles server-side; the Cloud terms forbid it, though geocoding results may be stored with attribution" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "B", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 62.1 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 70, "payments": 40, "reliability": 43, "schema": 79, "security": 64, "transparency": 64 }, "provenanceScore": 96, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-06", "maintenance": "2026-11-06", "payments": "2026-11-06", "reliability": "2026-11-06", "schema": "2026-11-06", "security": "2026-11-06", "transparency": "2026-11-06" }, "last": "2026-11-06", "oldest": "2026-11-06", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "npm install @maptiler/client", "http": "curl \"https://api.maptiler.com/geocoding/Zurich.json?language=en\u0026limit=3\u0026key=$MAPTILER_API_KEY\"" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/geo.geocode", "tool": "https://letme.dev/maptiler" }, "area": "everyday", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "API requests over the Flex allowance", "unit": "1k-requests", "usd": 0.15, "note": "Flex includes 500,000 a month" }, { "item": "Search sessions over the Flex allowance", "unit": "1k-requests", "usd": 2.5, "note": "Priced per 1,000 search sessions through MapTiler SDK JS" }, { "item": "Flex plan", "unit": "month", "usd": 30, "note": "Extra usage billed monthly" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "MapTiler AG", "domain": "maptiler.com", "domainRegistered": "2008-08-08", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.maptiler.com/terms/", "privacy": "https://www.maptiler.com/privacy-policy/", "statusPage": "https://status.maptiler.com", "changelog": "https://docs.maptiler.com/updates/", "securityTxt": "valid", "checked": "2026-11-06", "notes": [ "The general terms name MapTiler AG, Zugerstrasse 22, 6314 Unterägeri, Switzerland, under Swiss law with courts in Zug.", "security.txt at www.maptiler.com/.well-known/security.txt names sysadmin@maptiler.com, a PGP key and a signature, and has no Expires field.", "status.maptiler.com is a StatusCake public report whose data loads from app.statuscake.com. That host's robots.txt answered with a redirect, so it wasn't fetched and no uptime or incident history was read.", "RDAP gives maptiler.com a registration date of 8 August 2008.", "No clause on automated access to the website was found in the general terms. robots.txt on www.maptiler.com and docs.maptiler.com allows all agents apart from a few paths." ], "score": 96 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/maptiler.json", "live": { "slug": "maptiler", "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.maptiler.com", "indicator": "unknown", "summary": "no machine-readable status found", "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T04:48:02.124798696Z" }, "versions": [ { "registry": "github", "name": "maptiler/maptiler-client-js", "version": "v3.1.0", "released": "2026-10-02", "seenAt": "2026-11-06T23:42:38.646681081Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@maptiler/client", "version": "3.1.0", "seenAt": "2026-11-06T23:42:36.419318643Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@maptiler/sdk", "version": "4.2.1", "seenAt": "2026-11-06T23:42:37.315182633Z" } ], "githubStars": 25, "npmWeekly": 114682, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://maptiler.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "valid", "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T15:59:35.51300876Z" }, "llmsTxt": { "url": "https://docs.maptiler.com/llms.txt", "ok": true, "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T15:32:57.151624353Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://docs.maptiler.com/updates/", "kind": "changelog", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:06:56.724195464Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "1152e8fe8b9d" }, { "url": "https://www.maptiler.com/privacy-policy/", "kind": "privacy", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:31:21.154658791Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "46d3f1544780" }, { "url": "https://www.maptiler.com/terms/", "kind": "terms", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:31:23.29013826Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "fc740f21aa9f" } ], "updatedAt": "2026-11-07T15:59:35.51300876Z" } }, "edges": [ { "by": 27, "category": "reliability", "leads": "arcgis", "name": "Reliability", "reasons": { "a": "Graded as a hosted service on the REST location services, which are generally available. Esri runs its own status page at status.location.arcgis.com with current status and an event history (20). The history is drawn by script, so we read the platform's RSS feed at /admin/api/rss/all.rss, titled ArcGIS Location Platform Services Status. The page's own \"all services RSS feed\" link (location_platform.rss) answered 404 on 2 November. On 2 November its newest entry is still an intermittent basemap tile slowdown on 16 June 2026, outside the 90 days to 2 November. A readable feed that posts incidents, with none touching the product in the window, is a clean record (30). The 8 October check gave 25 and held back 5 for the feed's unknown depth, which isn't a checklist value. No request rate limits with numbers were found in the geocoding, places or routing reference (0, per the 8 October check, not re-read on 2 November). No 429 or backoff guidance was found. The geocoding output page says only that a timeout after 60 seconds may be retried later (0). The SLA of 23 December 2025 commits to 99.9 per cent monthly uptime for ten services (10). The REST services are generally available, and the MCP server is a beta (10). Total 70.", "b": "Hosted lines. status.maptiler.com is a StatusCake public uptime report rather than a component incident page (15). Its data loads from app.statuscake.com, whose robots.txt answered with a redirect, so we didn't fetch it and read no history. That's our limit, not a finding, and the rubric gives 5 (5). Monthly request and session quotas are published per plan, but no per-second limit (5). No 429, Retry-After or backoff guidance found in the API reference, the OpenAPI spec or llms-full.txt (0). The pricing page lists a 99.9% SLA on the Custom plan, while the Cloud terms call availability best effort and point to a custom SLA (8). The public APIs are GA (10). 