# Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B (slim)

> Qwen3.6-35B-A3B scores 63.2 (B) to Agents-A1-4B's 61 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agents-a1-4b-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b.md (~6,100 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agents-a1-4b-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agents-a1-4b-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B scores 63.2 (B) on agent readiness against Agents-A1-4B's 61 (C), and leads in 0 of 4 scored categories. Agents-A1-4B leads on reach and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Agents-A1-4B: C 61, rank #34 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/agents-a1-4b.min.md
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: B 63.2, rank #25 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-6-35b-a3b.min.md
- Agents-A1-4B, good for Local agent loops (search, research, tool calls) on a laptop, a small GPU or a phone-class machine, under a plain licence Ahead on Reach, 90 against 85; Documentation and upkeep, 43 against 36.
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, good for Agents with a 32 GB or larger machine that want a quick, permissively licensed coding and tool-calling cousin with vision.

| Category | Agents-A1-4B | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 90 | 85 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 43 | 36 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Agents-A1-4B | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | InternScience (Shanghai AI Laboratory) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Last release | 2026-07-14 | 2026-04-16 |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |