{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "akeyless", "name": "Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server)", "vendor": "Akeyless", "vendorUrl": "https://www.akeyless.io", "kind": "platform", "category": "secrets", "summary": "SaaS secrets and machine-identity platform with a self-hosted Gateway that brokers access.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/akeyless", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/akeyless.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/akeyless.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/akeyless.json", "repo": "https://github.com/akeylesslabs/akeyless-python", "license": "Apache-2.0 (SDKs), closed platform", "transports": [ "http", "stdio", "streamable-http" ], "remoteUrl": "https://api.akeyless.io", "packages": [ { "registry": "pypi", "name": "akeyless" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "akeyless" } ], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "POST /auth with an access-id and a credential from an access key, AWS IAM, Azure AD, GCP, Kubernetes, OIDC, SAML, LDAP, JWT, certificate, OCI, Kerberos or Universal Identity, returning a token passed in the body of later calls. The docs say API key auth is for proofs of concept, not production, and the access key is shown once. The MCP servers reuse the CLI profile or explicit auth flags and inherit its RBAC.", "pricing": "freemium", "pricingNotes": "Free and Enterprise plans. The free plan has 5 clients, 500 static secrets, 5 dynamic secrets, 5 rotated secrets, 3 targets, 1 OIDC app, 1 SSH and 1 PKI certificate issuer, 5 managed certificates, 1,000 encryption and KMS transactions a day, 5 KMS keys, 5 password manager users with 5 static and 50 shared passwords, 1 Gateway cluster and 3 days of audit log retention, without SAML, OIDC or LDAP auth, zero-knowledge mode, HSM integration or event forwarding. Enterprise is quoted, with clients and transactions counted at the end of each month and overage billed at the end of the 12-month contract. No dollar figures are published (https://www.akeyless.io/pricing/).", "priceSummary": "Freemium", "where": "both", "x402": { "level": "no", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": 2, "npmWeekly": 3523, "pypiWeekly": 219234, "asOf": "2026-09-30" }, "docsUrl": "https://docs.akeyless.io", "llmsTxt": "https://docs.akeyless.io/llms.txt", "openapi": "https://github.com/akeylesslabs/akeyless-go/blob/v5/api/openapi.yaml", "capabilities": [ "secrets.store", "secrets.rotate", "secrets.machine-identity", "secrets.audit", "auth.agent-identity" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "closed-source", "freemium", "free-tier", "mcp", "local", "python", "typescript", "go", "enterprise" ], "lastRelease": "2026-09-17", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 73.7, "grade": "BB", "agentReady": true, "rank": 55, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 452, "categoryRank": 4, "methodology": "0.3", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 63, "maintenance": 82, "payments": 25, "reliability": 90, "schema": 81, "security": 89, "transparency": 73 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-01" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Gateway-brokered SecretlessAI and a runtime-authority MCP server with 4 tools that return results, not credentials. No published prices above the free plan; clients and transactions are metered with overage billed at the end of a 12-month contract.", "strengths": [ "Gateway-brokered SecretlessAI and a runtime-authority MCP server with 4 tools that return results, not credentials", "Runtime Authority intent rules with a kill switch, generally available since 9 September 2026", "SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, PCI DSS and FIPS 140-3 validation listed in the trust centre, plus a bug bounty", "A 99.99% availability SLA on every support tier, with transaction caps published per tier", "OpenAPI 3.0 document for 657 paths in the Go SDK repository, and an llms.txt with about 800 Markdown links" ], "weaknesses": [ "No published prices above the free plan; clients and transactions are metered with overage billed at the end of a 12-month contract", "Errors come back as a single `error` string with no code, and no Retry-After or backoff guidance turned up", "The free plan has no OIDC, SAML or LDAP auth and keeps audit logs for 3 days", "akeyless mcp can return secret values to the model, and neither MCP server has a published tool list, version or registry entry", "No security.txt, and the closed CLI and Gateway are the only way to run the MCP servers" ], "agentNotes": [ "Run akeyless mcp-runtime-authority, not akeyless mcp, for an agent that acts on systems; the first returns results, the second has get_secret and get_password", "Authenticate with a cloud identity, Kubernetes or Universal Identity rather than