# Activepieces API + MCP vs Microsoft Power Automate (slim)

> Microsoft Power Automate scores 62 (B) on agent readiness against Activepieces API + MCP's 57.5 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Activepieces API + MCP leads on schema & documentation and payments & pricing. Both do automation workflows. Category scores, facts…

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-power-automate.md (~2,350 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-power-automate.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-power-automate
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-08

Microsoft Power Automate scores 62 (B) on agent readiness against Activepieces API + MCP's 57.5 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Activepieces API + MCP leads on schema & documentation and payments & pricing. Both do automation workflows.

- Activepieces API + MCP: C 57.5, rank #471 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/activepieces.min.md
- Microsoft Power Automate: B 62, rank #350 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/power-automate.min.md
- Activepieces API + MCP, good for A team that wants an MIT-licensed builder it can self-host or embed, with an agent that builds flows through MCP. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 80 against 68; Payments & pricing, 35 against 25. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install; Free to start without a card; Open source.
- Microsoft Power Automate, good for Organisations already on Microsoft 365 and Dataverse that want an agent to inventory, deploy or adjust flows inside existing roles and solutions. Ahead on Reliability, 63 against 55. Also No incidents deducted, where Activepieces API + MCP loses 6 points for them.

| Category | Activepieces API + MCP | Microsoft Power Automate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 55 | 63 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 80 | 68 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 65 | 69 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 64 | 61 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 35 | 25 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 80 | 76 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 73 | 76 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Activepieces API + MCP | Microsoft Power Automate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Activepieces | Microsoft |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://cloud.activepieces.com/api/v1` | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Licence | MIT (core), commercial licence for enterprise-only parts | Proprietary service under the Microsoft Product Terms for Microsoft Power Platform |
| Tools exposed | 45 | none |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | 2026-09-01 |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 25k stars, 452k npm/wk | 11k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | none |