# Arcade.dev vs WorkOS Pipes and Agents (slim)

> Arcade.dev has a score of 67 (B) against WorkOS Pipes and Agents's 60 (C). Both do auth oauth. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 30 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcade-vs-workos-pipes.md (~1,550 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcade-vs-workos-pipes.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcade-vs-workos-pipes
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

Arcade.dev has a score of 67 (B) against WorkOS Pipes and Agents's 60 (C). Both do auth oauth. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 30 points.

- Arcade.dev: B 67, rank #147 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/arcade.min.md
- WorkOS Pipes and Agents: C 60, rank #256 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/workos-pipes.min.md
- Pick Arcade.dev for schema & documentation (+29), agent ergonomics (+10), payments & pricing (+30), transparency & trust (+8). Pick WorkOS Pipes and Agents for reliability (+7), maintenance & community (+9).

| Category | Arcade.dev | WorkOS Pipes and Agents |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 63 | 70 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 82 | 53 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 79 | 69 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 71 | 69 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 40 | 10 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 74 | 83 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 72 | 64 |