15+5+5+0+8+10 = 43." }, "scores": { "a": 70, "b": 43 } }, { "by": 18, "category": "schema", "leads": "maptiler", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "reasons": { "a": "No OpenAPI description was found for geocoding, places or routing. The geocoding service description at `GeocodeServer?f=pjson` lists each parameter with its type, allowed values and supported operations, which earns 8 of 25. `/llms.txt` returns 404 on developers.arcgis.com and location.arcgis.com (0). The reference explains when to use a direct request or a job, and stored or unstored geocoding (16 of 20). Parameters carry types, defaults, allowed values and maximums, such as `maxLocations` up to 50 and `pageSize` up to 20 (12 of 15). Each operation has request and response examples, and the geocoding output page lists error codes with extended codes and causes (13 of 15). Geocoding has dated release notes back to 2023 and the platform has release notes by month, but the geocoding path carries no version while places uses `/v1` (12 of 15). Total 61.", "b": "OpenAPI 3.1.0 document with 32 paths for the public APIs (25). llms.txt, llms-full.txt and a Markdown twin of every page (10). Each API page says what it's for and when to use the SDK instead (session billing), with little on when not to call it (13). Parameters are typed with defaults, such as limit (default 5 forward, 1 reverse) and a types enum, but bbox and proximity are strings (11). Examples on every endpoint, and the spec documents 400, 403, 404 and 414, without an error reference page (10). A dated platform updates page and a geocoding index changelog, but no version in the API path and the spec is version '1.0' (10). 25+10+13+11+10+10 = 79." }, "scores": { "a": 61, "b": 79 } }, { "by": 13, "category": "maintenance", "leads": "arcgis", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "reasons": { "a": "The latest dated change is MCP server 1.0.0-beta.1.9 on 27 October 2026, which added stored and unstored geocoding and a service area tool (30). Dated entries in the 90 days to 2 November include MCP releases on 10 August, 1, 15 and 29 September, 9 and 27 October, the September 2026 platform and geocoding release notes, ArcGIS REST JS 4.11.0 on 7 August and 4.11.1 on 12 August, and the ArcGIS API for Python tag v2.4.4 on 22 September (20). Public release notes and the Esri Community forum exist, technical support is a paid extra, and we didn't read reply times. The 8 October check counted 60 open issues on the ArcGIS REST JS repository; github.com pages weren't readable on 2 November, and the clone's main branch was last changed on 7 August 2026 (10 of 15). Official SDKs are current, ArcGIS REST JS 4.11.1 and the ArcGIS API for Python 2.4.4 (15). The JS repository has pull-request test and release workflows, and we didn't check that they pass (8 of 10). Total 83.", "b": "@maptiler/client 3.1.0 and @maptiler/sdk 4.2.0 on 2 October 2026, 35 days before this check, with the agent skill updated on 21 October (20). Platform updates entries for August (EU endpoint, key security) and September 2026 (terrain blending) plus the two October releases (20). A Discord community and support answered on a best-effort basis within two business days, per the Cloud terms. We didn't read GitHub issues (10). Official JavaScript client and SDK current, no Python client (12). The SDK repository runs unit and end-to-end tests in CI; we didn't check results (8). 20+20+10+12+8 = 70." }, "scores": { "a": 83, "b": 70 } }, { "by": 11, "category": "transparency", "leads": "maptiler", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "reasons": { "a": "A closed service with a dated agreement that states what may be stored, cached and shared, and an Apache-2.0 client library (15 of 30). The privacy statement was revised on 31 July 2026, the Products \u0026 Services supplement on 9 September 2025 and the Data Processing Addendum on 12 March 2024. None states a retention period, and neither the supplement nor the addendum names ArcGIS Location Platform (14 of 30). The agreement promises 90 days' notice for deprecations, and the July 2026 release notes record the retirement of legacy API keys (16 of 20). The addendum names four sub-processors as examples and the GDPR page says information is stored in the United States, with no list specific to this product (9 of 20). Total 54.", "b": "Editorial half only. Closed service with general and Cloud-specific terms under Swiss law, and SDKs under BSD 3-Clause and the skill under MIT (20). The privacy policy covers account and payment data and says legal-claim data is kept up to 10 years, but says nothing about how long API request logs are kept (15). A dated deprecation page for v3 maps and migration guides, with no written notice period (12). Hosting with OVHcloud and Google Firebase, data mainly in Switzerland and the EEA, and an EU-only endpoint. Google Analytics, Firebase and FastSpring named in the privacy policy (17). 20+15+12+17 = 64." }, "scores": { "a": 69, "b": 80 } }, { "by": 8, "category": "ergonomics", "leads": "arcgis", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "reasons": { "a": "Responses can be sized with `outFields` and `maxLocations` on geocoding and `pageSize` on places (20 of 25). Places pages with `pageSize` and `offset` and filters by category and text, and geocoding filters by extent, country and category (18 of 20). Errors are a JSON object with `code`, `message` and `details`, with documented causes for 400, 403, 498 and 499 (15 of 20). The geocoding, places and routing calls are reads, so retries are safe, but no retry guidance was found and we didn't read the MCP tools' annotations (10 of 20). A geocode needs `f`, a token and an address, and Esri publishes ArcGIS REST JS and the ArcGIS API for Python (15). Total 78.", "b": "API reading. limit, types, bbox, proximity, country, language and fuzzyMatch size geocoding results, and the batch endpoint takes up to 50 queries (20). Country, bbox and type filters, no pagination (geocoding rarely needs it) (16). Errors are documented as 400 and 403 with no recovery guidance (10). Every public API reads and is safe to retry (12). Few required parameters, but official clients are JavaScript and TypeScript only, plus native mobile SDKs (12). 20+16+10+12+12 = 70." }, "scores": { "a": 78, "b": 70 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "HTTP API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "Esri", "b": "MapTiler AG", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "https://geocode-api.arcgis.com", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "HTTP, Streamable HTTP", "b": "HTTP", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "OAuth or key", "b": "API key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Freemium", "b": "Freemium", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "$0.50 per 1,000 requests", "b": "not published", "name": "Price for geocoding" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "Proprietary service under the ArcGIS Location Platform Agreement. The ArcGIS REST JS client library is Apache-2.0", "b": "none", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "9", "b": "none", "name": "Tools exposed" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "no", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-10-27", "b": "2026-10-02", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "not read yet", "b": "no date given", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "2026-07-31", "b": "no date given", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "not read yet", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "not read yet", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "not read yet", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "not read yet", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "not read yet", "b": "yes", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "392 stars, 65k npm/wk, 33k PyPI/wk", "b": "115k npm/wk", "name": "Popularity" }, { "a": "3.5/5 (4)", "b": "none", "name": "Agent reviews" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "ArcGIS Location Platform scores 66.1 (B) on agent readiness against MapTiler Cloud's 62.1 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. MapTiler Cloud leads on schema \u0026 documentation and transparency \u0026 trust.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, ArcGIS Location Platform or MapTiler Cloud?" }, { "answer": "ArcGIS Location Platform takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. MapTiler Cloud needs an API key.", "question": "Do ArcGIS Location Platform and MapTiler Cloud need an API key?" }, { "answer": "ArcGIS Location Platform has a hosted endpoint at https://geocode-api.arcgis.com. No hosted endpoint is listed for MapTiler Cloud.", "question": "Can an agent call ArcGIS Location Platform and MapTiler Cloud without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 70 against 43", "Agent ergonomics, 78 against 70", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 83 against 70" ], "also": [ "A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install" ], "goodFor": "Organisations already on Esri software, and work that needs demographic enrichment, service areas or fleet routing beside geocoding.", "slug": "arcgis", "watchFor": "The agreement bars benchmarking availability, performance or functionality, and publishing benchmark results, without prior written permission from Esri and its licensors (sections 3.1.b.6 and 3.1.c.6.F)." }, { "aheadOn": [ "Schema \u0026 documentation, 79 against 61", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 80 against 69" ], "also": [ "Free to start without a card" ], "goodFor": "Map tiles, static maps and worldwide geocoding with storable results for apps that also show a map, with EU data residency.", "slug": "maptiler", "watchFor": "The API key is always sent as a query parameter" } ], "history": { "arcgis": [ { "causes": [ "correction" ], "date": "2026-11-02", "delta": 1, "from": 65.1, "fromGrade": "B", "to": 66.1, "toGrade": "B" }, { "causes": [ "method" ], "date": "2026-10-30", "delta": -0.3, "from": 65.4, "fromGrade": "B", "to": 65.1, "toGrade": "B" } ], "maptiler": null }, "job": { "capability": "geo.geocode", "name": "Geocoding" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-location-vs-arcgis.json", "title": "Amazon Location Service vs ArcGIS Location Platform", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-location-vs-arcgis" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-location-vs-maptiler.json", "title": "Amazon Location Service vs MapTiler Cloud", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-location-vs-maptiler" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-azure-maps.json", "title": "ArcGIS