{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "agentgate", "name": "AgentGate", "vendor": "Mohit Singh (mohitdebian)", "vendorUrl": "https://github.com/mohitdebian/AgentGate", "kind": "http-api", "category": "guardrails", "summary": "AgentGate is an open-source, self-hosted gateway that checks an agent's tool calls before they run. A small local classifier scores each call and a YAML policy returns allow, deny or ask, through a REST API or an MCP stdio wrapper.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/agentgate", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/agentgate.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/agentgate.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/agentgate.json", "repo": "https://github.com/mohitdebian/AgentGate", "license": "MIT", "transports": [ "http", "stdio" ], "packages": [], "auth": "none", "authNotes": "No account. The agent endpoints (`/v1/sessions`, `/v1/assess`) are open unless the owner sets `AG_AGENT_KEY`, then need `Authorization: Bearer \u003ckey\u003e` or `x-agent-key`. Dashboard endpoints need `AG_DASHBOARD_KEY`, which falls back to `dev-key-123` when unset and is also accepted as a `?token=` query parameter. The checkpoint and shadow-summary endpoints have no auth check in the source.", "pricing": "free", "pricingNotes": "Free under MIT with nothing to buy. The owner runs four containers (Postgres, the Python decision service, the Fastify proxy and the dashboard), with an NVIDIA GPU recommended for the classifier and a CPU path in the code.", "priceSummary": "Free · OSS", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the source, the docs or the wiki (checked 2026-10-15). The project has no paid tier.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": 0, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-10-15" }, "docsUrl": "https://github.com/mohitdebian/AgentGate/wiki/Client-Integration-Guide", "openapi": "https://github.com/mohitdebian/AgentGate/blob/main/docs/openapi.yaml", "capabilities": [ "guard.policy", "guard.injection", "guard.self-host" ], "tags": [ "open-source", "self-hosted", "local", "free", "no-card", "mit", "typescript", "python", "mcp", "docker", "openapi" ], "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 48.5, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 883, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1094, "categoryRank": 16, "methodology": "0.4", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 53, "maintenance": 28, "payments": 60, "reliability": 44, "schema": 47, "security": 49, "transparency": 56 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-15" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "An agent or its host can send each tool call to one REST endpoint, or wrap an MCP server, and get allow, deny or ask from a local classifier and a YAML policy, with an audit log and approval queue. The project is three days old, auth is off by default, and no detection accuracy is published.", "bestFor": "A team that wants a self-hosted check between an agent and its shell, database or webhook tools, with a human approval queue.", "strengths": [ "One documented call, `POST /v1/assess`, returns a verdict, reason codes and four head probabilities", "Fail-closed defaults. A model error or timeout falls back to ask, and unmatched tools default to ask", "Decisions are logged in Postgres with redacted arguments, a SHA-256 of the full arguments and approval reviewer notes", "MIT code and MIT model weights on Hugging Face with no gate, run entirely on the owner's machines", "Shadow mode and policy replay let an operator test a policy against past decisions before enforcing it" ], "weaknesses": [ "Agent endpoints need no key unless `AG_AGENT_KEY` is set, the proxy binds 0.0.0.0:8080, and the dashboard key defaults to `dev-key-123`", "Checkpoint revert, which runs git on the proxy's workspace, has no auth check in the source of 15 October 2026", "No tagged release, an empty changelog and version 0.1.0, three days after the first commit", "The MCP wrapper treats `allow_with_checkpoint` as an error and does not send the agent key to `/v1/assess`", "No published accuracy or false-positive rate for the classifier, trained in 60 steps per its model card" ], "agentNotes": [ "Create a session with the user's real goal first. The goal-alignment head scores every later call against it", "Pass earlier tool results in `history_override` with `untrusted: true` for web or email content, or the injection head sees only the action", "On `ask`, stop and tell the user the `decision_id`. Polling `/v1/decisions/:id` needs the dashboard key", "Treat `allow_with_checkpoint` as allow and keep the `checkpoint_id` for an undo", "Expect HTTP 404 with `not_found` for an unknown session and 401 when the owner has set an agent key" ], "metrics": { "kind": "local", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.4", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 48.5 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 53, "maintenance": 28, "payments": 60, "reliability": 44, "schema": 47, "security": 49, "transparency": 59 }, "provenanceScore": 53 }, "connect": { "install": "git clone https://github.com/mohitdebian/AgentGate.git \u0026\u0026 cd AgentGate \u0026\u0026 docker compose up -d", "http": "curl -s -X POST http://localhost:8080/v1/assess -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" -d '{\"session_id\":\"\u003cid from POST /v1/sessions\u003e\",\"action\":{\"tool\":\"bash_exec\",\"arguments\":{\"command\":\"rm -rf /var/www\"}}}'", "config": { "mcpServers": { "postgres": { "args": [ "/path/to/AgentGate/proxy/dist/src/mcp.js", "npx", "-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-postgres", "postgresql://user:pass@localhost:5432/production" ], "command": "node", "env": { "AGENTGATE_URL": "http://localhost:8080" } } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/guard.policy", "tool": "https://letme.dev/agentgate" }, "area": "models", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Mohit Singh (individual)", "domain": "", "domainRegistered": "", "endpointOnVendorDomain": null, "terms": "", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://github.com/mohitdebian/AgentGate/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-10-15", "notes": [ "The licence file reads Copyright (c) 2026 Mohit Singh. The GitHub account mohitdebian links to mohitbuilds.in, a personal developer page.", "No terms or privacy policy. The software runs on the owner's machines, so there is no vendor endpoint or status page to check.", "SECURITY.md routes reports to GitHub private vulnerability reporting or a personal email, with a 48-hour acknowledgement target. No security.txt, since the project has no website.", "CHANGELOG.md holds a single Unreleased line, \"Initial scaffolding for Phase 1\"." ], "score": 53 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/agentgate.json" }, "answer": "Cisco AI Defense Inspection API scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against AgentGate's 48.5 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. AgentGate leads on payments \u0026 pricing.", "b": { "slug": "cisco-ai-defense-inspection", "name": "Cisco AI Defense Inspection API", "vendor": "Cisco Systems, Inc.", "vendorUrl": "https://www.cisco.com/site/us/en/products/security/ai-defense/index.html", "kind": "http-api", "category": "guardrails", "summary": "Hosted inspection API from Cisco that checks chat messages, HTTP requests and responses, and MCP messages for prompt injection, personal data, harmful content and policy violations, and returns an allow or block verdict for the calling application to enforce.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cisco-ai-defense-inspection", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cisco-ai-defense-inspection.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cisco-ai-defense-inspection.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/cisco-ai-defense-inspection.json", "repo": "https://github.com/cisco-ai-defense/ai-defense-python-sdk", "license": "Proprietary service under Cisco's General Terms and the AI Defense Offer Description. The Python SDK is Apache-2.0", "transports": [ "http" ], "remoteUrl": "https://us.api.inspect.aidefense.security.cisco.com/api/v1/inspect/chat", "packages": [ { "registry": "pypi", "name": "cisco-aidefense-sdk" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "Sales-led access. A customer buys an AI Defense subscription, claims it in Security Cloud Control with a code sent by email, then creates an API application and a connection in the AI Defense console and generates a key for that connection. The key goes in the `X-Cisco-AI-Defense-API-Key` header, is shown once, can carry an expiry date, and can be revoked or regenerated. It works only on the Inspection API. The Management API takes a separate key, and only the Admin role can create keys.", "pricing": "paid", "pricingNotes": "No public price, free tier or trial for the Inspection API was found. The Offer Description of 23 September 2026 sells per AI application, assuming 10 million queries per application a year, or as committed usage in indivisible blocks of one billion inspection tokens, with overage billed in arrears. The product page links a demo request. The free Explorer edition covers red teaming only (checked 2026-10-08).", "priceSummary": "Paid", "where": "hosted", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the developer docs, the user guide or the Offer Description (checked 2026-10-08).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": 35, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": 3977, "asOf": "2026-10-08" }, "docsUrl": "https://developer.cisco.com/docs/ai-defense-inspection/", "capabilities": [ "guard.injection", "guard.pii", "guard.moderation", "guard.policy" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "enterprise", "sales-led", "closed-source", "api-key", "python", "status-page", "security-txt", "soc2", "eu" ], "lastRelease": "2026-09-23", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 61.3, "grade": "C", "agentReady": false, "rank": 507, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1094, "categoryRank": 8, "methodology": "0.4", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 67, "maintenance": 80, "payments": 0, "reliability": 80, "schema": 59, "security": 81, "transparency": 76 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-08" }, "negative": -3, "negativeNotes": [ "16 September 2026. Release 2026.9.3 removed the Toxicity rule from runtime policies and said so in the same release note, with no earlier notice in the release notes or the API changelog. `cisco-aidefense-sdk` 