an access key, which the docs reserve for proofs of concept", "Use CLI 1.130.0 or later for either MCP server, and point the client at your Gateway URL", "Count identities and calls before scaling. The free plan allows 5 clients, and calls over a tier's cap (200 a minute on Silver) are billed as extra clients, not refused", "Pass the token in the JSON body of each POST, and page `/list-items` with `pagination-token`" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 2, "avgRating": 3, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "BB", "methodology": "0.3", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 73.7 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 63, "maintenance": 82, "payments": 25, "reliability": 90, "schema": 81, "security": 89, "transparency": 71 }, "provenanceScore": 75 }, "connect": { "install": "pip install akeyless # or: npm i akeyless", "http": "TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST https://api.akeyless.io/auth -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -d \"{\\\"access-id\\\":\\\"$AKEYLESS_ACCESS_ID\\\",\\\"access-key\\\":\\\"$AKEYLESS_ACCESS_KEY\\\"}\" | jq -r .token)\ncurl -s -X POST https://api.akeyless.io/get-secret-value -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -d \"{\\\"names\\\":[\\\"/prod/db-password\\\"],\\\"token\\\":\\\"$TOKEN\\\"}\"", "claudeCode": "claude mcp add akeyless -- akeyless mcp-runtime-authority", "config": { "mcpServers": { "akeyless": { "args": [ "mcp-runtime-authority" ], "command": "akeyless" } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/secrets.store", "tool": "https://letme.dev/akeyless" }, "area": "agent-runtime", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Akeyless Security Ltd.", "domain": "akeyless.io", "domainRegistered": "", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.akeyless.io/terms-of-service/", "privacy": "https://www.akeyless.io/privacy-policy/", "statusPage": "https://status.akeyless.io", "changelog": "https://changelog.akeyless.io/cli", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-10-01", "notes": [ "Website terms (21 March 2026) and privacy policy (5 May 2026) name Akeyless Security Ltd., Ze'ev Jabotinsky St. 7, Ramat Gan, Israel, with a US subsidiary Akeyless Security USA, Inc. The terms cover the website only; the service runs under a separate licence or master services agreement.", "www.akeyless.io/.well-known/security.txt returned 404 when checked on 30 September 2026.", "The .io RDAP servers answered 429 and a robots.txt failure, so the registration date is blank.", "The status page history shows one incident since 3 July 2026, 21 minutes of degraded dynamic secret performance in us-east-2 on 23 September, and a scheduled maintenance window on 19 July.", "The CLI changelog at changelog.akeyless.io dates each release, 1.152.0 on 16 September 2026 being the newest." ], "score": 75 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/akeyless.json", "live": { "slug": "akeyless", "probe": { "target": "https://api.akeyless.io", "method": "get", "lastAt": "2026-10-04T23:32:42.667621121Z", "lastOk": true, "lastStatus": 405, "lastMs": 45, "authRequired": false, "uptime24h": 100, "uptime30d": 100, "p50ms24h": 48, "p95ms24h": 87, "samples24h": 272, "samples30d": 895, "days": [ { "date": "2026-10-01", "probes": 109, "ok": 109 }, { "date": "2026-10-02", "probes": 248, "ok": 248 }, { "date": "2026-10-03", "probes": 271, "ok": 271 }, { "date": "2026-10-04", "probes": 267, "ok": 267 } ] }, "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.akeyless.io", "indicator": "none", "summary": "All Systems Operational", "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T23:27:39.687085067Z" }, "versions": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "akeyless", "version": "5.0.38", "seenAt": "2026-10-04T16:19:55.300496046Z" }, { "registry": "pypi", "name": "akeyless", "version": "5.0.38", "released": "2026-09-17", "seenAt": "2026-10-04T16:19:55.072572712Z" } ], "githubStars": 2, "npmWeekly": 3693, "pypiWeekly": 196221, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://akeyless.io/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:16:01.250724263Z" }, "llmsTxt": { "url": "https://docs.akeyless.io/llms.txt", "ok": true, "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:17:12.971720694Z" }, "domain": { "domain": "akeyless.io", "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T13:09:25.717264008Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://changelog.akeyless.io/cli", "kind": "changelog", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:41:49.583946265Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "a38aa48a055f" }, { "url": "https://www.akeyless.io/pricing/", "kind": "pricing", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:49:01.074153077Z", "changedAt": "2026-10-03T15:36:56.900207187Z", "fingerprint": "23bd00d937d2" }, { "url": "https://www.akeyless.io/privacy-policy/", "kind": "privacy", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:49:04.419721272Z", "changedAt": "2026-10-03T15:36:59.079097768Z", "fingerprint": "ae198dd0fa22" }, { "url": "https://www.akeyless.io/terms-of-service/", "kind": "terms", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:49:06.864103287Z", "changedAt": "2026-10-03T15:37:02.238780939Z", "fingerprint": "32e16cb5a55b" } ], "updatedAt": "2026-10-04T23:32:42.667621121Z" } }, "b": { "slug": "hashicorp-vault", "name": "HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server", "vendor": "HashiCorp (IBM)", "vendorUrl": "https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault", "kind": "http-api", "category": "secrets", "summary": "Secrets management platform for storing credentials and controlling application access.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hashicorp-vault", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hashicorp-vault.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hashicorp-vault.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hashicorp-vault.json", "repo": "https://github.com/hashicorp/vault", "license": "BUSL-1.1 (Vault), MPL-2.0 (MCP server)", "transports": [ "http", "stdio", "streamable-http" ], "packages": [], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "Every request carries a Vault token in `X-Vault-Token` (or as an HTTP bearer token). Machines get a token from an auth method such as AppRole, Kubernetes, JWT/OIDC, AWS, GCP, Azure, TLS certificates and more. Enterprise 2.0.3+ lets a registered agent present an OAuth 2.0 JWT from your identity provider directly, with RAR claims (RFC 9396) narrowing paths. The MCP server reads VAULT_ADDR, VAULT_TOKEN and VAULT_NAMESPACE, or takes them as headers in HTTP mode.", "pricing": "freemium", "pricingNotes": "Vault Community is free to run under the BUSL-1.1, which forbids selling a competing hosted product. HCP Vault Dedicated is hourly per cluster on the IBM price list. Development extra small $0.61644 an hour, Essentials small $1.57799, medium $3.16299, large $7.48857, Standard small $1.84299, medium $3.69099, large $9.40599, plus $72.92 a month per product client. Prices are indicative and exclude tax. Vault Enterprise self-managed is quoted, and the 2.1.0 licence added Agentic IAM terms. HCP has a $500 pay-as-you-go credit (https://www.ibm.com/products/hashicorp/pricing, https://www.hashicorp.com/en/pricing).", "priceSummary": "Freemium", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 16, "popularity": { "githubStars": 36234, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-09-30" }, "docsUrl": "https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs", "capabilities": [ "secrets.store", "secrets.rotate", "secrets.machine-identity", "secrets.audit", "secrets.self-host", "auth.agent-identity" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "self-hosted", "source-available", "freemium", "mcp", "local", "go", "enterprise", "eu" ], "lastRelease": "2026-09-16", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 64.4, "grade": "B", "agentReady": false, "rank": 184, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 452, "categoryRank": 7, "methodology": "0.3", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 64, "maintenance": 77, "payments": 30, "reliability": 71, "schema": 74, "security": 86, "transparency": 83 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-01" }, "negative": -5, "negativeNotes": [ "-4: The official Vault MCP server fixed cross-user credential inheritance through a shared MCP session ID on 2026-07-28 and an SSRF through a VAULT_ADDR query parameter on 2026-08-11, but the newest binary and Docker image are still 0.2.0 from 2025-09-24 and no advisory was published (https://github.com/hashicorp/vault-mcp-server/commits/main, https://releases.hashicorp.com/vault-mcp-server/)", "-1: Vault 2.0.3 (2026-06-17) fixed a LIST ACL bypass where a trailing slash skipped a more specific deny rule; fixed and documented in the changelog, so it decays (https://github.com/hashicorp/vault/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)" ], "verdict": "Dynamic secrets with leases, so a database or cloud credential can live for one agent run and be revoked after. The MCP server's newest build is 0.2.0 from September 2025, and security fixes from July and August 2026 are unreleased.", "strengths": [ "Dynamic secrets with leases, so a database or cloud credential can live for one agent run and be revoked after", "Path policies with explicit deny, audit devices on every edition, and Agent Registry with ceiling policies on Enterprise", "Auth methods for every major cloud, Kubernetes, JWT/OIDC and AppRole", "Three releases between 4 August and 16 September 2026 with a dated changelog that names each CVE fixed", "Each server generates its own OpenAPI