# Activepieces API + MCP vs Make API + MCP > Make API + MCP has a score of 58.9 (C) against Activepieces API + MCP's 57.8 (C). Both do automation workflows. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 44 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-make - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-make.md (~1,500 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-make.min.md (~330 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-make.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-05 Make API + MCP has a score of 58.9 (C) against Activepieces API + MCP's 57.8 (C). Both do automation workflows. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 44 points. - Activepieces API + MCP: grade C, 57.8/100, rank #288 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/activepieces.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/activepieces.json - Make API + MCP: grade C, 58.9/100, rank #274 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/make.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/make.json ## Which one, for what Pick Activepieces API + MCP for schema & documentation (+14), payments & pricing (+5), maintenance & community (+44). Pick Make API + MCP for reliability (+8). ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Activepieces API + MCP | Make API + MCP | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 55 | 63 | Make API + MCP +8 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 80 | 66 | Activepieces API + MCP +14 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 65 | 63 | Activepieces API + MCP +2 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 64 | 68 | Make API + MCP +4 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 35 | 30 | Activepieces API + MCP +5 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 80 | 36 | Activepieces API + MCP +44 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 76 | 75 | Activepieces API + MCP +1 | | Negative events | ≤15 | -6 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **57.8 · C** | **58.9 · C** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Activepieces API + MCP | Make API + MCP | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Activepieces | Make (Celonis) | | Hosted endpoint | `https://cloud.activepieces.com/api/v1` | `https://eu1.make.com/api/v2` | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | | Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key | | Pricing | Freemium | Freemium | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | MIT (core), commercial licence for enterprise-only parts | proprietary | | Tools exposed | 45 | none | | Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a | | p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | MCP registry | not listed | `com.make/mcp-server` | | Last release | 2026-09-30 | none | | Popularity | 25k stars, 452k npm/wk | none | | Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 2.5/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Activepieces API + MCP.** MIT core, self-hostable, with the enterprise parts clearly separated. Docs say API keys come from the platform dashboard in Platform and Enterprise editions, while the pricing page lists the API on every plan. **Make API + MCP.** Hosted MCP server with OAuth, and scenario run tools on the free plan. No published OpenAPI file and no official SDK. ## Before you call either ### Activepieces API + MCP 1. Run `ap_validate_flow` before publishing a flow 2. Use `ap_search_actions` with a plain task description rather than listing pieces 3. Turn off the Flow Building and Tables groups for a project the agent should only read 4. Page with `limit` and `cursor` and stop when `next` is null 5. Cloud runs stop at 10 minutes of active time. Waits and approvals don't count ### Make API + MCP 1. Find the organisation's zone first. It may be on make.com or make.celonis.com 2. Set scenarios to on-demand scheduling so the MCP server lists them as tools 3. Use the header form of the MCP token rather than the /mcp/u/ path form 4. On a 429, wait a full minute. The limit resets per minute and no Retry-After is sent 5. Check the `code` field on errors. IM002 means the token lacks rights, not that the resource is missing ## Other comparisons with Activepieces API + MCP or Make API + MCP - [Activepieces API + MCP vs n8n API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-n8n.md) - [Activepieces API + MCP vs Paragon ActionKit + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-paragon.md) - [Activepieces API + MCP vs Pipedream API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-pipedream.md) - [Activepieces API + MCP vs Tray.ai API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-tray.md) - [Activepieces API + MCP vs Windmill API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-windmill.md) - [Activepieces API + MCP vs Workato API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-workato.md) - [Make API + MCP vs n8n API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-n8n.md) - [Make API + MCP vs Paragon ActionKit + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-paragon.md) - [Make API + MCP vs Pipedream API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-pipedream.md) - [Make API + MCP vs Tray.ai API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-tray.md) - [Make API + MCP vs Windmill API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-windmill.md) - [Make API + MCP vs Workato API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-workato.md)