2.2.0, published two days later, still lists the rule. What the API returns for a call that names it was not established, so the deduction is the minimum (-3). https://securitydocs.cisco.com/docs/ai-def/user/168305.dita" ], "verdict": "Per-connection API keys with expiry, revocation and regeneration, published limits of 60,000 calls a minute, weekly dated release notes and a one-year retention statement suit companies already on Cisco Security Cloud Control. Access needs a subscription bought through sales, with no public price or trial for the API, and the developer changelog has one entry from February 2025.", "bestFor": "A company already buying Cisco security through Security Cloud Control that wants its own application to decide what to do with each verdict.", "strengths": [ "One call returns `is_safe`, an action, classifications, severity, matched rules and, since April 2026, the type and position of each suspected PII value", "Each connection has its own API key with an expiry date, revocation and regeneration, and the key works only on the Inspection API", "Published limits of 60,000 calls a minute, a one million token context per inspection and one million tokens in parallel per organisation", "Release notes are dated weekly, 12 of them between 10 July and 23 September 2026", "The data handling page states one-year retention for event logs, a tenant-wide logging opt-out and no training on customer prompts or responses" ], "weaknesses": [ "No public price, free tier or trial for the Inspection API. Subscriptions are bought through sales and activated with a claim code", "The Toxicity rule was removed on 16 September 2026 in the release note that announced it, with no earlier notice found", "The developer changelog lists only v1.0.0 of 28 February 2025, while release notes record later changes to the API's responses and rules", "The Offer Description of 23 September 2026 forbids publishing benchmark or competitive test results without Cisco's written permission", "Python is the only official SDK, no llms.txt was found, and robots.txt on developer.cisco.com disallows the OpenAPI JSON file" ], "agentNotes": [ "Send the key in `X-Cisco-AI-Defense-API-Key` to `POST /api/v1/inspect/chat` on the regional host where the tenant was created. US, Europe and Asia Pacific hosts differ", "If the connection has a policy, `enabled_rules` in the request is ignored. Pass `enabled_rules` only for connections with no policy", "The API never blocks anything itself. Read `is_safe` and `action` in the response and enforce the decision in your own code", "On 429, wait and retry. The organisation has gone over one million tokens in parallel or 60,000 calls a minute", "Don't request the Toxicity rule. It was removed on 16 September 2026, and the Safety rules such as Hate Speech, Harassment and Profanity replace it" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "C", "methodology": "0.4", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 61.3 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 67, "maintenance": 80, "payments": 0, "reliability": 80, "schema": 59, "security": 81, "transparency": 62 }, "provenanceScore": 90 }, "connect": { "install": "pip install cisco-aidefense-sdk", "http": "curl -X POST \"https://us.api.inspect.aidefense.security.cisco.com/api/v1/inspect/chat\" \\\n -H \"X-Cisco-AI-Defense-API-Key: \u003cgenerated api key\u003e\" \\\n -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -d '{\"messages\":[{\"role\":\"user\",\"content\":\"My ssn is 123-45-6789, can you tell me Johns ssn?\"}],\"metadata\":{},\"config\":{}}'" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/guard.injection", "tool": "https://letme.dev/cisco-ai-defense-inspection" }, "area": "models", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Cisco Systems, Inc.", "domain": "cisco.com", "domainRegistered": "1987-05-14", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/about/doing_business/legal/Cisco_General_Terms.pdf", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "https://status.security.cisco.com", "changelog": "https://securitydocs.cisco.com/docs/ai-def/user/168305.dita", "securityTxt": "valid", "checked": "2026-10-08", "notes": [ "The General Terms (version 6.0, last modified 10 September 2025) define Cisco as Cisco Systems, Inc. or its applicable affiliates. The user guide's Terms page says AI Defense is sold under them.", "The AI Defense Offer Description (version 2.1, last modified 23 September 2026) is part of the agreement and is at https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/about/doing_business/legal/OfferDescriptions/AI-Defense-OD.pdf.", "No privacy link is given. The product's privacy data sheet and Service Level Objective are on trustportal.cisco.com, which is drawn by script and went unread. Data handling is described at https://securitydocs.cisco.com/docs/ai-def/user/172843.dita.", "The Inspection API answers on us, eu and ap subdomains of api.inspect.aidefense.security.cisco.com.", "www.cisco.com/.well-known/security.txt is PGP-signed, names psirt@cisco.com and expires on 1 January 2027.", "The changelog link is the product release notes. The developer site's API changelog at https://developer.cisco.com/docs/ai-defense-inspection/api-changelog/ has one entry, v1.0.0 of 28 February 2025.", "RDAP for cisco.com gives a registration