Location Platform vs Azure Maps", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-azure-maps" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-geoapify.json", "title": "ArcGIS Location Platform vs Geoapify Location Platform + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-geoapify" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-geocodio.json", "title": "ArcGIS Location Platform vs Geocodio", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-geocodio" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-google-maps-platform.json", "title": "ArcGIS Location Platform vs Google Maps Platform + Grounding Lite MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-google-maps-platform" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-here-location-services.json", "title": "ArcGIS Location Platform vs HERE Location Services", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-here-location-services" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-locationiq.json", "title": "ArcGIS Location Platform vs LocationIQ", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-locationiq" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-mapbox.json", "title": "ArcGIS Location Platform vs Mapbox APIs + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-mapbox" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-mapquest.json", "title": "ArcGIS Location Platform vs MapQuest", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-mapquest" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-nextbillion.json", "title": "ArcGIS Location Platform vs NextBillion.ai", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-nextbillion" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-nominatim.json", "title": "ArcGIS Location Platform vs Nominatim", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-nominatim" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-opencage.json", "title": "ArcGIS Location Platform vs OpenCage Geocoding API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-opencage" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-radar.json", "title": "ArcGIS Location Platform vs Radar", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-radar" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-stadia-maps.json", "title": "ArcGIS Location Platform vs Stadia Maps", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-stadia-maps" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-tomtom.json", "title": "ArcGIS Location Platform vs TomTom Maps APIs + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-tomtom" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-woosmap.json", "title": "ArcGIS Location Platform vs Woosmap", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-woosmap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-maps-vs-maptiler.json", "title": "Azure Maps vs MapTiler Cloud", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-maps-vs-maptiler" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/geoapify-vs-maptiler.json", "title": "Geoapify Location Platform + MCP vs MapTiler Cloud", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/geoapify-vs-maptiler" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/geocodio-vs-maptiler.json", "title": "Geocodio vs MapTiler Cloud", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/geocodio-vs-maptiler" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-maps-platform-vs-maptiler.json", "title": "Google Maps Platform + Grounding Lite MCP vs MapTiler Cloud", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-maps-platform-vs-maptiler" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/here-location-services-vs-maptiler.json", "title": "HERE Location Services vs MapTiler Cloud", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/here-location-services-vs-maptiler" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/locationiq-vs-maptiler.json", "title": "LocationIQ vs MapTiler Cloud", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/locationiq-vs-maptiler" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mapbox-vs-maptiler.json", "title": "Mapbox APIs + MCP vs MapTiler Cloud", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mapbox-vs-maptiler" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mapquest-vs-maptiler.json", "title": "MapQuest vs MapTiler Cloud", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mapquest-vs-maptiler" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-nextbillion.json", "title": "MapTiler Cloud vs NextBillion.ai", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-nextbillion" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-nominatim.json", "title": "MapTiler Cloud vs Nominatim", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-nominatim" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-opencage.json", "title": "MapTiler Cloud vs OpenCage Geocoding API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-opencage" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-radar.json", "title": "MapTiler Cloud vs Radar", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-radar" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-stadia-maps.json", "title": "MapTiler Cloud vs Stadia Maps", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-stadia-maps" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-tomtom.json", "title": "MapTiler Cloud vs TomTom Maps APIs + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-tomtom" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-woosmap.json", "title": "MapTiler Cloud vs