# Anchor Browser vs Browserless (slim) > Browserless scores 70.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Anchor Browser's 67.3 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Anchor Browser leads on payments & pricing. Both do browser automation. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anchor-browser-vs-browserless.md (~2,500 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anchor-browser-vs-browserless.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anchor-browser-vs-browserless - Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-08 Browserless scores 70.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Anchor Browser's 67.3 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Anchor Browser leads on payments & pricing. Both do browser automation. - Anchor Browser: B 67.3, rank #196 of 629 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/anchor-browser.min.md - Browserless: BB 70.4, rank #128 of 629 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/browserless.min.md - Anchor Browser, good for Agents that must work inside signed-in accounts, with managed identities, MFA handling and a human sign-in link, and agents that need to start with no human signup. Ahead on Payments & pricing, 60 against 40. - Browserless, good for Agents that need a real browser in the cloud with stealth, proxies and CAPTCHA solving, and teams that want the option of running the same server themselves. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 89 against 80; Agent ergonomics, 78 against 73; Maintenance & community, 82 against 57; Transparency & trust, 62 against 51. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; Runs on your own machine. | Category | Anchor Browser | Browserless | | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability (16%) | 80 | 82 | | Performance (10%) | pending | pending | | Schema & documentation (13%) | 80 | 89 | | Agent ergonomics (13%) | 73 | 78 | | Security & auth (14%) | 54 | 53 | | Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 40 | | Task success (10%) | pending | pending | | Maintenance & community (7%) | 57 | 82 | | Transparency & trust (7%) | 51 | 62 | | Fact (where they differ) | Anchor Browser | Browserless | | --- | --- | --- | | Vendor | Anchor Forge Inc. | browserless.io, Inc. | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.anchorbrowser.io` | `https://production-sfo.browserless.io` | | Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | | Licence | Proprietary cloud service. No service agreement was found, only a website terms of use. The TypeScript and Python SDKs and the self-hosted MCP server are Apache-2.0 | SSPL 1.0 or a commercial licence for the core server and the MCP server. The BAP TypeScript SDK is MIT. BrowserQL, stealth and other cloud additions are proprietary | | Tools exposed | none | 14 | | Read-only variant documented | no | yes | | Last release | 2026-07-28 | 2026-10-05 | | Terms last updated | no document linked | no date given | | Privacy policy last updated | 2026-02-24 | no date given | | Customer content may train models | | not found in the text | | Terms restrict automated access | | yes | | Terms restrict benchmarking | | not found in the text | | Terms or service can change without notice | | yes | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | | not found in the text | | Popularity | 43k npm/wk, 10k PyPI/wk | 14k stars, 3.5k npm/wk |