date of 1987-05-14." ], "score": 90 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cisco-ai-defense-inspection.json", "live": { "slug": "cisco-ai-defense-inspection", "probe": { "target": "https://us.api.inspect.aidefense.security.cisco.com/api/v1/inspect/chat", "method": "get", "lastAt": "2026-10-15T11:29:49.599085599Z", "lastOk": false, "lastStatus": 501, "lastMs": 445, "lastNote": "server error", "authRequired": false, "uptime24h": 0, "uptime30d": 0, "p50ms24h": 0, "p95ms24h": 0, "samples24h": 254, "samples30d": 1530, "days": [ { "date": "2026-10-09", "probes": 169, "ok": 0 }, { "date": "2026-10-10", "probes": 247, "ok": 0 }, { "date": "2026-10-11", "probes": 247, "ok": 0 }, { "date": "2026-10-12", "probes": 247, "ok": 0 }, { "date": "2026-10-13", "probes": 248, "ok": 0 }, { "date": "2026-10-14", "probes": 249, "ok": 0 }, { "date": "2026-10-15", "probes": 123, "ok": 0 } ], "outages": [ { "start": "2026-10-09T07:40:22.876159997Z", "end": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "note": "HTTP 501 server error" } ] }, "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.security.cisco.com", "indicator": "none", "summary": "All Systems Operational", "checkedAt": "2026-10-15T11:31:45.254414878Z" }, "versions": [ { "registry": "github", "name": "cisco-ai-defense/ai-defense-python-sdk", "version": "v2.2.0", "released": "2026-09-18", "seenAt": "2026-10-14T23:44:10.083898516Z" }, { "registry": "pypi", "name": "cisco-aidefense-sdk", "version": "2.2.0", "released": "2026-09-18", "seenAt": "2026-10-14T23:44:08.086880528Z" } ], "githubStars": 36, "pypiWeekly": 4369, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://cisco.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "valid", "expires": "2027-01-01T00:00:00.000Z", "checkedAt": "2026-10-14T15:46:47.301379516Z" }, "domain": { "domain": "cisco.com", "registered": "1987-05-14", "source": "https://rdap.verisign.com/com/v1/domain/cisco.com", "checkedAt": "2026-10-11T13:19:45.031773931Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://securitydocs.cisco.com/docs/ai-def/user/168305.dita", "kind": "changelog", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-14T21:06:57.360853216Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "feeda5b36cbb" } ], "updatedAt": "2026-10-15T11:31:45.254414878Z" } }, "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "HTTP API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "Mohit Singh (mohitdebian)", "b": "Cisco Systems, Inc.", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "https://us.api.inspect.aidefense.security.cisco.com/api/v1/inspect/chat", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "HTTP, stdio", "b": "HTTP", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "None", "b": "API key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Free", "b": "Paid", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "MIT", "b": "Proprietary service under Cisco's General Terms and the AI Defense Offer Description. The Python SDK is Apache-2.0", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "none", "b": "2026-09-23", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "no document linked", "b": "", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "no document linked", "b": "no document linked", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "0 stars", "b": "35 stars, 4k PyPI/wk", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Cisco AI Defense Inspection API scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against AgentGate's 48.5 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. AgentGate leads on payments \u0026 pricing.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, AgentGate or Cisco AI Defense Inspection API?" }, { "answer": "AgentGate needs no key. Cisco AI Defense Inspection API needs an API key.", "question": "Do AgentGate and Cisco AI Defense Inspection API need an API key?" }, { "answer": "AgentGate runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. Cisco AI Defense Inspection API has a hosted endpoint at https://us.api.inspect.aidefense.security.cisco.com/api/v1/inspect/chat.", "question": "Can an agent call AgentGate and Cisco AI Defense Inspection API without installing anything?" }, { "answer": "AgentGate is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Cisco AI Defense Inspection API.", "question": "Are AgentGate and Cisco AI Defense Inspection API open source?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Payments \u0026 pricing, 60 against 0" ], "also": [ "No key needed to call it", "Runs on your own machine", "Free to start without a card", "Open source", "No incidents deducted, where Cisco AI Defense Inspection API loses 3 points for them" ], "goodFor": "A team that wants a self-hosted check between an agent and its shell, database or webhook tools, with a human approval queue.", "slug": "agentgate", "watchFor": "Agent endpoints need no key unless `AG_AGENT_KEY` is set, the proxy binds 0.0.0.0:8080, and the dashboard key defaults to `dev-key-123`" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 80 against 44", "Schema \u0026 documentation, 59 against 47", "Agent ergonomics, 67 against 53", "Security \u0026 auth, 81 against 49", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 80 against 28", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 76 against 56" ], "also": [ "A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install" ], "goodFor": "A company already buying Cisco security through Security Cloud Control that wants its own application to decide what to do with each verdict.", "slug": "cisco-ai-defense-inspection", "watchFor": "No public price, free tier or trial for the Inspection API. Subscriptions are bought through sales and activated with a claim code" } ], "job": { "capability": "guard.policy", "name": "Policy enforcement" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-guardrails-vs-cisco-ai-defense-inspection.json", "title": "Amazon Bedrock Guardrails vs Cisco AI Defense Inspection API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-guardrails-vs-cisco-ai-defense-inspection" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-ai-content-safety-vs-cisco-ai-defense-inspection.json", "title": "Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) vs Cisco AI Defense Inspection API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-ai-content-safety-vs-cisco-ai-defense-inspection" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-google-model-armor.json", "title": "Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Google Cloud Model Armor", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-google-model-armor" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-granite-guardian.json", "title": "Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Granite Guardian", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-granite-guardian" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-guardrails-ai.json", "title": "Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Guardrails AI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-guardrails-ai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-lakera-guard.json", "title": "Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-lakera-guard" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-llamafirewall.json", "title": "Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs LlamaFirewall", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-llamafirewall" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-nemo-guardrails.json", "title": "Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-nemo-guardrails" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-openai-guardrails.json", "title": "Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs OpenAI Guardrails", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-openai-guardrails" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-prisma-airs.json", "title": "Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-prisma-airs" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-llama-guard.json", "title": "Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Llama Guard 4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-llama-guard" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-mistral-moderation.json", "title": "Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Mistral Moderation API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-mistral-moderation" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-openai-moderation.json", "title": "Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs OpenAI Moderation API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-openai-moderation" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-amazon-bedrock-guardrails.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Amazon Bedrock Guardrails", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-amazon-bedrock-guardrails" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-azure-ai-content-safety.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-azure-ai-content-safety" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-google-model-armor.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Google Cloud Model Armor", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-google-model-armor" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-granite-guardian.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Granite Guardian", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-granite-guardian" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-guardrails-ai.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Guardrails AI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-guardrails-ai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-lakera-guard.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-lakera-guard" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-llama-guard.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Llama Guard 4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-llama-guard" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-llamafirewall.json", "title": "AgentGate vs LlamaFirewall", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-llamafirewall" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-mistral-moderation.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Mistral Moderation API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-mistral-moderation" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-nemo-guardrails.json", "title": "AgentGate vs NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-nemo-guardrails" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-openai-guardrails.json", "title": "AgentGate vs OpenAI Guardrails", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-openai-guardrails" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-prisma-airs.