# Alchemer vs Jotform (slim)

> Jotform scores 52.9 (D) on agent readiness against Alchemer's 41.4 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Alchemer leads on schema & documentation and maintenance & community. Both do forms create. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/alchemer-vs-jotform.md (~2,200 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/alchemer-vs-jotform.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/alchemer-vs-jotform
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Jotform scores 52.9 (D) on agent readiness against Alchemer's 41.4 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Alchemer leads on schema & documentation and maintenance & community. Both do forms create.

- Alchemer: E 41.4, rank #798 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/alchemer.min.md
- Jotform: D 52.9, rank #644 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/jotform.min.md
- Alchemer, good for A company already on an Alchemer Business Platform contract that wants an agent to build surveys, load contacts, send campaigns and export responses. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 45 against 30; Maintenance & community, 45 against 25.
- Jotform, good for An owner who already keeps forms in Jotform and wants an agent to build forms, read submissions and register webhooks, including EU and HIPAA accounts on their own hosts. Ahead on Reliability, 83 against 35; Agent ergonomics, 60 against 47; Security & auth, 56 against 44; Payments & pricing, 30 against 20; Transparency & trust, 68 against 61.

| Category | Alchemer | Jotform |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 35 | 83 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 45 | 30 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 47 | 60 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 44 | 56 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 20 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 45 | 25 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 61 | 68 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Alchemer | Jotform |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Alchemer LLC | Jotform Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.alchemer.com/v5` | `https://api.jotform.com` |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Licence | Proprietary service under the Alchemer Software as a Service Agreement | Proprietary service under Jotform's terms of use. The MCP server repository (docs and a Gemini CLI extension, no server code) and the Node client are MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | 6 |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | `com.jotform/mcp` |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-02-26 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-01-14 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-04-23 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | none | 3.6k npm/wk |