# Apodex-1.1-mini vs Kolibri-1 (slim)

> Apodex-1.1-mini and Kolibri-1 score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 61 and 61 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apodex-1-1-mini-vs-kolibri-1.md (~6,100 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apodex-1-1-mini-vs-kolibri-1.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apodex-1-1-mini-vs-kolibri-1
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Apodex-1.1-mini and Kolibri-1 score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Kolibri-1 leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Apodex-1.1-mini: C 61, rank #36 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/apodex-1-1-mini.min.md
- Kolibri-1: C 61, rank #38 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/kolibri-1.min.md
- Apodex-1.1-mini, good for Long-running agent tasks with tools on a 32 GB GPU or Mac, or through Apodex's API, under a plain licence Ahead on Reach, 85 against 60.
- Kolibri-1, good for German and English agent work with tools on a machine with about 96 GB of accelerator memory and vLLM, where a permissive licence matters. Ahead on Agent interface, 90 against 85; Documentation and upkeep, 70 against 38.

| Category | Apodex-1.1-mini | Kolibri-1 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 85 | 60 |
| Risk (20%) | 65 | 65 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 90 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 38 | 70 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Apodex-1.1-mini | Kolibri-1 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Apodex AI | Aleph Alpha |
| Last release | 2026-08-25 | 2026-10-19 |
