# Amp vs Muse Code (slim) > Muse Code scores 61.3 (C) to Amp's 57.1 (C) for agent harnesses. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side. - Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-muse-code.md (~2,650 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-muse-code.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-muse-code - Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-12 Muse Code scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against Amp's 57.1 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Amp leads on payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do agent harnesses. - Amp: C 57.1, rank #637 of 993 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/amp.min.md - Muse Code: C 61.3, rank #487 of 993 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/muse-code.min.md - Amp, good for Teams that want a hosted, multi-model coding agent with shared threads and cloud machines, driven from scripts through execute mode or the SDKs. Ahead on Payments & pricing, 35 against 20; Transparency & trust, 77 against 57. - Muse Code, good for Developers who want Meta's Muse models, Muse Wonder Full included, in a terminal or CI agent with the sandbox and approvals on from the first run. Ahead on Reliability, 45 against 31; Schema & documentation, 84 against 72; Agent ergonomics, 79 against 69; Security & auth, 67 against 57. | Category | Amp | Muse Code | | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability (16%) | 31 | 45 | | Performance (10%) | pending | pending | | Schema & documentation (13%) | 72 | 84 | | Agent ergonomics (13%) | 69 | 79 | | Security & auth (14%) | 57 | 67 | | Payments & pricing (10%) | 35 | 20 | | Task success (10%) | pending | pending | | Maintenance & community (7%) | 79 | 75 | | Transparency & trust (7%) | 77 | 57 | | Fact (where they differ) | Amp | Muse Code | | --- | --- | --- | | Vendor | Amp Frontier Corporation | Meta | | Pricing | Freemium | Paid | | Licence | Proprietary, under the Amp licence terms (Amp Frontier Corporation). The npm packages are marked Amp Commercial License and the source repository is private | Proprietary binary, used under the Meta Model API Terms of Service, which cover Meta's coding harness. Subscriptions are also under the Meta Subscription Terms of Service. The TypeScript and Python SDKs in the linked repository are MIT. | | Read-only variant documented | no | yes | | Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-11 | | Terms last updated | no date given | | | Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-10 | couldn't be read | | Customer content may train models | not found in the text | | | Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | | | Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | | | Terms or service can change without notice | yes | | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | | | Popularity | 41k npm/wk | 63k npm/wk |