# Aidbox vs Zus Health (slim)

> Aidbox scores 64.2 (B) to Zus Health's 56.6 (C) for fhir servers. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aidbox-vs-zus-health.md (~2,200 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aidbox-vs-zus-health.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aidbox-vs-zus-health
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-14

Aidbox scores 64.2 (B) on agent readiness against Zus Health's 56.6 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Zus Health leads on reliability and transparency & trust. Both do fhir servers.

- Aidbox: B 64.2, rank #385 of 1076 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/aidbox.min.md
- Zus Health: C 56.6, rank #669 of 1076 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/zus-health.min.md
- Aidbox, good for An organisation building its own clinical data repository, EHR or payer platform on FHIR, where an agent works against that store. Ahead on Agent ergonomics, 79 against 67; Security & auth, 74 against 49; Payments & pricing, 25 against 5; Maintenance & community, 80 against 64.
- Zus Health, good for US care organisations and digital health builders that want a shared, continuously refreshed patient profile in FHIR with EHR embedding. Ahead on Reliability, 66 against 59; Transparency & trust, 59 against 45.

| Category | Aidbox | Zus Health |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 59 | 66 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 77 | 77 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 79 | 67 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 74 | 49 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 25 | 5 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 80 | 64 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 45 | 59 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Aidbox | Zus Health |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Health Samurai, Inc. | Zus Health, Inc. |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Licence | Proprietary. Aidbox runs from Health Samurai's Docker images under a free development licence (no PHI) or a paid production licence. Examples and the Python SDK on GitHub are MIT | Proprietary service under the Zus Builder Terms of Service (last updated 11 March 2025), the Developer Sandbox Terms and the Zus Business Associate Addendum |
| Tools exposed | 9 | none |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-14 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2025-03-11 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2021-06-10 | 2026-06-24 |
| Customer content may train models |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  | not found in the text |