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-prisma-airs" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-microsoft-presidio.json", "title": "Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Presidio", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-microsoft-presidio" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-microsoft-presidio.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Presidio", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-microsoft-presidio" } ], "scores": [ { "agentgate": 44, "by": 36, "cisco-ai-defense-inspection": 80, "edge": "cisco-ai-defense-inspection", "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "agentgate": 47, "by": 12, "cisco-ai-defense-inspection": 59, "edge": "cisco-ai-defense-inspection", "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "weight": 13 }, { "agentgate": 53, "by": 14, "cisco-ai-defense-inspection": 67, "edge": "cisco-ai-defense-inspection", "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "weight": 13 }, { "agentgate": 49, "by": 32, "cisco-ai-defense-inspection": 81, "edge": "cisco-ai-defense-inspection", "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "weight": 14 }, { "agentgate": 60, "by": 60, "cisco-ai-defense-inspection": 0, "edge": "agentgate", "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "agentgate": 28, "by": 52, "cisco-ai-defense-inspection": 80, "edge": "cisco-ai-defense-inspection", "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "weight": 7 }, { "agentgate": 56, "by": 20, "cisco-ai-defense-inspection": 76, "edge": "cisco-ai-defense-inspection", "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "Cisco AI Defense Inspection API scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against AgentGate's 48.5 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. AgentGate leads on payments \u0026 pricing. Both do policy enforcement.", "verdicts": { "agentgate": "An agent or its host can send each tool call to one REST endpoint, or wrap an MCP server, and get allow, deny or ask from a local classifier and a YAML policy, with an audit log and approval queue. The project is three days old, auth is off by default, and no detection accuracy is published.", "cisco-ai-defense-inspection": "Per-connection API keys with expiry, revocation and regeneration, published limits of 60,000 calls a minute, weekly dated release notes and a one-year retention statement suit companies already on Cisco Security Cloud Control. Access needs a subscription bought through sales, with no public price or trial for the API, and the developer changelog has one entry from February 2025." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-cisco-ai-defense-inspection", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-cisco-ai-defense-inspection.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-cisco-ai-defense-inspection.md", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-cisco-ai-defense-inspection.min.md" }, "markdown": "Cisco AI Defense Inspection API scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against AgentGate's 48.5 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. AgentGate leads on payments \u0026 pricing. Both do policy enforcement.\n\n- AgentGate: grade D, 48.5/100, rank #883 of 1094. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/agentgate.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/agentgate.json\n- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API: grade C, 61.3/100, rank #507 of 1094. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cisco-ai-defense-inspection.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/cisco-ai-defense-inspection.json\n- Best guardrails and safety filters for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/guardrails/index.md\n- All 132 guardrails comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/guardrails/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### AgentGate (D)\n\nGood for: A team that wants a self-hosted check between an agent and its shell, database or webhook tools, with a human approval queue.\n\nAhead on:\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 60 against 0\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- No key needed to call it\n- Runs on your own machine\n- Free to start without a card\n- Open source\n- No incidents deducted, where Cisco AI Defense Inspection API loses 3 points for them\n\nWatch for: Agent endpoints need no key unless `AG_AGENT_KEY` is set, the proxy binds 0.0.0.0:8080, and the dashboard key defaults to `dev-key-123`\n\n### Cisco AI Defense Inspection API (C)\n\nGood for: A company already buying Cisco security through Security Cloud Control that wants its own application to decide what to do with each verdict.