# Alibaba Wan (Model Studio) vs Luma AI API (slim)

> Alibaba Wan (Model Studio) has a score of 65.4 (B) against Luma AI API's 48.7 (D). Both do video generate. The largest gap is security & auth, 32 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/alibaba-wan-vs-luma.md (~1,600 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/alibaba-wan-vs-luma.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/alibaba-wan-vs-luma
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-04

Alibaba Wan (Model Studio) has a score of 65.4 (B) against Luma AI API's 48.7 (D). Both do video generate. The largest gap is security & auth, 32 points.

- Alibaba Wan (Model Studio): B 65.4, rank #173 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/alibaba-wan.min.md
- Luma AI API: D 48.7, rank #374 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/luma.min.md
- Pick Alibaba Wan (Model Studio) for reliability (+20), schema & documentation (+24), security & auth (+32), maintenance & community (+20), transparency & trust (+22). Pick Luma AI API for nothing in particular.

| Category | Alibaba Wan (Model Studio) | Luma AI API |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 70 | 50 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 67 | 43 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 63 | 66 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 80 | 48 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 20 | 20 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 77 | 57 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 80 | 58 |