# Anchor Browser vs TinyFish (slim)

> TinyFish and Anchor Browser score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 67.7 (B) and 67.3 (B). Anchor Browser leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do browser automation. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anchor-browser-vs-tinyfish.md (~2,550 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anchor-browser-vs-tinyfish.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anchor-browser-vs-tinyfish
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

TinyFish and Anchor Browser score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 67.7 (B) and 67.3 (B). Anchor Browser leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do browser automation.

- Anchor Browser: B 67.3, rank #237 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/anchor-browser.min.md
- TinyFish: B 67.7, rank #227 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/tinyfish.min.md
- Anchor Browser, good for Agents that must work inside signed-in accounts, with managed identities, MFA handling and a human sign-in link, and agents that need to start with no human signup. Ahead on Reliability, 80 against 60; Payments & pricing, 60 against 55.
- TinyFish, good for Agents that want one account for a goal-driven web agent, a raw CDP browser, and free search and fetch. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 85 against 80; Agent ergonomics, 79 against 73; Maintenance & community, 80 against 57; Transparency & trust, 59 against 51.

| Category | Anchor Browser | TinyFish |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 80 | 60 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 80 | 85 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 73 | 79 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 54 | 57 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 55 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 57 | 80 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 51 | 59 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Anchor Browser | TinyFish |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Anchor Forge Inc. | Tiny Fish, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.anchorbrowser.io` | `https://agent.tinyfish.ai` |
| Licence | Proprietary cloud service. No service agreement was found, only a website terms of use. The TypeScript and Python SDKs and the self-hosted MCP server are Apache-2.0 | Proprietary service under Tiny Fish's terms of service. The MCP proxy `@tiny-fish/mcp` and the cookbook are MIT. The SDK packages state no licence in npm or PyPI metadata |
| MCP registry | not listed | `ai.tinyfish.agent/web-agent` |
| Last release | 2026-07-28 | 2026-10-07 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-08-17 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-02-24 | 2025-12-14 |
| Customer content may train models |  | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access |  | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  | yes |
| Popularity | 43k npm/wk, 10k PyPI/wk | 5.7k npm/wk, 6.5k PyPI/wk |