# ActiveCampaign vs Dreamlit > Dreamlit scores 57 (C) to ActiveCampaign's 43.9 (E) for marketing journeys. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activecampaign-vs-dreamlit - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activecampaign-vs-dreamlit.md (~4,300 tokens) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (the key docs and every listing in one file, at most 16 MB, about 4 million tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (the whole catalogue as tools, no key) - DNS: dig +short TXT .grade.anchorterminal.com (the grade as a DNS TXT record, for a sandbox with no HTTP where names still resolve; also top., best.. and .vs.. under the zone, and the same under grade.letme.dev) - Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data) - Updated: 2026-11-07 Dreamlit scores 57 (C) on agent readiness against ActiveCampaign's 43.9 (E), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. ActiveCampaign leads on schema & documentation and payments & pricing. Both do marketing journeys. - ActiveCampaign: grade E, 43.9/100, rank #1223 of 1486. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/activecampaign.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/activecampaign.json - Dreamlit: grade C, 57/100, rank #809 of 1486. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/dreamlit.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/dreamlit.json - Best lifecycle marketing and customer engagement platforms for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/lifecycle-marketing/index.md - All 66 lifecycle marketing comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lifecycle-marketing/index.md ## Which one, for what ### ActiveCampaign (E) Good for: Small and mid-sized teams already on ActiveCampaign that want an agent to maintain contacts, segments and campaign drafts and enrol contacts in automations. Ahead on: - Schema & documentation, 68 against 59 - Payments & pricing, 20 against 10 Also in its favour: - Free to start without a card Watch for: No readable incident history. The status page sits on ActiveCampaign's own domain, whose terms bar robots, and its earlier reading came from a data feed ### Dreamlit (C) Good for: Small product teams on Supabase or Postgres who want their coding agent to build lifecycle and transactional email workflows. Ahead on: - Agent ergonomics, 67 against 52 - Security & auth, 74 against 33 - Maintenance & community, 80 against 5 Also in its favour: - A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install Watch for: No REST API, SDK or OpenAPI; the MCP server is the only programmatic route ## Why the edge ### Maintenance & community: Dreamlit +75 - ActiveCampaign (5): There is no changelog. On 8 October the `updatedAt` stamps on 46 of the 185 reference pages fell on 12, 13, 17 and 31 August and 2 September 2026 (per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November). The 8 October check recorded them as page revisions, not changelog entries, and no API change was recorded on those pages. Page dates that record no change don't set recency (as wrike, coinbase-mcp and agentweb), and the clients are years old, so no dated API change is readable (0). Page stamps aren't releases, so the 90-day line is 0. No public changelog. A community site and a developer relations email address are published, and we did not see reply times (5). The official PHP and Node.js clients are v1 wrappers last changed in December 2017 and March 2018 (0). No current package to assess (0). 0 + 0 + 5 + 0 + 0 = 5. - Dreamlit (80): The latest changelog entry is 12 October 2026, custom repeating schedules (30). Eight dated entries between 10 August and 12 October (20). Priority support on Pro, dedicated support on Scale and a public changelog (10 of 15). ai.dreamlit/mcp is in the official MCP registry under its domain namespace (15). The metadata repository has validate and publish workflows; there's no package to check (5 of 10). Total 80. ### Security & auth: Dreamlit +41 - ActiveCampaign (33): One API key per user in an `Api-Token` header, with no scopes. The MCP server is authorised by signing in and approving, with no scopes documented. Key rotation was not found in the reviewed documentation (15 of 30). No read-only key or mode. The listed MCP tools include no delete tool and none that schedules a campaign, though `add_contact_to_automation` can start messages, and the definitions name a permission resource for each operation (8 of 20). The API returns contact data, notes and message content written by outsiders, and no prompt-injection guidance was found (0 of 15). No audit log or per-call visibility was found in the developer docs. The help centre refused our reader, so this is unchecked (0 of 15). The security page states SOC 2, HIPAA and GDPR compliance, a red team and a trust centre with the SOC 2 report. No security.txt, bug bounty or disclosure policy was found (10 of 20). All per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November. robots.txt disallows `/security/bounty`, so whether a bounty page exists wasn't read. - Dreamlit (74): OAuth to one workspace with four scopes, and project-scoped personal access tokens with chosen scopes, shown once (30). A read-only grant is possible, publishing needs its own scope, `confirm_publish` runs only after the user approves the prepared payload, and a dedicated least-privilege database user reads the customer's data (20). The docs warn that AI clients can be tricked by untrusted prompts and tell users to review edit, publish and unpublish calls (8 of 15). The security page lists access logs for database operations and for the platform, and analytics expose run rows; no customer-facing log of MCP calls was described (8 of 15). The security page claims penetration testing and a bug bounty programme without a link, SOC 2 is coming soon, no security.txt (404), and the MCP