Woosmap", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-woosmap" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "arcgis": 70, "by": 27, "edge": "arcgis", "key": "reliability", "maptiler": 43, "name": "Reliability", "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "arcgis": 61, "by": 18, "edge": "maptiler", "key": "schema", "maptiler": 79, "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "weight": 13 }, { "arcgis": 78, "by": 8, "edge": "arcgis", "key": "ergonomics", "maptiler": 70, "name": "Agent ergonomics", "weight": 13 }, { "arcgis": 64, "by": 0, "edge": "", "key": "security", "maptiler": 64, "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "weight": 14 }, { "arcgis": 40, "by": 0, "edge": "", "key": "payments", "maptiler": 40, "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "arcgis": 83, "by": 13, "edge": "arcgis", "key": "maintenance", "maptiler": 70, "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "weight": 7 }, { "arcgis": 69, "by": 11, "edge": "maptiler", "key": "transparency", "maptiler": 80, "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "ArcGIS Location Platform scores 66.1 (B) on agent readiness against MapTiler Cloud's 62.1 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. MapTiler Cloud leads on schema \u0026 documentation and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do geocoding.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "arcgis": "Per-unit prices are public for every service, with a monthly free tier of 20,000 geocodes and 20,000 routes, keys limited to chosen privileges and a 99.9 per cent SLA. No rate limits or OpenAPI description were found, results may not be stored unless the dearer stored geocode is bought, and the agreement bars benchmarking without written permission.", "maptiler": "MapTiler Cloud has an OpenAPI 3.1 reference, llms.txt with Markdown pages, an agent skill and ISO 27001 certification, and allows geocoding results to be stored. The key always travels in the query string, there's no routing API, no documented rate limit or 429 handling, and the free plan excludes commercial use." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-maptiler", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-maptiler.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-maptiler.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-maptiler.min.md" }, "markdown": "ArcGIS Location Platform scores 66.1 (B) on agent readiness against MapTiler Cloud's 62.1 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. MapTiler Cloud leads on schema \u0026 documentation and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do geocoding.\n\n- ArcGIS Location Platform: grade B, 66.1/100, rank #380 of 1486. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/arcgis.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/arcgis.json\n- MapTiler Cloud: grade B, 62.1/100, rank #574 of 1486. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/maptiler.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/maptiler.json\n- Best maps, geocoding and places APIs for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/maps/index.md\n- All 153 maps comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maps/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### ArcGIS Location Platform (B)\n\nGood for: Organisations already on Esri software, and work that needs demographic enrichment, service areas or fleet routing beside geocoding.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 70 against 43\n- Agent ergonomics, 78 against 70\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 83 against 70\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install\n\nWatch for: The agreement bars benchmarking availability, performance or functionality, and publishing benchmark results, without prior written permission from Esri and its licensors (sections 3.1.b.6 and 3.1.c.6.F).\n\n### MapTiler Cloud (B)\n\nGood for: Map tiles, static maps and worldwide geocoding with storable results for apps that also show a map, with EU data residency.\n\nAhead on:\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 79 against 61\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 80 against 69\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- Free to start without a card\n\nWatch for: The API key is always sent as a query parameter\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Reliability: ArcGIS Location Platform +27\n\n- ArcGIS Location Platform (70): Graded as a hosted service on the REST location services, which are generally available. Esri runs its own status page at status.location.arcgis.com with current status and an event history (20). The history is drawn by script, so we read the platform's RSS feed at /admin/api/rss/all.rss, titled ArcGIS Location Platform Services Status. The page's own \"all services RSS feed\" link (location_platform.rss) answered 404 on 2 November. On 2 November its newest entry is still an intermittent basemap tile slowdown on 16 June 2026, outside the 90 days to 2 November. A readable feed that posts incidents, with none touching the product in the window, is a clean record (30). The 8 October check gave 25 and held back 5 for the feed's unknown depth, which isn't a checklist value. No request rate limits with numbers were found in the geocoding, places or routing reference (0, per the 8 October check, not re-read on 2 November). No 429 or backoff guidance was found. The geocoding output page says only that a timeout after 60 seconds may be retried later (0). The SLA of 23 December 2025 commits to 99.9 per cent monthly uptime for ten services (10). The REST services are generally available, and the MCP server is a beta (10). Total 70.