# Apify MCP Server vs Firecrawl MCP (slim)

> Apify MCP Server has a score of 78.6 (A) against Firecrawl MCP's 75.5 (BB). Both do crawling. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 45 points. Apify MCP Server accepts x402. Firecrawl MCP doesn't. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apify-mcp-vs-firecrawl-mcp.md (~1,900 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apify-mcp-vs-firecrawl-mcp.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apify-mcp-vs-firecrawl-mcp
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-04

Apify MCP Server has a score of 78.6 (A) against Firecrawl MCP's 75.5 (BB). Both do crawling. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 45 points. Apify MCP Server accepts x402. Firecrawl MCP doesn't.

- Apify MCP Server: A 78.6, rank #11 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/apify-mcp.min.md
- Firecrawl MCP: BB 75.5, rank #34 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/firecrawl-mcp.min.md
- Pick Apify MCP Server for payments & pricing (+45), maintenance & community (+8), transparency & trust (+12). Pick Firecrawl MCP for reliability (+5), security & auth (+5).

| Category | Apify MCP Server | Firecrawl MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 65 | 70 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 92 | 88 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 92 | 92 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 62 | 67 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 95 | 50 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 95 | 87 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 88 | 76 |