repository's SECURITY.md routes reports to support (8 of 20). Total 74. ### Agent ergonomics: Dreamlit +15 - ActiveCampaign (52): List endpoints take `limit` up to 100 and contacts take `meta=only` for a count, but there is no field selection. The MCP server lists 50 tools with no documented toolsets (12 of 25). `limit`, `offset`, `orders`, `filters` and `id_greater` on contacts, less 4 because unsupported filter and order keys are silently ignored (16 of 20). Five documented status codes and a 422 `errors` array of titles without codes. Campaign state changes report failures as 200 with `succeeded` 0 and a localised message (10 of 20). No idempotency keys. Upsert by email and bulk import with per-row status give safe retries for contacts, and no MCP tool annotations are documented (8 of 20). Few required parameters. The official PHP and Node.js clients wrap the v1 API and last changed in 2017 and 2018, so no current official SDK was found (6 of 15). Docs per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November; the PHP client's last commit (7 December 2017) was confirmed from a clone. - Dreamlit (67): 16 tools, the 11 to 30 band; tools follow the granted scopes, so a read-only grant sees fewer (20 of 25). Analytics take filters, sorting and pagination, and brand styles paginate (18 of 20). The docs describe the errors an agent will meet, such as authorization required, choose a project and browser hand-off, without codes (12 of 20). Publishing is prepare then confirm, and tests don't publish; no idempotency or annotations documented (10 of 20). Empty scope requests default to the v1 scopes and `get_status` gives a first call; no SDK or REST route (7 of 15). Total 67. ### Payments & pricing: ActiveCampaign +10 - ActiveCampaign (20): No x402, MPP or L402 (0). The 8 October plan prices were read from a data file the pricing page loads, which this run doesn't use, and the pricing page wasn't re-read on 4 November because the terms bar automated access, so no published price is counted (0). A 14-day trial with no card, and a free developer sandbox on request (per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November) (20). A person signs up in a browser and copies the key from account settings (0). 0 + 0 + 20 + 0 = 20. - Dreamlit (10): No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Plan prices with included emails are public in pricing.md, no per-email overage price (10 of 20). No free plan for new accounts (0). Signup, database connection and payment happen in the web app (0). Total 10. ### Schema & documentation: ActiveCampaign +9 - ActiveCampaign (68): Each reference page is public Markdown with an OpenAPI 3.1 definition for its operation. No single downloadable specification was found (20 of 25). llms.txt and Markdown pages (10). Pages revised in August 2026, such as contact upsert and contact search, say when to use each endpoint and when not to. Older pages are short, and the MCP page gives one line a tool with no input schemas (14 of 20). Query parameters are typed with enums on status and sort order, but the segment body is described as flexible JSON to be checked against the segment builder (10 of 15). Request examples on most pages. The errors page lists five status codes and one 422 body, and 400 responses in the definitions are empty objects (9 of 15). The version is in the path (v3, Segments 2.0.0). No changelog was found, and developers.activecampaign.com/changelog returns 404 (5 of 15). All per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November, since the terms bar automated access to the developer site. - Dreamlit (59): The registry entry and the dreamlit-ai/dreamlit-mcp repository carry metadata only, so tool JSON Schemas are readable only inside a session; the docs give each tool's purpose and required scope (5 of 25). llms.txt, pricing.md and Markdown copies of docs pages (10). Tool descriptions say when to use each, such as `edit_workflow_steps` for exact edits without AI, and the publish pair's order (16 of 20). Parameter types aren't published beyond names such as `includeEmailHtml` and `startNewChat` (5 of 15). Example prompts and a troubleshooting section for each documented error state (10 of 15). A dated changelog; server version 0.1.0 in the registry (13 of 15). Total 59. ## Score by category | Category | Weight | ActiveCampaign | Dreamlit | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 52 | 51 | ActiveCampaign +1 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 68 | 59 | ActiveCampaign +9 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 52 | 67 | Dreamlit +15 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 33 | 74 | Dreamlit +41 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 20 | 10 | ActiveCampaign +10 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 5 | 80 | Dreamlit +75 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 60 | 59 | ActiveCampaign +1 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **43.9 · E** | **57 · C** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | ActiveCampaign | Dreamlit | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | MCP server | | Vendor | ActiveCampaign, LLC | Notika AI | | Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://mcp.dreamlit.ai/mcp` | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | Streamable HTTP | | Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth | | Pricing | Paid | Paid | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Proprietary service under ActiveCampaign's terms of service and API licence agreement | none | | Tools exposed | 50 | 16 | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | MCP registry | not listed | `ai.dreamlit/mcp` | | Last release | 2026-09-02 | 2026-10-12 | | Terms last updated | 2025-12-23 | 2026-01-29 | | Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | 2026-01-29 | | Customer content may train models | yes | not found in the text | | Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text | | Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text | | Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | yes | ## How the scores have moved ### ActiveCampaign - -6.8 on 4 November 2026 (D to E): correction, checklist - +0.2 on 27 October 2026: checklist ### Dreamlit No score change since it was listed. ## Verdicts **ActiveCampaign.