# Apify MCP Server vs Olostep (slim)

> Apify MCP Server has a score of 78.6 (A) against Olostep's 63.1 (B). Both do crawling. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 37 points. Apify MCP Server accepts x402. Olostep doesn't. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apify-mcp-vs-olostep.md (~1,650 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apify-mcp-vs-olostep.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apify-mcp-vs-olostep
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-04

Apify MCP Server has a score of 78.6 (A) against Olostep's 63.1 (B). Both do crawling. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 37 points. Apify MCP Server accepts x402. Olostep doesn't.

- Apify MCP Server: A 78.6, rank #11 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/apify-mcp.min.md
- Olostep: B 63.1, rank #210 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/olostep.min.md
- Pick Apify MCP Server for reliability (+5), schema & documentation (+8), agent ergonomics (+5), security & auth (+34), payments & pricing (+30), maintenance & community (+37), transparency & trust (+28). Pick Olostep for nothing in particular.

| Category | Apify MCP Server | Olostep |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 65 | 60 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 92 | 84 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 92 | 87 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 62 | 28 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 95 | 65 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 95 | 58 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 88 | 60 |