# Apodex-1.1-mini vs Carbon-X (slim)

> Apodex-1.1-mini and Carbon-X score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 61 and 61 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apodex-1-1-mini-vs-carbon-x.md (~6,150 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apodex-1-1-mini-vs-carbon-x.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apodex-1-1-mini-vs-carbon-x
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-23
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Apodex-1.1-mini and Carbon-X score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Carbon-X leads on reach and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Apodex-1.1-mini: C 61, rank #37 of 107 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/apodex-1-1-mini.min.md
- Carbon-X: C 61, rank #38 of 107 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/carbon-x.min.md
- Apodex-1.1-mini, good for Long-running agent tasks with tools on a 32 GB GPU or Mac, or through Apodex's API, under a plain licence Ahead on Agent interface, 85 against 35.
- Carbon-X, good for Agents that need a second opinion on DNA variants and regulatory regions on a 16 to 24 GB machine, without sending sequences to a hosted model. Ahead on Reach, 90 against 85; Documentation and upkeep, 77 against 38.

| Category | Apodex-1.1-mini | Carbon-X |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 85 | 90 |
| Risk (20%) | 65 | 65 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 35 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 38 | 77 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Apodex-1.1-mini | Carbon-X |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Apodex AI | Hugging Face (HuggingFaceBio) |
| Last release | 2026-08-25 | 2026-10-22 |
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |