# 402cron vs Convoy (slim)

> 402cron scores 63.5 (B) to Convoy's 62.4 (B) for sending webhooks. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/402cron-vs-convoy.md (~2,500 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/402cron-vs-convoy.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/402cron-vs-convoy
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-30
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

402cron scores 63.5 (B) on agent readiness against Convoy's 62.4 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Convoy leads on reliability, security & auth, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do sending webhooks. 402cron accepts x402. Convoy doesn't.

- 402cron: B 63.5, rank #452 of 1226 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/402cron.min.md
- Convoy: B 62.4, rank #501 of 1226 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/convoy.min.md
- 402cron, good for An agent that needs its own endpoint called on a schedule and can pay a few cents with no human, for example a nightly digest, a poll or a heartbeat, and a builder who wants signed, verified deliveries with a tiny bill. Ahead on Agent ergonomics, 76 against 69; Payments & pricing, 86 against 30. Also An agent can pay per call over x402, with no account; A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install; No incidents deducted, where Convoy loses 6 points for them.
- Convoy, good for A product that has to send signed webhooks to its customers' endpoints with retries, replay and a delivery log, or receive third-party webhooks and route them inward. Ahead on Reliability, 92 against 45; Security & auth, 53 against 41; Maintenance & community, 80 against 62; Transparency & trust, 69 against 64.

| Category | 402cron | Convoy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 45 | 92 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 81 | 78 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 76 | 69 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 41 | 53 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 86 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 62 | 80 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 64 | 69 |

| Fact (where they differ) | 402cron | Convoy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Georgi Kalchev | Frain Technologies Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://402cron.com` | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Paid |
| x402 | yes, from $0.02/call | no |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under 402cron's terms of service, effective 23 October 2026. The server's source isn't published. The docs and examples repository is MIT | Elastic Licence 2.0 for the gateway (source available, not an OSI licence). The convoy.js SDK is MIT per npm. Convoy Cloud is a proprietary hosted service under Convoy's terms of use |
| Tools exposed | 16 | none |
| MCP registry | `com.402cron/402cron` | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-09 | 2026-09-27 |
| Privacy policy last updated |  | 2023-06-01 |
| Popularity | 0 stars | 2.9k stars, 2.3k npm/wk, 679 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (4) |