\n- MapTiler Cloud (43): Hosted lines. status.maptiler.com is a StatusCake public uptime report rather than a component incident page (15). Its data loads from app.statuscake.com, whose robots.txt answered with a redirect, so we didn't fetch it and read no history. That's our limit, not a finding, and the rubric gives 5 (5). Monthly request and session quotas are published per plan, but no per-second limit (5). No 429, Retry-After or backoff guidance found in the API reference, the OpenAPI spec or llms-full.txt (0). The pricing page lists a 99.9% SLA on the Custom plan, while the Cloud terms call availability best effort and point to a custom SLA (8). The public APIs are GA (10). 15+5+5+0+8+10 = 43.\n\n### Schema \u0026 documentation: MapTiler Cloud +18\n\n- ArcGIS Location Platform (61): No OpenAPI description was found for geocoding, places or routing. The geocoding service description at `GeocodeServer?f=pjson` lists each parameter with its type, allowed values and supported operations, which earns 8 of 25. `/llms.txt` returns 404 on developers.arcgis.com and location.arcgis.com (0). The reference explains when to use a direct request or a job, and stored or unstored geocoding (16 of 20). Parameters carry types, defaults, allowed values and maximums, such as `maxLocations` up to 50 and `pageSize` up to 20 (12 of 15). Each operation has request and response examples, and the geocoding output page lists error codes with extended codes and causes (13 of 15). Geocoding has dated release notes back to 2023 and the platform has release notes by month, but the geocoding path carries no version while places uses `/v1` (12 of 15). Total 61.\n- MapTiler Cloud (79): OpenAPI 3.1.0 document with 32 paths for the public APIs (25). llms.txt, llms-full.txt and a Markdown twin of every page (10). Each API page says what it's for and when to use the SDK instead (session billing), with little on when not to call it (13). Parameters are typed with defaults, such as limit (default 5 forward, 1 reverse) and a types enum, but bbox and proximity are strings (11). Examples on every endpoint, and the spec documents 400, 403, 404 and 414, without an error reference page (10). A dated platform updates page and a geocoding index changelog, but no version in the API path and the spec is version '1.0' (10). 25+10+13+11+10+10 = 79.\n\n### Maintenance \u0026 community: ArcGIS Location Platform +13\n\n- ArcGIS Location Platform (83): The latest dated change is MCP server 1.0.0-beta.1.9 on 27 October 2026, which added stored and unstored geocoding and a service area tool (30). Dated entries in the 90 days to 2 November include MCP releases on 10 August, 1, 15 and 29 September, 9 and 27 October, the September 2026 platform and geocoding release notes, ArcGIS REST JS 4.11.0 on 7 August and 4.11.1 on 12 August, and the ArcGIS API for Python tag v2.4.4 on 22 September (20). Public release notes and the Esri Community forum exist, technical support is a paid extra, and we didn't read reply times. The 8 October check counted 60 open issues on the ArcGIS REST JS repository; github.com pages weren't readable on 2 November, and the clone's main branch was last changed on 7 August 2026 (10 of 15). Official SDKs are current, ArcGIS REST JS 4.11.1 and the ArcGIS API for Python 2.4.4 (15). The JS repository has pull-request test and release workflows, and we didn't check that they pass (8 of 10). Total 83.\n- MapTiler Cloud (70): @maptiler/client 3.1.0 and @maptiler/sdk 4.2.0 on 2 October 2026, 35 days before this check, with the agent skill updated on 21 October (20). Platform updates entries for August (EU endpoint, key security) and September 2026 (terrain blending) plus the two October releases (20). A Discord community and support answered on a best-effort basis within two business days, per the Cloud terms. We didn't read GitHub issues (10). Official JavaScript client and SDK current, no Python client (12). The SDK repository runs unit and end-to-end tests in CI; we didn't check results (8). 20+20+10+12+8 = 70.\n\n### Transparency \u0026 trust: MapTiler Cloud +11\n\n- ArcGIS Location Platform (69): A closed service with a dated agreement that states what may be stored, cached and shared, and an Apache-2.0 client library (15 of 30). The privacy statement was revised on 31 July 2026, the Products \u0026 Services supplement on 9 September 2025 and the Data Processing Addendum on 12 March 2024. None states a retention period, and neither the supplement nor the addendum names ArcGIS Location Platform (14 of 30). The agreement promises 90 days' notice for deprecations, and the July 2026 release notes record the retirement of legacy API keys (16 of 20). The addendum names four sub-processors as examples and the GDPR page says information is stored in the United States, with no list specific to this product (9 of 20). Total 54.\n- MapTiler Cloud (80): Editorial half only. Closed service with general and Cloud-specific terms under Swiss law, and SDKs under BSD 3-Clause and the skill under MIT (20). The privacy policy covers account and payment data and says legal-claim data is kept up to 10 years, but says nothing about how long API request logs are kept (15). A dated deprecation page for v3 maps and migration guides, with no written notice period (12). Hosting with OVHcloud and Google Firebase, data mainly in Switzerland and the EEA, and an EU-only endpoint. Google Analytics, Firebase and FastSpring named in the privacy policy (17). 20+15+12+17 = 64.