document at /v1/sys/internal/specs/openapi" ], "weaknesses": [ "The MCP server's newest build is 0.2.0 from September 2025, and security fixes from July and August 2026 are unreleased", "Agentic IAM, control groups and the OAuth resource server are Enterprise only", "BUSL-1.1, not an OSI licence, and HCP Vault Secrets was retired within two years of launch", "No llms.txt, and the only official client library is Go", "HCP client pricing ($72.92 a client a month) can dwarf the cluster price for many agents, and no SLA is published" ], "agentNotes": [ "Prefer a dynamic secret (database, AWS, GCP engines) over a KV read; the lease expires with the run and revoke is one call", "Log in with AppRole or Kubernetes auth and keep the token for its TTL. Renew with auth/token/renew-self rather than logging in per request", "For KV v2, GET /v1/\u003cmount\u003e/data/\u003cpath\u003e and read data.data, and pass cas on writes so a retry can't overwrite a newer version", "If you must use the MCP server, build it from main rather than running the 0.2.0 image, run it over stdio, and give it a token limited to one mount", "Ask your operator to set enable_rate_limit_response_headers on the quota so a 429 carries Retry-After" ], "metrics": { "kind": "local", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 2, "avgRating": 3, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "B", "methodology": "0.3", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 64.4 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 64, "maintenance": 77, "payments": 30, "reliability": 71, "schema": 74, "security": 86, "transparency": 65 }, "provenanceScore": 100 }, "connect": { "install": "docker run --rm -p 8200:8200 hashicorp/vault server -dev # or download vault-mcp-server from releases.hashicorp.com", "http": "curl -H \"X-Vault-Token: $VAULT_TOKEN\" \"$VAULT_ADDR/v1/secret/data/myapp\"", "claudeCode": "claude mcp add vault -e VAULT_ADDR=$VAULT_ADDR -e VAULT_TOKEN=$VAULT_TOKEN -- vault-mcp-server stdio", "config": { "mcpServers": { "vault": { "args": [ "run", "-i", "--rm", "-e", "VAULT_ADDR", "-e", "VAULT_TOKEN", "hashicorp/vault-mcp-server" ], "command": "docker", "env": { "VAULT_ADDR": "${VAULT_ADDR}", "VAULT_TOKEN": "${VAULT_TOKEN}" } } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/secrets.store", "tool": "https://letme.dev/hashicorp-vault" }, "sameCompany": [ "terraform-mcp" ], "area": "agent-runtime", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "HCP Vault Dedicated, product client", "unit": "account-month", "usd": 72.92, "note": "Per client a month, Essentials and Standard" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "HashiCorp, Inc. (an IBM company)", "domain": "hashicorp.com", "domainRegistered": "2011-04-30", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.hashicorp.com/en/terms-of-service", "privacy": "https://www.hashicorp.com/en/privacy", "statusPage": "https://status.hashicorp.com", "changelog": "https://github.com/hashicorp/vault/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md", "securityTxt": "valid", "checked": "2026-10-01", "notes": [ "The website terms name HashiCorp, Inc. and were last updated March 2018. The privacy policy (20 April 2026) gives HashiCorp, an IBM Company, c/o 1 North Castle Drive, Armonk, New York, and notes the IBM acquisition closed on 27 February 2025.", "security.txt has Contact, Policy and Encryption but no Expires field.", "HCP prices come from the IBM price table and are marked indicative, varying by country.", "status.hashicorp.com runs on incident.io. From 1 July to 1 October 2026 it posted nothing against HCP Vault Dedicated; it did post a DR cluster creation failure on HCP (6 August) and a releases.hashicorp.com outage (26 September).", "The Vault MCP server's newest published build is 0.2.0 (24 September 2025) on releases.hashicorp.com and Docker Hub, although its VERSION file and changelog say 0.2.1." ], "score": 100 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hashicorp-vault.json", "live": { "slug": "hashicorp-vault", "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.hashicorp.com", "indicator": "none", "summary": "All Systems Operational", "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T23:27:50.15354632Z" }, "versions": [ { "registry": "github", "name": "hashicorp/vault", "version": "v2.1.1", "released": "2026-09-16", "seenAt": "2026-10-04T16:29:29.320950791Z" } ], "githubStars": 36339, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://hashicorp.