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 80 against 44\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 59 against 47\n- Agent ergonomics, 67 against 53\n- Security \u0026 auth, 81 against 49\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 80 against 28\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 76 against 56\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install\n\nWatch for: No public price, free tier or trial for the Inspection API. Subscriptions are bought through sales and activated with a claim code\n\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | AgentGate | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 44 | 80 | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API +36 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 47 | 59 | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API +12 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 53 | 67 | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API +14 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 49 | 81 | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API +32 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 60 | 0 | AgentGate +60 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 28 | 80 | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API +52 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 56 | 76 | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API +20 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |\n| **Total** | | **48.5 · D** | **61.3 · C** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | AgentGate | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | Mohit Singh (mohitdebian) | Cisco Systems, Inc. |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://us.api.inspect.aidefense.security.cisco.com/api/v1/inspect/chat` |\n| Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP |\n| Auth | None | API key |\n| Pricing | Free | Paid |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | MIT | Proprietary service under Cisco's General Terms and the AI Defense Offer Description. The Python SDK is Apache-2.0 |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | no |\n| llms.txt | no | no |\n| Last release | none | 2026-09-23 |\n| Terms last updated | no document linked | |\n| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |\n| Customer content may train models | | |\n| Terms restrict automated access | | |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | | |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | | |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | | |\n| Popularity | 0 stars | 35 stars, 4k PyPI/wk |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**AgentGate.** An agent or its host can send each tool call to one REST endpoint, or wrap an MCP server, and get allow, deny or ask from a local classifier and a YAML policy, with an audit log and approval queue. The project is three days old, auth is off by default, and no detection accuracy is published.\n\n**Cisco AI Defense Inspection API.** Per-connection API keys with expiry, revocation and regeneration, published limits of 60,000 calls a minute, weekly dated release notes and a one-year retention statement suit companies already on Cisco Security Cloud Control. Access needs a subscription bought through sales, with no public price or trial for the API, and the developer changelog has one entry from February 2025.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### AgentGate\n\n1. Create a session with the user's real goal first. The goal-alignment head scores every later call against it\n2. Pass earlier tool results in `history_override` with `untrusted: true` for web or email content, or the injection head sees only the action\n3. On `ask`, stop and tell the user the `decision_id`. Polling `/v1/decisions/:id` needs the dashboard key\n4. Treat `allow_with_checkpoint` as allow and keep the `checkpoint_id` for an undo\n5. Expect HTTP 404 with `not_found` for an unknown session and 401 when the owner has set an agent key\n\n### Cisco AI Defense Inspection API\n\n1. Send the key in `X-Cisco-AI-Defense-API-Key` to `POST /api/v1/inspect/chat` on the regional host where the tenant was created. US, Europe and Asia Pacific hosts differ\n2. If the connection has a policy, `enabled_rules` in the request is ignored. Pass `enabled_rules` only for connections with no policy\n3. The API never blocks anything itself. Read `is_safe` and `action` in the response and enforce the decision in your own code\n4. On 429, wait and retry. The organisation has gone over one million tokens in parallel or 60,000 calls a minute\n5. Don't request the Toxicity rule. It was removed on 16 September 2026, and the Safety rules such as Hate Speech, Harassment and Profanity replace it\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, AgentGate or Cisco AI Defense Inspection API?\n\nCisco AI Defense Inspection API scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against AgentGate's 48.5 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. AgentGate leads on payments \u0026 pricing.\n\n### Do AgentGate and Cisco AI Defense Inspection API need an API key?\n\nAgentGate needs no key. Cisco AI Defense Inspection API needs an API key.\n\n### Can an agent call AgentGate and Cisco AI Defense Inspection API without installing anything?\n\nAgentGate runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. Cisco AI Defense Inspection API has a hosted endpoint at https://us.api.inspect.aidefense.security.cisco.com/api/v1/inspect/chat.\n\n### Are AgentGate and Cisco AI Defense Inspection API open source?\n\nAgentGate is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Cisco AI Defense Inspection API.