\n\n### Agent ergonomics: ArcGIS Location Platform +8\n\n- ArcGIS Location Platform (78): Responses can be sized with `outFields` and `maxLocations` on geocoding and `pageSize` on places (20 of 25). Places pages with `pageSize` and `offset` and filters by category and text, and geocoding filters by extent, country and category (18 of 20). Errors are a JSON object with `code`, `message` and `details`, with documented causes for 400, 403, 498 and 499 (15 of 20). The geocoding, places and routing calls are reads, so retries are safe, but no retry guidance was found and we didn't read the MCP tools' annotations (10 of 20). A geocode needs `f`, a token and an address, and Esri publishes ArcGIS REST JS and the ArcGIS API for Python (15). Total 78.\n- MapTiler Cloud (70): API reading. limit, types, bbox, proximity, country, language and fuzzyMatch size geocoding results, and the batch endpoint takes up to 50 queries (20). Country, bbox and type filters, no pagination (geocoding rarely needs it) (16). Errors are documented as 400 and 403 with no recovery guidance (10). Every public API reads and is safe to retry (12). Few required parameters, but official clients are JavaScript and TypeScript only, plus native mobile SDKs (12). 20+16+10+12+12 = 70.\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | ArcGIS Location Platform | MapTiler Cloud | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 70 | 43 | ArcGIS Location Platform +27 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 61 | 79 | MapTiler Cloud +18 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 78 | 70 | ArcGIS Location Platform +8 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 64 | 64 | even |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 40 | 40 | even |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 83 | 70 | ArcGIS Location Platform +13 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 69 | 80 | MapTiler Cloud +11 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **66.1 · B** | **62.1 · B** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | ArcGIS Location Platform | MapTiler Cloud |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | Esri | MapTiler AG |\n| Hosted endpoint | `https://geocode-api.arcgis.com` | no (local only) |\n| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |\n| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |\n| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |\n| Price for geocoding | $0.50 per 1,000 requests | not published |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | Proprietary service under the ArcGIS Location Platform Agreement. The ArcGIS REST JS client library is Apache-2.0 | none |\n| Tools exposed | 9 | none |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | no |\n| llms.txt | no | yes |\n| Last release | 2026-10-27 | 2026-10-02 |\n| Terms last updated | not read yet | no date given |\n| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-07-31 | no date given |\n| Customer content may train models | not read yet | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | not found in the text |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | not found in the text |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | yes |\n| Popularity | 392 stars, 65k npm/wk, 33k PyPI/wk | 115k npm/wk |\n| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | none |\n\n## How the scores have moved\n\n### ArcGIS Location Platform\n\n- +1.0 on 2 November 2026: correction\n- -0.3 on 30 October 2026: checklist\n\n### MapTiler Cloud\n\nNo score change since it was listed.\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**ArcGIS Location Platform.** Per-unit prices are public for every service, with a monthly free tier of 20,000 geocodes and 20,000 routes, keys limited to chosen privileges and a 99.9 per cent SLA. No rate limits or OpenAPI description were found, results may not be stored unless the dearer stored geocode is bought, and the agreement bars benchmarking without written permission.\n\n**MapTiler Cloud.** MapTiler Cloud has an OpenAPI 3.1 reference, llms.txt with Markdown pages, an agent skill and ISO 27001 certification, and allows geocoding results to be stored. The key always travels in the query string, there's no routing API, no documented rate limit or 429 handling, and the free plan excludes commercial use.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### ArcGIS Location Platform\n\n1. Send the token in an `X-Esri-Authorization: Bearer` or `Authorization` header. The docs' examples put it in a `token` parameter, which Esri's own best-practice page calls less secure.\n2. Set `forStorage=true` on `findAddressCandidates` or `reverseGeocode` only when results will be kept. It needs pay-as-you-go and the Geocode (stored) privilege, and costs eight times the unstored rate.\n3. Cap geocoding output with `maxLocations` (default and maximum 50) and `outFields`, because billing counts results returned and the default returns every field.\n4. Page place searches with `pageSize` (maximum 20) and `offset`. A nearby or extent search costs $8 per 1,000 requests after 500 free a month.\n5. Check the JSON body for an `error` object with `code`, `message` and `details`. Code 499 means the token is missing and 403 means it lacks the privilege.\n\n### MapTiler Cloud\n\n1. Restrict the key to an origin or User-Agent, or sign requests with a service token from a backend, since the key appears in every URL\n2. Use the batch geocoding path (up to 50 semicolon-separated queries) rather than one call per address\n3. Use api.maptiler.eu when the user's requests must stay in the EU\n4. Read docs pages as Markdown by appending .md, starting from https://docs.maptiler.com/llms.txt\n5. Don't cache map tiles server-side; the Cloud terms forbid it, though geocoding results may be stored with attribution\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, ArcGIS Location Platform or MapTiler Cloud?