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "unknown", "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:16:00.556489725Z" }, "domain": { "domain": "hashicorp.com", "registered": "2011-04-30", "source": "https://rdap.verisign.com/com/v1/domain/hashicorp.com", "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T13:10:23.718306751Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hashicorp/vault/main/CHANGELOG.md", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:47:41.235618427Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "0620845f2f7e" }, { "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/hcp-vault-secrets-end-life", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:50:50.575718841Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "e24e2e2b51c3" }, { "url": "https://www.hashicorp.com/en/pricing", "kind": "pricing", "status": 429, "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:50:36.37620806Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z" }, { "url": "https://www.ibm.com/products/hashicorp/pricing", "kind": "pricing", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:50:46.127664694Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "0e262eb503c4" }, { "url": "https://www.hashicorp.com/en/privacy", "kind": "privacy", "status": 429, "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:50:38.389849123Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z" }, { "url": "https://www.hashicorp.com/en/terms-of-service", "kind": "terms", "status": 429, "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:50:40.386204192Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z" } ], "updatedAt": "2026-10-04T23:27:50.15354632Z" } }, "summary": "Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) has a score of 73.7 (BB) against HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server's 64.4 (B). Both do secrets store. The largest gap is reliability, 19 points." }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-hashicorp-vault", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-hashicorp-vault.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-hashicorp-vault.md", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-hashicorp-vault.min.md" }, "markdown": "Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) has a score of 73.7 (BB) against HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server's 64.4 (B). Both do secrets store. The largest gap is reliability, 19 points.\n\n- Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server): grade BB, 73.7/100, rank #55 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/akeyless.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/akeyless.json\n- HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server: grade B, 64.4/100, rank #184 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hashicorp-vault.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hashicorp-vault.json\n\n## Which one, for what\n\nPick Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) for reliability (+19), schema \u0026 documentation (+7), maintenance \u0026 community (+5).\n\nPick HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server for payments \u0026 pricing (+5), transparency \u0026 trust (+10).\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) | HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 90 | 71 | Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) +19 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 81 | 74 | Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) +7 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 63 | 64 | HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server +1 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 89 | 86 | Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) +3 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 25 | 30 | HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server +5 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 82 | 77 | Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) +5 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 73 | 83 | HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server +10 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -5 | |\n| **Total** | | **73.7 · BB** | **64.4 · B** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) | HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | Model platform | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | Akeyless | HashiCorp (IBM) |\n| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.akeyless.io` | no (local only) |\n| Transports | HTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTP |\n| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |\n| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | Apache-2.0 (SDKs), closed platform | BUSL-1.1 (Vault), MPL-2.0 (MCP server) |\n| Tools exposed | none | 16 |\n| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |\n| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |\n| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | no |\n| llms.txt | yes | no |\n| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |\n| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-16 |\n| Popularity | 2 stars, 3.5k npm/wk, 219k PyPI/wk | 36k stars |\n| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server).