** The v3 REST API covers contacts, segments, campaign scheduling and bulk import, with OpenAPI 3.1 definitions inside public Markdown reference pages and documented Retry-After on 429s. Each user has one unscoped API key, the limit is 5 requests a second, no changelog was found, and the official PHP and Node.js clients date from 2017 and 2018. **Dreamlit.** Scoped OAuth and a two-step prepare-then-confirm publish let an agent draft and test lifecycle workflows without sending anything live by mistake. There is no REST API or published rate limit, tool schemas aren't public outside a session, there's no free plan, and its security page and privacy policy disagree on retention. ## Before you call either ### ActiveCampaign 1. Take the base URL from Settings, Developer in the account. Do not build it from the account name, because non-US accounts may not sit on api-us1.com 2. Use POST /contact/sync to upsert by email, and POST /import/bulk_import for up to 250 contacts, then read each row's outcome from GET /import/info 3. Page large contact sets with `orders[id]=ASC` and `id_greater`, not `offset`. Unsupported filter and order keys are silently ignored 4. Check `succeeded` in the body after scheduling, pausing or stopping a campaign. Business-rule failures return 200 with `succeeded` set to 0 5. Stay under 5 requests a second per account and wait for the Retry-After value on a 429 ### Dreamlit 1. Call `get_status` first to see the workspace, project setup state and prompting guidance 2. Use `send_workflow_test` to the user before `prepare_publish`, and call `confirm_publish` only after the user approves the returned payload 3. Request `workflows:read` and `analytics:read` only when the task is reporting, so the grant can't publish 4. Expect a browser hand-off link when setup or an unsupported edit needs the web app, and pass it to the user ## Questions ### Which is better for AI agents, ActiveCampaign or Dreamlit? Dreamlit scores 57 (C) on agent readiness against ActiveCampaign's 43.9 (E), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. ActiveCampaign leads on schema & documentation and payments & pricing. ### Do ActiveCampaign and Dreamlit need an API key? ActiveCampaign takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Dreamlit uses an OAuth sign-in. ### Can an agent call ActiveCampaign and Dreamlit without installing anything? No hosted endpoint is listed for ActiveCampaign. Dreamlit has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.dreamlit.ai/mcp. ## For agents - This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activecampaign-vs-dreamlit.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activecampaign-vs-dreamlit.min.md - Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "activecampaign", "b": "dreamlit"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare activecampaign dreamlit` - Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/activecampaign.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/dreamlit.json ## Other comparisons with ActiveCampaign or Dreamlit - [ActiveCampaign vs Braze](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activecampaign-vs-braze.md) - [ActiveCampaign vs CleverTap](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activecampaign-vs-clevertap.md) - [ActiveCampaign vs Customer.io](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activecampaign-vs-customer-io.md) - [ActiveCampaign vs Iterable](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activecampaign-vs-iterable.md) - [ActiveCampaign vs Klaviyo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activecampaign-vs-klaviyo.md) - [ActiveCampaign vs Mailchimp Marketing API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activecampaign-vs-mailchimp-marketing.md) - [ActiveCampaign vs MoEngage](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activecampaign-vs-moengage.md) - [ActiveCampaign vs Nitrosend](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activecampaign-vs-nitrosend.md) - [ActiveCampaign vs Omnisend](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activecampaign-vs-omnisend.md) - [ActiveCampaign vs Sequenzy](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activecampaign-vs-sequenzy.md) - [Braze vs Dreamlit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/braze-vs-dreamlit.md) - [Customer.io vs Dreamlit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/customer-io-vs-dreamlit.md) - [Dreamlit vs Iterable](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dreamlit-vs-iterable.md) - [Dreamlit vs Klaviyo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dreamlit-vs-klaviyo.md) - [Dreamlit vs Mailchimp Marketing API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dreamlit-vs-mailchimp-marketing.md) - [Dreamlit vs MoEngage](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dreamlit-vs-moengage.md) - [Dreamlit vs Nitrosend](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dreamlit-vs-nitrosend.md) - [Dreamlit vs Omnisend](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dreamlit-vs-omnisend.md) - [Dreamlit vs Sequenzy](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dreamlit-vs-sequenzy.md) - [CleverTap vs Dreamlit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clevertap-vs-dreamlit.md) --- Query this catalogue directly over MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (Streamable HTTP, no key). How: https://www.anchorterminal.com/agents/#mcp