\n\nArcGIS Location Platform scores 66.1 (B) on agent readiness against MapTiler Cloud's 62.1 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. MapTiler Cloud leads on schema \u0026 documentation and transparency \u0026 trust.\n\n### Do ArcGIS Location Platform and MapTiler Cloud need an API key?\n\nArcGIS Location Platform takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. MapTiler Cloud needs an API key.\n\n### Can an agent call ArcGIS Location Platform and MapTiler Cloud without installing anything?\n\nArcGIS Location Platform has a hosted endpoint at https://geocode-api.arcgis.com. No hosted endpoint is listed for MapTiler Cloud.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-maptiler.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-maptiler.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"arcgis\", \"b\": \"maptiler\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare arcgis maptiler`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/arcgis.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/maptiler.json\n\n## Other comparisons with ArcGIS Location Platform or MapTiler Cloud\n\n- [Amazon Location Service vs ArcGIS Location Platform](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-location-vs-arcgis.md)\n- [Amazon Location Service vs MapTiler Cloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-location-vs-maptiler.md)\n- [ArcGIS Location Platform vs Azure Maps](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-azure-maps.md)\n- [ArcGIS Location Platform vs Geoapify Location Platform + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-geoapify.md)\n- [ArcGIS Location Platform vs Geocodio](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-geocodio.md)\n- [ArcGIS Location Platform vs Google Maps Platform + Grounding Lite MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-google-maps-platform.md)\n- [ArcGIS Location Platform vs HERE Location Services](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-here-location-services.md)\n- [ArcGIS Location Platform vs LocationIQ](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-locationiq.md)\n- [ArcGIS Location Platform vs Mapbox APIs + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-mapbox.md)\n- [ArcGIS Location Platform vs MapQuest](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-mapquest.md)\n- [ArcGIS Location Platform vs NextBillion.ai](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-nextbillion.md)\n- [ArcGIS Location Platform vs Nominatim](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-nominatim.md)\n- [ArcGIS Location Platform vs OpenCage Geocoding API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-opencage.md)\n- [ArcGIS Location Platform vs Radar](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-radar.md)\n- [ArcGIS Location Platform vs Stadia Maps](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-stadia-maps.md)\n- [ArcGIS Location Platform vs TomTom Maps APIs + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-tomtom.md)\n- [ArcGIS Location Platform vs Woosmap](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-woosmap.md)\n- [Azure Maps vs MapTiler Cloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-maps-vs-maptiler.md)\n- [Geoapify Location Platform + MCP vs MapTiler Cloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/geoapify-vs-maptiler.md)\n- [Geocodio vs MapTiler Cloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/geocodio-vs-maptiler.md)\n- [Google Maps Platform + Grounding Lite MCP vs MapTiler Cloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-maps-platform-vs-maptiler.md)\n- [HERE Location Services vs MapTiler Cloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/here-location-services-vs-maptiler.md)\n- [LocationIQ vs MapTiler Cloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/locationiq-vs-maptiler.md)\n- [Mapbox APIs + MCP vs MapTiler Cloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mapbox-vs-maptiler.md)\n- [MapQuest vs MapTiler Cloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mapquest-vs-maptiler.md)\n- [MapTiler Cloud vs NextBillion.ai](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-nextbillion.md)\n- [MapTiler Cloud vs Nominatim](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-nominatim.md)\n- [MapTiler Cloud vs OpenCage Geocoding API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-opencage.md)\n- [MapTiler Cloud vs Radar](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-radar.md)\n- [MapTiler Cloud vs Stadia Maps](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-stadia-maps.md)\n- [MapTiler Cloud vs TomTom Maps APIs + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-tomtom.md)\n- [MapTiler Cloud vs Woosmap](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/maptiler-vs-woosmap.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-07", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.7", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "ArcGIS Location Platform vs MapTiler Cloud", "url": "" } ], "description": "ArcGIS Location Platform scores 66.1 (B) to MapTiler Cloud's 62.1 (B) for geocoding. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "ArcGIS Location Platform B 66.1", "MapTiler Cloud B 62.1", "scores" ], "h1": "ArcGIS Location Platform vs MapTiler Cloud", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/arcgis-vs-maptiler", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "ArcGIS Location Platform vs MapTiler Cloud for AI agents (2026)", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-07", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcgis-vs-maptiler" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 4950, "slim": 2780 }, "version": 1 }