# Agents-A1-4B vs SmolLM3-3B (slim)

> Agents-A1-4B and SmolLM3-3B score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 61 and 61 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agents-a1-4b-vs-smollm3-3b.md (~5,900 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agents-a1-4b-vs-smollm3-3b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agents-a1-4b-vs-smollm3-3b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Agents-A1-4B and SmolLM3-3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). SmolLM3-3B leads on risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Agents-A1-4B: C 61, rank #34 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/agents-a1-4b.min.md
- SmolLM3-3B: C 61, rank #47 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/smollm3-3b.min.md
- Agents-A1-4B, good for Local agent loops (search, research, tool calls) on a laptop, a small GPU or a phone-class machine, under a plain licence Ahead on Reach, 90 against 85.
- SmolLM3-3B, good for Agents that want a small, fully transparent tool-calling cousin on a laptop, CPU or edge device Ahead on Risk, 65 against 55; Agent interface, 80 against 70; Documentation and upkeep, 54 against 43.

| Category | Agents-A1-4B | SmolLM3-3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 90 | 85 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 65 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 80 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 43 | 54 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Agents-A1-4B | SmolLM3-3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | InternScience (Shanghai AI Laboratory) | Hugging Face |
| Last release | 2026-07-14 | 2025-09-10 |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |