# Apodex-1.1-mini vs gpt-oss-20b (slim)

> gpt-oss-20b scores 69.9 (B) to Apodex-1.1-mini's 61 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apodex-1-1-mini-vs-gpt-oss-20b.md (~6,100 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apodex-1-1-mini-vs-gpt-oss-20b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apodex-1-1-mini-vs-gpt-oss-20b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

gpt-oss-20b scores 69.9 (B) on agent readiness against Apodex-1.1-mini's 61 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Apodex-1.1-mini: C 61, rank #36 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/apodex-1-1-mini.min.md
- gpt-oss-20b: B 69.9, rank #8 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/gpt-oss-20b.min.md
- Apodex-1.1-mini, good for Long-running agent tasks with tools on a 32 GB GPU or Mac, or through Apodex's API, under a plain licence
- gpt-oss-20b, good for Local agents on a 24 GB GPU or Mac that want a permissive licence, wide runtime support and documented structured output, one tool call at a time Ahead on Reach, 90 against 85; Risk, 85 against 65; Agent interface, 90 against 85.

| Category | Apodex-1.1-mini | gpt-oss-20b |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 85 | 90 |
| Risk (20%) | 65 | 85 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 90 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 38 | 42 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Apodex-1.1-mini | gpt-oss-20b |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Apodex AI | OpenAI |
| Last release | 2026-08-25 | 2025-08-26 |
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (4) | 3.5/5 (4) |