# Alloy vs Veriff (slim)

> Veriff scores 61.1 (C) to Alloy's 52.4 (D) for identity verification. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/alloy-vs-veriff.md (~2,450 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/alloy-vs-veriff.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/alloy-vs-veriff
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-14

Veriff scores 61.1 (C) on agent readiness against Alloy's 52.4 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Alloy leads on agent ergonomics. Both do identity verification.

- Alloy: D 52.4, rank #782 of 1076 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/alloy.min.md
- Veriff: C 61.1, rank #512 of 1076 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/veriff.min.md
- Alloy, good for Banks and fintechs that already run onboarding through Alloy and want an agent to submit journey applications, read decisions and work investigations. Ahead on Agent ergonomics, 52 against 43.
- Veriff, good for A team that needs document and selfie verification with public per-verification prices and a trial, and that can run a webhook receiver and HMAC signing. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 82 against 73; Security & auth, 63 against 49; Payments & pricing, 40 against 0; Transparency & trust, 67 against 62.

| Category | Alloy | Veriff |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 59 | 62 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 73 | 82 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 52 | 43 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 49 | 63 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 0 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 72 | 74 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 62 | 67 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Alloy | Veriff |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | First Mile Group, Inc. (Alloy) | Veriff OÜ |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Pay per use |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Alloy's terms of service. The @alloyidentity/web-sdk capture package is MIT | Proprietary service. The npm capture SDKs are ISC (@veriff/js-sdk, @veriff/incontext-sdk) and MIT (@veriff/react-native-sdk) |
| Last release | 2026-10-05 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-03-12 | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2026-04-16 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 21k npm/wk | 32 stars, 110k npm/wk |