# Agno vs LangGraph (slim)

> Agno scores 72.8 (BB) on agent readiness against LangGraph's 70.6 (BB), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. LangGraph leads on payments & pricing. Both do agent frameworks. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agno-vs-langgraph.md (~1,900 tokens) · this version ~580 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agno-vs-langgraph.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agno-vs-langgraph
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-08

Agno scores 72.8 (BB) on agent readiness against LangGraph's 70.6 (BB), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. LangGraph leads on payments & pricing. Both do agent frameworks.

- Agno: BB 72.8, rank #85 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/agno.min.md
- LangGraph: BB 70.6, rank #131 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/langgraph.min.md
- Agno, good for Python teams that want agents, teams and workflows plus a self-hosted server with REST, MCP, approvals and scheduling in one package. Ahead on Reliability, 83 against 75; Agent ergonomics, 76 against 70.
- LangGraph, good for Long-running, stateful agents that pause for people and must survive restarts. Ahead on Payments & pricing, 60 against 50. Also No key needed to call it.

| Category | Agno | LangGraph |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 83 | 75 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 90 | 89 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 76 | 70 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 64 | 60 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 50 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 86 | 90 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 83 | 79 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Agno | LangGraph |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Agno Inc. | LangChain |
| Auth | API key | None |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-10-02 | 2026-09-21 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read |  |
| Popularity | 43k stars, 476k PyPI/wk | 42k stars, 2.3M npm/wk, 10.4M PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (2) |