** Gateway-brokered SecretlessAI and a runtime-authority MCP server with 4 tools that return results, not credentials. No published prices above the free plan; clients and transactions are metered with overage billed at the end of a 12-month contract.\n\n**HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server.** Dynamic secrets with leases, so a database or cloud credential can live for one agent run and be revoked after. The MCP server's newest build is 0.2.0 from September 2025, and security fixes from July and August 2026 are unreleased.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server)\n\n1. Run akeyless mcp-runtime-authority, not akeyless mcp, for an agent that acts on systems; the first returns results, the second has get_secret and get_password\n2. Authenticate with a cloud identity, Kubernetes or Universal Identity rather than an access key, which the docs reserve for proofs of concept\n3. Use CLI 1.130.0 or later for either MCP server, and point the client at your Gateway URL\n4. Count identities and calls before scaling. The free plan allows 5 clients, and calls over a tier's cap (200 a minute on Silver) are billed as extra clients, not refused\n5. Pass the token in the JSON body of each POST, and page `/list-items` with `pagination-token`\n\n### HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server\n\n1. Prefer a dynamic secret (database, AWS, GCP engines) over a KV read; the lease expires with the run and revoke is one call\n2. Log in with AppRole or Kubernetes auth and keep the token for its TTL. Renew with auth/token/renew-self rather than logging in per request\n3. For KV v2, GET /v1/\u003cmount\u003e/data/\u003cpath\u003e and read data.data, and pass cas on writes so a retry can't overwrite a newer version\n4. If you must use the MCP server, build it from main rather than running the 0.2.0 image, run it over stdio, and give it a token limited to one mount\n5. Ask your operator to set enable_rate_limit_response_headers on the quota so a 429 carries Retry-After\n\n## Other comparisons with Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) or HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server\n\n- [1Password service accounts, SDKs and Environments MCP vs Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/1password-vs-akeyless.md)\n- [1Password service accounts, SDKs and Environments MCP vs HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/1password-vs-hashicorp-vault.md)\n- [Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs AWS Secrets Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-aws-secrets-manager.md)\n- [Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Bitwarden Secrets Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-bitwarden-secrets-manager.md)\n- [Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Doppler](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-doppler.md)\n- [Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Google Cloud Secret Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-google-secret-manager.md)\n- [Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Infisical](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-infisical.md)\n- [AWS Secrets Manager vs HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aws-secrets-manager-vs-hashicorp-vault.md)\n- [Bitwarden Secrets Manager vs HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitwarden-secrets-manager-vs-hashicorp-vault.md)\n- [Doppler vs HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/doppler-vs-hashicorp-vault.md)\n- [Google Cloud Secret Manager vs HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-secret-manager-vs-hashicorp-vault.md)\n- [HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server vs Infisical](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hashicorp-vault-vs-infisical.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-10-04", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.3", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server", "url": "" } ], "description": "Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) has a score of 73.7 (BB) against HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server's 64.4 (B). Both do secrets store. The largest gap is reliability, 19 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) BB 73.7", "HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server B 64.4", "scores" ], "h1": "Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/compare-akeyless-vs-hashicorp-vault.png", "path": "/compare/akeyless-vs-hashicorp-vault", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP…", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-10-04", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-hashicorp-vault" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 1850, "slim": 380 }, "version": 1 }