# Agno vs TradingAgents (slim)

> Agno scores 72.8 (BB) to TradingAgents's 64.7 (B) for agent frameworks. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agno-vs-tradingagents.md (~2,250 tokens) · this version ~630 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agno-vs-tradingagents.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agno-vs-tradingagents
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-25
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Agno scores 72.8 (BB) on agent readiness against TradingAgents's 64.7 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. TradingAgents leads on payments & pricing. Both do agent frameworks.

- Agno: BB 72.8, rank #102 of 1210 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/agno.min.md
- TradingAgents: B 64.7, rank #388 of 1210 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/tradingagents.min.md
- Agno, good for Python teams that want agents, teams and workflows plus a self-hosted server with REST, MCP, approvals and scheduling in one package. Ahead on Reliability, 83 against 67; Schema & documentation, 90 against 61; Agent ergonomics, 76 against 61; Transparency & trust, 83 against 68. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better.
- TradingAgents, good for Researchers who want a fixed multi-agent analysis of one listed instrument or crypto pair on a date, with point-in-time data for backtests, and who will run Python. Ahead on Payments & pricing, 60 against 50. Also No incidents deducted, where Agno loses 3 points for them.

| Category | Agno | TradingAgents |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 83 | 67 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 90 | 61 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 76 | 61 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 64 | 62 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 50 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 86 | 82 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 83 | 68 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Agno | TradingAgents |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Agno Inc. | Tauric Research |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-02 | 2026-10-16 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read |  |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read |  |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read |  |
| Popularity | 43k stars, 476k PyPI/wk | 114k stars |
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (4) | none |