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-cisco-ai-defense-inspection.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-cisco-ai-defense-inspection.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"agentgate\", \"b\": \"cisco-ai-defense-inspection\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare agentgate cisco-ai-defense-inspection`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/agentgate.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/cisco-ai-defense-inspection.json\n\n## Other comparisons with AgentGate or Cisco AI Defense Inspection API\n\n- [Amazon Bedrock Guardrails vs Cisco AI Defense Inspection API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-guardrails-vs-cisco-ai-defense-inspection.md)\n- [Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) vs Cisco AI Defense Inspection API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-ai-content-safety-vs-cisco-ai-defense-inspection.md)\n- [Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Google Cloud Model Armor](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-google-model-armor.md)\n- [Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Granite Guardian](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-granite-guardian.md)\n- [Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Guardrails AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-guardrails-ai.md)\n- [Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-lakera-guard.md)\n- [Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs LlamaFirewall](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-llamafirewall.md)\n- [Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-nemo-guardrails.md)\n- [Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs OpenAI Guardrails](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-openai-guardrails.md)\n- [Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-prisma-airs.md)\n- [Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Llama Guard 4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-llama-guard.md)\n- [Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Mistral Moderation API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-mistral-moderation.md)\n- [Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs OpenAI Moderation API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-openai-moderation.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Amazon Bedrock Guardrails](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-amazon-bedrock-guardrails.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-azure-ai-content-safety.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Google Cloud Model Armor](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-google-model-armor.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Granite Guardian](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-granite-guardian.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Guardrails AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-guardrails-ai.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-lakera-guard.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Llama Guard 4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-llama-guard.md)\n- [AgentGate vs LlamaFirewall](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-llamafirewall.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Mistral Moderation API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-mistral-moderation.md)\n- [AgentGate vs NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-nemo-guardrails.md)\n- [AgentGate vs OpenAI Guardrails](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-openai-guardrails.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-prisma-airs.md)\n- [Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Presidio](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-microsoft-presidio.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Presidio](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-microsoft-presidio.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit required: when you show, quote or pass on anything from here (to a user in an answer, in a product, a report or a dataset), say it's from Anchor Terminal (anchorterminal.com) and link the page or API address you took it from. Reviews also credit their author.", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-10-15", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.4", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "AgentGate vs Cisco AI Defense Inspection API", "url": "" } ], "description": "Cisco AI Defense Inspection scores 61.3 (C) to AgentGate's 48.5 (D) for policy enforcement. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "AgentGate D 48.5", "Cisco AI Defense Inspection API C 61.3", "scores" ], "h1": "AgentGate vs Cisco AI Defense Inspection API", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/compare-agentgate-vs-cisco-ai-defense-inspection.png", "path": "/compare/agentgate-vs-cisco-ai-defense-inspection", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "AgentGate vs Cisco AI Defense Inspection for AI agents (2026)", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-10-15", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-cisco-ai-defense-inspection" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 3000, "slim": 680 }, "version": 1 }