# AgentWeb vs letme (slim)

> letme scores 74.2 (BB) to AgentWeb's 57 (C) for tool access for agents. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentweb-vs-letme.md (~2,500 tokens) · this version ~830 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentweb-vs-letme.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentweb-vs-letme
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-23
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

letme scores 74.2 (BB) on agent readiness against AgentWeb's 57 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do tool access for agents.

- AgentWeb: C 57, rank #710 of 1201 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/agentweb.min.md
- letme: BB 74.2, rank #78 of 1201 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/letme.min.md
- AgentWeb, good for Agents that need to act on consumer and business websites without an official API (shopping, food delivery, flights, LinkedIn), where a pre-mapped action is cheaper than driving a browser.
- letme, good for An agent that needs one tool for a job, chosen at run time by a published rule from Anchor Terminal's ratings, with the endpoint and connect snippet to call it direct, keyless over HTTP or MCP. Ahead on Reliability, 85 against 60; Schema & documentation, 88 against 77; Agent ergonomics, 88 against 77; Security & auth, 57 against 47; Payments & pricing, 60 against 40; Maintenance & community, 58 against 25; Transparency & trust, 80 against 52. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; No key needed to call it; Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.8 against 2.8 out of 5.

| Category | AgentWeb | letme |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 60 | 85 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 77 | 88 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 77 | 88 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 47 | 57 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 40 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 25 | 58 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 52 | 80 |

| Fact (where they differ) | AgentWeb | letme |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Agent Web Labs, Inc. | Anchor Terminal |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://mcp.agentweb.us/mcp` | `https://letme.dev` |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Free |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under AgentWeb's Terms of Service. No source code or public repository was found | Closed source. The about page says the code is private and there's no public repository. Bugs go on Anchor Terminal's public issue tracker (https://www.anchorterminal.com/issues/), open since 20 October 2026. The directory data letme reads and hands out is CC BY 4.0. |
| Tools exposed | 22 | 2 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| Last release | none | 2026-10-22 |
| Terms last updated |  | 2026-10-14 |
| Privacy policy last updated |  | 2026-10-18 |
| Customer content may train models |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  | not found in the text |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 3.8/5 (8) |